Advertisement

Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy

, Volume 129, Issue 1–2, pp 1–23 | Cite as

Secular resonances between bodies on close orbits II: prograde and retrograde orbits for irregular satellites

  • Daohai LiEmail author
  • Apostolos A. Christou
Original Article

Abstract

In extending the analysis of the four secular resonances between close orbits in Li and Christou (Celest Mech Dyn Astron 125:133–160, 2016) (Paper I), we generalise the semianalytical model so that it applies to both prograde and retrograde orbits with a one-to-one map between the resonances in the two regimes. We propose the general form of the critical angle to be a linear combination of apsidal and nodal differences between the two orbits \( b_1 \Delta \varpi + b_2 \Delta \varOmega \), forming a collection of secular resonances in which the ones studied in Paper I are among the strongest. Test of the model in the orbital vicinity of massive satellites with physical and orbital parameters similar to those of the irregular satellites Himalia at Jupiter and Phoebe at Saturn shows that \({>}20\) and \({>}40\%\) of phase space is affected by these resonances, respectively. The survivability of the resonances is confirmed using numerical integration of the full Newtonian equations of motion. We observe that the lowest order resonances with \(b_1+|b_2|\le 3\) persist, while even higher-order resonances, up to \(b_1+|b_2|\ge 7\), survive. Depending on the mass, between 10 and 60% of the integrated test particles are captured in these secular resonances, in agreement with the phase space analysis in the semianalytical model.

Keywords

Irregular satellites Secular resonances Solar perturbations Coorbital interaction N-body simulation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the constructive comments from two anonymous referees, increasing the quality of the paper. We wish to acknowledge the SFI/HEA Irish Centre for High-End Computing (ICHEC) for the provision of computational facilities and support. Astronomical research at the Armagh Observatory is funded by the Northern Ireland Department for Communities (DfC). Figure 13 is produced using LibreOffice Draw and Inkscape; all the other figures are generated with gnuplot.

References

  1. Beaugé, C., Nesvorný, D.: Proper elements and secular resonances for irregular satellites. Astrophys. J. 133, 2537–2558 (2007)ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. Brouwer, D., Clemence, G.M.: Methods of Celestial Mechanics. Academic Press, New York (1961)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Carruba, V., Burns, J.A., Nicholson, P.D., Gladman, B.J.: On the inclination distribution of the jovian irregular satellites. Icarus 158, 434–449 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carruba, V., Burns, J.A., Bottke, W., Nesvorný, D.: Orbital evolution of the Gefion and Adeona asteroid families: close encounters with massive asteroids and the Yarkovsky effect. Icarus 162, 308–327 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carruba, V., Michtchenko, T.A., Roig, F., Ferraz-Mello, S., Nesvorný, D.: On the V-type asteroids outside the Vesta family. Astron. Astrophys. 441, 819–829 (2005)ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Carruba, V.: The (not so) peculiar case of the Padua family. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 395, 358–377 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carruba, V., Nesvorný, D., Marchi, S., Aljbaae, S.: Footprints of a possible Ceres asteroid paleo-family. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 458, 1117–1126 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chambers, J.E.: A hybrid symplectic integrator that permits close encounters between massive bodies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 304, 793–799 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen, Y.-Y., Liu, H.-G., Zhao, G., Zhou, J.-L.: Mechanism for exciting planetary inclination and eccentricity through a residual gas disk. Astrophys. J. 769, 26 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christou, A.A.: Gravitational scattering within the Himalia group of jovian prograde irregular satellites. Icarus 174, 215–229 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Delisle, J.B., Laskar, J.: Chaotic diffusion of the Vesta family induced by close encounters with massive asteroids. Astron. Astrophys. 540, A118 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fabrycky, D.C., Lissauer, J.J., Ragozzine, D., Rowe, J.F., Steffen, J.H., Agol, E., et al.: Architecture of Kepler’s multi-transiting systems. ii. new investigations with twice as many candidates. Astrophys. J. 790, 146 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frouard, J., Fouchard, M., Vienne, A.: About the dynamics of the evection resonance. Astron. Astrophys. 515, A54 (2010)ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Gallardo, T.: Atlas of the mean motion resonances in the solar system. Icarus 184, 29–38 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gayon, J., Bois, E.: Are retrograde resonances possible in multi-planet systems? Astron. Astrophys. 482, 665–672 (2008)ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Gayon, J., Bois, E., Scholl, H.: Dynamics of planets in retrograde mean motion resonance. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 103, 267–279 (2009)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Gladman, B., Kavelaars, J.J., Holman, M., Nicholson, P.D., Burns, J.A., Hergenrother, C.W., et al.: Discovery of 12 satellites of Saturn exhibiting orbital clustering. Nature 412, 163–166 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greenberg, R.: Commensurabilities of satellites? Apsidal precession periods. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 170, 295–303 (1975)ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Hahn, J.M., Malhotra, R.: Neptune’s migration into a stirred-up Kuiper Belt: a detailed comparison of simulations to observations. Astron. J. 130, 2392–2414 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hénon, M., Petit, J.M.: Series expansions for encounter-type solutions of Hill’s problem. Celest. Mech. 38, 67–100 (1986)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Innanen, K.A., Zheng, J.Q., Mikkola, S., Valtonen, M.J.: The Kozai mechanism and the stability of planetary orbits in binary star systems. Astron. J. 113, 1915–1919 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kessler, D.J.: Derivation of the collision probability between orbiting objects: the lifetimes of Jupiter’s outer moons. Icarus 48, 39–48 (1981)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kozai, Y.: Secular perturbations of asteroids with high inclination and eccentricity. Astron. J. 67, 591–598 (1962)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li, D., Christou, A.A.: Secular resonances between bodies on close orbits: a case study of the Himalia prograde group of jovian irregular satellites. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 125, 133–160 (2016)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lidov, M.: The evolution of orbits of artificial satellites of planets under the action of gravitational perturbations of external bodies. Planet. Space Sci. 9, 719–759 (1962)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Luciani, J.F., Namouni, F., Pellat, R.: The kinetics of systems of planetesimals. Astrophys. J. 439, 800–813 (1995)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Malhotra, R.: The phase space structure near Neptune resonances in the Kuiper belt. Astron. J. 111, 504–516 (1996)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Michel, P., Benz, W., Tanga, P., Richardson, D.C.: Collisions and gravitational reaccumulation: forming asteroid families and satellites. Science 294, 1696–700 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Michel, P., Benz, W., Richardson, D.C.: Catastrophic disruption of asteroids and family formation: a review of numerical simulations including both fragmentation and gravitational reaccumulations. Planet. Space Sci. 52, 1109–1117 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Milani, A., Knežević, Z.: Secular perturbation theory and computation of asteroid proper elements. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 49, 347–411 (1990)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Milani, A.: Asteroid proper elements and the dynamical structure of the asteroid main belt. Icarus 107, 219–254 (1994)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morais, M.H.M., Giuppone, C.A.: Stability of prograde and retrograde planets in circular binary systems. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 424, 52–64 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Morais, M.H.M., Namouni, F.: Asteroids in retrograde resonance with Jupiter and Saturn. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. Lett. 436, L30–L34 (2013a)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Morais, M.H.M., Namouni, F.: Retrograde resonance in the planar three-body problem. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 117, 405–421 (2013b)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Murray, C.D., Dermott, S.F.: Solar System Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Namouni, F.: Secular interactions of coorbiting objects. Icarus 314, 293–314 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Naoz, S., Farr, W.M., Lithwick, Y., Rasio, F.A., Teyssandier, J.: Secular dynamics in hierarchical three-body systems. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 431, 2155–2171 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nesvorný, D., Morbidelli, A.: An analytic model of three-body mean motion resonances. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 71, 243–271 (1998)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nesvorný, D., Morbidelli, A., Vokrouhlický, D., Bottke, W., Brož, M.: The Flora family: a case of the dynamically dispersed collisional swarm? Icarus 157, 155–172 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nesvorný, D., Alvarellos, J.L.A., Dones, L., Levison, H.F.: Orbital and collisional evolution of the irregular satellites. Astron. J. 126, 398–429 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Novaković, B., Maurel, C., Tsirvoulis, G., Knežević, Z.: Asteroid secular dynamics: Ceres? Fingerprint identified. Astrophys. J. 807, L5 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Saha, P., Tremaine, S.: The orbits of the retrograde Jovian satellites. Icarus 106, 549–562 (1993)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Touma, J., Wisdom, J.: Resonances in the early evolution of the Earth–Moon System. Astron. J. 115, 1653–1663 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tsirvoulis, G., Novaković, B.: Secular resonances with Ceres and Vesta. Icarus 280, 300–307 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Valtonen, M., Karttunen, H.: The Three-Body Problem. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. Whipple, A., Shelus, P.J.: A secular resonance between Jupiter and its eighth satellite? Icarus 101, 265–271 (1993)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wisdom, J.: The resonance overlap criterion and the onset of stochastic behavior in the restricted three-body problem. Astron. J. 85, 1122–1133 (1980)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yokoyama, T., Vieira Neto, E., Winter, O.C., Sanchez, D.M., Brasil, P.I.D.O.: On the evection resonance and its connection to the stability of outer satellites. Math. Probl. Eng. 2008, 1–16 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Armagh ObservatoryCollege Hill, ArmaghUK
  2. 2.School of Mathematics and PhysicsQueen’s University BelfastBelfastUK

Personalised recommendations