Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy

, Volume 109, Issue 1, pp 13–26 | Cite as

On the stability of artificial equilibrium points in the circular restricted three-body problem

Original Article

Abstract

The article analyses the stability properties of minimum-control artificial equilibrium points in the planar circular restricted three-body problem. It is seen that when the masses of the two primaries are of different orders of magnitude, minimum-control equilibrium is obtained when the spacecraft is almost coorbiting with the second primary as long as their mutual distance is not too small. In addition, stability is found when the distance from the second primary exceeds a minimum value which is a simple function of the mass ratio of the two primaries and their separation. Lyapunov stability under non-resonant conditions is demonstrated using Arnold’s theorem. Among the most promising applications of the concept we find solar-sail-stabilized observatories coorbiting with the Earth, Mars, and Venus.

Keywords

Three-body problem Artficial equilibrium points Stability Solar sails 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baig S., McInnes C.: Artificial three-body equilibria for hybrid low-thrust propulsion. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 31(6), 1644–1655 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Celletti A., Giorgilli A.: On the stability of the lagrangian points in the spatial restricted problem of three-body. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 50, 31–58 (1991)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  3. Curreli D., Lorenzini E.C., Bombardelli C., Sanjurjo-Rivo M., Pelaez J., Scheeres D.: Three-body dynamics and self-powering of an electrodynamic tether in a plasmasphere. J. Propuls. Power 26(3), 385–393 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deprit A., Deprit-Bartholome A.: Stability of the triangular lagrangian points. Astron. J. 72(2), 173–179 (1967)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. Farres A., Jorba A.: Periodic and quasi-periodic motions of a solar sail close to SL 1 in the Earth–Sun system. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 107, 233–253 (2010)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  6. Forward R.L.: Statite: A spacecraft that does not orbit. J. Spacecr. Rockets 28(5), 606–611 (1991)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. Leontovich A.: On the stability of the lagrange periodic solutions of the restricted three-body problem. Dokl. Math. (in Russian) 3, 425–428 (1962)MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Markeev A.: Stability of the triangular lagrangian solutions of the restricted three-body problem in the three-dimensional circular case. Sov. Astron. 15(4), 682–686 (1972)MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  9. McInnes C.: Azimuthal repositioning of payloads in heliocentric orbit Using solar sails. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 26(4), 662–664 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. McInnes C.: Solar sailing: Mission applications and engineering challenges. Philos. Transact. R. Soc. London A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 361(1813), 2989 (2003)CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  11. McInnes C.R., McDonald A.J.C., Simmons J.F.L., MacDonald E.W.: Solar sail parking in restricted three-body systems. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 17(2), 399–406 (1994)MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. Mengali G., Quarta A.: Non-Keplerian orbits for electric sails. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 105(1), 179–195 (2009)CrossRefMathSciNetADSMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Morimoto M.Y., Yamakawa H., Uesugi K.: Artificial equilibrium points in the low-thrust restricted three-body problem. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 30(5), 1563–1567 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nayfeh A.: Introduction to perturbation techniques. Wiley, New York (1981)MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Pelaez J., Scheeres D.J.: A permanent tethered observatory at jupiter. Dynamical analysis. Adv. Astronaut. Sci. 127(PART 2), 1307–1330 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ETSI AeronauticosUniversidad Politecnica de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations