Advertisement

Analytical theory of a lunar artificial satellite with third body perturbations

  • Bernard De Saedeleer
Original Article

Abstract

We present here the first numerical results of our analytical theory of an artificial satellite of the Moon. The perturbation method used is the Lie Transform for averaging the Hamiltonian of the problem, in canonical variables: short-period terms (linked to l, the mean anomaly) are eliminated first. We achieved a quite complete averaged model with the main four perturbations, which are: the synchronous rotation of the Moon (rate Open image in new window ), the oblateness J 2 of the Moon, the triaxiality C 22 of the Moon ( \(C_{22} \approx J_2/10\)) and the major third body effect of the Earth (ELP2000). The solution is developed in powers of small factors linked to these perturbations up to second-order; the initial perturbations being sorted ( Open image in new window is first-order while the others are second-order). The results are obtained in a closed form, without any series developments in eccentricity nor inclination, so the solution apply for a wide range of values. Numerical integrations are performed in order to validate our analytical theory. The effect of each perturbation is presented progressively and separately as far as possible, in order to achieve a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms. We also highlight the important fact that it is necessary to adapt the initial conditions from averaged to osculating values in order to validate our averaged model dedicated to mission analysis purposes.

Keywords

Lunar artificial satellite Third body Lie Hamiltonian C22 Earth 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brouwer D. (1959). Solution of the problem of artificial satellite theory without air drag. Astron. J. 64:378–397MathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. Chapront-Touzé, M., Chapront, J.: Lunar Tables and Programs 4000 BC to AD 8000. Willmann- Bell. (1991)Google Scholar
  3. De Saedeleer, B., Henrard, J.: Orbit of a lunar artificial satellite: analytical theory of perturbations. IAU Colloq. 196: Transits of Venus: New Views of the Solar System and Galaxy. pp. 254–262 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. De Saedeleer, B., Henrard, J.: The combined effect of J 2 and C 22 on the critical inclination of a lunar orbiter’. Adv. Space Res. 37(1): 80–87 (2006). The Moon and Near-Earth Objects. Also available as http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.06.052Google Scholar
  5. De Saedeleer, B.: Analytical theory of an artificial satellite of the Moon. In: Belbruno, E., Gurfil, P. (eds.) Astrodynamics, Space Missions, and Chaos, of the Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. Proceedings of the Conference New Trends in Astrodynamics and Applications, January 20-22, 2003, Vol. 1017, pp. 434–449. Washington (2004)Google Scholar
  6. De Saedeleer B. (2005). Complete zonal problem of the artificial satellite: generic compact analytic first order in closed form. Celest. Mech. Dynam. Astron. 91:239–268zbMATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. Deprit A. (1969). Canonical transformations depending on a small parameter. Celest. Mech. 1:12–30zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. Henrard, J.: The algorithm of the inverse for Lie transform. In: Szebehely, V., Tapley, B. (eds.) ASSL: Recent Advances in Dynamical Astronomy, Vol. 39, pp. 248–257. Dordrecht (1973)Google Scholar
  9. Jefferys W. (1971). Automated, closed form integration of formulas in elliptic motion. Celest. Mech. 3:390–394CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. Jupp A. (1988). The critical inclination problem: 30 years of progress. Celest. Mech. 43:127–138zbMATHADSGoogle Scholar
  11. Knežević Z., Milani A. (1995). Perturbation theory for low satellites: an application. Bull. Astron. Belgrade 152:35–48ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. Knežević Z., Milani A. (1998). Orbit maintenance of a lunar polar orbiter. Planet. Space Sci. 46:1605–1611CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. Konopliv, A. S., Sjogren, W.L., Wimberly, R.N., Cook, R.A., Vijayaraghavan, A.: A high resolution lunar gravity field and predicted orbit behavior. In Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, Astrodynamics (AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Pap. # AAS 93–622, Victoria, B.C.), Vol. 85, pp. 1275–1295 (1993)Google Scholar
  14. Kozai Y. (1962). Second-order solution of artificial satellite theory without air drag. Astron. J. 67:446–461MathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu L., Wang X. (2000). On the orbital lifetime of high-altitude satellites. Chinese Astron, Astrophys. 24:284–288CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. Milani, A., Knežević, Z.: Selenocentric proper elements: A tool for lunar satellite mission analysis. Final Report of a study conducted for ESA, ESTEC, Noordwijk (1995)Google Scholar
  17. Oesterwinter C. (1970). The motion of a lunar satellite. Celest. Mech. 1:368–436zbMATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. Press W.H., Teukolsky S.A., Vetterling W.T., Flannery B.P. (1986). Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77—The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Roy A. (1968). The theory of the motion of an artificial lunar satellite I. Development of the disturbing function. Icarus 9:82–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shniad H. (1970). The equivalence of von Zeipel mappings and Lie transforms. Celest. Mech. 2:114–120zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. Steichen D. (1998a). An averaging method to study the motion of lunar artificial satellites—I: Disturbing function. Celest. Mech. Dynam. Astron. 68:205–224MathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. Steichen D. (1998b). An averaging method to study the motion of lunar artificial satellites—II: Averaging and applications. Celest. Mech. Dynam. Astron. 68:225–247MathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. Szebehely V. (1989). Adventures in Celestial Mechanics. University of Texas Press, TexaszbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Département de MathématiqueUniversity of NamurNamurBelgium

Personalised recommendations