Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy

, Volume 112, Issue 2, pp 117–130 | Cite as

Constraints on the location of a putative distant massive body in the Solar System from recent planetary data

Original Article

Abstract

We analytically work out the long-term variations caused on the motion of a planet orbiting a star by a very distant, pointlike massive object X. Apart from the semi-major axis a, all the other Keplerian osculating orbital elements experience long-term variations which are complicated functions of the orbital configurations of both the planet itself and of X. We infer constraints on the minimum distance dX at which X may exist by comparing our prediction of the long-term variation of the longitude of the perihelion \({\varpi}\) to the latest empirical determinations of the corrections \({\Delta\dot\varpi}\) to the standard Newtonian/Einsteinian secular precessions of several solar system planets recently estimated by independent teams of astronomers. We obtain the following approximate lower bounds on dX for the assumed masses of X quoted in brackets: 150–200 au (Mars), 250–450 au \(({0.7 m_{\oplus}})\), 3500–4500 au (4 mJup).

Keywords

Planets Planet X Solar System perturbations 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson J.D., van Flandern T.C.: Does the sun have a dark companion?. Newsweek 99, 83 (1982)Google Scholar
  2. Anderson J.D.: Still no Planet-X. Sky and Telesc. 74, 237 (1987)ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. Babich D., Blake C., Steinhardt C.: What can the cosmic microwave background tell us about the outer solar system?. Astrophys. J. 669, 1406–1413 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailer-Jones C.A.L.: The evidence for and against astronomical impacts on climate change and mass extinctions: a review. Int. J. Astrobiol. 8, 213–219 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertone G., Hooper D., Silk J.: Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints. Phys. Rep. 405, 279–390 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bertotti B., Farinella P., Vokrouhlický D.: Physics of the Solar System. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanchet L., Novak J.: External field effect of modified Newtonian dynamics in the solar system. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 412, 2530–2542 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blinnikov S.I., Khlopov M.Y.: Possible astronomical effects of mirror particles. Sov. Astron. 27, 371– 375 (1983)ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. Brunini A.: On the unmodeled perturbations in the motion of Uranus. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 53, 129–143 (1992)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brunini A., Melita M.D.: The existence of a planet beyond 50 AU and the orbital distribution of the classical Edgeworth–Kuiper-Belt objects. Icarus 160, 32–43 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collander-Brown S., Maran M., Williams I.P.: The effect on the Edgeworth–Kuiper belt of a large distant tenth planet. Mon. Not. Astron. Soc. 318, 101–108 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Collier Cameron A., Guenther E., Smalley B., McDonald I., Hebb L., Andersen J. et al.: Line-profile tomography of exoplanet transits—II. A gas-giant planet transiting a rapidly rotating A5 star. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 407, 507–514 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cook G.E.: Luni-solar perturbations of the orbit of an earth satellite. Geophys. J. Int. 6, 271–291 (1962)ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cowling S.A.: The pulsar \({\dot P/P}\) distribution and the postulated solar companion. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 204, 1237–1244 (1983)ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis M., Hut P., Muller R.A.: Extinction of species by periodic comet showers. Nature 308, 715–717 (1984)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Di Stefano R.: Mesolensing explorations of nearby masses: from planets to black holes. Astrophys. J. 684, 59–67 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fernández, J.A.: On the existence of a distant solar companion and its possible effects on the Oort cloud and the observed comet population. Astrophys. J. 726(33) (2011)Google Scholar
  18. Fienga, A.: INPOP10a. Invited talk presented at Journées 2010. “Systèmes de Référence Spatio-temporels. New Challenges for Reference Systems and Numerical Standards in Astronomy”. 20–22 September. Paris (2010)Google Scholar
  19. Fienga, A., Laskar, J., Kuchynka, P., Leponcin-Lafitte, C., Manche, H., Gastineau, M.: Gravity tests with INPOP planetary ephemerides. In: Klioner, S.A., Seidelmann, P.K., Soffel, M.H. (eds.) Relativity in Fundamental Astronomy: Dynamics, Reference Frames, and Data Analysis, Proceedings IAU Symposium No. 261, pp. 159–169. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)Google Scholar
  20. Fienga A., Laskar J., Kuchynka P., Manche H., Desvignes G., Gastineau M., Cognard I., Theureau G.: The INPOP10a planetary ephemeris and its applications in fundamental physics. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 111, 363–385 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Foot R., Silagadze Z.K.: Do mirror planets exist in our solar system?. Acta Phys. Polon. B 32, 2271–2277 (2001)ADSGoogle Scholar
  22. Foot R.: Shadowlands: Quest for Mirror Matter in the Universe. Universal Publishers, Parkland (2002)Google Scholar
  23. Foot R., Mitra S.: Mirror matter in the solar system: new evidence for mirror matter from eros. Astropart. Phys. 19, 739–753 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gaudi B.S., Bloom J.S.: Astrometric microlensing constraints on a massive body in the outer solar system with Gaia. Astrophys. J. 635, 711–717 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gomes R.S.: On the problem of the search for Planet X based on its perturbation of the outer planets. Icarus 80, 334–343 (1989)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gomes R.S., Ferraz-Mello S.: Would a Planet X explain the discrepancies in the motions of Uranus and Neptune?. Anais Acad. Brasil. Ciências 60, 399–403 (1988)Google Scholar
  27. Gomes R.S., Matese J.J., Lissauer J.J.: A distant planetary-mass solar companion may have produced distant detached objects. Icarus 184, 589–601 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gunn E.J.: Another planet?. New Sci. 48, 345 (1970)Google Scholar
  29. Gurfil P., Lainey V., Efroimsky M.: Long-term evolution of orbits about a precessing oblate planet: 3. A semianalytical and a purely numerical approach. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 99, 261–292 (2007)MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harrison E.R.: Has the sun a companion star?. Nature 270, 324–326 (1977)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harrington R.S.: The location of Planet X. Astron. J. 96, 1476–1478 (1988)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hills J.G.: Dynamical constraints on the mass and perihelion distance of Nemesis and the stability of its orbit. Nature 311, 636–638 (1984)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Høg E., Fabricius C., Makarov V.V., Urban S., Corbin T., Wycoff G., Bastian U., Schwekendiek P., Wicenec A.: The Tycho-2 catalogue of the 2.5 million brightest stars. Astron. Astrophys. 355, L27–L30 (2000)ADSGoogle Scholar
  34. Hogg D.W., Quinlan G.D., Tremaine S.: Dynamical limits on dark mass in the outer solar system. Astron. J. 101, 2274–2286 (1991)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Horner J., Evans N.W.: Biases in cometary catalogues and Planet X. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 335, 641–654 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Houck J.R., Soifer B.T., Neugebauer G., Beichman C.A., Aumann H.H., Clegg P.E. et al.: Unidentified point sources in the IRAS minisurvey. Astrophys. J. 278, L63–L66 (1984)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Houck, J.R., Schneider, D.P., Danielson, G.E., Neugebauer, G., Soifer, B.T., Beichman, C.A., Lonsdale, C.J.: Unidentified IRAS sources - Ultrahigh-luminosity galaxies. Astrophys. J. 290, L5–L8 (1985)Google Scholar
  38. Howard A.W., Johnson J.A., Marcy G.W., Fischer D.A., Wright J.T., Bernat D. et al.: The California planet survey. I. Four new giant exoplanets. Astrophys. J. 721, 1467–1481 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hut P.: How stable is an astronomical clock that can trigger mass extinctions on Earth?. Nature 311, 638–641 (1984)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Iorio L.: Constraints on Planet X/Nemesis from solar system’s inner dynamics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 400, 346–353 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Iorio L.: The perihelion precession of Saturn, Planet X/Nemesis and MOND. Open Astron. J. 3, 1–6 (2010)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Iorio L.: Effects of standard and modified gravity on interplanetary ranges. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 20, 181–232 (2011)ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jewitt D.: Project Pan-STARRS and the outer solar system. Earth Moon Planets 92, 465–476 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Khlopov M.Y., Beskin G.M., Bochkarev N.G., Pustilnik L.A., Pustilnik S.A.: Observational physics of the mirror world. Sov. Astron. 35, 21–29 (1991)ADSGoogle Scholar
  45. Khlopov M.Y.: Cosmoparticle Physics. World Scientific, Singapore (1999)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kowal C.: A solar system survey. Icarus 77, 118–123 (1989)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kozai, Y.: On the effects of the sun and the moon upon the motion of a close earth satellite. Smithsonian Astronomical Observatory. Special Report 22, Part 2. pp. 7–10 (1959)Google Scholar
  48. Lakdawalla, E.: WISE Guys. In: The Planetary Society Blog, August 27. http://www.planetary.org/blog/article/00002070/ (2009). Accessed 23 June 2011
  49. Larsen J.A., Roe E.S., Albert C.E., Descour A.S., McMillan R.S., Gleason A.E. et al.: The search for distant objects in the solar system using spacewatch. Astron. J. 133, 1247–1270 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lowell P.: Memoir on a trans-Neptunian planet. Mem. Lowell Obs. 1(1), 1–135 (1915)MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  51. Lykawka P.S., Mukai T.: An outer planet beyond Pluto and the origin of the trans-Neptunian belt architecture. Astron. J. 135, 1161–1200 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mainzer, A., Cushing, M.C., Skrutskie, M., Gelino, C.R., Kirkpatrick, J.D., Jarrett, T. et al.: The first ultra-cool Brown Dwarf discovered by the wide-field infrared survey explorer. Astrophys. J. 726, 30 (2011)Google Scholar
  53. Maran M.D., Collander-Brown S.J., Williams I.P.: Limitations on the existence of a tenth planet. Planet. Space Sci. 45, 1037–1043 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Maris M., Burigana C.: On the transits of solar system objects in the forthcoming planck mission: data flagging and Coeval multi-frequency observations. Earth, Moon, Planets 105, 81–88 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Matese J.J., Whitmire D.P.: Planet X and the origins of the shower and steady state flux of short-period comets. Icarus 65, 37–50 (1986)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Matese J.J., Whitman P.G., Whitmire D.P.: Cometary evidence of a massive body in the outer Oort clouds. Icarus 141, 354–366 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Matese J.J., Whitmire D.P., Lissauer J.J.: A widebinary solar companion as a possible origin of Sedna-like objects. Earth, Moon, Planets 97, 459–470 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Matese J.J., Whitmire D.P.: Persistent evidence of a jovian mass solar companion in the Oort cloud. Icarus 211, 926–938 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Melita M.D., Williams I.P.: Planet X and the extended scattered disk. Earth, Moon, Planets 92, 447–452 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Melita M.D., Williams I.P., Collander-Brown S.J., Fitzsimmons A.: The edge of the Kuiper belt: the Planet X scenario. Icarus 171, 516–524 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Melott A.L., Bambach R.K.: Nemesis reconsidered. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 407, L99–L102 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Milgrom M.: MOND effects in the inner solar system. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 399, 474–486 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Muller, R.: Measurement of the Lunar impact record for the past 3.5 billion years, and implications for the Nemesis Theory. Geological Society of America Special Paper vol. 356, p. 659 (2002)Google Scholar
  64. Murray J.B.: Arguments for the presence of a distant large undiscovered solar system planet. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 309, 31–34 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Murray C.D., Dermott S.F.: Solar System Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)MATHGoogle Scholar
  66. Neugebauer G., Habing H.J., van Duinen R., Aumann H.H., Baud B., Beichman C.A. et al.: The infrared astronomical satellite (IRAS) mission. Astrophys. J. 278, L1–L6 (1984)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. O’Toole, T.: Mistery Heavily Body Discovered. The Washington Post, A1 (30th December 1983)Google Scholar
  68. Pickering W.H.: The next planet beyond Neptune. Pop. Astron. 36, 143–165 (1928)ADSGoogle Scholar
  69. Pickering W.H.: Planet P, its orbit, position and magnitude. Planets S and T. Pop. Astron. 39, 385–398 (1931)ADSGoogle Scholar
  70. Pitjeva E.V.: Relativistic effects and solar oblateness from Radar observations of planets and spacecraft. Astron. Lett. 31, 340–349 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pitjeva, E.V.: Ephemerides EPM2008: the updated model, constants, data. Paper presented at Journées “Systèmes de référence spatiotemporels” and X. Lohrmann-Kolloquium, pp. 22–24. Dresden, Germany (2008)Google Scholar
  72. Pitjeva, E.V.: EPM ephemerides and relativity. In: Klioner, S.A., Seidelmann, P.K., Soffel, M.H., (eds.) Relativity in Fundamental Astronomy: Dynamics, Reference Frames, and Data Analysis, Proceedings IAU Symposium No. 261, pp. 170–178. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)Google Scholar
  73. Powell C.: A mathematical search for Planet X. J. Br. Interplanet. Soc. 42, 327–333 (1989)ADSGoogle Scholar
  74. Raup D.M., Sepkoski J.J.: Periodicity of extinctions in the geologic past. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 81, 801–805 (1984)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rawlins D.: The great unexplained residual in the orbit of Neptune. Astron. J. 75, 856–857 (1970)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schilling G.: The Hunt for Planet X. Springer, Berlin (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schuette C.H.: Two new families of comets. Pop. Astron. 57, 176–182 (1949)ADSGoogle Scholar
  78. Seidelmann P.K.: A dynamical search for a transplutonian planet. Astron. J. 76, 740–742 (1971)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Seidelmann P.K., Harrington R.S.: Planet X—the current status. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 43, 55–68 (1988)Google Scholar
  80. Skrutskie M.F., Cutri R.M., Stiening R., Weinberg M.D., Schneider S., Carpenter J.M. et al.: The two micron all sky survey (2MASS). Astron. J. 131, 1163–1183 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Soifer B.T., Neugebauer G., Houck J.R.: The IRAS view of the extragalactic sky. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 25, 187–230 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Standish E.M.: Planet X—no dynamical evidence in the optical observations. Astron. J. 105, 2000–2006 (1993)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Standish, E.M.: Pluto and Planets X. In: Rettig, T.W., Hahn, J.M. (eds.) Completing the Inventory of the Solar System, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Proceedings, vol. 107, pp. 163–170. (1996)Google Scholar
  84. Stubbs C.W., Sweeney D., Tyson J.A.: An overview of the large synoptic survey telescope (LSST) system. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 36, 1527 (2004)ADSGoogle Scholar
  85. Tombaugh C.: The trans-Neptunian planet search. In: Kuiper, G.P., Middlehurst, B.M. (eds) Planets and Satellites, pp. 12–30. University Chicago Press, Chicago (1961)Google Scholar
  86. van Flandern T.C., Pulkkinen K.F., Santoro E.J., Seidelmann P.K., Harrington R.S.: Perturbations of a trans-Neptunian planet. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 13, 568 (1981)Google Scholar
  87. van Flandern T.C.: Planet-X. Sky Telesc. 82, 340–341 (1991)Google Scholar
  88. Vandervoort P.O., Sather E.A.: On the resonant orbit of a solar companion star in the gravitational field of the galaxy. Icarus 105, 26–47 (1993)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Whitmire D.P., Jackson A.A.: Are periodic mass extinctions driven by a distant solar companion?. Nature 308, 713–715 (1984)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wright E.L., Eisenhardt P.R.M., Mainzer A.K., Ressler M.E., Cutri R.M., Jarrett T. et al.: The wide-field infrared survey explorer (WISE): mission description and initial on-orbit performance. Astron. J. 140, 1868–1881 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Zakamska N., Tremaine S.: Constraints on the acceleration of the solar system from high-precision timing. Astron. J. 130, 1939–1950 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ministero dell’Istruzionedell’Università e della Ricerca (M.I.U.R.)-IstruzioneBariItaly
  2. 2.Fellow of the Royal Astronomical Society (F.R.A.S.)International Institute for Theoretical Physics and Advanced Mathematics, Einstein-GalileiPratoItaly

Personalised recommendations