Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy

, Volume 126, Issue 4, pp 405–432 | Cite as

Forced periodic motions by solar radiation pressure around uniformly rotating asteroids

Original Article

Abstract

Since asteroids generally have relatively weak gravity fields, solar radiation pressure (SRP) is a major perturbation for orbits in their vicinity, which under certain circumstances can be even larger than the third-body gravitational perturbations. In this work, by adopting a triaxial ellipsoid model for the asteroid and taking into account of SRP, the forced periodic motions caused by SRP around equilibrium points are studied in the body-fixed frame of the asteroid. For forced periodic motions around saddle equilibrium points, we find that the SRP does not alter their stability yet does change the morphology of the associated invariant manifolds. For forced periodic motions around center equilibrium points, different types of orbits are identified. Their stability changes with different parameters, i.e., the asteroid’s shape and spin period, the latitude of the Sun, and the magnitude of SRP. Evolution of these forced periodic motions is described in detail and some interesting phenomena are found. Stability results found for our ideal model with the Sun at a fixed distance and latitude are shown to predict stability regions in a realistic model with the Sun on inclined and elliptic orbits. Though our work is based on the simplified triaxial ellipsoid model, similar computation method and conclusions should also be applicable to real asteroids.

Keywords

Asteroid exploration Solar radiation pressure Periodic orbit Stability Saddle equilibrium (SE) Center equilibrium (CE) 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was finished during the first author’s visit to the Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research (CCAR). X.S.X thanks Nicola Baresi, David Surovik and Inkwan Park for their valuable discussions and help during the visit. X.S.X and X.Y.H thank the support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (11322330) and National Basic Research Program of China (2013CB834100). All authors thank the anonymous reviewers for their invaluable comments.

References

  1. Belton, M., Veverka, J., Thomas, P., Helfenstein, P., Simonelli, D., Chapman, C., et al.: Galileo encounter with 951 Gaspra: first pictures of an asteroid. Science 257(5077), 1647–1652 (1992)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belton, M., Chapman, C., Veverka, J., Klaasen, K., Harch, A., Greeley, R., et al.: First images of asteroid 243 Ida. Science 265(5178), 1543–1547 (1994)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bibring, J.P., Taylor, M., Alexander, C., Auster, U., Biele, J., Finzi, A.E., et al.: Philae’s first days on the comet. Science 349(6247), 493–493 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bracewell, R.N.: The Fourier Transform and Its Applications, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (2000)MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Britt, D., Yeomans, D., Housen, K., Consolmagno, G.: Asteroid density, porosity, and structure. In: Bottke Jr., W.F., Cellino, A., Paolicchi, P., Binzel, R.P. (eds.) Asteroids III, pp. 485–500. University of Arizona Press, Tucson (2002)Google Scholar
  6. Broschart, S.B., Lantoine, G., Grebow, D.J.: Characteristics of quasi-terminator orbits near primitive bodies. In: 23rd AAS/AIAA Spaceflight Mechanics Meeting. Kauai, Hawaii (2013)Google Scholar
  7. Broschart, S.B., Lantoine, G., Grebow, D.J.: Quasi-terminator orbits near primitive bodies. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 120(2), 195–215 (2014)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chappaz, L., Howell, K.C.: Exploration of bounded motion near binary systems comprised of small irregular bodies. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 123(2), 123–149 (2015)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheng, A.F.: Near Earth Asteroid Rendezvous: mission overview. Space Sci. Rev. 82(1), 3–29 (1997)Google Scholar
  10. Colombo, C., Lücking, C., McInnes, C.R.: Orbital dynamics of high area-to-mass ratio spacecraft with \(J_2\) and solar radiation pressure for novel Earth observation and communication services. Acta Astronaut. 81(1), 137–150 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Farrés, A., Jorba, À., Mondelo, J.M., Villac, B.: Periodic motion for an imperfect solar sail near an asteroid. In: Macdonald, M. (ed.) Advances in Solar Sailing, pp. 885–898. Springer, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  12. Fujiwara, A., Kawaguchi, J., Yeomans, D., Abe, M., Mukai, T., Okada, T., et al.: The rubble-pile asteroid Itokawa as observed by Hayabusa. Science 312(5778), 1330–1334 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fulle, M.: Injection of large grains into orbits around comet nuclei. Astron. Astrophys. 325, 1237–1248 (1997)ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. García Yárnoz, D., Sanchez Cuartielles, J.P., McInnes, C.R.: Alternating orbiter strategy for asteroid exploration. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 38(2), 280–291 (2015a)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. García Yárnoz, D., Scheeres, D.J., McInnes, C.R.: On the a and g families of orbits in the Hill problem with solar radiation pressure and their application to asteroid orbiters. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 121(4), 365–384 (2015b)Google Scholar
  16. Giancotti, M., Funase, R.: Solar sail equilibrium positions and transfer trajectories close to a Trojan asteroid. In: The 63rd International Astronautical Congress (2012)Google Scholar
  17. Giancotti, M., Campagnola, S., Tsuda, Y., Kawaguchi, J.: Families of periodic orbits in Hill’s problem with solar radiation pressure: application to Hayabusa 2. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 120(3), 269–286 (2014)Google Scholar
  18. Glassmeier, K.H., Boehnhardt, H., Koschny, D., Kührt, E., Richter, I.: The Rosetta mission: flying towards the origin of the solar system. Space Sci. Rev. 128(1–4), 1–21 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gómez, G., Masdemont, J., Mondelo, J.: Dynamical substitutes of the libration points for simplified solar system models. In: Gómez, G., Lo, M.W., Masdemont, J.J. (eds.) Libration Point Orbits and Applications, pp. 373–397. World Scientific, Singapore (2003)Google Scholar
  20. Hamilton, D.P., Burns, J.A.: Orbital stability zones about asteroids: II. The destabilizing effects of eccentric orbits and of solar radiation. Icarus 96(1), 43–64 (1992)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Herrera-Sucarrat, E., Palmer, P., Roberts, R.: Asteroid observation and landing trajectories using invariant manifolds. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 37(3), 907–920 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hilton, J.L.: Asteroid masses and densities. In: Bottke Jr., W.F., Cellino, A., Paolicchi, P., Binzel, R.P. (eds.) Asteroids III, pp. 103–112. University of Arizona Press, Tucson (2002)Google Scholar
  23. Hou, X., Liu, L.: On Lyapunov families around collinear libration points. Astron. J. 137(6), 4577 (2009)Google Scholar
  24. Hou, X.Y., Liu, L.: On quasi-periodic motions around the triangular libration points of the real Earth–Moon system. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 108, 301–313 (2010). doi: 10.1007/s10569-010-9305-3 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Hou, X.Y., Liu, L.: On quasi-periodic motions around the collinear libration points in the real Earth–Moon system. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 110, 71–98 (2011)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Huang, J., Ji, J., Ye, P., Wang, X., Yan, J., Meng, L., et al.: The ginger-shaped asteroid 4179 Toutatis: new observations from a successful flyby of Chang’e-2. Sci. Rep. 3, 3411 (2013)Google Scholar
  27. Kawaguchi, J., Kuninaka, H., Fujiwara, A., Uesugi, T.: MUSES-C, its launch and early orbit operations. Acta Astronaut. 59(8), 669–678 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Keller, H.B.: Numerical solution of bifurcation and nonlinear eigenvalue problems. In: Rabinowitz, P.H. (ed.) Applications of Bifurcation theory, pp.359–384. Academic Press, New York (1977)Google Scholar
  29. Lantukh, D., Russell, R.P., Broschart, S.: Heliotropic orbits at oblate asteroids: balancing solar radiation pressure and \(J_2\) perturbations. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 121(2), 171–190 (2015)Google Scholar
  30. Lauretta, D., Bartels, A., Barucci, M., Bierhaus, E., Binzel, R., Bottke, W., et al.: The OSIRIS-REx target asteroid (101955) Bennu: constraints on its physical, geological, and dynamical nature from astronomical observations. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 50(4), 834–849 (2015)Google Scholar
  31. Lauretta, D.S., OSIRIS-REx Team: An overview of the OSIRIS-REx asteroid sample return mission. In: Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, vol. 43, p. 2491 (2012)Google Scholar
  32. Magri, C., Ostro, S.J., Scheeres, D.J., Nolan, M.C., Giorgini, J.D., Benner, L.A., et al.: Radar observations and a physical model of asteroid 1580 Betulia. Icarus 186(1), 152–177 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McInnes, C.R.: Solar Sailing: Technology, Dynamics and Mission Applications. Springer, London (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Morrow, E., Scheeres, D.J., Lubin, D.: Solar sail orbit operations at asteroids. J. Spacecr. Rockets 38(2), 279–286 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ostro, S.J., Hudson, R.S., Benner, L.A., Giorgini, J.D., Magri, C., Margot, J.L., Nolan, M.C.: Asteroid radar astronomy. In: Bottke Jr., W.F., Cellino, A., Paolicchi, P., Binzel, R.P. (eds.) Asteroids III, pp. 151–168. University of Arizona Press, Tucson (2002)Google Scholar
  36. Press, W., Teukolsky, S., Vetterling, W., Flannery, B.: Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press, New York (1992)MATHGoogle Scholar
  37. Richter, K., Keller, H.: On the stability of dust particle orbits around cometary nuclei. Icarus 114(2), 355–371 (1995)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Russell, C., Capaccioni, F., Coradini, A., De Sanctis, M., Feldman, W., Jaumann, R., et al.: Dawn mission to Vesta and Ceres. Earth Moon Planets 101(1–2), 65–91 (2007)Google Scholar
  39. Russell, C., Raymond, C., Coradini, A., McSween, H., Zuber, M., Nathues, A., et al.: Dawn at Vesta: testing the protoplanetary paradigm. Science 336(6082), 684–686 (2012)Google Scholar
  40. Sawai, S., Scheeres, D., Broschart, S.: Control of hovering spacecraft using altimetry. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 25(4), 786–795 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scheeres, D.: Satellite dynamics about small bodies: averaged solar radiation pressure effects. J. Astronaut. Sci. 47, 25–46 (1999)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  42. Scheeres, D.: Orbital Motion in Strongly Perturbed Environments: Applications to Asteroid, Comet and Planetary Satellite Orbiters. Springer, New York (2012a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Scheeres, D., Marzari, F.: Temporary orbital capture of ejecta from comets and asteroids: application to the deep impact experiment. Astron. Astrophys. 356, 747–756 (2000)ADSGoogle Scholar
  44. Scheeres, D., Williams, B., Miller, J.: Evaluation of the dynamic environment of an asteroid: Applications to 433 Eros. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 23(3), 466–475 (2000)Google Scholar
  45. Scheeres, D., Durda, D., Geissler, P.: The fate of asteroid ejecta. In: Bottke Jr., W.F., Cellino, A., Paolicchi, P., Binzel, R.P. (eds.) Asteroids III, pp. 527–544. University of Arizona Press, Tucson (2002)Google Scholar
  46. Scheeres, D.J.: Dynamics about uniformly rotating triaxial ellipsoids: applications to asteroids. Icarus 110(2), 225–238 (1994)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Scheeres, D.J.: Orbit mechanics about asteroids and comets. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 35(3), 987–997 (2012b)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Scheeres, D.J., Sutter, B.: Design, dynamics and stability of the OSIRIS-REx sun-terminator orbits. In: 23rd AAS/AIAA Spaceflight Mechanics Meeting. Kauai, Hawaii (2013)Google Scholar
  49. Seydel, R.: Practical Bifurcation and Stability Analysis, 3rd edn. Springer, New York (2010)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  50. Taylor, M., Alexander, C., Altobelli, N., Fulle, M., Fulchignoni, M., Grün, E., et al.: Rosetta begins its comet tale. Science 347(6220), 387–387 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Thomas, V.C., Makowski, J.M., Brown, G.M., McCarthy, J.F., Bruno, D., Cardoso, J.C., et al.: The Dawn spacecraft. Space Sci. Rev. 163(1), 175–249 (2011)Google Scholar
  52. Tsuda, Y., Yoshikawa, M., Abe, M., Minamino, H., Nakazawa, S.: System design of the Hayabusa 2–Asteroid sample return mission to 1999 JU3. Acta Astronaut. 91, 356–362 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang, X., Jiang, Y., Gong, S.: Analysis of the potential field and equilibrium points of irregular-shaped minor celestial bodies. Astrophys. Space Sci. 353(1), 105–121 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Werner, R.A., Scheeres, D.J.: Exterior gravitation of a polyhedron derived and compared with harmonic and mascon gravitation representations of asteroid 4769 Castalia. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 65(3), 313–344 (1996)ADSMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  55. Yeomans, D., Antreasian, P., Barriot, J.P., Chesley, S., Dunham, D., Farquhar, R., et al.: Radio science results during the NEAR-Shoemaker spacecraft rendezvous with Eros. Science 289(5487), 2085–2088 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zuber, M.T., Smith, D.E., Cheng, A.F., Garvin, J.B., Aharonson, O., Cole, T.D., et al.: The shape of 433 Eros from the NEAR-Shoemaker Laser Rangefinder. Science 289(5487), 2097–2101 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Astronomy and Space ScienceNanjing UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Department of Aerospace Engineering SciencesUniversity of Colorado at BoulderBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations