Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy

, Volume 103, Issue 4, pp 365–372

Proposals for the masses of the three largest asteroids, the Moon-Earth mass ratio and the Astronomical Unit

Original Article

Abstract

We propose to the NSFA (the IAU Working Group on Numerical Standards for Fundamental Astronomy) the following representative values and realistic uncertainties for the masses of the three largest asteroids (Ceres, Pallas, Vesta), to be used as the current best estimates:
$$\begin{array}{ll}M_{\rm Ceres}/M_\odot \,=\, 4.72(3)\cdot 10^{-10},\\ M_{\rm Pallas}/M_\odot \,=\, 1.03(3)\cdot 10^{-10},\\ M_{\rm Vesta}/M_\odot\, =\, 1.35(3)\cdot 10^{-10}.\end{array}$$
Unlike the values previously adopted in the Astronomical Almanac, these are consistent with nearly all of the twenty or so modern accurate determinations from various authors. We also have proposed the following values for the Moon-Earth mass ratio and the astronomical unit in meters obtained from the ephemeris improvement processes at JPL in Pasadena and at IAA RAS in St.Petersburg: MMoon/MEarth =  0.0123000371(4) and AU =  149597870700(3) m. The numerical value of the AU in meters is identical in both the TDB-based and the TCB-based systems of units if one uses the conversion proposed by Irwin and Fukushima, Brumberg and Groten, Brumberg and Simon.

Keywords

Ceres mass DE ephemerides EPM ephemerides Pallas mass Vesta mass Moon-Earth mass ratio Astronomical Unit 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baer J., Chesley S.R.: Astrometric masses of 21 asteroids, and an integrated asteroid ephemeris. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 100, 27–42 (2008)MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. Brumberg V.A., Groten E.: IAU resolutions on reference systems and time scales in practice. Astron. Astrophys. 367, 1070–1077 (2001)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. Brumberg V.A., Simon J.-L.: Relativistic indirect third-body perturbations in the SMART Earth’s rotation theory. In: Finkelstein, A., Capitaine, N. (eds) Astrometry, Geodynamics and Solar System Dynamics: from milliarcsecond to microarcseconds/Journees-2003, pp. 302–313. IAA RAS, St.Petersburg (2004)Google Scholar
  4. Fienga A., Manche H., Laskar J., Gastineau M.: INPOP06: a new numerical planetary ephemeris. Astron. Astrophys. 477, 315–327 (2008)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. Folkner, W.M., Williams, J.G., Boggs, D.H.: The planetary and lunar ephemerides DE421. Interoffice Memorandum 343.R-08-003 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. Goffin E.: New determination of the mass of Pallas. Astron. Astrophys. 365, 627–630 (2001)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. Hertz, H.G.: Mass of Vesta. IAU Circ. 1983 (1966)Google Scholar
  8. Hilton J.L.: New Masses and Densities for 1 Ceres, 2 Pallas, and 4 Vesta. Br. Assoc. Adv. Stud. 29, 1318 (1997)Google Scholar
  9. Hilton J.L.: US Naval observatory ephemerides of the largest asteroids. Astron. J. 117, 1077–1086 (1999)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. Hilton J.L.: Asteroid masses and densities. In: Bottke, W.F., Cellino, A., Paolicchi, P., Binzel, R.P. (eds) Asteroids III, pp. 103–112. University of Arizona Press, Tucson (2002)Google Scholar
  11. Irwin A.W., Fukushima T.: A numerical time ephemeris of the Earth. Astron. Astrophys. 348, 642–651 (1999)ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. Kochetova, O.M.: Masses and densities of minor planets. IAA RAS, St.Petersburg, http://www.ipa.nw.ru/PAGE/DEPFUND/LSBSS/engmasses.htm (2006)
  13. Konopliv A.S., Yoder C.F., Standish E.M., Yuan D.N., Sjogren W.L.: A global solution for the Mars static and seasonal gravity, Mars orientation, Phobos and Deimos masses, and Mars ephemeris. Icarus 182, 23–50 (2006)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. Kovacevic A., Kuzmanoski M.: A new determination of the mass of (1) Ceres. Earth Moon Planets 100, 117–123 (2007)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. Krasinsky G.A., Pitjeva E.V., Sveshnikov M.L., Chunaeva L.I.: The motion of major planets from observations 1769–1988 and some astronomical constants. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 55, 1–23 (1993)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. Krasinsky, G.A., Pitjeva, E.V., Vasilyev, M.V., Yagudina, E.I.: Estimating masses of asteroids. Communication of IAA RAS 139 (2001)Google Scholar
  17. Michalak G.: Determination of asteroid masses, I. (1) Ceres, (2) Pallas, and (4) Vesta. Astron. Astrophys. 360, 363–374 (2000)ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. Pitjeva E.V.: Modern numerical ephemerides of planets and the importance of ranging observations for their creation. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 80, 249–271 (2001)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. Pitjeva, E.V.: EPM2002 and EPM2002C—two versions of high accuracy numerical planetary ephemerides constructed for TDB and TCB time scales. Communication of IAA RAS 155 (2003)Google Scholar
  20. Pitjeva E.V.: Precise determination of the motion of planets and some astronomical constants from modern observations. In: Kurtz, D.W. (eds) IAU Coll. N 196 / Transit of Venus: new views of the solar system and galaxy, pp. 230–241. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  21. Pitjeva, E.V.: National high-precision ephemerides of planets and the Moon—EPM. IAA Transaction issue 17, St.Petersburg, IAA RAS, 42–59 (2007, in Russian)Google Scholar
  22. Pitjeva, E. V.: Ephemerides EPM2008: the updated model, constants, data. In: Soffel, M., Capitaine, N. (eds.) Journees-2008/Astrometry, Geodynamics and Astronomical Reference Systems. Dresden (2009, in press)Google Scholar
  23. Sitarski G., Todorovic-Juchniewicz B.: Determination of the mass of (1) Ceres from perturbations on (203) Pompeja and (348) May. Acta Astron. 42, 139–144 (1992)ADSGoogle Scholar
  24. Sitarski G., Todororovic-Juchniewicz B.: Determination of masses of Ceres and Vesta from their perturbations on four asteroids. Acta Astron. 45, 673–677 (1995)ADSGoogle Scholar
  25. Standish E.M., Jr.: The observational basis for JPL’s DE200, planetary ephemerides of the Astronomical Almanac. Astron. Astrophys. 233, 252–271 (1990)ADSGoogle Scholar
  26. Standish, E.M.: JPL planetary and lunar ephemerides, DE405/LE405. Interoffice Memorandum 312.F-98-048 (1998)Google Scholar
  27. Standish, E.M.: Recommendation of DE405 for the 2001 mars surveyor mission and for Cassini. Interoffice Memorandum 312.F-00-107 (2000)Google Scholar
  28. Standish, E.M.: JPL planetary ephemeris DE410. Interoffice Memorandum 312.N-03-109 (2003)Google Scholar
  29. Standish E.M.: The astronomical unit now. In: Kurtz, D.W. (eds) IAU Coll. N 196 / Transit of Venus: new views of the solar system and galaxy, pp. 163–179. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  30. Standish, E.M.: JPL planetary, DE414. Interoffice Memorandum 343R-06-002 (2006)Google Scholar
  31. Standish M.E., Hellings R.W.: A determination of the masses of Ceres, Pallas and Vesta from their perturbations upon the orbit of Mars. Icarus 80, 326–333 (1989)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  32. Standish, E.M., Newhall X.X., Williams, J.G., Folkner, W.M.: JPL Planetary and lunar ephemerides, DE403/LE403. Interoffice Memorandum 314.10-127 (1995)Google Scholar
  33. Viateau B., Rapaport M.: The mass of (1) Ceres from its gravitational perturbations on the orbits of 9 asteroids. Astron. Astrophys. 344, 729–735 (1998)ADSGoogle Scholar
  34. Viateau B., Rapaport M.: Mass and density of asteroids (4) Vesta and (11) Parthenope. Astron. Astrophys. 370, 602–609 (2001)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  35. Vitagliano A., Stoss R.M.: New mass determination of (15) Eunomia based on a very close encounter with (50278) 2000CZ12. Astron. Astrophys. 455(3), L29–31 (2006)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Applied Astronomy of Russian Academy of SciencesSt.PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA

Personalised recommendations