Cellulose

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 601–610 | Cite as

The effects of ionizing radiation on the cellulose of woodfree paper

Article

Abstract

There is presently a concern because the US Postal Service now has 8 electron beam accelerators to treat mail in locations along the east coast and that a sufficient dosage to destroy Anthrax is also strong enough to darken and weaken the paper in the postal envelopes. In addition to direct photolytic scission of the cellulose chain, irradiation darkens paper, swells pulp fibres, increases hygroscopicity, and renders the cellulose more soluble in alkaline solution and more susceptible to acid hydrolysis. This report will focus on the effect of electron beam irradiation on degradation of cellulose of fine papers. Three reference papers were selected, sorted into postal envelopes and exposed to electron beam irradiation. The results have shown that irradiation at the dosage used to treat mail by the US Postal Service depolymerizes and oxidizes the cellulose. Depolymerization is responsible for a decrease of paper strength while oxidation induces darkening of the paper. Irradiating at high electron beam energy is less damaging than using lower energy. Moreover, linear relationships have been found between the number of chain scission (CSN) in cellulose and the irradiation dosage as well as between CSN and Zero-Span Breaking Length. These relationships make the strength loss predictable.

Key words

Carbonyls Carboxylic acid Cellulose Depolymerization Electron beam treatment Ionizing radiation Kraft pulp Molecular weight distribution 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bouchard J., Méthot M., Lapierre L. and Berry R. (2004). Combined effect of polysulphide pulping and ECF bleaching on softwood polysaccharides. J. Pulp Paper Sci. 30(6):172–176Google Scholar
  2. Charlesby A. (1960). Atomic Radiation and Polymers. Pergamon Press, London, pp. 361Google Scholar
  3. Charlesby A. (1955). The degradation of cellulose by ionizing radiation. J. Polymer Sci. XV:263–270Google Scholar
  4. Desai R.L. (1968). Photodegradation of cellulosic materials – a review of the literature. Pulp Paper Mag. Can. 69(16):53–61Google Scholar
  5. Ducháček V. and Blud’ovsky R. (1979). Gamma irradiation of cellulose and some problems of its utilization. Radiochem. Radioanal. Lett. 38(1):31–38Google Scholar
  6. Dziedziela W.M. and Rosiak J. (1977). Some aspects of radiation-induced transformations of cellulose. Cell. Chem. Technol. 11:261–268Google Scholar
  7. Ershov B.G. and Klimentov A.S. (1977). Nature of the radicals and the mechanism of low-temperature of radiolysis of cellulose. Vysokomol. Soed. 19a(4):808–812Google Scholar
  8. Ershov B.G., Matiushkina E.P. and Samuilova S.D. (1984). Radiation-Chemical destruction of cellulose. ZfI-Mitt 97:325–332Google Scholar
  9. Fardim P. and Holmbom B. (2003). Fast determination of anionic groups in different pulp fibers by methylene blue sorption. Tappi J. 2(10):28–32Google Scholar
  10. Gurnagul N., Page D.H. and Paice M.G. (1992) The effect of cellulose degradation on the strength of wood pulp fibres. Nordic Pulp Pap. Res. J. 7(3):152–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Iller E., Kukiełka A., Stupińska H. and Mikołajczyc M. (2002). Electron-beam stimulation of the reactivity of cellulose pulps for production of derivatives. Radiation Phys. Chem. 63:253–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kenaga D.L. and Cowling E.B. 1959. Effect of gamma radiation on ponderosa pine: hygroscopicity, swelling, and decay susceptibility. For. Prod. J. 9:112–116Google Scholar
  13. Lapierre L. and Bouchard J. (1999). Molecular weight determination of softwood kraft cellulose: effects of carbanilation solvent, hemicelluloses, and lignin. In: Argyropoulos D.S. (eds). Advances in Lignocellulosics Characterization. Tappi Press, Atlanta, pp. 239–262Google Scholar
  14. McLaren K.G. (1978). Degradation of cellulose in irradiated wood and purified celluloses. Int. J. Appl. Radiation Isotopes 29:631–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Morin F.G., Jordan B.D. and Marchessault R.H. (2004). High-energy radiation-induced changes in the crystal morphology of cellulose. Macromolecules 37(7):2268–2270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Muto N., Takahashi K. and Yamazaki H. (1995). Effect of electron beam irradiation on characteristics of paper. Japan Tappi J. 49(7):1086–1097Google Scholar
  17. Nitzel K. (1984). The influence of electron beam processing on the degradation of cellulose. J. Indust. Irradiation Tech. 2(1):11–30Google Scholar
  18. Paton J.M. and Hearmon R.F.S. 1957. Effect of exposure to gamma-rays on the hygroscopicity of sitka spruce wood. Nature 179: 651PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Potter J.E. (2002). U. S. Postal Service emergency preparedness plan for protecting postal employees and postal customers from exposure to biohazard material and for ensuring mail security against bioterror attacks. U.S. Postal Service, Washington D. CGoogle Scholar
  20. Pruzinec J., Kadlecik J., Varga S. and Pivovarnicek F. (1981). Study on the effect of high-energy radiation on cellulose. Radiochem. Radioanal. Lett. 49:395–397Google Scholar
  21. Saeman J.F., Millet M.A. and Lawton E.J. (1952). Effect of high-energy cathode rays on cellulose. Industrial Eng. Chem. 44(12):2848–2852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tabács E., Wojnárovits L., Földváry C., Hargittai P., Borsa J. and Sajó I. (2000). Effect of combined gamma-irradiation and alkali treatment on cotton cellulose. Radiation Phys. Chem. 57:399–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Winogradoff N.N. 1950. X-ray irradiation of cellulose acetate. Nature 165: 72Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pulp and Paper Research Institute of Canada (Paprican)Pointe-ClaireCanada

Personalised recommendations