Advertisement

Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy

, Volume 126, Issue 1–3, pp 31–60 | Cite as

Complete spin and orbital evolution of close-in bodies using a Maxwell viscoelastic rheology

  • Gwenaël BouéEmail author
  • Alexandre C. M. Correia
  • Jacques Laskar
Original Article

Abstract

In this paper, we present a formalism designed to model tidal interaction with a viscoelastic body made of Maxwell material. Our approach remains regular for any spin rate and orientation, and for any orbital configuration including high eccentricities and close encounters. The method is to integrate simultaneously the rotation and the position of the planet as well as its deformation. We provide the equations of motion both in the body frame and in the inertial frame. With this study, we generalize preexisting models to the spatial case and to arbitrary multipole orders using a formalism taken from quantum theory. We also provide the vectorial expression of the secular tidal torque expanded in Fourier series. Applying this model to close-in exoplanets, we observe that if the relaxation time is longer than the revolution period, the phase space of the system is characterized by the presence of several spin-orbit resonances, even in the circular case. As the system evolves, the planet spin can visit different spin-orbit configurations. The obliquity is decreasing along most of these resonances, but we observe a case where the planet tilt is instead growing. These conclusions derived from the secular torque are successfully tested with numerical integrations of the instantaneous equations of motion on HD 80606 b. Our formalism is also well adapted to close-in super-Earths in multiplanet systems which are known to have non-zero mutual inclinations.

Keywords

Restricted problems Extended body Dissipative forces Planetary systems Rotation HD 80606 b 

Notes

Acknowledgments

GB is grateful to Dan Fabrycky for the fruitful discussions which lead to this work. We acknowledge support from CIDMA strategic project UID/MAT/04106/2013.

References

  1. Auclair-Desrotour, P., Laskar, J., Mathis, S.: Atmospheric tides in Earth-like planets. Astron. Astrophys. (2016)Google Scholar
  2. Correia, A.C.M., Laskar, J.: The four final rotation states of Venus. Nature 411, 767–770 (2001). doi: 10.1038/35081000 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Correia, A.C.M., Laskar, J., de Surgy, O.N.: Long-term evolution of the spin of Venus. I. Theory. Icarus 163, 1–23 (2003). doi: 10.1016/S0019-1035(03)00042-3 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Correia, A.C.M., Laskar, J., Farago, F., Boué, G.: Tidal evolution of hierarchical and inclined systems. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 111, 105–130 (2011). doi: 10.1007/s10569-011-9368-9.arXiv:1107.0736 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Correia, A.C.M., Boué, G., Laskar, J., Rodríguez, A.: Deformation and tidal evolution of close-in planets and satellites using a Maxwell viscoelastic rheology. Astron. Astrophys. 571, A50 (2014). doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424211.arXiv:1411.1860 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cunha, D., Correia, A.C.M., Laskar, J.: Spin evolution of Earth-sized exoplanets, including atmospheric tides and core-mantle friction. Int. J. Astrobiol. 14, 233–254 (2015). doi: 10.1017/S1473550414000226.arXiv:1406.4544 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Darwin, G.H.: On the secular changes in the elements of the orbit of a satellite revolving about a tidally distorted planet. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 171, 713–891 (1880)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Efroimsky, M.: Bodily tides near spin-orbit resonances. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 112, 283–330 (2012a). doi: 10.1007/s10569-011-9397-4.arXiv:1105.6086 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Efroimsky, M.: Tidal dissipation compared to seismic dissipation. In small bodies, Earths, and super-Earths. Astrophys. J. 746, 150 (2012b). doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/746/2/150.arXiv:1105.3936 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Efroimsky, M., Lainey, V.: Physics of bodily tides in terrestrial planets and the appropriate scales of dynamical evolution. J. Geophys. Res. (Planets) 112(E11), E12003 (2007). doi: 10.1029/2007JE002908.arXiv:0709.1995 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Efroimsky, M., Makarov, V.V.: Tidal friction and tidal lagging. Applicability limitations of a popular formula for the tidal torque. Astrophys. J. 764, 26 (2013). doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/26.arXiv:1209.1615 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fabrycky, D.C., Lissauer, J.J., Ragozzine, D., Rowe, J.F., Steffen, J.H., Agol, E., et al.: Architecture of Kepler’s multi-transiting systems. II. New investigations with twice as many candidates. Astrophys. J. 790, 146 (2014). doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/790/2/146.arXiv:1202.6328 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferraz-Mello, S.: Tidal synchronization of close-in satellites and exoplanets. A rheophysical approach. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 116, 109–140 (2013). doi: 10.1007/s10569-013-9482-y.arXiv:1204.3957 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferraz-Mello, S.: The small and large lags of the elastic and anelastic tides. The virtual identity of two rheophysical theories. Astron. Astrophys. 579, A97 (2015). doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525900.arXiv:1504.04609 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Figueira, P., Marmier, M., Boué, G., Lovis, C., Santos, N.C., Montalto, M., et al.: Comparing HARPS and Kepler surveys. The alignment of multiple-planet systems. Astron. Astrophys. 541, A139 (2012). doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219017.arXiv:1202.2801 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frouard, J., Quillen, A.C., Efroimsky, M., Giannella, D.: Numerical simulation of tidal evolution of a viscoelastic body modelled with a mass-spring network. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 458, 2890–2901 (2016). doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw491.arXiv:1601.08222 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gimbutas, Z., Greengard, L.: A fast and stable method for rotating spherical harmonic expansions. J. Comput. Phys. 228, 5621–5627 (2009)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Henning, W.G., O’Connell, R.J., Sasselov, D.D.: Tidally heated terrestrial exoplanets: viscoelastic response models. Astrophys. J. 707, 1000–1015 (2009). doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/707/2/1000.arXiv:0912.1907 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jeffreys, H.: The Earth. Its Origin, History and Physical Constitution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1976)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaula, W.M.: Tidal dissipation by solid friction and the resulting orbital evolution. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 2, 661–685 (1964). doi: 10.1029/RG002i004p00661 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lambeck, K.: Geophysical Geodesy—The Slow Deformations of the Earth. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1988)Google Scholar
  22. Laskar, J., Boué, G., Correia, A.C.M.: Tidal dissipation in multi-planet systems and constraints on orbit fitting. Astron. Astrophys. 538, A105 (2012). doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116643. arXiv:1110.4565 ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. MacDonald, G.J.F.: Tidal friction. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 2, 467–541 (1964). doi: 10.1029/RG002i003p00467 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Makarov, V.V., Efroimsky, M.: No pseudosynchronous rotation for terrestrial planets and Moons. Astrophys. J. 764, 27 (2013). doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/27. arXiv:1209.1616 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mignard, F.: Multiple expansion of the tidal potential. Celest. Mech. 18, 287–294 (1978). doi: 10.1007/BF01230169 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Mignard, F.: The evolution of the lunar orbit revisited. I. Moon Planets 20, 301–315 (1979). doi: 10.1007/BF00907581 ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Ogilvie, G.I., Lin, D.N.C.: Tidal dissipation in rotating giant planets. Astrophys. J. 610, 477–509 (2004). doi: 10.1086/421454.arXiv:astro-ph/0310218 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Peltier, W.R.: The impulse response of a Maxwell Earth. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 12, 649–669 (1974). doi: 10.1029/RG012i004p00649 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Remus, F., Mathis, S., Zahn, J.P., Lainey, V.: Anelastic tidal dissipation in multi-layer planets. Astron. Astrophys. 541, A165 (2012). doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118595.arXiv:1204.1468 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Singer, S.F.: The origin of the Moon and geophysical consequences*. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 15(1–2), 205–226 (1968). doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1968.tb05759.x Google Scholar
  31. Tremaine, S., Dong, S.: The statistics of multi-planet systems. Astronom. J. 143, 94 (2012). doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/143/4/94.arXiv:1106.5403 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Varshalovich, D., Moskalev, A., Khersonskii, V.: Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum. World Scientific, Singapore (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IMCCE, Observatoire de ParisUPMC Univ. Paris 6ParisFrance
  2. 2.Departamento de Física, CIDMAUniversidade de AveiroAveiroPortugal

Personalised recommendations