Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy

, Volume 108, Issue 3, pp 215–232 | Cite as

Spacecraft trajectories to the L3 point of the Sun–Earth three-body problem

  • Marco TantardiniEmail author
  • Elena Fantino
  • Yuan Ren
  • Pierpaolo Pergola
  • Gerard Gómez
  • Josep J. Masdemont
Original Article


Of the three collinear libration points of the Sun–Earth Circular Restricted Three-Body Problem (CR3BP), L3 is that located opposite to the Earth with respect to the Sun and approximately at the same heliocentric distance. Whereas several space missions have been launched to the other two collinear equilibrium points, i.e., L1 and L2, taking advantage of their dynamical and geometrical characteristics, the region around L3 is so far unexploited. This is essentially due to the severe communication limitations caused by the distant and permanent opposition to the Earth, and by the gravitational perturbations mainly induced by Jupiter and the close passages of Venus, whose effects are more important than those due to the Earth. However, the adoption of a suitable periodic orbit around L3 to ensure the necessary communication links with the Earth, or the connection with one or more relay satellites located at L4 or L5, and the simultaneous design of an appropriate station keeping-strategy, would make it possible to perform valuable fundamental physics and astrophysics investigations from this location. Such an opportunity leads to the need of studying the ways to transfer a spacecraft (s/c) from the Earth’s vicinity to L3. In this contribution, we investigate several trajectory design methods to accomplish such a transfer, i.e., various types of two-burn impulsive trajectories in a Sun-s/c two-body model, a patched conics strategy exploiting the gravity assist of the nearby planets, an approach based on traveling on invariant manifolds of periodic orbits in the Sun–Earth CR3BP, and finally a low-thrust transfer. We examine advantages and drawbacks, and we estimate the propellant budget and time of flight requirements of each.


Two-body impulsive maneuvers Patched conics Gravity assist Circular restricted three-body problem Libration points Periodic orbits Invariant manifolds Low-thrust 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barrabés E., Ollé M.: Invariant Manifolds of L3 and horseshoe motion in the restricted three-body problem. Nonlinearity 9, 2065–2090 (2006)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. Brison A.E., Ho Y.-C.: Applied Optimal Control. Blaisdell Publishing Company, Waltham (1969)Google Scholar
  3. Font, J.: The Role of Homoclinic and Heteroclinic Orbits in Two-Degrees of Freedom Hamiltonian Systems. Ph.D. Dissertation, Departament de Matematica. Aplicada i Analisi, Universitat de Barcelona (1990)Google Scholar
  4. Gill P.E., Murray W., Saunders M.A.: Snopt: an sqp algorithm for large-scale constrained optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 12, 979–1006 (2002)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. Gómez G., Koon W.S., Lo M.W., Marsden J., Masdemont J., Ross S.D.: Connecting orbits and invariant manifolds in the spatial three-body problem. Nonlinearity 17, 1571 (2004)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  6. Hechler, M., Yanez, A.: Herschel/Planck Consolidated Report on Mission Analysis FP-MA-RP-0010-TOS/GMA (3.1) (2006)Google Scholar
  7. Hou, X., Tang, J., Liu, L.: Transfer to the Collinear Libration Point L3 in the Sun–Earth + Moon System. Nasa Technical Report 20080012700 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. Koon W.S., Lo M.W., Marsden J.E., Ross S.D.: Heteroclinic connections between periodic orbits and resonance transitions in celestial mechanics. Chaos 10(2), 427–469 (2000)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  9. Lo, M.W., Williams, B.G., Bollman, W.E., Han, D., Hahn, Y., et al.: Genesis Mission Design. AIAA Space Flight Mechanics, Paper No. AIAA 98–4468 (1998)Google Scholar
  10. Senent J., Ocampo C., Capella A.: Low-thrust variable-specific-impulse transfers and guidance to unstable periodic orbits. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 28, 280–290 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Szebehely V.: Theory of Orbits. Academic Press, Massachusetts (1967)Google Scholar
  12. Tantardini, M.: Transfer Strategies to the L3 Libration Point of the Sun–Earth System. MS Thesis, Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft (2009)Google Scholar
  13. Vallado D.A.: Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications. Microcosm Press, Hawthorne (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco Tantardini
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Elena Fantino
    • 3
  • Yuan Ren
    • 3
  • Pierpaolo Pergola
    • 4
  • Gerard Gómez
    • 5
  • Josep J. Masdemont
    • 3
  1. 1.Departament de Matemàtica Aplicada I, ETSEIBUniversitat Politècnica de CatalunyaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Faculty of Aerospace EngineeringDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
  3. 3.IEEC & Departament de Matemàtica Aplicada I, ETSEIBUniversitat Politècnica de CatalunyaBarcelonaSpain
  4. 4.Faculty of Computer Science, Electrical Engineering and MathematicsUniversity of PaderbornPaderbornGermany
  5. 5.IEEC & Departament de Matemàtica Aplicada i AnàlisiUniversitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations