Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 75–113 | Cite as

Evidence-based Kernels: Fundamental Units of Behavioral Influence

Open Access
Article

Abstract

This paper describes evidence-based kernels, fundamental units of behavioral influence that appear to underlie effective prevention and treatment for children, adults, and families. A kernel is a behavior–influence procedure shown through experimental analysis to affect a specific behavior and that is indivisible in the sense that removing any of its components would render it inert. Existing evidence shows that a variety of kernels can influence behavior in context, and some evidence suggests that frequent use or sufficient use of some kernels may produce longer lasting behavioral shifts. The analysis of kernels could contribute to an empirically based theory of behavioral influence, augment existing prevention or treatment efforts, facilitate the dissemination of effective prevention and treatment practices, clarify the active ingredients in existing interventions, and contribute to efficiently developing interventions that are more effective. Kernels involve one or more of the following mechanisms of behavior influence: reinforcement, altering antecedents, changing verbal relational responding, or changing physiological states directly. The paper describes 52 of these kernels, and details practical, theoretical, and research implications, including calling for a national database of kernels that influence human behavior.

Keywords

Evidence-based kernels Public-health benefits Prevention Treatment 

This paper presents an analysis of fundamental units of behavioral influence that underlie effective prevention and treatment. We call these units kernels. They have two defining features. First, in experimental analysis, researchers have found them to have a reliable effect on one or more specific behaviors. Second, they are fundamental units of behavior influence in the sense that deleting any component of a kernel would render it inert. Understanding kernels could contribute to an empirically based theory of behavioral influence, facilitate dissemination of effective prevention and treatment practices, clarify the active ingredients in existing interventions, and contribute to developing interventions that are more efficient and effective. Subsequent sections of this paper expand on the two essential features of evidence-based kernels, as well as the origins of the idea and terminology.

The ultimate goals of treatment and prevention research are a reduction of the prevalence of the most common and costly problems of behavior and an increase in the prevalence of wellbeing. Current thinking about how to accomplish this assumes that we will identify empirically supported programs and, to a lesser extent, policies, and will disseminate them widely and effectively. Although substantial progress is occurring through this strategy, there are at least four limitations to it that point to the value of kernels as a complementary strategy.

First, it is difficult to implement a program’s efficacy widely with fidelity or effectiveness. Ringwalt et al. (2003) surveyed a sample of 1,795 school staff members who were in charge of teaching substance-use prevention programs. Nearly two-thirds reported teaching content that meta-analyses showed was effective. However, only 17% used effective delivery and only 14% used both effective delivery and content. In a second study, Ringwalt et al. (2003) found that about one-fifth of teachers of substance-use prevention curricula did not use a curriculum guide at all and only 15% reported following one closely. Hallfors and Godette (2002) studied 104 school districts in 12 states. They found that many districts selected evidence-based programs, but only 19% of district coordinators indicated their schools implemented those programs with fidelity. They concluded there was inadequate funding and infrastructural support for implementation. More recently, prevention programs with long-standing efficacy data from more controlled conditions and settings, such as Project Alert or Reconnecting Youth (e.g., Bell et al. 1993; Ellickson et al. 1993), were tested for effectiveness in real-world contexts and conditions. Most often, the obtained effectiveness results do not replicate the efficacy trials (e.g., Hallfors et al. 2006; Sanchez et al. 2007; St. Pierre et al. 2005). Research on how to get programs widely adopted, effectively implemented, and appropriately adapted to different conditions is still in its infancy. However, initial evidence suggests that sole reliance on program dissemination to affect population outcomes will have a limited impact, even with restrictive policies (e.g., Hallfors et al. 2007).

Second, many problems—or behaviors—that affect wellbeing do not require lengthy or complex interventions involving consultations, workshops, training, or support. Consider a few examples. A teacher might improve classroom behavior just by using some non-verbal cues during transitions (Abbott et al. 1998; Krantz and Risley 1977; Rosenkoetter and Fowler 1986) or reduce aggression and bullying on the playground by cooperative games (Murphy et al. 1983). A parent might easily improve a teenager’s cooperation with a mystery motivator (Madaus et al. 2003). A principal might reduce disturbing or disruptive behaviors and increase engaged learning with the principal’s lottery (Thorpe et al. 1978). A college professor might increase participation of students with response cards instead of the expensive clicker systems (Shabani and Carr 2004). In other words, a simple method of behavior influence might well solve a specific problem, and that was all that was required. The simple solution might actually avoid larger, more unpleasant difficulties or have greater good over time. For example, the response cards used in a classroom increase academic achievement (Gardner et al. 1994) or the use of organized recess might not only reduce aggression on the playground, but also improve the academic performance of children in the classroom with ADHD (Jarrett et al. 1998). Thus, simple solutions might just be sufficient in many cases.

Third, program dissemination is unlikely to affect practices or problems that fall outside the scope of a program. Teachers, clinicians, parents, healthcare providers, coworkers, supervisors, and many others are constantly trying to have a beneficial influence on others’ behavior. Existing formal programs address only a small range of situations and behaviors they seek to influence. For example, parents may complain to a teacher, principal, nurse, or doctor how hard it is to get their young child moving in the morning. Alone, such a complaint does not merit implementing parenting skills training. However, a simple behavior change strategy, such as the Beat the Timer game (Adams and Drabman 1995), in which the child receives a reward for completing a behavior before the timer goes off, could solve the problem, and prevent parent–child conflict. Even in situations where an effective program exists, the program dissemination strategy will fail to affect any practices of those who choose not to adopt the program. A related issue is that that many problems have no evidence-based programs on published approved lists. For example, bipolar disorder is increasingly common among younger children, yet there are no listed programs for teachers with such children. Thus, given current evidence, it is likely that for now most daily practices that influence human development will fall outside the scope of existing programs. Failing to improve those practices is a missed opportunity.

Cost is a fourth limitation of depending solely on program dissemination to affect public health. The National Registry of Effective Programs and Practices provides cost information (see http://modelprograms.samhsa.gov/template.cfm?page=nrepbutton). Direct costs for program developers include material production, training, licensing, ongoing consultation of adopters, results monitoring, and program improvement. There are also hidden costs, such as venues, staff training, temporary staff replacement to cover duties, and administrative costs. For example, a model universal program that reduced observed aggression on the playground by about 10% (Grossman et al. 1997) requires 17.5 h of direct instruction per pupil, plus indirect costs for material and training of teachers. Thus, a school with 25 teachers may spend $12,000–15,000 for materials, training, staff timing, and (possibly) substitute teachers. A cost of $500 per teacher per universal program is unexceptional for listed programs. Therapeutic model programs (e.g., Ogden and Halliday-Boykins 2004; Szapocznik and Williams 2000) can cost between $80,000 and 200,000 depending on the nature of licensing needs, training, materials, supervision, monitoring, and staffing. If multiple evidence-based programs are required, costs per problem (e.g., tobacco, alcohol, violence, bullying, or mental illness) can bring the total to hundreds of thousands of dollars in direct and indirect costs per setting. These funds are not typically available to schools, human service agencies, groups, and others charged with prevention and treatment. There is no reason to expect a surge in such funds at a local, state, or federal level anytime soon. Clearly, if program adoption is the only avenue to large population effects, progress will be slow and costly. It would be very useful from a public health and safety perspective if there were low-cost prevention, intervention, and treatment strategies to deploy easily—reducing the need for more expensive strategies that might not be possible to field where money and resources are scarce.

A fifth concern is that existing programs have limited effectiveness, modest effect sizes, scalability concerns, weak generalization, difficulty with maintenance or sustainability, and even iatrogenic effects (e.g., Hallfors et al. 2006; St. Pierre et al. 2005; Sanchez et al. 2007). This is not to diminish the enormous progress of prevention science in the past 30 years (Biglan 2004). However, inspection of recent meta-analyses of interventions (e.g., Bledsoe 2003; Derzon et al. 2005, 2006; Ennett et al. 2003; Lősel and Beelmann 2003; Lipsey et al. 2006; Scheckner et al. 2004; Tobler et al. 2000) finds plenty of room for improving the effectiveness of our programs.

A sixth concern is that current evidence-based programs do not easily meet the diffusion criteria (Rogers 1995). For instance, individuals who might be early adopters of proven and tested prevention strategies can often gain access to these strategies only through institutions such as schools or state agencies. If a school or agency lags, thousands of individuals or families in geographic areas cannot avail themselves of strategies that might prevent school failure, substance abuse, mental illness, delinquency, or other ills. Individual teachers also cannot adopt science-based strategies, as almost all evidence-based prevention programs require school or district adoptions. For example, it is easier for a parent or teacher to gain access to a prescription drug to treat ADHD or depression than to obtain evidence-based strategies that might similarly affect behavior (e.g., Ridgway et al. 2003; Schilling et al. 2003; Larun et al. 2006).

Each limitation points to the value of identifying and making available kernels of behavior influence. We do not suggest that kernels replace tested, proven programs; we propose that kernels supplement or strengthen programs, help to create new programs more efficiently, or make effective behavior–influence techniques available in situations where programs are unavailable, impractical, or just unnecessary based on the simplicity of the problem addressed.

Kernel Definition, Derivation, and Examples

We designate as evidence-based kernels any indivisible procedure shown through experimental evaluation to produce reliable effects on behavior (Embry 2004). The derivation of the term “kernels” arose in Embry’s (2004) paper describing the active ingredients in evidenced-based prevention or treatment behavior-change programs, distinct from the earlier nebulous concepts of “principles of effectiveness.” The perceived need for a taxonomy and nomenclature for these active ingredients emerged from a yearlong series of meetings organized by the second author, involving some 20 leading prevention, scientific, and policy leaders. Some of the scientists at the meetings were Richard Catalano, Harold Holder, Brian Flay, and the authors of this paper. These scientists had created and tested many prevention and treatment programs and had used some common ingredients to make those programs work. The scientists, however, had never denominated those ingredients or active components in ways that each other understood or that others might easily perceive for new invention or systematic replications.

Other disciplines do have such taxonomies and nomenclature. For example, medications contain lists of known “active ingredients,” which have proven effectiveness separate from effects of the compounded product. For example, aspirin is clearly effective in its own right, and so are enteric coatings. Joined, they result in a product such as “buffered aspirin,” composed of two separate active ingredients. One can look up medications’ active ingredients in publications like the Physician’s Desk Reference and look up how to use them in the Merck Manual. Nothing similar exists in applied behavioral science.

We chose the term “evidence-based kernel” for several reasons. First, it had the metaphorical resonance of something organic that influenced life or behavior. Second, the metaphor was about something very compact, although obviously in quantity or through blending, it could become something bigger or more productive. Third, the term was novel, which would confer the ability to track its use and make its meaning clear and crisp compared to words or phrases in past use such as “principles of effectiveness.”

The unit of a kernel is indivisible in the sense that it would be ineffective if one eliminated any of its components. Experimental evaluations of kernels may involve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or interrupted time-series experiments (Flay et al. 2004). Examples of kernels include timeout, written praise notes, self-monitoring, framing relations among stimuli to affect the value of a given stimulus, and physiological strategies such as nasal breathing when upset or increasing omega-3 fatty acids in the diet in order to influence behavior. The description of a kernel as an indivisible procedure merits discussion by metaphor and example.

First, a kernel is like a seed that contains central information for growth or change. Second, a kernel also evokes the idea of an implicit human technology to effect change from the earliest use of agriculture to the use of core routines in modern computers. A broken seed will not grow, and a broken core computer routine (“kernel panic”) will cause the machine to be inoperative. One of the oldest prepared foods by humans, dating to the Neolithic era—bread, further illustrates the point of indivisibility. Bread consists of flour and water. Bread may be leavened or unleavened. Even unleavened, bread can be quite varied: lavashes, tortilla, chapatis, rotis, naans, etc. Bread is simple and irreductable: remove the flour or liquid, there is no bread. The example of bread also illustrates the nearly infinite ways additions to it can make it sweet, spicy, bitter, fattening, medicinal, or celebratory. Of course other preparations of meat, legumes, fruits, or vegetables can be served with bread to form daily meals or diet—a culinary equivalent of a program.

Second, an evidence-based kernel has core components that cannot be removed and be effective. Consider some examples: (1) Timeout must be a brief removal from whatever is reinforcing the undesirable behavior, followed by intensive reinforcement for engaging in the desired behavior upon return; (2) a Home-Note from school must cue high rates of positive reinforcement from home adults, not emphasize the bad behavior at school; (3) beat the timer requires some kind of mechanical device to keep track of time, set for a brief time, and with a signal that cues reinforcement for the target behavior when the time elapses; and (4) nasal breathing must involve breathing through the nose and not the through the mouth, when upset, for the physiological and behavior benefits to happen.

Programs, however, are rarely irreductable. Programs contain many components or kernels, and the loss of a single one enables the program still to have some effect in most cases. For example, evidence-based reading programs like Direct Instruction or Success for All have kernels such as choral responding or peer-assisted learning among many other active ingredients. The loss or omission of a single program component may reduce results but will not obliterate results typically.

Naturally, some may ask about the cultural competence of evidence-based kernels. Anthropologists or evolutionary theorists (e.g., Wilson and Wilson 2007) posit human evolution and advancement are significantly based on our ability to influence each other for group benefit. We suggest that the idea of evidence-based kernels has deep roots in anthropology. Humans have a long history of creating ways to influence each other, and noticing the effects of their inventions to do so. While we hold fast to the notion that an evidence-based kernel must have peer-reviewed publication showing experimentally proven results, we are not blind to the fact that many kernels listed in this publication have more than chance analogue in the wisdom traditions of cultures to influence the behavior of relatives, mates, and neighbors. Many of the kernels herein are not just found in evidence-based programs or scientific journals; they can be found, too, in old culturally selected practices. For example, choral responding is a scientifically proven practice described herein (e.g., Godfrey et al. 2003), yet it can be found as a cultural practice from cultures as environmentally diverse as Polynesians to Arctic peoples; scientists funded by the National Institute of Health have recently experimentally demonstrated the efficacy of the omega-3 fatty acid on influencing many types of human behavior (e.g., Freeman et al. 2006a, b), while grandmothers several hundred years ago made sure that everybody had their daily dose of cod liver oil; and while legions of behavioral scientists since the 1960s may have demonstrated the effects of praise (e.g., Leblanc et al. 2005), the Yup’ik peoples of Alaska apparently applied the principle a long time before European contact.

Humans—be they parents, teachers, leaders, business people, or even scientists—attempt to influence behavior, which begs the question of what influence might mean. Thus, a kernel may increase the frequency or duration of a behavior or may make a behavior less likely. The change in frequency or duration of behavior is observable in real time. The mechanism of influence might be a function of an antecedent to channel behavior, a consequence following the behavior, a set of words about the behavior, or direct manipulation of physiology. These possible mechanisms or pathways of how kernels can influence the acquisition, rate, or duration of behavior will be discussed subsequently. Some examples of kernels now merit attention.

The Example of Timeout

Timeout was one of the first kernels of behavior–influence technology (Wolf et al. 1964). Dicky was a 3-year-old boy with autism who had undergone surgery for cataracts. He lived in a psychiatric hospital and had frequent tantrums resulting in self-injury. In tribute to the late Montrose Wolf, Risley described this landmark study (Risley 2005):

After having just discovered the power of adult attention for young children, and realizing that the staff could not simply ignore temper tantrums, especially violent ones with mild self-abuse, Wolf decided to prescribe a response to tantrums that would minimize any social reinforcing effect of the necessary attention and counterbalance that reinforcement with a period of social isolation. The prescription for tantrums was to place Dicky, calmly and without comment, in his room until the tantrum ceased and at least 10 minutes had passed. When tantrums were under control and after wearing glasses had been hand shaped, Dicky began to throw his glasses occasionally. When the social isolation prescription was applied, glasses throwing decreased from about twice per day to zero. But the hospital staff doubted that it was due to the procedure, because Dicky didn’t seem to mind being taken to his room; he just rocked in his rocking chair and hummed to himself. Because throwing glasses was both less serious and more reliably measured than tantrums, Wolf agreed to discontinue the procedure—and glasses throwing soon increased to the previous level. The social isolation procedure was reinstated, and glasses throwing decreased again to zero. (pp. 281–282)

Thus was born timeout, shown since in hundreds of studies to reduce the frequency of a vast range of behaviors. It is a staple of nearly every evidence-based prevention program for parenting (e.g., Incredible Years [Webster-Stratton and Reid 2007]; Triple P [Sanders and Markie-Dadds 1996]; Parent Management Training [Forgatch et al. 2005a, b]). It is also part of popular culture. Shows like Nanny 911 display its use; websites with advice to parents describe it (e.g., http://www.thelaboroflove.com/forum/quality/timeout.html). Although there is no population-based data on the prevalence of families and schools using timeout, it seems that in many areas, timeout is the normative replacement for harsh methods of discipline.

The Example of Nasal Breathing or “Doing Turtle”

Humans are amazing at noticing the effects of small physiological interventions that influence human behavior. Grandmothers and experienced teachers, for example, often tell children who are emotionally overwrought and hyperventilating to close their mouths and breathe through the nose while exhaling through the mouth. This strategy is taught formally in such evidence-based prevention programs as the Incredible Years and PATHS (Positive Alternative Thinking Skills), and even has a child-friendly name and story of “doing turtle” (Robin et al. 1976). The strategy is based in empirical observations of the relationship among breathing patterns, physiological measures, behavior, and children’s emotional states (McDonnell and Bowden 1989; Naveen et al. 1997; Perna et al. 2002; Pine et al. 1998; Telles et al. 1997; Zaichkowsky et al. 1986). This kernel also illustrates how a simple strategy might be independently discovered and tested from very different theoretical perspectives (e.g., pediatric medical practice, basic research, child psychology, prevention, parenting, and even alternative bodywork such as yoga). Like most kernels, it can be used and proven on its own, or incorporated in programmatic efforts.

Theoretical Taxonomy of Kernels

Although simple enumeration of kernels may support effective practice, their contribution may be more substantial if we organize them within a theoretical framework to delineate the key influences on behavior. Such a framework would facilitate generating new kernels and could point to overlooked procedures for influencing behavior.

Kernels are understandable in terms of the operant behavior of biological organisms, viewed within a developmental and evolutionary perspective. Human behavior—including verbal, cognitive, and emotional functioning—has developed over time as a function of the biological capacities of the organism and the consequences to behavior. Human behavioral tendencies are adaptive functions of current situations and a history of consequences for behaving in similar situations (e.g., Biglan 1995).

Kernels involve one of four primary processes. Many involve consequation of behavior—the presentation or removal of reinforcing or aversive consequences (Biglan 1995, Chap. 3). Others involve an antecedent stimulus affecting motivation to behave due to a history of consequences for responding to that stimulus (e.g., teachers’ use of standard signals to prompt students to sit down; Jason, Neal, and Marinakis 1985; Wasserman 1977). A third type primarily involves altering the relations that people derive among verbal stimuli in ways that affect motivation. For example, to elicit a public commitment to engage in a behavior (Chassin et al. 1990), a person feels prompted to associate a network of consequences (such as others’ approval) with engaging in the behavior and other consequences with not engaging in the behavior (e.g., disapproval). Each of these three types of kernels involves ways in which a person’s social environment affects his or her behavior. In a sense, kernels provide prescriptions for how the social environment can show more support of human development.

A fourth type of kernel alters a biological function of the organisms in ways that affect behavior. An example is supplementation of diets with omega-3 fatty acid (Haag 2003). Indeed, any pharmacological agent that affects behavior would fall into this category, although we stress the importance of distinguishing prescription medications from non-prescription, scientifically proven kernels that individuals or organizations might choose to use without a prescription.

Table 1 presents a list of kernels organized according to this theoretical framework. We categorize each kernel in terms of the primary mechanism by which it affects behavior, although clearly many kernels involve more than one process. Space precludes a complete review of the empirical evidence for each kernel, but we cite all experimental evaluations done for each kernel along with the types of experimental evaluations that have occurred. In each of the following, we describe the empirical evidence in detail for one kernel.
Table 1

Example taxonomy of potential kernels

Kernel example

Description

Behaviors affected

Evidence and experimental designs

Kernels altering consequences for behavior

Kernels increasing frequency of behavior

    Verbal praise

Person or group receives spoken (or signed) recognition for engagement in target acts, which may be descriptive or simple acknowledgements

Cooperation, social competence, academic engagement/achievement, positive parent–child interactions or marital relations, better sales; reduced disruptive or aggressive behavior; reduced DSM-IV symptoms

Leblanc et al. (2005), Lowe and McLaughlin (1974), Marchant and Young (2001), Marchant et al. (2004), Martens et al. (1997), Matheson and Shriver (2005), Robinson and Robinson (1979), Scott et al. (2001) (All TS)

    Peer-to-peer written praise: “Tootle” notes, compliments books/praise notes

A pad or display of decorative notes is posted on a wall, read aloud, or placed in a photo album where peers praise behaviors

Social competence, academic achievement, work performance, violence, aggression, physical health, vandalism

Cabello and Terrell (1994), Embry et al. (1996), Farber and Mayer (1972), Heap and Emerson (1989), Mayer et al. (1983, 1993), Skinner et al. (2000) (TS plus 1 RCT with other kernels)

    Beat the timer or beat the buzzer

Reduced time set to complete a task, with access to reward or recognition if task successfully completed before time interval

Parent–child interactions, compliance, physical abuse, child aggression, ADHD, work completion, academic accuracy

Adams and Drabman (1995), Ball and Irwin (1976), Drabman and Creedon (1979), Hudson et al. (1985), Luiselli and Greenidge (1982), McGrath et al. (1987), Wolfe et al. (1981), Wurtele and Drabman (1984) (TS)

    Mystery motivators/grab bag/prize bowl/game of life

Person draws variable prize of higher and lower values for engaging in targeted behavior

Conduct disorders, oppositional defiance, ADHD, substance abuse, work performance

DeMartini-Scully et al. (2000), Madaus et al. (2003), Moore et al. (1994), Petry et al. (2000, 2001a, b, c, 2004, 2005), Petry and Simcic (2002), Robinson and Sheridan (2000) (TS with children; RCTs with adults)

    Public posting (graphing) of feedback of a targeted behavior

Results, products of activity posted for all, may be scores of individuals, teams, or display of work product for all to see

Speeding, academic achievement, conservation, donations, community participation, injury control

Parsons (1982, 1992), Jackson and Mathews (1995), Whyte et al. (1983), Ragnarsson and Bjorgvinsson (1991), Nordstrom et al. (1990), Van Houten and Nau (1981), Nicol and Hantula (2001) (TS)

    Principal lottery

Tokens or symbolic rewards for positive behavior result in random rewards from status person (e.g., principal, authority figures) such as positive phone calls home

Academic achievement, disruptive behavior, aggression

Thorpe et al. (1978, 1979) (All TS)

    Safety or performance lottery

Tokens or reward tickets given for observed safety or performance behavior, then entered into lottery

Safety behaviors, accident reduction, improved sales or work performance

Geller et al. (1982), Putnam et al. (2003), Roberts and Fanurik (1986), Saari and Latham (1982) (All TS)

    Team competition

Groups compete on some task, performance, or game

Improved academic engagement/achievement, reduced disruptive behavior, increased sales, fund raising, and safety; reduced smoking; changed brain chemistry favoring attention and endurance

Beersma et al. (2003); Hoigaard et al. (2006), Kivlighan and Granger (2006), Koffman et al. (1998), Neave and Wolfson (2003) (All TS, and one naturalistic study)

    Contingent music

Music played or stopped in real time, based on observed behavior of the individual or group

Increased weight gain of babies, improved baby development possibly, work performance, academic achievement, attention and focus (ADHD symptoms down); reduced aggression

Allen and Bryant (1985), Barmann and Croyle-Barmann (1980), Barmann et al. (1980), Bellamy and Sontag (1973), Blumenfeld and Eisenfeld (2006), Cevasco and Grant (2005), Cook and Freethy (1973), Cotter (1971), Davis et al. (1980), Dellatan (2003), Deutsch et al. (1976), Eisenstein (1974), Harding and Ballard (1982), Hill et al. (1989), Holloway (1980), Hume and Crossman (1992), Jorgenson (1974), Larson and Ayllon (1990), Madsen (1982), McCarty et al. (1978), McLaughlin and Helm (1993), Standley (1996, 1999), Wilson (1976), Wolfe (1982) (All TS)

    Special play

Adult (caregiver or teacher) plays with the child, but lets the child lead in determining what games will be played and how

Improved stress physiology, compliance, and social competence; reduced trauma or depressive symptoms

Bratton et al. (2005) (Meta analysis)

    Choral responding

Person(s) chant or sign answer to oral or visual prompt in unison; praise/correction follows

Compared to hand raising, improved academic achievement, disruptive symptoms, retention; reduced behavior problems

Godfrey et al. (2003), Kamps et al. (1994), Taubman et al. (2001), Wolery et al. (1992) (All TS)

    Mystery shopper

Unknown individuals make “purchase” or “help request”, and target receives praise, reinforcement or corrective feedback

Reduced tobacco sales; improved customer relations; better sales, better compliance by pharmacists, better service from medical personnel or prevention personnel

Bennett et al. (2003), Borfitz (2001), Krevor et al. (2003), Lowndes and Dawes (2001), Moore (1984), Norris (2002), Saunders (2005), Steiner (1986), Sykes and O’Sullivan (2006) (All TS)

    Peer-to-peer tutoring

Dyad or triad take turns asking questions, give praise or points and corrective feedback

Improved academics, reduced ADHD/conduct problems, and long-term effects on school engagement decreased special education needs

Allsopp (1997), Delquadri et al. (1983), DuPaul et al. (1998), Fantuzzo and Ginsburg-Block (1998), Greenwood (1991a, b), Maheady et al. (1988a, b), Sideridis et al. (1997) (Both TS and RCT)

    Computer action game

Motor response to hit target or get right answer; visual/auditory feedback for correct response, with scoreboard

Increased attention and reduced ADHD like symptoms, which is associated with release of dopamine in the brain

Aase and Sagvolden (2006), Ford et al. (1993), Green and Bavelier (2003), Koepp et al. (1998), Silva (1999) (TS, and TS mixed with randomized conditions)

    Correspondence training, “Say-Do”

Symbolic or live models typically represented with a language frame; others elicit what individual says will do and reinforcement follows

Increased rates of targeted behaviors such as academic engagement, disturbing behavior or self-care behaviors

Anderson and Merrett (1997), Luciano et al. (2001), Luciano-Soriano et al. (2000) (TS)

    Correspondence training, “Do-Say”

Symbolic or live models typically presented. Cues for behavior and reports by individual to others followed by praise/reinforcement

Increased rates of targeted behaviors such as academics, self-care or other developmental/life skill tasks

Merrett and Merrett (1997), Morrison et al. (2002), Roca and Gross (1996) (TS)

Kernels decreasing frequency of behavior

    Time out

Using timer, remove from natural reinforcement for 1 min + 1 min for each year of age

Decreases non-compliance, argumentative behavior and mood outbursts

Fabiano et al. (2004), Kazdin (1980), Wolf et al. (1967) (TS)

    Sit and watch, contingent observation or response lock out

Very brief removal from reinforcement (2 min or less), with high-density reinforcement upon reentry for desired behavior

Reduces disruptions in classroom, aggression on playground or during physical education, reduces dangerous behavior

Embry (1982, 1984), Murphy et al. (1983), Porterfield et al. (1976), White and Bailey (1990) (TS)

    Taxes on consumptive behaviors

Percent of purchase price of goods (cigarettes, alcohol, luxury

Increasing taxation on liquor or tobacco reduces consumption

Biglan et al. (2004) (TS)

    Positive note home for inhibition

Adult sends home positive note for inhibition that results in home reward

Reduces disruptive and aggressive behavior and problems at home; increases engagement at school

Gupta et al. (1990), Hutton (1983), Kelley et al. (1988), McCain and Kelley (1993), Taylor et al. (1984) (TS)

    Timed rewards for inhibition (DRO)

Using fixed or variable interval, person receives praise and reward for not engaging in a behavior

Reduces ADHD symptoms, conduct problems, accidental attention to negative; increases engagement in prosocial activities

Conyers et al. (2003), Conyers et al. (2004), Hegel and Ferguson (2000) (TS)

    Premack principle

The opportunity to engage in a high-probability behavior is made contingent engaging in a targeted behavior or on the inhibition of problematic behavior

Decreases ADHD like behavior, inattention, disruptive behavior, non-compliance

Agathon and Granjus (1976), Andrews (1970), Browder et al. (1984), Ghosh and Chattopadhyay (1993), Gonzalez and Ribes (1975), Harrison and Schaeffer (1975), Homme et al. (1963), Hosie et al. (1974), Knapp (1976), Leclerc and Thurston (2003), Mazur (1975), McMorrow et al. (1978), Van Hevel and Hawkins (1974), Welsh et al. (1992), Williamson (1984) (TS)

    Response-cost (point loss)

Small symbolic reward removed or debited, non-emotionally, quickly following targeted behavior

Decreases inattention and disruption; decreases ADHD like behaviors; may if used as a part of teams in first grade decrease substance abuse over lifetime

Conyers et al. (2004), Filcheck et al. (2004), Furr-Holden et al. (2004), Jason et al. (2005), Jorgensen and Pedersen (2005), Kellam and Anthony (1998), Kelley and McCain (1995), McGoey and DuPaul (2000), Storr et al. (2002) (TS and RCT with other embedded kernels)

    Low emotion or “private” reprimands

Corrective feedback given without biological cues of threat or intense emotion; short rather than long reprimands are typically of more effective ones

Reduces inattention, disruptions, aggression; reduces emotional responding by adults, including attention to negative behavior

Abramowitz et al. (1987, 1988), Acker and O’Leary (1987), Harris et al. (2003), Houghton et al. (1990), Maglieri et al. (2000), Merrett and Tang (1994), Ostrower and Ziv (1982), Pfiffner et al. (1985), Piazza et al. (1999), Rolider and Van Houten (1984), Scholer et al. (2006), Van Houten et al. (1982) (All TS)

    Stop clock

Clock triggered when students misbehave. Lower times on the clock result in access to rewards

Increased academic engagement and reduced disruptions

Cowen et al. (1979) (TS)

    Law enforcement fine or citation

Fine or ticket given for relatively minor non-compliant behavior

Reduces tobacco possession, illegal water use, parking in handicap spots

Agras et al. (1980), de Waard and Rooijers (1994), Fletcher (1995), Jason et al. (2000, 2005), Jorgensen and Pedersen (2005), Liberman et al. (1975) (TS and RCT)

    Over-correction or positive practice

Person repeats restorative or correct behavior many times

Reduces symptoms of developmental delay; reduces aggression or noncompliance; may reduce accidental attention to negative behavior

Carey and Bucher (1986), Foxx and Jones (1978), Lennox et al. (1988), Maag et al. (1986), Singh (1987), Singh and Singh (1988), Sisson et al. (1993), Sumner et al. (1974), Watson (1993) (All TS)

    Buzzer/noise training

A buzzer or noxious noise happens upon some undesired behavior

Reduces non seatbelt use, bedwetting, walking through unauthorized door or driving on shoulder of road

Ankjaer-Jensen and Sejr (1994), Collins (1973), Crisp et al. (1984), Hirasing and Reus (1991), Meadow (1977), Robertson (1975), Robertson and Haddon (1974) (All TS)

Kernels affecting behaviors primarily via antecedents

Non-verbal transition cues

Visual, kinesthetic and/or auditory cues to single shift attention or task in patterned way, with praise or occasional rewards

Reduces dawdling, increases time on task or engaged learning; gives more time for instruction

Abbott et al. (1998), Embry et al. (1996), Krantz and Risley (1977), Rosenkoetter and Fowler (1986), (TS plus RCT with other embedded kernels)

Stop lights in school settings or traffic settings

Traffic light signals when behavior is appropriate/desirable or inappropriate/undesirable in real time, and connected to a kind of occasional reinforcement

Decreases noise, off task behavior, or increases stopping in dangerous intersections

Cox et al. (2000), Jason and Liotta (1982), Jason et al. (1985), Lawshe (1940), Medland and Stachnik (1972), Van Houten and Malenfant (1992), Van Houten and Retting (2001), Wasserman (1977) (All TS)

Boundary cues and railings

These may be lines or other cues such as ropes or rails that signal where behavior is safe, acceptable or desired

Decreases dangerous behavior; decreases pushing and shoving; increases waiting behavior in a queue; reduces falls

Carlsson and Lundkvist (1992), Erkal and Safak (2006), Marshall et al. (2005), Nedas et al. (1982), Sorock (1988) (All TS)

Cooperative, structured peer play

Planned activities during children playtime and involve rules, turn taking, social competencies, and cooperation with/without “soft competition”

Decreases aggression/increases social competence; affects BMI, reduces ADHD symptoms and increases academics after; reduces social rejection in M.S.

Bay-Hinitz et al. (1994), Leff et al. (2004), Mikami et al. (2005), Murphy et al. (1983), Ridgway et al. (2003) (TS and RCT)

Self-modeling

Drawn, photographic, or video model viewer/listener engaging targeted behavior, receiving rewards or recognition

Increases academic engagement; increases attention; increases recall and long term memory; improves behavior; reduces dangerous behavior; increases social competence; improved sports performance; reduced health problems

Barker and Jones (2006), Ben Shalom (2000), Bray and Kehle (2001), Buggey (2005), Clare et al. (2000), Clark et al. (1992, 1993), Clement (1986), Davis (1979), Dowrick (1999), Dowrick et al. (2006), Elegbeleye (1994), Hartley et al. (1998, 2002), Hitchcock et al. (2004), Houlihan et al. (1995), Kahn et al. (1990), Kehle et al. (2002), Law and Ste-Marie (2005), Lonnecker et al. (1994), Meharg and Lipsker (1991), Meharg and Woltersdorf (1990), Owusu-Bempah and Howitt (1983, 1985), Possell et al. (1999), Ram and McCullagh (2003), Reamer et al. (1998), Rickards-Schlichting et al. (2004), Rickel and Fields (1983), Schunk and Hanson (1989), Schwartz et al. (1997), Walker and Clement (1992), Wedel and Fowler (1984), Woltersdorf (1992) (All TS)

Self-monitoring

Coding target behavior with a relational frame, which is often charted or graphed for public or semi-public display, occasioning verbal praise from others

Reductions in alcohol, tobacco use; reductions in illness symptoms from diabetes; increased school achievement; changes in other social competencies or health behaviors; reductions in ADHD, Tourettes and other DSM-IV disorder; improvement in brain injured persons

Agran et al. (2005), Blick and Test (1987), Boyle and Hughes (1994), Brown and Frank (1990), Buggey (1995, 1999), Burch et al. (1987), Carr and Punzo (1993), Cavalier et al. (1997), Clare et al. (2000), Clarke et al. (2001), Dalton et al. (1999), de Haas-Warner (1991), Foxx and Axelroth (1983), Glasgow et al. (1983a, b), Gray and Shelton (1992), Hall and Zentall (2000), Harris et al. (2005), Hertz and McLaughlin (1990), Hitchcock et al. (2004), Hughes et al. (2002), Kern et al. (1994), Martella et al. (1993), Mathes and Bender (1997), McCarl et al. (1991), McDougall and Brady (1995), McLaughlin et al. (1985), Nakano (1990), O’Reilly et al. (2002), Petscher and Bailey (2006), Possell et al. (1999), Rock (2005), Selznick and Savage (2000), Shabani et al. (2001), Shimabukuro et al. (1999), Stecker et al. (1996), Thomas et al. (1971), Todd et al. (1999), Trammel et al. (1994), Winn et al. (2004), Wood et al. (1998, 2002) (TS & RCT, latter most from medical studies)

Paragraph shrinking

After hearing or seeing some content, person learns to “shrink” meaning to eight to ten words, full sentence; praise typically happens for good summaries

Improved reading responses and retention

Bean and Steenwyk (1984), Mathes et al. (1994), Spencer et al. (2003) (TS)

Errorless discrimination training

Stimuli are faded or shaped in such a way that errors are nearly non-existent

Improved reading, letter recognition and life-task discriminations; reductions in symptoms of mental retardation or brain injury

Akhtar et al. (2006), Egeland and Winer (1974), Etzel and LeBlanc (1979), Fillingham et al. (2003), Hunkin et al. (1998), Keel and Gast (1992), Lambert (1979), Melchiori et al. (1992), Plummer et al. (1977), Schilmoeller et al. (1979), Stawar (1978), Terrace (1969), Walsh and Lamberts (1979) (TS)

Kernels affecting behaviors primarily via relational frames

Adjectival noun for belonging to status group

Verbal phrase “I am/we _____” is paired with status, belonging, protection or safety

Increased rule governed behavior; increases behavior associated with the named group; decreases aggression within group; may affect physical health

Choenarom et al. (2005), Embry et al. (1996), Gaskell and Smith (1986), Juarez (2002), Mishima (2003) (RCT)

Public commitment

Individuals sign or pledge self to collective behavior

Voting, contributing money, recycling

Burgess et al. (2000), Chen and Komorita (1994), Wang and Katzev (1990)

“US” and “THEM” role framing

Individuals or groups divided into two groups, with differences framed by clothing, adornment, language, social position, etc.

Increase aggression and violence by each group toward each other

Roos (2005), Sherif (1958, 1968, 1970), Sherif, Hogg and Abrams (2001), Sherif et al. (1955) (RCT)

Graphic/node maps

A graphic organizer for goal-based behavior, guided by other status individuals

Increased sobriety and goal completion; increased treatment compliance

Collier et al. (2001), Czuchry and Dansereau (1996, 1999, 2003), Czuchry et al. (1995), Dansereau et al. (1993, 1995), Dees et al. (1994), Joe et al. (1994, 1997), Melville et al. (2004), Newbern et al. (1999, 2005), Pitre et al. (1996, 1997, 1998) (RCT)

MI

Oral or written questions by status individual (or on paper) around major goals of target person with clarifying questions about interfering behavior

Reduced substance abuse, increased social competence & related goals; reduced injuries or antisocial behavior; increase in healthy behaviors, increase achievement

Cohen et al. (2006), Bernstein et al. (2005), Burke et al. (2003), Monti et al. (1999), Resnicow et al. (2001), Rusch and Corrigan (2002), Smith (2004), Sobell et al. (2003), Stein et al. (2006) (RCT)

Media associating behavior with immediate negative social outcomes

Media (TV, video, radio) showing behavior results in social rejection or escape from social rejection

Reduces sexually transmitted diseases; reduces alcohol, tobacco and other drug use

Beyth-Marom et al. (1993), Downs et al. (2004), Pechmann (2001), Pechmann and Ratneshwar (1994), Pechmann et al. (2003) (RCT)

Kernels affecting behaviors primarily via physiology

Pleasant greeting with or without positive physical touch

Friendly physical and verbal gestures, on a frequent basis

Affects donations; social status an perceptions of safety or harm; affects behavior streams of aggression, hostility or politeness

Edwards and Johnston (1977), Ferguson (1976), Field (1999), Fry (1987), Howard (1990), La Greca and Santogrossi (1980), Schloss et al. (1984) (TS)

Massage, brushing or stroking

Any method of rubbing, stroking and therapeutic touch applied to the body

Reduces aggression, arousal, cortisol, depressive symptoms, PTSD symptoms, and pain

Diego et al. (2002), Field et al. (1996a, b, c, d), Field (1998), Jones et al. (1998), Scafidi and Field (1996) (RCT)

Turtle technique

Using a turtle metaphor, child holds self, verbal frame, breaths through nose, and engage in sub-verbal or verbal self-coaching, with peer or adult reinforcement

Reduces arousal and aggression against peers or adults

Heffner et al. (2003), Robin et al. (1976) (TS plus embedded in RCT with other kernels)

Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation or increased fish consumption

1–3 g taken orally per day; or fish consumption several times per week high in omega-3

Reduces aggression, violence, depression, bipolar disorder, post-partum depression and borderline personality disorder; early evidence for reducing symptoms of developmental disorders; and for reducing CVD and asthma

Fava (2001), Freeman et al. (2006), Gesch et al. (2002), Hibbeln et al. (2006), Jarvinen et al. (2006), Mickleborough et al. (2006), Richardson (2006), Stoll et al. (2000), Vaddadi (2006), Zanarini and Frankenburg (2003) (RCT)

Zinc supplementation or dietary consumption

15 mg/day eaten or supplemented

Evolving evidence finds the addition of zinc to the diet or by supplementation to increase the effectiveness of drug treatment and/or may prevent ADHD symptoms

Akhondzadeh et al. (2004), Arnold et al. (2005), Arnold and DiSilvestro (2005), Bilici et al. (2004), McGee et al. (1990), Sandyk (1990) (RCT)

“Rough and tumble” free play with higher status conspecific

Several times per week child or adolescent engages in rough and tumble play, causing increased arousal and self-control mediated by status adult or peer

Reduces aggression, teaches self-control, may improve status among same-sex peers; changes c-fos gene expression in lab animals; the behavior may be especially important to the development of positive behavior among boys and unique contribution of fathering

Boulton and Smith (1989), Gordon et al. (2002), Hines and Kaufman (1994), Jacklin et al. (1984), Paquette (2004), Pellegrini and Smith (1998), Reed and Brown (2001), Scott and Panksepp (2003) (RCT, TS and ethology studies)

Aerobic play or behavior

Daily or many times per week child or adult engage running or similar aerobic solitary activities, game, or food gathering behavior

Reduces ADHD symptoms, reduces depression; reduces stress hormones; may increase cognitive function; decreases PTSD

Antunes et al. (2005), Atlantis et al. (2004), Berlin et al. (2006), Blue (1979), Blumenthal et al. (2005), Crews et al. (2004), Doyne et al. (1983), Dunn et al. (2001, 2005), Dustman et al. (1984), Khatri et al. (2001), Kubesch et al. (2003), Manger and Motta (2005), Marin and Menza (2005), Phillips et al. (2003), Stein (2005), Stella et al. (2005) (TS and RCT)

Nasal breathing

When aroused, person breaths through nose, not mouth

Reduces panic, anxiety and hostility; may improve cognitive function; changes core temp of limbic area

Backon (1990), Block et al. (1989) (RCT)

Progressive muscle relaxation

Person tenses and relaxes sequence of muscles combined with anxiety evoking stimulus

Reduces panic, fear, anxiety; decreases negative attributions; decreases phobic responses with paired with evoking stimuli

Larsson et al. (2005), Norlander et al. (2005), Pawlow and Jones (2005), Wencai et al. (2005) (RCT)

TS, time-series; RCT, randomized control trial

Designating Example Kernels for This Paper

The 52 kernels presented in Table 1 are not exhaustive; they are simply examples that meet the definition of a kernel from the four types. That is, the kernel has one or more peer-reviewed experimental studies showing behavior change. We are aware of many more kernels; the more kernels we identified, the more we found others. Because of the yearlong process that gave rise to the need for and idea denominating the active ingredients of evidence-based prevention and a book about the science of preventing problems of adolescence (Biglan et al. 2004), many of the 52 kernels were evident to us at first blush because of our own published studies and that of our colleagues on parenting, violence prevention, substance abuse prevention, etc.; others we chose deliberately to illustrate the potential theoretical diversity of kernels—an interesting point in itself, exemplified by reactions to early drafts of the paper. Some early readers were delighted to see the inclusion of examples from behavior analysis, yet chaffed at the physiological kernels such as omega-3 and massage—despite the scientific evidence available for each. Others objected to behavioral procedures, arguing that behavioral procedures were proven to be ineffective—despite studies showing otherwise. We are aware that any given professional community might disagree with the theoretical approach of another professional group, yet a taxonomy of kernels begins to elucidate how, where, when, for whom, and for what scientifically proven strategies might be more or less beneficial in influencing human behavior. We imagine that a database of kernels will emerge, much like the human genome project (i.e., http://genomics.energy.gov/) wherein the breadth, depth, magnitude, and replications of the effects of any given kernel might be reported by the international research community in order to build an open-source molecular technology of behavioral influence. The arbitrary selection of the 52 kernels in this paper illustrates the possibility of a rich “behaviornome” type project for fundamental units of behavioral influence. Subsequent paragraphs detail examples of four types of kernels for influencing behavior from Table 1, as a proof of concept from 52 experimentally demonstrated kernels.

Kernels Altering Consequences for Behavior

Increasing Rate or Probability of Behavior

Many kernels increase behavior by mobilizing reinforcement for the targeted behavior. These include vocal praise, written praise notes, prize bowls, and public posting of feedback about the rate of a targeted behavior. Each delivers positive consequences contingent on a behavior. In the case of public posting of feedback, it is necessary that the recipients of the post in some sense want to increase the behavior recorded in the postings. An example of a powerful yet simple reinforcement kernel involves writing positive notes to increase behavior. Written praise notes from a supervisor increase work performance (Nordstrom et al. 1988), notes written by a teacher to students increase academic success (Hickey et al. 1979), and notes from students to each other increase social competence (Skinner et al. 2000).

We also put special play with parents in this category. It involves adults letting the child lead in free play activities (Webster-Stratton and Reid 2007). Its purpose is to facilitate interactions in which parents do not command, criticize, or unduly restrict activities of the child and allow the child to engage in fantasy play with the parent. Such interactions presumably are reinforcing for parent and child; the child receives the undivided attention of the parent contingent on cooperative play, and the parent experiences cooperative and pleasant interactions with the child contingent on listening to the child and following the child’s lead.

Decrease Behavior by Altering Consequences

Other procedures alter consequences in order to decrease the frequency or probability of a behavior. Some involve ensuring an undesirable behavior does not elicit reinforcement. Timeout is one such procedure. Rewarding behavior incompatible with the undesirable behavior is another.

A third set (ostensibly designed to decelerate behavior rates) involves delivering aversive consequences for a certain behavior—traditionally termed punishment. However, many so-called punishments (e.g., lengthy grounding, mandatory minimum sentences) have no beneficial effect and, in fact, cause harm (Sampson and Laub 1994). Indeed, a major challenge for many parenting programs is getting parents to be less punitive. Thus, in developing procedures to make aversive consequences contingent upon behavior, we must evaluate them carefully to ensure they are effective and have few side effects.

Fining is an example of a negative consequence affecting behavior. Agras et al. (1980) found that receiving a fine reduced individual, but not business, water wastage. Fletcher (1995) found that fines for parking in disabled-reserved spaces notably decreased the behavior.

Kernels Altering Behavior Through Antecedents

Many kernels work by establishing the functions of antecedents to behavior. A common example in schools is teachers establishing signals to guide transitions (Marion and Muza 1998; Rosenkoetter and Fowler 1986; West et al. 1995). For example, many teachers turn lights off and on to signal students to return to their seats and become quiet and attentive. Of course, positive consequences (e.g., praise) are involved in establishing effectiveness of the stimulus, but once established, the salient feature is the influence of the light on the behavior.

Assigning students meaningful roles (Rutter 1981), such as setting up equipment for an assembly, taking roll, or taking photographs for communicating desirable school functions, are activities that organize useful behavior. Antecedents may also include organized playground activities to reduce aggressive behavior and occasion various social competencies (Murphy et al. 1983). Reinforcement follows naturally from the enactment of the role.

It would be arbitrary to classify antecedent interventions based upon whether they increase or decrease behavior. This is because antecedents that prompt a desired behavior simultaneously make troublesome behavior less likely.

Kernels Altering Behavior by Influencing Relational Responding

Tradition within psychology suggests it is unfeasible to deal with cognitive and emotional influences on behavior within a basic behavioral framework of antecedents and consequences. However, recent work on relational frame theory (Hayes et al. 2001) has shown that human cognitive and verbal behavior can be understood in terms of basic operant processes, while honoring that humans do appear to have unique evolutionarily selected brain structures supporting language. To the extent this is true, it provides a parsimonious account of complex human functioning within a contextualist framework focusing on manipulable influences on behavior (Biglan and Hayes 1996).

Research on Relational Responding

There is growing evidence that a fundamental feature of human cognitive or verbal processes is the relating of stimuli (Barnes et al. 2000). Because this analysis is a recent development and likely to be unfamiliar to most readers, we will elaborate on it here. Barnes et al. (2000) present a theoretical analysis of relational responding. According to them, relating stimuli is the core feature of verbal behavior. Perhaps the most rudimentary relational responding involves naming. At the beginning of learning language, young children learn to say names for objects and separately learn to orient to objects when they hear their names. Each response is operant behavior reinforced by consequences such as attention, praise, and gaining of an object. After multiple experiences of this sort, however, a child also learns that if an object has a name, the name also goes with the object. In other words, they become able to derive the mutual entailment of name to object and object to name. Further experiences like this enable children to derive relations that are more complex. For example, learning that a puppy is a kind of dog and that Buddy is a puppy, a child is able to derive that Buddy is a dog. We call this ability to derive relations between two stimuli based on their relations with a third stimulus combinatorial entailment.

The third defining feature of relational responding is the transformation of function. Humans’ derivation of relations among stimuli can transform the functions of stimuli that participate in the relation. For example, discovering that one coin is worth more than another makes the coin more reinforcing. Learning that water has bacilli in it may have no impact on a child, but upon learning that bacilli are germs, and that germs can you make you sick, a child’s reaction to the water changes.

A fourth defining feature of relational responding is arbitrary applicability. Many of the relations we learn arise from physical relations among stimuli. For example, smaller than and larger than are terms based on the relative size of objects. However, humans become able to relate stimuli in these terms even though the stimuli do not have physical features involving relative size. If you hear that one person has a bigger heart than another person does, you may expect that person to be kinder, even though you understand that his heart is not literally larger.

For theorists accustomed to the panoply of existing cognitive constructs, which admittedly do a good job of predicting much human behavior, the value of this analysis may be obscure. Its value lies in providing a direct analysis of the specific procedures that influence relational responding and thereby transform the functions of stimuli.

Increasing Behavior by Altering Relational Responding

Perhaps the simplest and most important procedures of this type are those that augment the value of stimuli by influencing people to relate them to stimuli they already value. If we tell children they can stay up a half hour more if they get five stickers, we change their valuing of the stickers. In essence, any procedures influencing people to relate a stimulus with stimuli they already value make that stimulus more reinforcing. Prevention and treatment scientists, unlike marketing professionals, are often unfamiliar with relational responding.

One example of relational responding involves branding to influence behavior (Fischer et al. 1991). A recent study shows that children preferred foods “branded” as McDonald’s (logos, wrapping papers, etc.), even for carrots, which McDonald’s does not sell (Robinson et al. 2007). Another example of branding is the introduction to the PeaceBuilders program (Embry et al. 1996). It used kernels like peer-to-peer praise/tootle notes and positive notes home to establish the word PeaceBuilder as a valued concept and to make being a PeaceBuilder—and all behaviors later related to this concept—more reinforcing. The program improved social competence and reduced aggression and injuries due to violence (Flannery et al. 2003; Krug et al. 1997). Biglan and colleagues recently completed a study showing that pairing fun social activities for middle-schoolers with a non-smoking brand (f2b—for Freedom to Breathe) reduced smoking among students even when the program had little overt antitobacco content (Gordon et al. 2008).

Another example of a kernel using relational responding involves public commitment. When people publicly commit to engage in a behavior, they are more likely to follow through on the behavior (e.g., Burn and Oskamp 1986). The public oath makes behavior inconsistent with that pledge aversive due to expected disapproval for failing to follow through with the promise.

In self-modeling, the professional helps to create a story about a person’s behavior (Hosford 1980); the person typically participates in the process. The story embeds a person’s self in a set of relations with desired behaviors and attributes (e.g., depicting a child as a hero at school or home for helping bring about peaceful behaviors; Embry et al. 1996). A child might learn a series of self-help skills through photographs or video (Hartley et al. 1998), making the child more apt to relate engaging in the behavior with valued ideas, such as being a “PeaceBuilder” (Embry et al. 1996).

Motivational interviewing (MI) is a powerful example of relational responding. MI may seem complex, yet we believe that subdividing it would destroy its effects. In MI, the interviewer prompts a person to discuss a topic he or she generally avoids (e.g., one’s drinking patterns and difficulties associated with them; Bernstein et al. 2005; McCambridge and Strang 2004; Miller et al. 1988). The interviewer is warm and accepting as the person talks but asks questions designed to put the person in psychological contact with negative consequences of his/her behavior and the possible benefits of changing the behavior. It is clear this process has reinforcing and antecedent features, but the most salient aspect of the process seems to be that it alters the way people relate their problematic behavior to negative consequences and the possible alternatives to more reinforcing consequences. In other words, MI changes people’s networks of relations in ways that make some behaviors more, and others less, desirable. Although most treatment professionals are familiar with complex forms of MI, very brief, scientifically validated forms do exist (McCambridge and Strang 2004)—including just 15 min (Cohen et al. 2006).

Decreasing Behavior by Altering Relational Responding

Some behavior–influence procedures discourage behavior by prompting a person to relate the behavior to aversive stimuli. In general, any procedure that prompts a person to relate undesirable behavior to negatively valenced stimuli would qualify as such a procedure—provided there was experimental evidence of its effect. For example, media associating drug use with negative outcomes have sometimes been shown to reduce drug use (Palmgreen et al. 1995). Messages suggesting that youth’s peers will reject them for smoking affects their motivation to use tobacco (Pechmann and Knight 2002; Pechmann et al. 2003).

Kernels Altering Behavior Through Physiological Interventions

Finally, some procedures primarily affect physiological behavior. For centuries, humans have altered their health and mood by manipulating physiological states. Anthropological and archeological literatures are replete with examples (Lalramnghinglova 1999; Rajan et al. 2002; Rodrigues 2006; Spindler 1995). Hunters and gatherers often consume plants with stimulant properties, apparently since they confer an advantage during tasks such as hunting, which requires sustained effort and attention. Modern humans have similar reasons for using caffeine.

The impact of omega-3 fatty acid is a particularly important example of a physiological kernel (Olafsdottir et al. 2005). We use this example because of its exemplary laboratory, epidemiological, and randomized control studies across many domains of prevention, intervention, and treatment. Aside from epidemiological research on the relationships of omega-3 fatty acid (n-3) to a wide variety of causes of morbidity and mortality (Hibbeln 2001), experimental and quasi-experimental studies find supplementation of omega-3 reduces violent aggression among men (Gesch et al. 2002). Its use also reduces depression or bipolar disorder (Mischoulon and Fava 2000; Stoll et al. 1999; Sund et al. 2003) and other health or public health concerns, such as low birth weight and offspring IQ (Helland et al. 2003). Although not yet proven, omega-3 may even alleviate some of the problems associated with poverty, since poorer people have diets lower in omega-3 (Egeland et al. 2001; Liu et al. 2004).

Another intervention affecting behavior through direct impact on physiology is deep breathing, shown to reduce anxiety, arousal, and aggression among all ages (Appels et al. 1997; DiFilippo and Overholser 1999; Peck et al. 2005; Sharma et al. 2005; Suzuki et al. 2000). Zinc supplementation may reduce or moderate ADHD symptoms (Arnold et al. 2005; Bilici et al. 2004). We include a variety of strategies that enhance self-regulation in aroused states such as “rough and tumble” play and related martial arts training for children, as studies have shown it to reduce children’s aggressive behavior (Bjorklund and Brown 1998; Paquette 2004; Pellegrini 1992; Shannon et al. 2002) and the mechanism appears to involve alteration of brain chemistry (Panksepp et al. 2003; Siviy et al. 1996; Taylor et al. 1986). The martial arts studies with children show improved self-regulation, less aggression, and positive mood along with decreased impulsiveness (Lakes and Hoyt 2004; Palermo et al. 2006; Twemlow and Sacco 1998; Zivin et al. 2001), though student self-report may show less change than classroom teacher reports (McDiarmid 2008).

The distinction between biological and environmental interventions is not certain. Of course, any environmental manipulation may influence biological functioning. Below we discuss interventions that directly manipulate biological processes instead of changing psychological or behavioral functioning.

Although many pharmacological agents alter behavior and meet our definition of a kernel, the substantial literature on these influences is beyond the scope of this paper. Moreover, unlike nutritional supplements and nasal breathing, FDA-approved pharmacological agents require prescriptions; thus, they would not be available to most prevention practitioners or consumers directly.

Prevention scientists, oriented toward the implementation of programs, may overlook physiological interventions. Publications about these kernels are not in journals devoted to behavioral science but more likely to appear in medical, public health, or specialty journals. However, the evidence for them suggests that treatment and prevention scientists should pay greater attention to the reciprocal relationships between physiology and behaviors.

Types of Experimental Evidence Supporting Kernels

We define kernels as procedures shown empirically to affect a behavior. In keeping with the Society for Prevention Research Standards of Evidence (Flay et al. 2004), our criteria for empirical support include RCTs and interrupted time-series designs in which a procedure’s impact is evaluated on a repeated measure of target behavior. Most evaluations of kernels have been via interrupted time-series designs, while some, such as omega-3 impact, have been in randomized trials. Some have undergone evaluation both ways. Some studies measured generalizability of results across time, behaviors, people, or places; others measured only proximal or immediate effects.

Many kernels result from interplay between basic and applied research. Variable interval or ratio contingency management kernels (e.g., Mystery Motivator, Prize Bowl) have roots in animal (Ferster and Skinner 1957) then human (Majovski and Clement 1977) research. Researchers next conducted clinical studies using interrupted time series (Henderson et al. 1986; Leibowitz 1975; Libb et al. 1973; Madaus et al. 2003; Moore et al. 1994; Robinson and Sheridan 2000; Snell and Cole 1976) and formal RCTs (Petry et al. 2004, 2005).

Physiological kernels have a similar scientific trajectory. For example, the understanding of omega-3 (n-3) has roots in early epidemiological or forensic inquiries showing differences among individuals with diseases or disorders (Anderson and Connor 1989; Gudbjarnason et al. 1991; Lieber et al. 1969; Rudin 1981). Initial epidemiological findings (Hibbeln 1998, 2001, 2002) prompted precision-oriented laboratory studies (Hibbeln et al. 1998; Hibbeln and Salem 1995) and larger epidemiological inquiries. All this work led to clinical trials evaluating omega-3 supplementation (Nemets et al. 2002; Sund et al. 2003; Zanarini and Frankenburg 2003).

The frequent use of interrupted time-series designs in developing kernels deserves further comment. It reflects not simply an arbitrary methodological preference but an incremental, inductive, bottom-up strategy to build effective behavior–influence practices. Kernels are of necessity simple steps targeting a behavior one can easily measure repeatedly; it is thus easy to implement interrupted time-series designs. Single-subject studies are quite robust in terms of reducing threats to validity (Sidman 1960) and in answering questions of whether a particular medication, procedure, or process is efficacious in changing the behavior of a person or small group of persons (e.g., families, classrooms, and organizations; Dadds et al. 1984; Greenwood and Matyas 1990; Mayer et al. 1983; McGrath et al. 1987; Reagles and O’Neill 1977). Such interrupted time-series designs are not limited to evaluating individuals but are often the choice for evaluating policy impact on large, important social issues (Briscoe et al. 1975; Hayes and Cone 1977; Wagenaar et al. 1988). One may summarize interrupted time-series designs effectively via effect sizes and meta-analyses (Campbell 2004; Stage and Quiroz 1997).

An important limitation on current understanding of kernels is that we have relatively little information about situations in which they will be effective and those in which they will not be effective. Further research should explore the range of situations in which given kernels work and seek to develop a theory of the relationship between situations and the efficacy of kernels.

The Utility of Kernels

Disseminating Effective Behavior–influence Practices

If our ultimate public health goal is to minimize the prevalence of behavioral and psychological problems and improve wellbeing, then increasing the prevalence of effective behavior–influence practices is essential. Disseminating kernels could be an important supplement to current reliance on program dissemination for achieving this outcome. Kernels have most features that Rogers (1995) identified as important in fostering dissemination. He observed that people are more likely to adopt and implement a practice if it is simple and easily tested, its effects are readily observable, it appears to offer an advantage over existing practices, it addresses an important problem, and it is compatible with existing practices.

Most kernels are quite simple and consist of an easily tested, low-cost activity. Moreover, it is usually possible to observe their immediate impact on a person’s behavior; it does not require statistical analysis of groups of individuals. As a result, the person who tries a kernel is likely to observe immediate benefit, which will likely reinforce its use. Finally, as the list of kernels in Table 1 shows, most kernels affect behaviors important to change agents.

As noted above, even if empirically supported programs were widely disseminated, numerous behavior–influence interactions in society would fall outside the scope of existing programs. For example, programs may teach social competencies to avoid aggressive behavior (Taylor et al. 1999) but teachers and youth leaders need ways to structure interactions among youth so that prompts for aggressive behavior decrease. Cooperative games (Murphy et al. 1983); peer-to-peer tootle/praise notes (Embry et al. 1996; Mayer et al. 1983, 1993; Skinner et al. 2000); the principal’s lottery or preferrals (Thorpe et al. 1978, 1979); and non-verbal transition cues (Abbott et al. 1998; Embry et al. 1996; Krantz and Risley 1977; Rosenkoetter and Fowler 1986) are easy to build into daily school or afterschool routines. They can also structure student interactions to minimize prompts to engage in aggression. If we widely disseminated kernels to behavior–influence agents (e.g., teachers, therapists, youth leaders, human service workers, and parents), it could result in effective behavior support practices being more widely used than if we waited for these agents to generalize good practices from programs that they were trained to use in specific situations.

Glasgow et al. (1999) proposed the RE-AIM framework for thinking about the long-term public health effects of interventions. They argue that the benefit of a practice is a function of its Reach times its Efficacy. However, even an efficacious intervention that reaches many people will have limited impact over time, unless it is Adopted, Implemented, and Maintained. From this standpoint, kernels supplement program dissemination strategies because their readily observed benefits (efficacy) make them prone for adoption and maintenance and because they will increase the reach of beneficial behavior–influence practices since there are kernels relevant to so many situations.

A recent RCT of a media version of Triple P (Positive Parenting Program(s); Sanders et al. 2000) illustrates this point. Behavioral parenting skills programs consist largely of kernels (e.g., timeout, praise, and special play). Parents who go through such programs learn several important behavior–influence strategies. However, the reach of these programs is limited, due to administration costs and costs in time and money to participants. Triple P’s media version reflects the recognition that a population-based impact may be greater if specific kernels of effective parenting practice can reach large numbers of parents. Preliminary data from this 18-county RCT showed that the promotion of “kernel-like” parenting practices through media, tip sheets, and brief, structured interactions reached about 25% of the population in intervention counties. Multiweek parenting courses were available for parents who needed support that was more intensive. The combination of kernels and programs, where needed, significantly reduced child-abuse reports, medical injuries, and out-of-home foster placement (Prinz et al. accepted).

In sum, in addition to empirically supported programs coming into wider use, we foresee the spread of kernels into the repertoires of many change agents for situations without designed programs and those where the problem does not require a multicomponent program.

Reducing the Cost of Beneficially Influencing Behavior

Making kernels widely available to behavior–influence agents may reduce the cost of bringing about widespread use of effective practices. Most of the kernels we identify are in the public domain, easy to adopt, and useful across many situations. Their dissemination requires no expensive materials. Training in their use can be accomplished much more cheaply (often simply by modeling or defining) than training in complex programs.

Since kernels are in the public domain, it discourages certain types of profit-motivated dissemination. For example, despite strong evidence of its efficacy for diverse problems, omega-3 (fish oil) offers little incentive to pharmaceutical companies to market it for treatment of bipolar disorder, post-partum depression, depression, developmental disabilities, or aggression.

Nevertheless, viable business models exist that would motivate dissemination of kernels. It is possible to make access to information about kernels a commodity sold on the Internet at low cost. Indeed, video modeling of—and supporting materials for—kernels could be available through iTunes, amazon.com, or e-bay. Alternatively, some kernels could be available at drug stores, supermarkets, or video rental stores. Workplaces, local governments, and other potential beneficiaries of kernels might well become bulk purchasers or distributors of kernels that they calculate will affect health, safety, competitiveness, or other important outcomes.

Using Kernels Across Developmental Stages

The example kernels in this paper have utility with particular ages or developmental periods. Table 2 includes kernels with experimental evidence across multiple developmental stages, those predicted to be useful for ages for which they have not undergone testing, and those without data or clear hypotheses about their utility for developmental stages except the ones on which they have been tested. We will show kernels that are effective across multiple age ranges.
Table 2

Kernel utility across age groups

 

Infants

Children

Teens

Adults

Verbal praise

*

*

*

*

Peer-to-peer written praise—“tootle” notes, compliments books/praise notes

NA

*

*

*

Beat the timer or beat the buzzer

*

*

*

*

Mystery motivators/grab bag/prize bowl/game of life

P

*

*

*

Public posting (graphing) of feedback of a targeted behavior

NA

*

*

*

Principal lottery

NA

*

*

 

Safety or performance lottery

NA

*

*

*

Contingent music

*

*

*

*

Team competition

NA

*

*

*

Special play

*

*

  

Choral responding

*

*

P

P

Mystery shopper

NA

 

P

P

Peer-to-peer tutoring

NA

*

*

*

Computer action game

P

*

*

*

Correspondence training, “Say-Do”

NA

*

*

P

Correspondence training, “Do-Say”

NA

*

*

P

Time out

*

*

  

Sit and watch, contingent observation, or response lock out

*

*

*

*

Taxation on consumptive behaviors

NA

NA

*

*

Positive note home for inhibition

NA

*

*

 

Timed rewards for inhibition (DRO)

*

*

*

*

Premack principle

*

*

*

*

Response-cost (point loss)

P

*

*

*

Low emotion or “private” reprimands

*

*

*

*

Stop clock

NA

*

*

*

Law enforcement fine or citation

NA

NA

*

*

Over-correction or positive practice

*

*

*

*

“Buzzer/noise training”

P

*

*

 

Non-verbal transition cues

*

*

*

*

Stop lights in school settings or traffic settings

NA

*

*

*

Boundary cues and railings

*

*

*

*

Cooperative, structured peer play

P

*

*

 

Self-modeling

P

*

*

*

Self-monitoring

NA

*

*

*

Paragraph shrinking

NA

*

*

P

Errorless discrimination training

*

*

*

*

Adjectival noun for belonging to status group

P

*

*

*

Public commitment

NA

*

*

*

“US” and “THEM” role framing

P

*

*

*

Graphic/node maps

NA

*

*

*

MI

NA

P

*

*

Media associating behavior with “immediate” negative social outcomes

NA

P

*

*

Pleasant greeting with or without positive physical touch

*

*

*

*

Massage, brushing or stroking

*

*

*

*

Turtle technique

P

*

NA

NA

Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation or increased fish consumption

*

*

*

*

Zinc supplementation or dietary consumption

P

*

*

*

“Rough and tumble” free play/martial arts with higher status conspecific

NA

*

*

*

Aerobic play or behavior

P

*

*

*

Nasal breathing

P

*

*

*

Progressive muscle relaxation

NA

*

*

*

NA, not applicable; *, experimental evidence; P, predicted utility

Implications of Kernels for Policy

The evidence on kernels points to the possibility that policies requiring or promoting the use of some kernels may be appropriate. For example, peer-to-peer tutoring of Title 1 students in first grade increases long-term academic success into middle school (Greenwood 1991a, b). Creating a federal, state, or district policy to use peer-to-peer tutoring in Title 1 schools or at-risk areas theoretically could raise academic performance and reduce historical racial, ethnic, and cultural disparities (Greenwood 1991a, b)—without adopting a new curriculum. Communities or school districts with high rates of dropping out in ninth grade might consider making a policy around using the 15-min motivational process in seventh grade that improves grades in ninth grade (Cohen et al. 2006). Another kernel, taking omega-3 (cod liver oil) during pregnancy increases the child IQ at age 4 (Helland et al. 2003). The evidence justifies a policy for providing free omega-3 to pregnant and post-partum mothers via Women, Infants, and Children (e.g., Helland et al. 2003; Hibbeln et al. 2006; Richardson 2006). The American Psychiatric Association recently created a policy recommending at least 1 g/day of omega-3 for all psychiatric patients (Freeman et al. 2006b), which is an example of a professional organization adopting a kernel.

Some Concerns About Kernels

Some argue that kernels are useful only if their effects are lasting. Numerous kernels do have such effects. For example, the errorless-compliance training kernel has at least a 6-month maintenance of effects for parent–child pairs coming from violent homes (Ducharme et al. 2000) and for children diagnosed with autism (Ducharme and Drain 2004). The safe playing kernel (Embry 1984) has reduced dangerous behavior 9 months after parents implemented the strategy at home. Peer-to-peer tutoring has effects that last from first-grade intervention through middle school (Greenwood 1991a, b). Omega-3 supplementation of cod liver oil during pregnancy has effects on children’s cognitive development at least through age 4. Emotional writing reduces or prevents medication use, healthcare visits, or continued unemployments months later (Richards et al. 2000; Smyth et al. 1999; Spera et al. 1994). Response slates—as opposed to having students raise their hands—improve performance on academic measures of retention, recall, and end-of-term tests for that content (Christle and Schuster 2003; Kellum et al. 2001). Finally, a 15-min motivational interview on paper has an 18-month lasting effect on the improvement of grades of high-risk African American students from seventh grade to ninth grade (Cohen et al. 2006).

Yet even if a kernel does not seem to have a lasting impact, we should not overlook its value. In numerous situations, parents, teachers, youth workers, and others need to influence a behavior. For example, if the only evidence for response slates was that they increased classroom participation (Christle and Schuster 2003; Kellum et al. 2001), they would be valuable to teachers who want to raise classroom participation. In general, providing people with simple and reliable ways of influencing behavior is an important benefit for them, even with no current evidence that the impact is long lasting. Put another way, if we wish to create a society with high levels of caring and effective guidance in all areas, the widespread dissemination of kernels could help in this quest.

Another concern might be that kernels needed daily or weekly are futile. Yet to exclude from the approved armamentarium of prevention any strategies that do not permanently change behavior seems odd both scientifically and practically. Such a stance would exclude taking a daily aspirin to prevent strokes and heart attacks; using UV lotion to prevent skin cancer before going outside; conducting daily physical activity to prevent obesity, health problems, and depression; using a car seat each trip to protect an infant, etc. From a contextual standpoint, behavior is always, to some extent, a function of the immediate environment (e.g., Biglan 1995). In order to ensure that the environment promotes prosocial behavior through kernels is a useful way to improve human wellbeing.

Population-level Prevention

The literature reports two tracks of parenting interventions: brief solution focused and general parent training, each with experimental evidence supporting its efficacy. Solution-focused parenting involves brief interventions that may be kernels like safe playing or good shopper; others may be to-the-point recipes for going to restaurants, bedwetting, cleaning up, doing homework, getting ready for bed, etc., showing experimentally controlled results (e.g., Dadds et al. 1984; Sanders et al. 1984). The more general strategies—8-to-12 week courses focusing on general parenting skills with high-risk populations—also have positive results (e.g., Hoath and Sanders 2002).

Recently, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control supported an RCT of a combined solution-focused and general-parenting skill model to prevent child abuse in 18 South Carolina counties (Prinz et al. accepted). In counties receiving the multilevel parenting model (e.g., Sanders et al. 2003), most of the utilization of services was for the solution-focused kernels or recipes and not for the intensive services, yet the intervention produced significant reductions in substantiated child maltreatment reports, child maltreatment-related medical injuries, and out-of-home placements (Prinz et al. accepted). It may seem counterintuitive that these simple and narrowly focused strategies could produce such effects, but many acts of child maltreatment happen precisely during the types of activities addressed by the solution-focused interventions—getting ready, mealtimes, homework, chores, bedtimes, etc. The defusion of the brief kernel-like recipes to solve these problems for thousands of parents in these communities makes further sense when one understands that official reports of child physical maltreatment underestimate its prevalence by 40 times (Theodore et al. 2007), making logistics and staffing for intensive parenting courses clearly impractical and improbable for thousands of families at any given time in a community or county.

The South Carolina experiment suggests that providing individuals access to self-selected simple preventative strategies could have large implications for public health and safety. The study hints that science-based prevention of behavioral issues could be an individual consumer product. Currently, individuals cannot access best practice prevention programs, as they can consume products for child safety, such as car seats, bike helmets, or safety guards for electric sockets or kitchen cabinets.

Improving the Effectiveness of Prevention and Treatment

Eddy (2006) has noted that intervention research does not contribute to the extent it could to improve our understanding of basic psychological and social processes that interventions must target. In most cases, we have no models of preventive interventions to show which social or psychological processes they target, the effects of the intervention on those targets, and the effects of changes in these targets on outcomes. As a result, we have not developed a robust and generalizable theory of the key aspects of human functioning and the ways in which to affect them. We can therefore say little about how to construct new interventions in new problem areas and cannot easily communicate to nonscientists what they might do for novel problems. All we can say is “apply this program.” However, often there are no evidence-based programs to apply.

A theoretical analysis that pinpoints specific procedures to influence behavior and psychological processes would stimulate research to refine and improve these component strategies and encourage creation of new, more effective programs, and practices. Specifying fundamental units of behavioral influence could point to components to add to the existing programs and provide building blocks for creating new and more powerful programs. We propose that kernels are candidate building blocks for a generalizable science of intervention and prevention. The next few paragraphs, therefore, loop back to the conditions that gave rise to the need for a taxonomy of active ingredients of science-based prevention and treatment (Embry 2004) and discussed early in this paper, showing how existing evidence-based programs can be analyzed or strengthened by kernels.

In order to illustrate how we created one evidenced-based program using kernels, we briefly outline the active ingredients of PeaceBuilders (Embry et al. 1996), constructed by using previously validated kernels (Embry et al. 1996; Embry 1997). Note we did not have the language for kernels then, but quite consciously used the principle of kernels in the program design. There were five core kernels in PeaceBuilders. First, the children and adults received a framing language repertoire via a self-modeling story kernel, which we had tested for its impact on behavior. Second, children and adults created a vision of peaceful behavior using a goal/node map kernel. Third, adults and children adopted an adjectival identity noun kernel, “I am a PeaceBuilder.” Fourth, adults and children learned to use praise notes or “caught-you-being good” notes for reinforcing behaviors defined earlier in the self-modeling stories. At the same time, adults learned to use the positive-home note kernel to support the reinforcement of these same peacebuilding behaviors. Fifth, classrooms and schools received public recognition and posting for engaging in peacebuilding behaviors or creating peacebuilding “inventions” each week. Weekly walk-throughs of the school allowed monitoring of these active kernels. This combination of kernels was tested in a randomized control design over several years, and showed reductions in actual violent injuries (Krug et al. 1997), increased social competence and resiliency measures, as well as reduced aggression and inattention (Flannery et al. 2003). It affected the high-risk students the most (Vazsonyi et al. 2004). The selection and use of kernels in PeaceBuilders is an example of how kernels can both construct an intervention and clearly specify the putative ingredients.

In order to illustrate how kernels can clarify why programs work, we examine the Good Behavior Game (GBG), not created with kernels in mind. The GBG has already increased cooperative on-task behavior in school significantly (Barrish et al. 1969; Medland and Stachnik 1972) and reduced antisocial behavior and smoking in adolescence and adulthood (Kellam et al. 2008, 1994; Kellam and Anthony 1998). Its core kernels include a response cost for negative behavior (e.g., Conyers et al. 2004); team competition (e.g., Beersma et al. 2003); public posting of results (e.g., Parsons 1982); and team rotations (deemed critical but with no supporting study). Additional kernels include a low emotional response to negative behaviors (e.g., Abramowitz et al. 1987), playing three games per day, and using beat the timer (e.g., Adams and Drabman 1995).

The GBG also provides an occasion to describe the utility of kernels in helping disseminate programs. Until 2003, when the first author started collaborating with Johns Hopkins, there was virtually no diffusion of the GBG based on Kellam’s work or even earlier behavior analysis studies, beyond journal articles. Inspection, direct replication, and systematic replication in different settings of the GBG (Embry 2002) as implemented by Kellam and colleagues, pointed to several ways that planned dissemination and further testing underway at Johns Hopkins could strengthen it. First, it was necessary to stop edible reinforcers used by Kellam and colleagues, as social context and validity do not support this 20 years later. A switch to a kernel of prizes based on the Premack Principle (Andrews 1970; Homme et al. 1963; Hosie et al. 1974; Premack 1962; Van Hevel and Hawkins 1974) proved acceptable and reinforcing to children and adults alike.

Second, we added kernels to improve adoption, implementation, and maintenance of the GBG based on observations and consumer feedback. These included non-verbal cues (e.g., Cox et al. 2000; Rosenkoetter and Fowler 1986) to improve generalization and adoption of the Game and meaningful roles as differential reinforcement of other behaviors (e.g., Rutter 1981) to reduce accidental negative attention. Another includes setting generalization recipes for carrying over the GBG to hallways, restrooms, cafeteria, etc. (e.g., Fishbein and Wasik 1981) to improve generalization by students and acceptability by adults. Other kernels include symbolic self-modeling (e.g., Embry et al. 1996) to improve imitation of behavior and school-home notes (e.g., Kelley et al. 1988) for prompting family reinforcement and generalization of behavior to home. Others are peer-to-peer praise notes (e.g., Skinner et al. 2000) to improve social competence and reduce negative peer attention, and the good behavior lottery (e.g., Putnam et al. 2003) to increase generalization when not playing the Game. Inserting these kernels provided a more systematic approach to address the issues of diffusion of scientific innovation, raised by Rogers (1995), of relative advantage, compatibility, ease of use, trialability, and observability.

Kernels may also be useful in strengthening existing programs. Several investigations have noted problems replicating the results of Project Alert in community contexts (e.g., St. Pierre et al. 2005). In Houston, an agency requested assistance from the first author for improving implementation of Project Alert in the context of gym classes—they had never tested it scientifically but it was the only slot available in the school day. Attendance was poor and pre–post assessments did not show that the program affected the students. We recommended use of several kernels in order to make attendance more reinforcing and the lessons more participatory, and to create peer pressure for attendance: prize-bowl, random calling, peer-to-peer tutoring, tootle notes, response slates, pleasant greetings to students by program staff in the halls, and student jobs. In year-to-year comparisons, attendance doubled, increasing to 90% in most of the schools. Moreover, for the first time, students achieve the target scores for the post-tests proposed to measure dose and fidelity by the developers of Project Alert.

The analysis of kernels can also help construct new interventions by putting together a set of kernels that all appear relevant and useful for new problems. For example, methamphetamine addiction is a serious public-health problem and there is a dearth of evidence-based programs to reduce it (Embry et al. 2005). Table 3 outlines a potential community- or state-level response to methamphetamine use via evidenced-based kernels. The table tackles the huge public health problem that arises from meth-exposed infants or children who enter the medical, social service, and legal systems as well as intervention, prevention, and treatment issues associated with teens or adults using or at risk for using methamphetamine.
Table 3

Applying kernel to community-level methamphetamine addiction issues

Kernel

Strategy and procedure

Sample citations

Quality of evidence

Prize bowl (contingency management) for sobriety and recovery

Multiple contracts/grants to organizations to recruit individuals at jails, ERs, shelters plus thru existing courts, clinics, faith-based organizations w/monitoring of results across settings

Petry and Martin (2002), Petry et al. (2000, 2001a, b, c, 2004, 2005), Rawson et al. (2006)

Multiple RCT; 1 with comparisons to proven program

Omega-3 supplements

2 g/day to reduce comorbid depression, bipolar disorder, aggression, plus CVD symptoms, promoted at jails, clinics, shelters, public health, and outreach workers. Policy changed to support addition to government formularies

Freeman et al. (2006), Gesch et al. (2002), Stoll et al. (2000)

Cross-national epi; lab studies; RCT with/without other meds

Kangaroo care for infants

Infants born to addicted moms or moved to foster care (Conde-Agudelo et al. 2003; Feldman and Eidelman 2003) given to reduce developmental problems; training of caseworkers, nurses, doctors; added to program policy standards

Ferber and Makhoul (2004), Ludington-Hoe et al. (2004), Priya (2004)

Lab studies for mechanisms; case studies; randomized trials

Errorless compliance training for exposed children

Toddlers/preschoolers neglected or abused by drug-using parents receive errorless compliance training by bio parent, foster parent, and/or teacher; Policy implemented via court order

Ducharme (2003), Ducharme et al. (2000, 2001, 2002, 2003)

Empirical case studies; several multiple baselines; randomized control studies

Self-modeling for exposed preschool and elementary children

Exposed preschoolers and elementary children under court petition or special ed receive self-modeling videos or digitally created storybooks for social skills and behavior at home, foster care, or care settings. Academic, social skills and self-regulatory behaviors taught related to developmental delays

Clare et al. (2000), Hitchcock et al. (2003), Kehle et al. (2002), Lonnecker et al. (1994), Reamer et al. (1998)

Multiple single subject studies using interrupted time-series designs; meta analyses of single subject studies

Community-wide adult to child/youth positive praise notes

Local governments and school districts promote community-wide praise notes from adults to increased protective factor of reinforcement of social competence, which protect against substance abuse and related antisocial behaviors

Gupta et al. (1990), Hutton (1983), Kelley et al. (1988), McCain and Kelley (1993), Taylor et al. (1984), Embry et al. (1996)

Multiple interrupted time-series studies on individual level and school level; a few RCT with practice embedded

Red flag training for exposed children or teens with serious emotional disturbance

Dependency or delinquency court order or special education plan includes Red Flag procedure to reduce explosive anger and aggression among children exposed to drugs, neglect, or abuse

Ninness et al. (1995), Ninness (1991)

Multiple interrupted time-series designs

MI for at-risk youth

Juvenile justice, emergency room, and school personnel conduct motivational interviews for youth engaged in problematic behaviors; supportive policies and contracts issued

Colby et al. (1998), Diamond et al. (2002), Monti et al. (1999), Smith (2004), Spirito et al. (2004), Stein et al. (2006)

Multiple randomized control studies

Of course, such a constructed program demands experimental evaluation via randomized trials or at least via quasi-experimental studies. At the same time, however, practitioners and policymakers desperate to deal with the methamphetamine problem must have a strategy, that, although not yet evaluated in an RCT, is composed of elements, each one shown in prior experimental work in RCT or interrupted time series to affect its target behaviors. The bundled kernels to address this public health and safety problem could face testing in an interrupted time-series design across neighborhoods, communities, or counties using naturally occurring archival data on meth-related crimes, arrests, emergency-room care use, or child removals.

The theoretical analysis of kernels also may help to develop new kernels. In essence, the framework suggests that, in any instance requiring altered behavior, it will pay to examine systematically whether it is possible to alter consequences or antecedents for the behavior, if it is possible to influence relational responding in ways that change the value of relevant behaviors, and finally, whether physiological interventions could alter the probability of behavior. A thorough understanding of existing kernels would contribute to the success of this effort.

Prevention science might also gain strength by mapping kernels onto risk and protective factors. For instance, much research points to early antisocial behavior, school bonding, and inadequate parental monitoring as predictors of various adverse outcomes (Arthur et al. 2002; Dekovic 1999; Duncan et al. 2000). Numerous kernels are relevant to affect these constructs. Examples include the percentage of students with meaningful roles in a day, the square footage of student work displayed on the walls, the number of peer-to-peer positive written notes, the caught-you-being good notes, or positive notes home (Rutter 1981). Articulating the kernels relevant to each risk or protective factor would provide practitioners with more precise guidance as to which kernels are most useful for altering key risk and protective factors.

Thinking in terms of kernels may also facilitate our identifying kernel-like practices that occur naturally in society, as has already happened in some cases. For example, epidemiological studies show that omega-3 consumption was associated with many important health and behavior outcomes, such as reduced CVD, depression, and homicide (Hibbeln 2001, 2002; Hibbeln et al. 2007; McGrath-Hanna et al. 2003; Tanskanen et al. 2001). Then intervention studies showed that changes in the consumption of omega-3 reduced these types of adverse conditions (Freeman et al. 2006a; Gesch et al. 2002). In a similar vein, epidemiologists can use existing evidence about kernels to examine whether kernels occur naturally in social systems and benefit the population. Such research would strengthen the link between epidemiology and intervention research and practice, while strengthening empirically based theory about human development.

A Database Repository of Kernels

In the interest of fostering the dissemination and further development of kernels, we propose a database repository of kernels, analogous to the human genome project, which might be called the behaviornome. Initially, it would contain the kernels that Table 1 lists and would enable people to describe additional kernels and empirical evidence regarding their effects. The database would allow a user to search for specific kernels or to identify a behavior and search for kernels relevant to influence the behavior. We are hopeful that this repository will provide detailed information about how kernels influence behavior, the circumstances in which they do or do not work, and any iatrogenic effects, potential positive or negative combinations of kernels not documented presently, variations of kernels related to cultures or other establishing conditions, and proximal and distal behavioral effects. In time, the database would have hyperlinks to PsychInfo or PubMed. We expect the repository to help reduce the cost of beneficially influencing behavior and improving the efficacy of prevention and treatment practice and theory.

Summary

Kernels are fundamental units of behavior–influence technology. They provide a wealth of resources for those trying to influence human behavior in beneficial ways. The four primary mechanisms of kernels are providing consequences for behavior, establishing antecedent stimuli for behavior, altering people’s relational framing about targeted behaviors, and altering physiology that affects behavior. Understanding the range and effectiveness of kernels could contribute to the public-health goals of decreasing the prevalence of problems and increasing wellbeing. Kernels could provide behavior–influence agents with a wider array of effective practices. Denomination of kernels could clarify the active components of existing programs. It could also lead to the development of new programs composed entirely of effective kernels. Finally, it could contribute to the development of an empirically based theory of behavior influence consistent with current knowledge of risk and protective factors and that clarifies the mechanisms through which behavior influence occurs.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The inspiration for this paper comes from conversations over 20 years ago with the late Dr. Donald M. Baer, one of the founders of applied behavior analysis, and from a presentation by Dr. Shep Kellam in 1998 who proved that a very simple behavior analysis protocol could have lifetime effects. The authors prepared this manuscript under the auspices of the Center on Early Adolescence in Eugene, Oregon, NIDA Grant Number P30 DA018760. Dr. Biglan is the Director and Principal Investigator and Dr. Embry is a co-investigator of the Center. The authors express their appreciation to co-investigators, Drs. Shawn Boles and Brian Flay, for their suggestions and insights for improving the manuscript. We also wish to thank Christine Cody for editorial assistance and for help in preparing the very complex manuscript.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. Aase, H., & Sagvolden, T. (2006). Infrequent, but not frequent, reinforcers produce more variable responding and deficient sustained attention in young children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 47(5), 457–471. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01468.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abbott, R. D., O’Donnell, J., Hawkins, J. D., Hill, K. G., Kosterman, R., & Catalano, R. F. (1998). Changing teaching practices to promote achievement and bonding to school. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 68, 542–552. doi:10.1037/h0080363.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abramowitz, A. J., O’Leary, S. G., & Futtersak, M. W. (1988). The relative impact of long and short reprimands on children’s off-task behavior in the classroom. Behavior Therapy, 19(2), 243–247. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(88)80046-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Abramowitz, A. J., O’Leary, S. G., & Rosen, L. A. (1987). Reducing off-task behavior in the classroom: A comparison of encouragement and reprimands. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 15(2), 153–163. doi:10.1007/BF00916345.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Acker, M. M., & O’Leary, S. G. (1987). Effects of reprimands and praise on appropriate behavior in the classroom. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 15(4), 549–557. doi:10.1007/BF00917240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Adams, C. D., & Drabman, R. S. (1995). Improving morning interactions: Beat-the-Buzzer with a boy having multiple handicaps. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 17(3), 13–26. doi:10.1300/J019v17n03_02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Agathon, M., & Granjus, M. (1976). Behavior modification of a character disorder. Perspectives Psychiatriques, 27(58), 1–274.Google Scholar
  8. Agran, M., Sinclair, T., Alper, S., Cavin, M., Wehmeyer, M., & Hughes, C. (2005). Using self-monitoring to increase following-direction skills of students with moderate to severe disabilities in general education. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40(1), 3–13.Google Scholar
  9. Agras, W. S., Jacob, R. G., & Lebedeck, M. (1980). The California drought: A quasi-experimental analysis of social policy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 561–570. doi:10.1901/jaba.1980.13-561.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Akhondzadeh, S., Mohammadi, M. R., & Khademi, M. (2004). Zinc sulfate as an adjunct to methylphenidate for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children: A double blind and randomized trial. BMC Psychiatry, 4, 9. doi:10.1186/1471-244X-4-9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Akhtar, S., Moulin, C. J. A., & Bowie, P. C. W. (2006). Are people with mild cognitive impairment aware of the benefits of errorless learning? Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 16(3), 329–346. doi:10.1080/09602010500176674.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Allen, L. D., & Bryant, M. C. (1985). A multielement analysis of contingent versus contingent-interrupted music. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 6(1), 87–97. doi:10.1016/S0270-3092(85)80024-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Allsopp, D. H. (1997). Using classwide peer tutoring to teach beginning algebra problem-solving skills in heterogeneous classrooms. Remedial and Special Education, 18(6), 367–379.Google Scholar
  14. Anderson, G. J., & Connor, W. E. (1989). On the demonstration of omega-3 essential-fatty-acid deficiency in humans. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 49(4), 585–587.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Anderson, V., & Merrett, F. (1997). The use of correspondence training in improving the in-class behaviour of very troublesome secondary school children. Educational Psychology, 17(3), 313–328. doi:10.1080/0144341970170306 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Andrews, H. B. (1970). The systematic use of the Premack principle in modifying classroom behaviors. Child Study Journal, 1(2), 74–79.Google Scholar
  17. Ankjaer-Jensen, A., & Sejr, T. E. (1994). Costs of the treatment of enuresis nocturna. Health economic consequences of alternative methods in the treatment of enuresis nocturna. Ugeskrift for Laeger, 156(30), 4355–4360.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Antunes, H. K. M., Stella, S. R. G, Santos, R. F., Bueno, O. F. A., & de Mello, M. T. l. (2005). Depression, anxiety and quality of life scores in seniors after an endurance exercise program. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, 27(4), 266–271. doi:10.1590/S1516-44462005000400003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Appels, A., Bar, F., Lasker, J., Flamm, U., & Kop, W. (1997). The effect of a psychological intervention program on the risk of a new coronary event after angioplasty: A feasibility study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 43(2), 209–217. doi:10.1016/S0022-3999(97)00022-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Arnold, L. E., Bozzolo, H., Hollway, J., Cook, A., DiSilvestro, R. A., Bozzolo, D. R., et al. (2005). Serum zinc correlates with parent- and teacher- rated inattention in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 15(4), 628–636. doi:10.1089/cap.2005.15.628.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Arnold, L. E., & DiSilvestro, R. A. (2005). Zinc in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 15(4), 619–627. doi:10.1089/cap.2005.15.619.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Arthur, M. W., Hawkins, J. D., Pollard, J. A., Catalano, R. F., & Baglioni, A. J. (2002). Measuring risk and protective factors for substance use, delinquency, and other adolescent problem behaviors: Communities that care youth survey. Evaluation Review, 26(6), 575–601. doi:10.1177/019384102237850.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Atlantis, E., Chow, C.-M., Kirby, A., & Singh, M. F. (2004). An effective exercise-based intervention for improving mental health and quality of life measures: A randomized controlled trial. Preventive Medicine, 39(2), 424–434. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.02.007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Backon, J. (1990). Forced unilateral nostril breathing: A technique that affects brain hemisphericity and autonomic activity. Brain and Cognition, 12(1), 155–157. doi:10.1016/0278-2626(90)90011-C.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ball, T. S., & Irwin, A. E. (1976). A portable, automated device applied to training a hyperactive child. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 7(2), 185–187. doi:10.1016/0005-7916(76)90082-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Barker, J. B., & Jones, M. V. (2006). Using hypnosis, technique refinement, and self-modeling to enhance self-efficacy: A case study in cricket. The Sport Psychologist, 20(1), 94–110.Google Scholar
  27. Barmann, B. C., & Croyle-Barmann, C. (1980). Use of contingent-interrupted music in the treatment of disruptive behavior while riding a bus. Psychological Reports, 47, 269–270.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Barmann, B. C., Croyle-Barmann, C., & McLain, B. (1980). The use of contingent-interrupted music in the treatment of disruptive bus-riding behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13(4), 693–698. doi:10.1901/jaba.1980.13-693.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Barnes, D., Healy, O., & Hayes, S. C. (2000). Relational frame theory and the relational evaluation procedure: Approaching human language as derived relational responding. In J. C. Leslie & D. Blackman (Eds.), Experimental and applied analysis of human behavior (pp. 149–180). Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  30. Barrish, H. H., Saunders, M., & Wolf, M. M. (1969). Good behavior game: Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 119–124. doi:10.1901/jaba.1969.2-119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Bay-Hinitz, A. K., Peterson, R. F., & Quilitch, H. R. (1994). Cooperative games: a way to modify aggressive and cooperative behaviors in young children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27(3), 435–446. doi:10.1901/jaba.1994.27-435.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Bean, T. W., & Steenwyk, F. L. (1984). The effect of three forms of summarization instruction on sixth graders’ summary writing and comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 16(4), 297–306.Google Scholar
  33. Beersma, B., Hollenbeck, J. R., Humphrey, S. E., Moon, H., Conlon, D. E., & Ilgen, D. R. (2003). Cooperation, competition, and team performance: toward a contingency approach. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 572–590.Google Scholar
  34. Bell, R. M., Ellickson, P. L., & Harrison, E. R. (1993). Do drug prevention effects persist into high school? How project ALERT did with ninth graders. Preventive Medicine, 22, 463–483. doi:10.1006/pmed.1993.1038.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Bellamy, T., & Sontag, E. (1973). Use of group contingent music to increase assembly line production rates of retarded students in a simulated sheltered workshop. Journal of Music Therapy, 10(3), 125–136.Google Scholar
  36. Ben Shalom, D. (2000). Developmental depersonalization: The prefrontal cortex and self-functions in autism. Consciousness and Cognition, 9(3), 457–460. doi:10.1006/ccog.2000.0453.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Bennett, W., Petraitis, C., D’Anella, A., & Marcella, S. (2003). Pharmacists’ knowledge and the difficulty of obtaining emergency contraception. Contraception, 68(4), 261–267. doi:10.1016/S0010-7824(03)00180-X.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Berlin, A. A., Kop, W. J., & Deuster, P. A. (2006). Depressive mood symptoms and fatigue after exercise withdrawal: The potential role of decreased fitness. Psychosomatic Medicine, 68(2), 224–230. doi:10.1097/01.psy.0000204628.73273.23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Bernstein, J., Bernstein, E., Tassiopoulos, K., Heeren, T., Levenson, S., & Hingson, R. (2005). Brief motivational intervention at a clinic visit reduces cocaine and heroin use. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 77(1), 49–59. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.07.006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Beyth-Marom, R., Austin, L., Fischhoff, B., Palmgren, C., & Quadrel, M. J. (1993). Perceived consequences of risky behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 29, 549–563. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.29.3.549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Biglan, A. (1995). Changing cultural practices: A contextualist framework for intervention research. Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  42. Biglan, A. (2004). Contextualism and the development of effective prevention practices. Prevention Science, 5, 15–21. doi:10.1023/B:PREV.0000013977.07261.5a.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Biglan, A., Brennan, P. A., Foster, S. L., Holder, H. D., Miller, T. L., Cunningham, P. B., et al. (2004). Helping adolescents at risk: Prevention of multiple problem behaviors. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  44. Biglan, A., & Hayes, S. C. (1996). Should the behavioral sciences become more pragmatic? The case for functional contextualism in research on human behavior. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 5, 47–57. doi:10.1016/S0962-1849(96)80026-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Bilici, M., Yildirim, F., Kandil, S., Bekaroglu, M., Yildirmis, S., Deger, O., et al. (2004). Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of zinc sulfate in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 28, 181–190. doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2003.09.034.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Bjorklund, D. F., & Brown, R. D. (1998). Physical play and cognitive development: Integrating activity, cognition, and education. Child Development, 69(3), 604–606. doi:10.2307/1132190.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Bledsoe, K. L. (2003). Effectiveness of drug prevention programs designed for adolescents of color: A meta-analysis. US: ProQuest Information & Learning.Google Scholar
  48. Blick, D. W., & Test, D. W. (1987). Effects of self-recording on high-school students’ on-task behavior. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10(3), 203–213. doi:10.2307/1510493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Block, R. A., Arnott, D. P., Quigley, B., & Lynch, W. C. (1989). Unilateral nostril breathing influences lateralized cognitive performance. Brain and Cognition, 9(2), 181–190. doi:10.1016/0278-2626(89)90028-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Blue, F. R. (1979). Aerobic running as a treatment for moderate depression. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 48(1), 228.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Blumenfeld, H., & Eisenfeld, L. (2006). Does a mother singing to her premature baby affect feeding in the neonatal intensive care unit? Clinical Pediatrics, 45(1), 65–70. doi:10.1177/000992280604500110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Blumenthal, J. A., Sherwood, A., Babyak, M. A., Watkins, L. L., Waugh, R., Georgiades, A., et al. (2005). Effects of exercise and stress management training on markers of cardiovascular risk in patients with ischemic heart disease: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 293(13), 1626–1634. doi:10.1001/jama.293.13.1626.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Borfitz, D. (2001). Is a “mystery shopper” lurking in your waiting room? Medical Economics, 78(10), 63–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Boulton, M. J., & Smith, P. K. (1989). Rough and tumble play in children: Research and theory. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 48, 79–91.Google Scholar
  55. Boyle, J. R., & Hughes, C. A. (1994). Effects of self-monitoring and subsequent fading of external prompts on the on-task behavior and task productivity of elementary students with moderate mental retardation. Journal of Behavioral Education, 4(4), 439–457. doi:10.1007/BF01539544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Bratton, S. C., Ray, D., Rhine, T., & Jones, L. (2005). The efficacy of play therapy with children: A meta-analytic review of treatment outcomes. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice, 36(4), 376–390. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.36.4.376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Bray, M. A., & Kehle, T. J. (2001). Long-term follow-up of self-modeling as an intervention for stuttering. School Psychology Review, 30(1), 135–141.Google Scholar
  58. Briscoe, R. V., Hoffman, D. B., & Bailey, J. S. (1975). Behavioral community psychology: Training a community board to problem solve. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8(2), 157–168. doi:10.1901/jaba.1975.8-157.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Browder, D. M., Hines, C., McCarthy, L. J., & Fees, J. (1984). A treatment package for increasing sight word recognition for use in daily living skills. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 19(3), 191–200.Google Scholar
  60. Brown, D., & Frank, A. R. (1990). “Let me do it”: Self-monitoring in solving arithmetic problems. Education and Treatment of Children, 13(3), 239–248.Google Scholar
  61. Buggey, T. (1995). An examination of the effectiveness of videotaped self-modeling in teaching specific linguistic structures to preschoolers. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 15(4), 434–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Buggey, T. (2005). Video self-modeling applications with students with autism spectrum disorder in a small private school setting. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20(1), 52–63. doi:10.1177/10883576050200010501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Buggey, T., Toombs, K., Gardener, P., & Cervetti, M. (1999). Training responding behaviors in students with autism: Using videotaped self-modeling. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1(4), 205–214. doi:10.1177/109830079900100403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Burch, M. R., Clegg, J. C., & Bailey, J. S. (1987). Automated contingent reinforcement of correct posture. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 8(1), 15–20. doi:10.1016/0891-4222(87)90037-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Burgess, D., Haney, B., Snyder, M., Sullivan, J. L., & Transue, J. E. (2000). Rocking the vote: Using personalized messages to motivate voting among young adults. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(1), 29–52. doi:10.1086/316758.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Burke, B. L., Arkowitz, H., & Menchola, M. (2003). The efficacy of motivational interviewing: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(5), 843–861. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.71.5.843.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Burn, S. M., & Oskamp, S. (1986). Increasing community recycling with persuasive communication and public commitment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 29–41. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1986.tb02276.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Cabello, B., & Terrell, R. (1994). Making students feel like family: How teachers create warm and caring classroom climates. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 29(1), 17.Google Scholar
  69. Campbell, J. M. (2004). Statistical comparison of four effect sizes for single-subject designs. Behavior Modification, 28(2), 234–246. doi:10.1177/0145445503259264.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Carey, R. G., & Bucher, B. D. (1986). Positive practice overcorrection. Effects of reinforcing correct performance. Behavior Modification, 10(1), 73–92. doi:10.1177/01454455860101005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Carlsson, A., & Lundkvist, S. O. (1992). Road user effects of alternative roadway painting on a major road. VTI Meddelande 687. Linkoping: VTI Swedish Road & Transport Research Institute.Google Scholar
  72. Carr, S. C., & Punzo, R. P. (1993). The effects of self-monitoring of academic accuracy and productivity on the performance of students with behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 18(4), 241–250.Google Scholar
  73. Cavalier, A. R., Ferretti, R. P., & Hodges, A. E. (1997). Self-management within a classroom token economy for students with learning disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 18(3), 167–178. doi:10.1016/S0891-4222(96)00045-5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Cevasco, A. M., & Grant, R. E. (2005). Effects of the pacifier activated lullaby on weight gain of premature infants. Journal of Music Therapy, 42(2), 123–139.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Chassin, L., Presson, C. C., & Sherman, S. J. (1990). Social psychological contributions to the understanding and prevention of adolescent cigarette smoking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16(1), 133–151. doi:10.1177/0146167290161010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Chen, X. P., & Komorita, S. S. (1994). The effects of communication and commitment in a public goods social dilemma. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60, 367–386. doi:10.1006/obhd.1994.1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Choenarom, C., Williams, R. A., & Hagerty, B. M. (2005). The role of sense of belonging and social support on stress and depression in individuals with depression. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 19(1), 18–29. doi:10.1016/j.apnu.2004.11.003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Christle, C. A., & Schuster, J. W. (2003). The effects of using response cards on student participation, academic achievement, and on-task behavior during whole-class, math instruction. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12, 147–165. doi:10.1023/A:1025577410113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Clare, S. K., Jenson, W. R., Kehle, T. J., & Bray, M. A. (2000). Self-modeling as a treatment for increasing on-task behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 37(6), 517–522. doi:10.1002/1520-6807(200011)37:6<517::AID-PITS4>3.0.CO;2-Y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Clark, E., Beck, D., Sloane, H., Goldsmith, D., Jenson, W., Bowen, J., et al. (1993). Self-modeling with preschoolers: Is it different? School Psychology International, 14(1), 83–89. doi:10.1177/0143034393141006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Clark, E., Kehle, T. J., Jenson, W. R., & Beck, D. E. (1992). Evaluation of the parameters of self-modeling interventions. School Psychology Review, 21(2), 246–254.Google Scholar
  82. Clarke, M. A., Bray, M. A., Kehle, T. J., & Truscott, S. D. (2001). A school-based intervention designed to reduce the frequency of tics in children with Tourette’s syndrome. School Psychology Review, 30(1), 11–22.Google Scholar
  83. Clement, P. W. (1986). Behavioral approaches to anger management training. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 5(4), 41–49.Google Scholar
  84. Cohen, G. L., Garcia, J., Apfel, N., & Master, A. (2006). Reducing the racial achievement gap: A social-psychological intervention. Science, 313(5791), 1307–1310. doi:10.1126/science.1128317.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Colby, S. M., Monti, P. M., Barnett, N. P., Rohsenow, D. J., Weissman, K., Spirito, A., et al. (1998). Brief motivational interviewing in a hospital setting for adolescent smoking: A preliminary study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(3), 574–578. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.66.3.574.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Collier, C. R., Czuchry, M., Dansereau, D. F., & Pitre, U. (2001). The use of node-link mapping in the chemical dependency treatment of adolescents. Journal of Drug Education, 31, 305. doi:10.2190/GMC2-K3XX-XLHF-K2J0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Collins, R. W. (1973). Importance of the bladder-cue buzzer contingency in the conditioning treatment for enuresis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 82(2), 299–308. doi:10.1037/h0035171.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Conde-Agudelo, A., Diaz-Rossello, J. L., Belizan, J. M. (2003). Kangaroo mother care to reduce morbidity and mortality in low birthweight infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Online : Update Software), (2), CD002771. Update of Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000; (4):CD002771; PMID: 11034759.Google Scholar
  89. Conyers, C., Miltenberger, R. G., Maki, A., Barenz, R., Jurgens, M., Sailer, A., et al. (2004). A comparison of response cost and differential reinforcement of other behavior to reduce disruptive behavior in a preschool classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37(3), 411–415. doi:10.1901/jaba.2004.37-411.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Conyers, C., Miltenberger, R., Romaniuk, C., Kopp, B., & Himle, M. (2003). Evaluation of DRO schedules to reduce disruptive behavior in a preschool classroom. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 25(3), 1–6. doi:10.1300/J019v25n03_01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Cook, M., & Freethy, M. (1973). The use of music as a positive reinforcer to eliminate complaining behavior. Journal of Music Therapy, 10(4), 213–216.Google Scholar
  92. Cotter, V. W. (1971). Effects of music on performance of manual tasks with retarded adolescent females. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 76(2), 242–248.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Cowen, R. J., Jones, F. H., & Bellack, A. S. (1979). Grandma’s rule with group contingencies: A cost-efficient means of classroom management. Behavior Modification, 3(3), 397–418. doi:10.1177/014544557933006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Cox, B. S., Cox, A. B., & Cox, D. J. (2000). Motivating signage prompts safety belt use among drivers exiting senior communities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 635–638. doi:10.1901/jaba.2000.33-635.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Crews, D. J., Lochbaum, M. R., & Landers, D. M. (2004). Aerobic physical activity effects on psychological well-being in low-income Hispanic children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 98(1), 319–324. doi:10.2466/PMS.98.1.319-324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Crisp, A. H., Sireling, L. I., & Faizey, J. (1984). Nocturnal activity and the enuresis alarm device. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 60(702), 280–281.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Czuchry, M., & Dansereau, D. F. (1996). Node-link mapping as an alternative to traditional writing assignments in undergraduate psychology courses. Teaching of Psychology (Columbia, Mo.), 23(2), 91. doi:10.1207/s15328023top2302_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Czuchry, M., & Dansereau, D. F. (1999). Node-link mapping and psychological problems: Perceptions of a residential drug abuse treatment program for probationers. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 17(4), 321. doi:10.1016/S0740-5472(99)00013-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Czuchry, M., & Dansereau, D. (2003). A model of the effects of node-link mapping on drug abuse counseling. Addictive Behaviors, 28(3), 537. doi:10.1016/S0306-4603(01)00252-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Czuchry, M., Dansereau, D. F., Dees, S. M., & Simpson, D. D. (1995). The use of node-link mapping in drug abuse counseling: The role of attentional factors. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 27(2), 161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Dadds, M. R., Sanders, M. R., & Bor, B. (1984). Training children to eat independently: Evaluation of mealtime management training for parents. Behavioural Psychotherapy, 12(4), 356–366.Google Scholar
  102. Dalton, T., Martella, R. C., & Marchand-Martella, N. E. (1999). The effects of a self-management program in reducing off-task behavior. Journal of Behavioral Education, 9, 157–176. doi:10.1023/A:1022183430622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Dansereau, D. F., Dees, S. M., Greener, J. M., & Simpson, D. D. (1995). Node-link mapping and the evaluation of drug abuse counseling sessions. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 9, 195. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.9.3.195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Dansereau, D. F., Joe, G. W., & Simpson, D. D. (1993). Node-link mapping: A visual representation strategy for enhancing drug abuse counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40(4), 385. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.40.4.385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Davis, R. A. (1979). The impact of self-modeling on problem behaviors in school-age children. School Psychology Review, 8(1), 128–132.Google Scholar
  106. Davis, W. B., Wieseler, N. A., & Hanzel, T. E. (1980). Contingent music in management of rumination and out-of-seat behavior in a profoundly mentally retarded institutionalized male. Mental Retardation, 18(1), 43–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. de Haas-Warner, S. J. (1991). Effects of self-monitoring on preschoolers’ on-task behavior: A pilot study. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 11(2), 59–73.Google Scholar
  108. de Waard, D., & Rooijers, T. (1994). An experimental study to evaluate the effectiveness of different methods and intensities of law enforcement on driving speed on motorways. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 26(6), 751–765. doi:10.1016/0001-4575(94)90052-3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Dees, S. M., Dansereau, D. F., & Simpson, D. D. (1994). A visual representation system for drug abuse counselors. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 11(6), 517. doi:10.1016/0740-5472(94)90003-5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Dekovic, M. (1999). Risk and protective factors in the development of problem behavior during adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 28(6), 667–685. doi:10.1023/A:1021635516758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Dellatan, A. K. (2003). The use of music with chronic food refusal: A case study. Music Therapy Perspectives, 21(2), 105–109.Google Scholar
  112. Delquadri, J. C., Greenwood, C. R., Stretton, K., & Hall, R. V. (1983). The peer tutoring spelling game: A classroom procedure for increasing opportunity to respond and spelling performance. Education and Treatment of Children, 6(3), 225–239.Google Scholar
  113. DeMartini-Scully, D., Bray, M. A., & Kehle, T. J. (2000). A packaged intervention to reduce disruptive behaviors in general education students. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 149–156. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6807(200003)37:2<149::AID-PITS6>3.0.CO;2-K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Derzon, J., Jimerson, S. R., & Furlong, M. (2006). How effective are school-based violence prevention programs in preventing and reducing violence and other antisocial behaviors? A meta-analysis. In Handbook of school violence and school safety: From research to practice (pp. 429–441). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  115. Derzon, J. H., Sale, E., Springer, J. F., & Brounstein, P. (2005). Estimating intervention effectiveness: Synthetic projection of field evaluation results. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 26, 321–343. doi:10.1007/s10935-005-5391-5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Deutsch, H., Parks, A. L., & Aylesworth, J. (1976). The use of contingent music to increase on-task academic behavior in children with emotional problems. Behavioral Engineering, 3(3), 77–79.Google Scholar
  117. Diamond, G., Godley, S. H., Liddle, H. A., Sampl, S., Webb, C., Tims, F. M., et al. (2002). Five outpatient treatment models for adolescent marijuana use: A description of the cannabis youth treatment interventions. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 97(Suppl 1), 70–83. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.97.s01.3.x.Google Scholar
  118. Diego, M. A., Field, T., Hernandez-Reif, M., Shaw, J. A., Rothe, E. M., Castellanos, D., et al. (2002). Aggressive adolescents benefit from massage therapy. Adolescence, 37, 597.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. DiFilippo, J. M., & Overholser, J. C. (1999). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of panic disorder: Confronting situational precipitants. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 29(2), 99–113. doi:10.1023/A:1021952614479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Downs, J. S., Murray, P. J., de Bruin, W.n. B., Penrose, J., Palmgren, C., & Fischhoff, B. (2004). Interactive video behavioral intervention to reduce adolescent females’ STD risk: A randomized controlled trial. Social Science and Medicine, 59(8), 1561–1572. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.01.032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Dowrick, P. W. (1999). A review of self modeling and related interventions. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 8(1), 23–39. doi:10.1016/S0962-1849(99)80009-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Dowrick, P. W., Kim-Rupnow, W. S., & Power, T. J. (2006). Video feed-forward for reading. The Journal of Special Education, 39(4), 194–207. doi:10.1177/00224669060390040101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Doyne, E. J., Chambless, D. L., & Beutler, L. E. (1983). Aerobic exercise as a treatment for depression in women. Behavior Therapy, 14(3), 434–440. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(83)80106-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Drabman, R. S., & Creedon, D. L. (1979). Beat the buzzer. Child Behavior Therapy, 1, 295–296.Google Scholar
  125. Ducharme, J. M. (2003). “Errorless” rehabilitation: strategies of proactive intervention for individuals with brain injury and their children. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 18(1), 88. doi:10.1097/00001199-200301000-00009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Ducharme, J. M., Atkinson, L., & Poulton, L. (2000). Success-based, noncoercive treatment of oppositional behavior in children from violent homes. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39(8), 995. doi:10.1097/00004583-200008000-00014.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Ducharme, J. M., Atkinson, L., & Poulton, L. (2001). Errorless complicance training with physically abusive mothers: A single-case approach. Child Abuse and Neglect, 25(6), 855. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(01)00243-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Ducharme, J. M., Davidson, A., & Rushford, N. (2002). Treatment of oppositional behavior in children of parents with brain injury and chronic pain. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10(4), 241. doi:10.1177/10634266020100040601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Ducharme, J. M., & Drain, T. L. (2004). Errorless academic compliance training: Improving generalized cooperation with parental requests in children with autism. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 43, 163–171. doi:10.1097/00004583-200402000-00011.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Ducharme, J. M., Harris, K., Milligan, K., & Pontes, E. (2003). Sequential evaluation of reinforced compliance and graduated request delivery for the treatment of noncompliance in children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33(5), 519. doi:10.1023/A:1025831528809.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Duncan, S. C., Duncan, T. E., & Strycker, L. A. (2000). Risk and protective factors influencing adolescent problem behavior: A multivariate latent growth curve analysis. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 22(2), 103–109. doi:10.1007/BF02895772.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Dunn, A. L., Trivedi, M. H., Kampert, J. B., Clark, C. G., & Chambliss, H. O. (2005). Exercise treatment for depression: Efficacy and dose response. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(1), 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2004.09.003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Dunn, A. L., Trivedi, M. H., & O’Neal, H. A. (2001). Physical activity dose-response effects on outcomes of depression and anxiety. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 33, S587–S597. doi:10.1097/00005768-200106001-00027.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. DuPaul, G. J., Ervin, R. A., Hook, C. L., & McGoey, K. E. (1998). Peer tutoring for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Effects on classroom behavior and academic performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31(4), 579–592. doi:10.1901/jaba.1998.31-579.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Dustman, R. E., Ruhling, R. O., Russell, E. M., Shearer, D. E., Bonekat, H. W., Shigeoka, J. W., et al. (1984). Aerobic exercise training and improved neuropsychological function of older adults. Neurobiology of Aging, 5(1), 35–42. doi:10.1016/0197-4580(84)90083-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Eddy, J. M. (2006). The need for a paradigm shift in preventive intervention research. Invited Address to the 14th Annual Meeting of the Society for Prevention Research. San Antonio, TX, May 2006.Google Scholar
  137. Edwards, K. A., & Johnston, R. (1977). Increasing greeting and farewell responses in high school students by a bus driver. Education & Treatment of Children, 1(1), 9–18.Google Scholar
  138. Egeland, G. M., Meyer, H. E., Selmer, R., Tverdal, A., & Vollset, S. E. (2001). Cod liver oil consumption, smoking, and coronary heart disease mortality: three counties, Norway. International Journal of Circumpolar Health, 60(2), 143–149.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. Egeland, B., & Winer, K. (1974). Teaching children to discriminate letters of the alphabet through errorless discrimination training. Journal of Reading Behavior, 6(2), 143–150.Google Scholar
  140. Eisenstein, S. R. (1974). Effect of contingent guitar lessons on reading behavior. Journal of Music Therapy, 11(3), 138–146.Google Scholar
  141. Elegbeleye, O. S. (1994). Differential effects of two modeling strategies on social competence development in Nigerian adolescents. IFE Psychologia, 2(1), 85–102.Google Scholar
  142. Ellickson, P. L., Bell, R. M., & Harrison, E. R. (1993). Changing adolescent propensities to use drugs: Results from project ALERT. Health Education Quarterly, 20, 227–242.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. Embry, D. D. (1982). Reducing the risk of pedestrian accidents to preschoolers by parent training and symbolic modeling for children: An experimental analysis in the natural environment. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.Google Scholar
  144. Embry, D. D. (1984). The safe-playing program: A case study of putting research into practice. In S. Paine & B. Bellamy (Eds.), Human services that work: From innovation to standard practice (p. 624). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
  145. Embry, D. D. (1997). Does your school have a peaceful environment? Using an audit to create a climate for change and resiliency. Intervention in School and Clinic, 32, 217–222.Google Scholar
  146. Embry, D. D. (2002). The good behavior game: A best practice candidate as a universal behavioral vaccine. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 5(4), 273–297. doi:10.1023/A:1020977107086.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Embry, D. D. (2004). Community-based prevention using simple, low-cost, evidence-based kernels and behavior vaccines. Journal of Community Psychology, 32(5), 575. doi:10.1002/jcop.20020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Embry, D. D., Flannery, D. J., Vazsonyi, A. T., Powell, K. E., & Atha, H. (1996). PeaceBuilders: A theoretically driven, school-based model for early violence prevention. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 12, 91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  149. Embry, D. D., Lopez, D. C. W., & Minugh, P. A. (2005). Stop the methamphetamine epidemic. Arizona Medicine, October, 30–34.Google Scholar
  150. Ennett, S. T., Ringwalt, C. L., Thorne, J., Rohrbach, L. A., Vincus, A., Simons-Rudolph, A., et al. (2003). A comparison of current practice in school-based substance use prevention programs with meta-analysis findings. Prevention Science, 4, 1–14. doi:10.1023/A:1021777109369.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Erkal, S., & Safak, S. (2006). Determination of the risks of domestic accidents for the 0–6 age group in the Tuzlucayir Village Clinic neighborhood. The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics, 48(1), 56–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  152. Etzel, B. C., & LeBlanc, J. M. (1979). The simplest treatment alternative: The law of parsimony applied to choosing appropriate instructional control and errorless-learning procedures for the difficult-to-teach child. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 9, 361–382. doi:10.1007/BF01531445.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Fabiano, G. A., Pelham, W. E., Manos, M. J., Gnagy, E. M., Chronis, A. M., Onyango, A. N., et al. (2004). An evaluation of three time-out procedures for children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Behavior Therapy, 35(3), 449–469. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80027-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Fantuzzo, J., & Ginsburg-Block, M. (1998). Reciprocal peer tutoring: Developing and testing effective peer collaborations for elementary school students. Peer-assisted learning (pp. 121–144). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  155. Farber, H., & Mayer, G. R. (1972). Behavior consultation in a barrio high school. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 51(4), 273.Google Scholar
  156. Fava, M. (2001). Augmentation and combination strategies in treatment-resistant depression. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 62(Suppl 18), 4–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  157. Feldman, R., & Eidelman, A. I. (2003). Skin-to-skin contact (Kangaroo Care) accelerates autonomic and neurobehavioural maturation in preterm infants. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 45(4), 274–281. doi:10.1017/S0012162203000525.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Ferber, S. G., & Makhoul, I. R. (2004). The effect of skin-to-skin contact (kangaroo care) shortly after birth on the neurobehavioral responses of the term newborn: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics, 113(4), 858–865. doi:10.1542/peds.113.4.858.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Ferguson, C. A. (1976). The structure and use of politeness formulas. Language in Society, 5(2), 137–151.Google Scholar
  160. Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  161. Field, T. M. (1998). Touch therapy effects on development. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 22(4), 779. doi:10.1080/016502598384162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Field, T. (1999). American adolescents touch each other less and are more aggressive toward their peers as compared with French adolescents. Adolescence, 34(136), 753.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  163. Field, T. M., Grizzle, N., Scafidi, F., & Schanberg, S. (1996a). Massage and relaxation therapies’ effects on depressed adolescent mothers. Adolescence, 31(124), 903.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  164. Field, T., Grizzle, N., Scafidi, F., Abrams, S., Richardson, S., Kuhn, C., et al. (1996b). Massage therapy for infants of depressed mothers. Infant Behavior and Development, 19(1), 107. doi:10.1016/S0163-6383(96)90048-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Field, T., Kilmer, T., Hernandez-Reif, M., & Burman, I. (1996c). Preschool children’s sleep and wake behavior: Effects of massage therapy. Early Child Development and Care, 120, 39. doi:10.1080/0300443961200104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. Field, T., Seligman, S., Scafidi, F., & Schanberg, S. (1996d). Alleviating post-traumatic stress in children following Hurricane Andrew. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 17(1), 37. doi:10.1016/S0193-3973(96)90004-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. Filcheck, H. A., McNeil, C. B., Greco, L. A., & Bernard, R. S. (2004). Using a whole-class token economy and coaching of teacher skills in a preschool classroom to manage disruptive behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 41(3), 351–361. doi:10.1002/pits.10168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Fillingham, J. K., Hodgson, C., Sage, K., & Ralph, M. A. L. (2003). The application of errorless learning to aphasic disorders: A review of theory and practice. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 13(3), 337–363. doi:10.1080/09602010343000020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. Fischer, P. M., Schwartz, M. P., Richards, J. W., Jr, Goldstein, A. O., & Rojas, T. H. (1991). Brand logo recognition by children aged 3 to 6 years. Mickey mouse and old Joe the camel. Journal of the American Medical Association, 266(22), 3145–3148. doi:10.1001/jama.266.22.3145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. Fishbein, J. E., & Wasik, B. H. (1981). Effect of the good behavior game on disruptive library behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 89–93. doi:10.1901/jaba.1981.14-89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. Flannery, D. J., Vazsonyi, A. T., Liau, A. K., Guo, S., Powell, K. E., Atha, H., et al. (2003). Initial behavior outcomes for the peacebuilders universal school-based violence prevention program. Developmental Psychology, 39(2), 292–308. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.39.2.292.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. Flay, B. R., Biglan, A., Boruch, R. F., Castro, F. G., Gottfredson, D., Kellam, S., et al. (2004). Standards of evidence: Criteria for efficacy, effectiveness, and dissemination. Washington, DC: Society for Prevention Research.Google Scholar
  173. Fletcher, D. (1995). A five-year study of effects of fines, gender, race, and age on illegal parking in spaces reserved for people with disabilities. Rehabilitation Psychology, 40, 203–210. doi:10.1037/0090-5550.40.3.203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. Ford, M. J., Poe, V., & Cox, J. (1993). Attending behaviors of ADHD children in math and reading using various types of software. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 4(2), 183–196.Google Scholar
  175. Forgatch, M. S., DeGarmo, D. S., & Beldvas, Z. G. (2005a). An efficacious theory-based intervention for stepfamilies. Behavior Therapy, 34, 357–365. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80117-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. Forgatch, M. S., Patterson, G. R., & DeGarmo, D. S. (2005b). Evaluating fidelity: Predictive validity for a measure of competent adherence to the Oregon model of parent management training. Behavior Therapy, 36, 3–13. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80049-8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Foxx, R. M., & Axelroth, E. (1983). Nicotine fading, self-monitoring, and cigarette fading to produce cigarette abstinence or controlled smoking. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 21(1), 17–27. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(83)90122-5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. Foxx, R. M., & Jones, J. R. (1978). A remediation program for increasing the spelling achievement of elementary and junior high school students. Behavior Modification, 2, 211–230. doi:10.1177/014544557822004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  179. Freeman, M. P., Hibbeln, J. R., Wisner, K. L., Brumbach, B. H., Watchman, M., & Gelenberg, A. J. (2006a). Randomized dose-ranging pilot trial of omega-3 fatty acids for postpartum depression. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 113(1), 31–35. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00660.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. Freeman, M. P., Hibbeln, J. R., Wisner, K. L., Davis, J. M., Mischoulon, D., Peet, M., et al. (2006b). Omega-3 fatty acids: evidence basis for treatment and future research in psychiatry. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 67(12), 1954–1967.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  181. Fry, D. P. (1987). Differences between playfighting and serious fighting among Zapotec children. Ethology and Sociobiology, 8(4), 285. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(87)90029-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. Furr-Holden, C. D., Ialongo, N. S., Anthony, J. C., Petras, H., & Kellam, S. G. (2004). Developmentally inspired drug prevention: middle school outcomes in a school-based randomized prevention trial. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 73(2), 149–158. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2003.10.002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. Gardner, R., Heward, W. L., & Grossi, T. A. (1994). Effects of response cards on student participation and academic achievement: A systematic replication with inner-city students during whole-class science instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 63–71. doi:10.1901/jaba.1994.27-63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  184. Gaskell, G., & Smith, P. (1986). Group membership and social attitudes of youth: An investigation of some implications of social identity theory. Social Behaviour, 1, 67–77.Google Scholar
  185. Geller, E. S., Johnson, R. P., & Pelton, S. L. (1982). Community-based interventions for encouraging safety belt use. American Journal of Community Psychology, 10(2), 183. doi:10.1007/BF00896423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. Gesch, C. B., Hammond, S. M., Hampson, S. E., Eves, A., & Crowder, M. J. (2002). Influence of supplementary vitamins, minerals and essential fatty acids on the antisocial behaviour of young adult prisoners. Randomised, placebo-controlled trial. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 181, 22–28. doi:10.1192/bjp.181.1.22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  187. Ghosh, S., & Chattopadhyay, P. K. (1993). Application of behaviour modification techniques in treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A case report. Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology, 20(2), 124–129.Google Scholar
  188. Glasgow, R. E., Klesges, R. C., Godding, P. R., & Gegelman, R. (1983a). Controlled smoking, with or without carbon monoxide feedback, as an alternative for chronic smokers. Behavior Therapy, 14(3), 386–397. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(83)80101-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  189. Glasgow, R. E., Klesges, R. C., & Vasey, M. W. (1983b). Controlled smoking for chronic smokers: An extension and replication. Addictive Behaviors, 8(2), 143–150. doi:10.1016/0306-4603(83)90008-4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. Glasgow, R. E., Vogt, T. M., & Boles, S. M. (1999). Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1322–1327.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  191. Godfrey, S. A., Grisham-Brown, J., Schuster, J. W., & Hemmeter, M. L. (2003). The effects of three techniques on student participation with preschool children with attending problems. Education and Treatment of Children, 26(3), 255–272.Google Scholar
  192. Gonzalez, M., & Ribes, E. (1975). Reversibility of the reinforcement-punishment function in children. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 1(1), 55–67.Google Scholar
  193. Gordon, J., Biglan, A., & Smolkowski, K. (2008). The impact on tobacco use of branded youth antitobacco activities and family communications about tobacco. Prevention Science, 9(2), 73–87. doi:10.1007/s11121-008-0089-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  194. Gordon, N. S., Kollack-Walker, S., Akil, H., & Panksepp, J. (2002). Expression of c-fos gene activation during rough and tumble play in juvenile rats. Brain Research Bulletin, 57(5), 651–659. doi:10.1016/S0361-9230(01)00762-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  195. Gray, S. I., & Shelton, R. L. (1992). Self-monitoring effects on articulation carryover in school-age children. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 23(4), 334–342.Google Scholar
  196. Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2003). Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature, 423(6939), 534–537. doi:10.1038/nature01647.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  197. Greenwood, C. R. (1991a). Classwide peer tutoring: longitudinal effects on the reading, language, and mathematics achievement of at-risk students. Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities International, 7(2), 105–123.Google Scholar
  198. Greenwood, C. R. (1991b). Longitudinal analysis of time, engagement, and achievement in at-risk versus non-risk students. Exceptional Children, 57(6), 521–535.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  199. Greenwood, K. M., & Matyas, T. A. (1990). Problems with the application of interrupted time series analysis for brief single-subject data. Behavioral Assessment, 12(3), 355–370.Google Scholar
  200. Grossman, D. C., Neckerman, H. J., Koepsell, T. D., Liu, P., Asher, K. N., Beland, K., et al. (1997). Effectiveness of a violence prevention curriculum among children in elementary school. A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 277, 1605–1611. doi:10.1001/jama.277.20.1605.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  201. Gudbjarnason, S., Benediktsdottir, V. E., & Gudmundsdottir, E. (1991). Balance between omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids in heart muscle in relation to diet, stress, and aging. World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics, 66, 292–305.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  202. Gupta, R., Stringer, B., & Meakin, A. (1990). A study to access the effectiveness of home-based reinforcement in a secondary school: Some preliminary findings. Association of Educational Psychologists Journal, 5(4), 197.Google Scholar
  203. Haag, M. (2003). Essential fatty acids and the brain. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 48(3), 195–203.Google Scholar
  204. Hall, A. M., & Zentall, S. S. (2000). The effects of a learning station on the completion and accuracy of math homework for middle school students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10(2–3), 123–137. doi:10.1023/A:1016636113459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  205. Hallfors, D., Cho, H., Sanchez, V., Khatapoush, S., Kim, H. M., & Bauer, D. (2006). Efficacy vs effectiveness trial results of an indicated “model” substance abuse program: implications for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 96(12), 2254–2259. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2005.067462.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  206. Hallfors, D., & Godette, D. (2002). Will the ‘principles of effectiveness’ improve prevention practice? Early findings from a diffusion study. Health Education Research, 17, 461–470. doi:10.1093/her/17.4.461.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  207. Hallfors, D. D., Pankratz, M., & Hartman, S. (2007). Does federal policy support the use of scientific evidence in school-based prevention programs? Prevention Science, 8(1), 75–81. doi:10.1007/s11121-006-0058-x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  208. Harding, C., & Ballard, K. D. (1982). The effectiveness of music as a stimulus and as a contingent reward in promoting the spontaneous speech of three physically handicapped preschoolers. Journal of Music Therapy, 19(2), 86–101.Google Scholar
  209. Harris, C. L., Aycicegi, A., & Gleason, J. B. (2003). Taboo words and reprimands elicit greater autonomic reactivity in a first language than in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(4), 561–579. doi:10.1017/S0142716403000286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  210. Harris, K. R., Friedlander, B. D., Saddler, B., Frizzelle, R., & Graham, S. (2005). Self-monitoring of attention versus self-monitoring of academic performance: Effects among students with ADHD in the general education classroom. The Journal of Special Education, 39, 145–156. doi:10.1177/00224669050390030201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  211. Harrison, R. G., & Schaeffer, R. W. (1975). Another test of the Premack principle. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 6(6), 565–568.Google Scholar
  212. Hartley, E. T., Bray, M. A., & Kehle, T. J. (1998). Self-modeling as an intervention to increase student classroom participation. Psychology in the Schools, 35(4), 363–372. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6807(199810)35:4M<363::AID-PITS7>3.0.CO;2-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  213. Hartley, E. T., Kehle, T. J., & Bray, M. A. (2002). Increasing student classroom participation through self-modeling. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19(1), 51–63.Google Scholar
  214. Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.Google Scholar
  215. Hayes, S. C., & Cone, J. D. (1977). Reducing residential electrical energy use: Payments, information and feedback. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10(3), 425–435. doi:10.1901/jaba.1977.10-425.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  216. Heap, C., & Emerson, E. (1989). A note on the use of peer assistance and praise to increase engagement and productivity on a vocational assembly task. Mental Handicap Research, 2(2), 186–196.Google Scholar
  217. Heffner, M., Greco, L. A., & Eifert, G. H. (2003). Pretend you are a turtle: Children’s responses to metaphorical versus literal relaxation instructions. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 25(1), 19–33. doi:10.1300/J019v25n01_02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  218. Hegel, M. T., & Ferguson, R. J. (2000). Differential reinforcement of other behavior (DRO) to reduce aggressive behavior following traumatic brain injury. Behavior Modification, 24(1), 94–101. doi:10.1177/0145445500241005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  219. Helland, I. B., Smith, L., Saarem, K., Saugstad, O. D., & Drevon, C. A. (2003). Maternal supplementation with very-long-chain n-3 fatty acids during pregnancy and lactation augments children’s IQ at 4 years of age. Pediatrics, 111(1), e39–e44. doi:10.1542/peds.111.1.e39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  220. Henderson, H. S., Jenson, W. R., & Erken, N. F. (1986). Using variable interval schedules to improve on-task behavior in the classroom. Education and Treatment of Children, 9(3), 250–263.Google Scholar
  221. Hertz, V., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1990). Self-recording: Effects for on-task behavior of mildly handicapped adolescents. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 12(3), 1–11. doi:10.1300/J019v12n03_01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  222. Hibbeln, J. R. (1998). Fish consumption and major depression. Lancet, 351(9110), 1213. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)79168-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  223. Hibbeln, J. R. (2001). Seafood consumption and homicide mortality. A cross-national ecological analysis. World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics, 88, 41–46. doi:10.1159/000059747.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  224. Hibbeln, J. R. (2002). Seafood consumption, the DHA content of mothers’ milk and prevalence rates of postpartum depression: A cross-national, ecological analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 69(1–3), 15–29. doi:10.1016/S0165-0327(01)00374-3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  225. Hibbeln, J. R., Davis, J. M., Steer, C., Emmett, P., Rogers, I., Williams, C., et al. (2007). Maternal seafood consumption in pregnancy and neurodevelopmental outcomes in childhood (ALSPAC study): An observational cohort study. Lancet, 369, 578–585. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60277-3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  226. Hibbeln, J. R., Ferguson, T. A., & Blasbalg, T. L. (2006a). Omega-3 fatty acid deficiencies in neurodevelopment, aggression, and autonomic dysregulation: opportunities for intervention. International Review of Psychiatry (Abingdon, England), 18(2), 107–118. doi:10.1080/09540260600582967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  227. Hibbeln, J. R., Linnoila, M., Umhau, J. C., Rawlings, R., George, D. T., & Salem, N., Jr. (1998). Essential fatty acids predict metabolites of serotonin and dopamine in cerebrospinal fluid among healthy control subjects, and early- and late-onset alcoholics. Biological Psychiatry, 44(4), 235–242. doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(98)00141-3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  228. Hibbeln, J. R., Nieminen, L. R., Blasbalg, T. L., Riggs, J. A., & Lands, W. E. (2006b). Healthy intakes of n-3 and n-6 fatty acids: estimations considering worldwide diversity. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 83(6 Suppl), 1483S–1493S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  229. Hibbeln, J. R., & Salem, N., Jr. (1995). Dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids and depression: when cholesterol does not satisfy. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 62(1), 1–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  230. Hickey, K., Imber, S. C., & Ruggiero, E. (1979). Modifying reading behavior of elementary special needs children: A cooperative resource-parent program. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12: 444–449.Google Scholar
  231. Hill, J., Brantner, J., & Spreat, S. (1989). The effect of contingent music on the in-seat behavior of a blind young woman with profound mental retardation. Education and Treatment of Children, 12(2), 165–173.Google Scholar
  232. Hines, M., & Kaufman, F. R. (1994). Androgen and the development of human sex-typical behavior: rough-and-tumble play and sex of preferred playmates in children with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH). Child Development, 65(4), 1042–1053. doi:10.2307/1131303.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  233. Hirasing, R. A., & Reus, H. (1991). Dry bed training in nocturnal enuresis. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde, 135(38), 1750–1753.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  234. Hitchcock, C. H., Dowrick, P. W., & Prater, M. A. (2003). Video self-modeling intervention in school-based settings: A review. Remedial and Special Education, 24(1), 36–46. doi:10.1177/074193250302400104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  235. Hitchcock, C. H., Prater, M. A., & Dowrick, P. W. (2004). Reading comprehension and fluency: Examining the effects of tutoring and video self-modeling on first-grade students with reading difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27(2), 89–103. doi:10.2307/1593644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  236. Hoath, F. E., & Sanders, M. R. (2002). A feasibility study of enhanced group Triple P—positive parenting program for parents of ahildren with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Behaviour Change, 19, 191–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  237. Hoigaard, R., Safvenbom, R., & Tonnessen, F. E. (2006). The relationship between group cohesion, group norms, and perceived social loafing in soccer teams. Small Group Research, 37(3), 217–232. doi:10.1177/1046496406287311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  238. Holloway, M. S. (1980). A comparison of passive and active music reinforcement to increase preacademic and motor skills in severely retarded children and adolescents. Journal of Music Therapy, 17(2), 58–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  239. Homme, L. E., Debaca, P. C., Devine, J. V., Steinhorst, R., & Rickert, E. J. (1963). Use of the Premack principle in controlling the behavior of nursery school children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6(4), 544. doi:10.1901/jeab.1963.6-544.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  240. Hosford, R. E. (1980). Self-as-a-model: A cognitive social learning technique. The Counseling Psychologist, 9(1), 45–62. doi:10.1177/001100008000900113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  241. Hosie, T. W., Gentile, J. R., & Carroll, J. D. (1974). Pupil preferences and the Premack principle. American Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 241–247.Google Scholar
  242. Houghton, S., Wheldall, K., Jukes, R., & Sharpe, A. (1990). The effects of limited private reprimands and increased private praise on classroom behaviour in four British secondary school classes. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 60(3), 255–265.Google Scholar
  243. Houlihan, D., Miltenberger, R. G., Trench, B., Larson, M., Larson, S., & Vincent, J. (1995). A video-tape peer/self modeling program to increase community involvement. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 17(3), 1–11. doi:10.1300/J019v17n03_01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  244. Howard, D. J. (1990). The influence of verbal responses to common greetings on compliance behavior: The foot-in-the-mouth effect. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20(14 Pt 2), 1185–1196. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1990.tb00399.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  245. Hudson, A., Vincent, J., Wilks, R., & Drabman, R. (1985). “Beat the buzzer” for early morning dawdling: Two case illustrations. Behaviour Change, 2(2), 136–142.Google Scholar
  246. Hughes, C., Copeland, S. R., Agran, M., Wehmeyer, M. L., Rodi, M. S., & Presley, J. A. (2002). Using self-monitoring to improve performance in general education high school classes. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 262–272.Google Scholar
  247. Hume, K. M., & Crossman, J. (1992). Musical reinforcement of practice behaviors among competitive swimmers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25(3), 665–670. doi:10.1901/jaba.1992.25-665.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  248. Hunkin, N. M., Squires, E. J., Parkin, A. J., & Tidy, J. A. (1998). Are the benefits of errorless learning dependent on implicit memory? Neuropsychologia, 36(1), 25–36. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00106-1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  249. Hutton, J. B. (1983). How to decrease problem behavior at school by rewarding desirable behavior at home. Pointer, 27(4), 25.Google Scholar
  250. Jacklin, C. N., DiPietro, J. A., & Maccoby, E. E. (1984). Sex-typing behavior and sex-typing pressure in child/parent interaction. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 13(5), 413–425. doi:10.1007/BF01541427.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  251. Jackson, N. C., & Mathews, R. M. (1995). Using public feedback to increase contributions to a multipurpose senior center. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 449–455. doi:10.1901/jaba.1995.28-449.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  252. Jarrett, O. S., Maxwell, D. M., Dickerson, C., Hoge, P., Davies, G., & Yetley, A. (1998). Impact of recess on classroom behavior: Group effects and individual differences. The Journal of Educational Research, 92, 121–126.Google Scholar
  253. Jarvinen, R., Knekt, P., Rissanen, H., & Reunanen, A. (2006). Intake of fish and long-chain n-3 fatty acids and the risk of coronary heart mortality in men and women. The British Journal of Nutrition, 95(4), 824–829. doi:10.1079/BJN20051687.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  254. Jason, L. A., Katz, R., Pokorny, S. B., Engstrom, M., Tegart, G., & Curie, C. (2000). The relationship between youth tobacco control enforcement and crime rates in a Midwestern county. American Journal of Health Promotion, 14(4), 229–231.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  255. Jason, L. A., & Liotta, R. F. (1982). Pedestrian jaywalking under facilitating and nonfacilitating conditions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15(3), 469–473. doi:10.1901/jaba.1982.15-469.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  256. Jason, L. A., Neal, A. M., & Marinakis, G. (1985). Altering contingencies to facilitate compliance with traffic light systems. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18(1), 95–100. doi:10.1901/jaba.1985.18-95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  257. Jason, L. A., Pokorny, S. B., Turner, P. L., Freeland, M., Corbin, S., & Driscoll, M. (2005). Decreasing public smoking among youth: A preliminary study. Education and Treatment of Children, 28(3), 299–307.Google Scholar
  258. Joe, G. W., Dansereau, D. F., Pitre, U., & Simpson, D. D. (1997). Effectiveness of node-link mapping enhanced counseling for opiate addicts: A 12-month post-treatment follow-up. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 185(5), 306. doi:10.1097/00005053-199705000-00004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  259. Joe, G. W., Dansereau, D. F., & Simpson, D. D. (1994). Node-link mapping for counseling cocaine users in methadone treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse, 6(4), 393. doi:10.1016/S0899-3289(94)90320-4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  260. Jones, N. A., Field, T., & Davalos, M. (1998). Massage therapy attenuates right frontal EEG asymmetry in one-month-old infants of depressed mothers. Infant Behavior and Development, 21(3), 527. doi:10.1016/S0163-6383(98)90025-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  261. Jorgenson, H. (1974). The use of a contingent music activity to modify behaviors which interfere with learning. Journal of Music Therapy, 11(1), 41–46.Google Scholar
  262. Jorgensen, F., & Pedersen, H. (2005). Enforcement of speed limits—actual policy and drivers’ knowledge. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 37(1), 53–62. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2004.06.004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  263. Juarez, F. (2002). Tendency and relationships in violent behavior patterns in groups. Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica, 11(2), 155–170.Google Scholar
  264. Kahn, J. S., Kehle, T. J., Jenson, W. R., & Clark, E. (1990). Comparison of cognitive-behavioral, relaxation, and self-modeling interventions for depression among middle-school students. School Psychology Review, 19(2), 196–211.Google Scholar
  265. Kamps, D. M., Dugan, E. P., Leonard, B. R., & Daoust, P. M. (1994). Enhanced small group instruction using choral responding and student interaction for children with autism and developmental disabilities. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 99(1), 60–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  266. Kazdin, A. E. (1980). Acceptability of alternative treatments for deviant child behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13(2), 259–273. doi:10.1901/jaba.1980.13-259.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  267. Keel, M. C., & Gast, D. L. (1992). Small-group instruction for students with learning disabilities: Observational and incidental learning. Exceptional Children, 58(4), 357–368.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  268. Kehle, T. J., Bray, M. A., Margiano, S. G., Theodore, L. A., & Zhou, Z. (2002). Self-modeling as an effective intervention for students with serious emotional disturbance: Are we modifying children’s memories? Psychology in the Schools, 39(2), 203–207. doi:10.1002/pits.10031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  269. Kellam, S. G., & Anthony, J. C. (1998). Targeting early antecedents to prevent tobacco smoking: Findings from an epidemiologically based randomized field trial. American Journal of Public Health, 88(10), 1490–1495.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  270. Kellam, S., Brown, C. H., Poduska, J., Ialongo, N., Wang, W., Toyinbo, P., et al. (2008). Effects of a universal classroom behavior management program in first and second grades on young adult behavioral, psychiatric, and social outcomes. Drug & Alcohol Dependence (Special Issue), 24.Google Scholar
  271. Kellam, S. G., Rebok, G. W., Ialongo, N., & Mayer, L. S. (1994). The course and malleability of aggressive behavior from early first grade into middle school: Results of a developmental epidemiology-based preventive trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 35, 259–281. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1994.tb01161.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  272. Kelley, M. L., Carper, L. B., Witt, J. C., & Elliott, S. N.(1988). Home-based reinforcement procedures. Handbook of behavior therapy in education (p. 419). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  273. Kelley, M. L., & McCain, A. P. (1995). Promoting academic performance in inattentive children. The relative efficacy of school-home notes with and without response cost. Behavior Modification, 19(3), 357–375.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  274. Kellum, K. K., Carr, J. E., & Dozier, C. L. (2001). Response-card instruction and student learning in a college classroom. Teaching of Psychology (Columbia, Mo.), 28, 101–104. doi:10.1207/S15328023TOP2802_06.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  275. Kern, L., Dunlap, G., Childs, K. E., & Clarke, S. (1994). Use of a classwide self-management program to improve the behavior of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 17(4), 445–458.Google Scholar
  276. Khatri, P., Blumenthal, J. A., Babyak, M. A., Craighead, W. E., Herman, S., Baldewicz, T., et al. (2001). Effects of exercise training on cognitive functioning among depressed older men and women. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 9(1), 43–57.Google Scholar
  277. Kivlighan, K. T., & Granger, D. A. (2006). Salivary a-amylase response to competition: Relation to gender, previous experience, and attitudes. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 31, 703–714. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2006.01.007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  278. Knapp, T. J. (1976). The Premack principle in human experimental and applied settings. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 14(2), 133–147. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(76)90067-X.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  279. Koepp, M. J., Gunn, R. N., Lawrence, A. D., Cunningham, V. J., Dagher, A., Jones, T., et al. (1998). Evidence for striatal dopamine release during a video game. Nature, 393, 266–268. doi:10.1038/30498.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  280. Koffman, D. M., Lee, J. W., Hopp, J. W., & Emont, S. L. (1998). The impact of including incentives and competition in a workplace smoking cessation program on quit rates. American Journal of Health Promotion, 13(2), 105–111.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  281. Krantz, P. J., & Risley, T. R. (1977). Behavioral ecology in the classroom. In K. D. O’Leary & S. G. O’Leary (Eds.), Classroom management: The successful use of behavior modification (2nd ed., pp. 349–367). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  282. Krevor, B., Capitman, J. A., Oblak, L., Cannon, J. B., & Ruwe, M. (2003). Preventing illegal tobacco and alcohol sales to minors through electronic age-verification devices: A field effectiveness study. Journal of Public Health Policy, 24(3–4), 251–268. doi:10.2307/3343372.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  283. Krug, E. G., Brener, N. D., Dahlberg, L. L., Ryan, G. W., & Powell, K. E. (1997). The impact of an elementary school-based violence prevention program on visits to the school nurse. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 13(6), 459–463.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  284. Kubesch, S., Bretschneider, V., Freudenmann, R., Weidenhammer, N., Lehmann, M., Spitzer, M., et al. (2003). Aerobic endurance exercise improves executive functions in depressed patients. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 64(9), 1005–1012.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  285. La Greca, A. M., & Santogrossi, D. A. (1980). Social skills training with elementary school students: A behavioral group approach. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48(2), 220. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.48.2.220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  286. Lakes, K. D., & Hoyt, W. T. (2004). Promoting self-regulation through school-based martial arts training. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 25(3), 283–302. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2004.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  287. Lalramnghinglova, H. (1999). Ethnobiology in Mizoram state: folklore medico-zoology. Bulletin of the Indian Institute of History of Medicine (Hyderabad), 29(2), 123–148.Google Scholar
  288. Lambert, J. L. (1979). Experiments with errorless discrimination learning. Enfance, 2, 107–132.Google Scholar
  289. Larson, K., & Ayllon, T. (1990). The effects of contingent music and differential reinforcement on infantile colic. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28(2), 119–125. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(90)90024-D.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  290. Larsson, B., Carlsson, J., Fichtel, S., & Melin, L. (2005). Relaxation treatment of adolescent headache sufferers: Results from a school-based replication series. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 45(6), 692–704. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4610.2005.05138.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  291. Larun, L., Nordheim, L. V., Ekeland, E., Hagen, K. B., & Heian, F. (2006). Exercise in prevention and treatment of anxiety and depression among children and young people. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, article number: CD004691. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004691.pub2.
  292. Law, B., & Ste-Marie, D. M. (2005). Effects of self-modeling on figure skating jump performance and psychological variables. European Journal of Sport Science, 5, 143–152. doi:10.1080/17461390500159273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  293. Lawshe, C. H. (1940). Studies in automobile speed on the highway II. Approach speeds and changes in sign size and location on the highway. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 24, 308–317. doi:10.1037/h0057756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  294. Leblanc, M.-P., Ricciardi, J. N., & Luiselli, J. K. (2005). Improving discrete trial instruction by paraprofessional staff through an abbreviated performance feedback intervention. Education and Treatment of Children, 28(1), 76–82.Google Scholar
  295. Leclerc, R., & Thurston, C. (2003). Applications of the Premack principle by the parents of an autistic child. Revue Francophone de la Déficience Intellectuelle, 14(2), 139–150.Google Scholar
  296. Leff, S. S., Costigan, T., & Power, T. J. (2004). Using participatory research to develop a playground-based prevention program. Journal of School Psychology, 42(1), 3. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2003.08.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  297. Leibowitz, J. M. (1975). Differential reinforcement effectiveness as a function of schedule of reinforcement and reinforcement history. The Psychological Record, 25(3), 343–354.Google Scholar
  298. Lennox, D. B., Miltenberger, R. G., Spengler, P., & Erfanian, N. (1988). Decelerative treatment practices with persons who have mental retardation: a review of five years of the literature. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 92(6), 492–501.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  299. Libb, J. W., Sachs, C., & Boyd, W. (1973). Reinforcement strategies for token economies in a special classroom setting. Psychological Reports, 32(3 Pt 1), 831–834.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  300. Liberman, R. P., Ferris, C., Salgado, P., & Salgado, J. (1975). Replication of the achievement place model in California. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8(3), 287–299. doi:10.1901/jaba.1975.8-287.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  301. Lieber, C. S., Spritz, N., & DeCarli, L. M. (1969). Fatty liver produced by dietary deficiencies: Its pathogenesis and potentiation by ethanol. Journal of Lipid Research, 10(3), 283–287.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  302. Lipsey, M. W., Dodge, K. A., Dishion, T. J., & Lansford, J. E. (2006). The effects of community-based group treatment for delinquency: A meta-analytic search for cross-study generalizations. Deviant peer influences in programs for youth: Problems and solutions (pp. 162–184). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  303. Liu, J., Raine, A., Venables, P. H., & Mednick, S. A. (2004). Malnutrition at age 3 years and externalizing behavior problems at ages 8, 11, and 17 years. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 161(11), 2005–2013. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.161.11.2005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  304. Lonnecker, C., Brady, M. P., McPherson, R., & Hawkins, J. (1994). Video self-modeling and cooperative classroom behavior in children with learning and behavior problems: Training and generalization effects. Behavioral Disorders, 20(1), 24–34.Google Scholar
  305. Lősel, F., & Beelmann, A. (2003). Effects of child skills training in preventing antisocial behavior: A systematic review of randomized evaluations. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 587, 84–109. doi:10.1177/0002716202250793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  306. Lowe, T. O., & McLaughlin, E. C. (1974). The use of verbal reinforcement by paraprofessionals in the treatment of underachieving elementary school students. Journal of the Student Personnel Association for Teacher Education, 12(3), 95.Google Scholar
  307. Lowndes, M., & Dawes, J. (2001). Do distinct SERVQUAL dimensions emerge from mystery shopping data? A test of convergent validity. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 16(2), 41–53.Google Scholar
  308. Luciano, M. C., Herruzo, J., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2001). Generalization of say-do correspondence. The Psychological Record, 51(1), 111–130.Google Scholar
  309. Luciano-Soriano, M. C., Molina-Cobos, F. J., & Gomez-Becerra, I. (2000). Say-do-report training to change chronic behaviors in mentally retarded subjects. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 21(5), 355–366. doi:10.1016/S0891-4222(00)00048-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  310. Ludington-Hoe, S. M., Anderson, G. C., Swinth, J. Y., Thompson, C., & Hadeed, A. J. (2004). Randomized controlled trial of kangaroo care: cardiorespiratory and thermal effects on healthy preterm infants. Neonatal Network—Journal of Neonatal Nursing, 23(3), 39–48.Google Scholar
  311. Luiselli, J. K., & Greenidge, A. (1982). Behavioral treatment of high-rate aggression in a rubella child. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 13(2), 152–157. doi:10.1016/0005-7916(82)90059-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  312. Maag, J. W., Rutherford, R. B., Wolchik, S. A., & Parks, B. T. (1986). Comparison of two short overcorrection procedures on the stereotypic behavior of autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 16(1), 83–87. doi:10.1007/BF01531581.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  313. Madaus, M. M. R., Kehle, T. J., Madaus, J., & Bray, M. A. (2003). Mystery motivator as an intervention to promote homework completion and accuracy. School Psychology International, 24(4), 369–377. doi:10.1177/01430343030244001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  314. Madsen, C. K. (1982). The effect of contingent teacher approval and withholding music performance on improving attentiveness. Psychology of Music, Special Issue, 76–81.Google Scholar
  315. Maglieri, K. A., DeLeon, I. G., Rodriguez-Catter, V., & Sevin, B. M. (2000). Treatment of covert food stealing in an individual with Prader-Willi syndrome. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33(4), 615–618. doi:10.1901/jaba.2000.33-615.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  316. Maheady, L., Harper, G. F., & Sacca, K. (1988a). A classwide peer tutoring system in a secondary, resource room program for the mildly handicapped. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 21(3), 76–83.Google Scholar
  317. Maheady, L., Sacca, M. K., & Harper, G. F. (1988b). Classwide peer tutoring with mildly handicapped high school students. Exceptional Children, 55(1), 52–59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  318. Majovski, L. V., & Clement, P. W. (1977). Children’s lever-pulling rates under variable-interval percentage schedules. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 23(2), 212–225. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(77)90100-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  319. Manger, T. A., & Motta, R. W. (2005). The impact of an exercise program on posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and depression. International Journal of Emergency Mental Health, 7(1), 49–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  320. Marchant, M., & Young, K. R. (2001). The effects of a parent coach on parents’ acquisition and implementation of parenting skills. Education and Treatment of Children, 24(3), 351–373.Google Scholar
  321. Marchant, M., Young, K. R., & West, R. P. (2004). The effects of parental teaching on compliance behavior of children. Psychology in the Schools, 41(3), 337–350. doi:10.1002/pits.10165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  322. Marin, H., & Menza, M. A. (2005). The management of fatigue in depressed patients. Essential Psychopharmacology, 6(4), 185–192.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  323. Marion, M., & Muza, R. (1998). Positive discipline: Six strategies for guiding behavior. Texas Child Care, 22(2), 6–11.Google Scholar
  324. Marshall, S. W., Runyan, C. W., Yang, J., Coyne-Beasley, T., Waller, A. E., Johnson, R. M., et al. (2005). Prevalence of selected risk and protective factors for falls in the home. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(1), 95–101. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2004.09.015.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  325. Martella, R. C., Leonard, I. J., Marchand-Martella, N. E., & Agran, M. (1993). Self-monitoring negative statements. Journal of Behavioral Education, 3(1), 77–86. doi:10.1007/BF00947146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  326. Martens, B. K., Hiralall, A. S., & Bradley, T. A. (1997). A note to teacher: Improving student behavior through goal setting and feedback. School Psychology Quarterly, 12(1), 33–41. doi:10.1037/h0088945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  327. Mathes, M. Y., & Bender, W. N. (1997). The effects of self-monitoring on children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder who are receiving pharmacological interventions. Remedial and Special Education, 18(2), 121–128.Google Scholar
  328. Mathes, P. G., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Henley, A. M., et al. (1994). Increasing strategic reading practice with peabody classwide peer tutoring. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 9(1), 44–48.Google Scholar
  329. Matheson, A. S., & Shriver, M. D. (2005). Training teachers to give effective commands: effects on student compliance and academic behaviors. School Psychology Review, 34, 202–219.Google Scholar
  330. Mayer, G. R., Butterworth, T., Nafpaktitis, M., & Sulzer-Azaroff, B. (1983). Preventing school vandalism and improving discipline: A three-year study. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16(4), 355–369. doi:10.1901/jaba.1983.16-355.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  331. Mayer, G. R., Mitchell, L. K., Clementi, T., Clement-Robertson, E., Myatt, R., & Bullara, D. T. (1993). A dropout prevention program for at-risk high school students: Emphasizing consulting to promote positive classroom climates. Education and Treatment of Children, 16(2), 135.Google Scholar
  332. Mazur, J. E. (1975). The matching law and quantifications related to Premack’s principle. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes, 1(4), 374–386. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.1.4.374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  333. McCain, A. P., & Kelley, M. L. (1993). Managing the classroom behavior of an ADHD preschooler: The efficacy of a school-home note intervention. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 15(3), 33. doi:10.1300/J019v15n03_03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  334. McCambridge, J., & Strang, J. (2004). The efficacy of single-session motivational interviewing in reducing drug consumption and perceptions of drug-related risk and harm among young people: results from a multi-site cluster randomized trial. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 99(1), 39–52. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00564.x.Google Scholar
  335. McCarl, J. J., Svobodny, L., & Beare, P. L. (1991). Self-recording in a classroom for students with mild to moderate mental handicaps: Effects on productivity and on-task behavior. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 26(1), 79–88.Google Scholar
  336. McCarty, B. C., McElfresh, C. T., Rice, S. V., & Wilson, S. J. (1978). The effect of contingent background music on inappropriate bus behavior. Journal of Music Therapy, 15, 150–156.Google Scholar
  337. McDiarmid, A. K. (2008). The impact of traditional Taekwondo on self-control for middle school students.Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 68(8-A), 3282.Google Scholar
  338. McDonnell, L., & Bowden, M. L. (1989). Breathing management: A simple stress and pain reduction strategy for use on a pediatric service. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 12(5), 339–344. doi:10.3109/01460868909038042.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  339. McDougall, D., & Brady, M. P. (1995). Using audio-cued self-monitoring for students with severe behavior disorders. The Journal of Educational Research, 88(5), 309–317.Google Scholar
  340. McGee, R., Williams, S., Anderson, J., McKenzie-Parnell, J. M., & Silva, P. A. (1990). Hyperactivity and serum and hair zinc levels in 11-year-old children from the general population. Biological Psychiatry, 28(2), 165–168. doi:10.1016/0006-3223(90)90634-E.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  341. McGoey, K. E., & DuPaul, G. J. (2000). Token reinforcement and response cost procedures: Reducing the disruptive behavior of preschool children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. School Psychology Quarterly, 15(3), 330–343. doi:10.1037/h0088790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  342. McGrath, M. L., Dorsett, P. G., Calhoun, M. E., & Drabman, R. S. (1987). “Beat-the-buzzer”: A method for decreasing parent-child morning conflicts. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 9(3–4), 35–48.Google Scholar
  343. McGrath-Hanna, N. K., Greene, D. M., Tavernier, R. J., & Bult-Ito, A. (2003). Diet and mental health in the Arctic: Is diet an important risk factor for mental health in circumpolar peoples? A review. International Journal of Circumpolar Health, 62(3), 228–241.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  344. McLaughlin, T. F., & Helm, J. L. (1993). Use of contingent music to increase academic performance of middle-school students. Psychological Reports, 72(2), 658.Google Scholar
  345. McLaughlin, T. F., Krappman, V. F., & Welsh, J. M. (1985). The effects of self-recording for on-task behavior of behaviorally disordered special education students. RASE: Remedial and Special Education, 6(4), 42–45.Google Scholar
  346. McMorrow, M. J., Cullinan, D., & Epstein, M. H. (1978). The use of the Premack principle to motivate patient activity attendance. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 16(1), 14–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  347. Meadow, R. (1977). How to use buzzer alarms to cure bed-wetting. British Medical Journal, 2(6094), 1073–1075.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  348. Medland, M. B., & Stachnik, T. J. (1972). Good-behavior game: A replication and systematic analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5(1), 45–51. doi:10.1901/jaba.1972.5-45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  349. Meharg, S. S., & Lipsker, L. E. (1991). Parent training using videotape self-modeling. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 13(4), 1–27. doi:10.1300/J019v13n04_01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  350. Meharg, S. S., & Woltersdorf, M. A. (1990). Therapeutic use of videotape self-modeling: A review. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 12(2), 85–99. doi:10.1016/0146-6402(90)90008-E.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  351. Melchiori, L. E., Souza, D. G., & Rose, J. C. (1992). Reading acquisition through an errorless discrimination procedure (exclusion): A replication with preschoolers. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa (Brasília), 8(1), 101–111.Google Scholar
  352. Melville, C. L., Davis, C. S., Matzenbacher, D. L., & Clayborne, J. (2004). Node-link-mapping-enhanced group treatment for pathological gambling. Addictive Behaviors, 29(1), 73. doi:10.1016/S0306-4603(03)00091-1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  353. Merrett, J., & Merrett, F. (1997). Correspondence training as a means of improving study skills. Educational Psychology, 17(4), 469–482. doi:10.1080/0144341970170407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  354. Merrett, F., & Tang, W. M. (1994). The attitudes of British primary school pupils to praise, reward, punishments and reprimands. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 91–103.Google Scholar
  355. Mickleborough, T. D., Lindley, M. R., Ionescu, A. A., & Fly, A. D. (2006). Protective effect of fish oil supplementation on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in asthma. Chest, 129(1), 39–49. doi:10.1378/chest.129.1.39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  356. Mikami, A. Y., Boucher, M. A., & Humphreys, K. (2005). Prevention of peer rejection through a classroom-level intervention in middle school. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 26, 5–23. doi:10.1007/s10935-004-0988-7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  357. Miller, W. R., Sovereign, R. G., & Krege, B. (1988). Motivational interviewing with problem drinkers: II. The Drinker’s check-up as a preventive intervention. Behavioural Psychotherapy, 16(4), 251–268.Google Scholar
  358. Mischoulon, D., & Fava, M. (2000). Docosahexanoic acid and omega-3 fatty acids in depression. The Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 23(4), 785–794. doi:10.1016/S0193-953X(05)70197-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  359. Mishima, K. (2003). How children address each other in class and in peer relations: power balance and group membership. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(2), 121–129.Google Scholar
  360. Monti, P. M., Colby, S. M., Barnett, N. P., Spirito, A., Rohsenow, D. J., Myers, M., et al. (1999). Brief intervention for harm reduction with alcohol-positive older adolescents in a hospital emergency department. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(6), 989–994. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.67.6.989.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  361. Moore, S. (1984). Unleashing the mystery shopper. Contemporary Administrator for Long-Term Care, 7(9), 73–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  362. Moore, L. A., Waguespack, A. M., Wickstrom, K. F., Witt, J. C., et al. (1994). Mystery motivator: An effective and time efficient intervention. School Psychology Review, 23(1), 106–118.Google Scholar
  363. Morrison, R. S., Sainato, D. M., Benchaaban, D., & Endo, S. (2002). Increasing play skills of children with autism using activity schedules and correspondence training. Journal of Early Intervention, 25(1), 58–72. doi:10.1177/105381510202500106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  364. Murphy, H. A., Hutchison, J. M., & Bailey, J. S. (1983). Behavioral school psychology goes outdoors: The effect of organized games on playground aggression. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16(1), 29. doi:10.1901/jaba.1983.16-29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  365. Nakano, K. (1990). Operant self-control procedure in modifying type A behavior. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 21(4), 249–255. doi:10.1016/0005-7916(90)90025-G.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  366. Naveen, K. V., Nagarathna, R., Nagendra, H. R., & Telles, S. (1997). Yoga breathing through a particular nostril increases spatial memory scores without lateralized effects. Psychological Reports, 81(2), 555–561.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  367. Neave, N., & Wolfson, S. (2003). Testosterone, territoriality, and the ‘home advantage.’ Physiology and Behavior, 78(2), 269–275. doi:10.1016/S0031-9384(02)00969-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  368. Nedas, N. D., Balcar, G. P., & Macy, P. R. (1982). Road markings as an alcohol countermeasure for highway safety: Field study of standard and wide edgelines. Abridged. http://pubsindex.trb.org/document/view/default.asp?lbid=182183.
  369. Nemets, B., Stahl, Z., & Belmaker, R. H. (2002). Addition of omega-3 fatty acid to maintenance medication treatment for recurrent unipolar depressive disorder. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 159(3), 477–479. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.159.3.477.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  370. Newbern, D., Dansereau, D. F., Czuchry, M., & Simpson, D. (2005). Node-link mapping in individual counseling: Treatment impact on clients with ADHD-related behaviors. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 37(1), 93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  371. Newbern, D., Dansereau, D. F., & Pitre, U. (1999). Positive effects on life skills motivation and self-efficacy: Node-link maps in a modified therapeutic community. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 25(3), 407. doi:10.1081/ADA-100101869.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  372. Nicol, N., & Hantula, D. A. (2001). Decreasing delivery drivers’ departure times. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 21, 105–116. doi:10.1300/J075v21n04_07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  373. Ninness, H. A. C., Fuerst, J., & Rutherford, R. (1995). A descriptive analysis of disruptive behavior during pre- and post-unsupervised self-management by students with serious emotional disturbance: A within-study replication. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 3(4), 230–240.Google Scholar
  374. Ninness, H. C., Fuerst, J., Rutherford, R. D., & Glenn, S. S. (1991). Effects of self-management training and reinforcement on the transfer of improved conduct in the absence of supervision. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24(3), 499–508. doi:10.1901/jaba.1991.24-499.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  375. Nordstrom, R., Hall, R. V., Lorenzi, P., & Delquadri, J. (1988). Organizational behavior management in the public sector: Three field experiments. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 9, 91–112.Google Scholar
  376. Nordstrom, R., Lorenzi, P., & Hall, V. (1990). A review of public posting of performance feedback in work settings. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 11, 101–121. doi:10.1300/J075v11n02_07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  377. Norlander, T., Moas, L., & Archer, T. (2005). Noise and stress in primary and secondary school children: noise reduction and increased concentration ability through a short but regular exercise and relaxation program. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16, 91–99. doi:10.1080/092434505000114173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  378. Norris, P. T. (2002). Purchasing restricted medicines in New Zealand pharmacies: Results from a “mystery shopper” study. Pharmacy World & Science, 24(4), 149–153. doi:10.1023/A:1019506120713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  379. Ogden, T., & Halliday-Boykins, C. A. (2004). Multisystemic treatment of antisocial adolescents in Norway: Replication of clinical outcomes outside of the US. Child and Adolescent Mental Health Care, 9, 77–83. doi:10.1111/j.1475-3588.2004.00085.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  380. Olafsdottir, A. S., Magnusardottir, A. R., Thorgeirsdottir, H., Hauksson, A., Skuladottir, G. V., & Steingrimsdottir, L. (2005). Relationship between dietary intake of cod liver oil in early pregnancy and birthweight. BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 112(4), 424–429. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00477.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  381. O’Reilly, M., Tiernan, R., Lancioni, G., Lacey, C., Hillery, J., & Gardiner, M. (2002). Use of self-motivating and delayed feedback to increase on-task behavior in a post-institutionalized child within regular classroom settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 25(1), 91–102.Google Scholar
  382. Ostrower, C., & Ziv, A. (1982). Soft reprimands and self-control as ways of behavior modification in the classroom. Israeli Journal of Psychology and Counseling in Education, 15, 21–28.Google Scholar
  383. Owusu-Bempah, J., & Howitt, D. L. (1983). Self-modeling and weight control. The British Journal of Medical Psychology, 56(2), 157–165.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  384. Owusu-Bempah, J., & Howitt, D. (1985). The effects of self-modeling on cigarette smoking behavior. Current Psychological Research and Reviews, 4(2), 133–142. doi:10.1007/BF02686580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  385. Palermo, M. T., Di Luigi, M., Dal Forno, G., Dominici, C., Vicomandi, D., Sambucioni, A., et al. (2006). Externalizing and oppositional behaviors and Karate-do: The way of crime prevention: A pilot study. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 50(6), 654–660. doi:10.1177/0306624X06293522.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  386. Palmgreen, P., Lorch, E. P., Donohew, L., & Harrington, N. G. (1995). Reaching at-risk populations in a mass media drug abuse prevention campaign: Sensation seeking as a targeting variable. Drugs and Society, 8, 29–45. doi:10.1300/J023v08n03_04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  387. Panksepp, J., Burgdorf, J., Turner, C., & Gordon, N. (2003). Modeling ADHD-type arousal with unilateral frontal cortex damage in rats and beneficial effects of play therapy. Brain and Cognition, 52(1), 97–105. doi:10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00013-7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  388. Paquette, D. (2004). Theorizing the father-child relationship: Mechanisms and developmental outcomes. Human Development, 47(4), 193–219. doi:10.1159/000078723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  389. Parsons, H. M. (1982). More on the Hawthorne effect. The American Psychologist, 37, 856–857. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.37.7.856.b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  390. Parsons, H. M. (1992). Hawthorne: An early OBM experiment. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 12(1), 27. doi:10.1300/J075v12n01_03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  391. Pawlow, L. A., & Jones, G. E. (2005). The impact of abbreviated progressive muscle relaxation on salivary cortisol and salivary immunoglobulin a (sIgA). Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 30(4), 375–387. doi:10.1007/s10484-005-8423-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  392. Pechmann, C. (2001). A comparison of health communication models: Risk learning versus stereotype priming. Media Psychology, 3(2), 189–210. doi:10.1207/S1532785XMEP0302_04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  393. Pechmann, C., & Knight, S. J. (2002). An experimental investigation of the joint effects of advertising and peers on adolescents’ beliefs and intentions about cigarette consumption. Journal of Consumer Research. Inc, 29, 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  394. Pechmann, C., & Ratneshwar, S. (1994). The effects of antismoking and cigarette advertising on young adolescents’ perceptions of peers who smoke. The Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 236–251. doi:10.1086/209395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  395. Pechmann, C., Zhao, G., Goldberg, M. E., & Reibling, E. T. (2003). What to convey in antismoking advertisements for adolescents: The use of protection motivation theory to identify effective message themes. Journal of Marketing, 67, 1–18. doi:10.1509/jmkg.67.2.1.18607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  396. Peck, H. L., Kehle, T. J., Bray, M. A., & Theodore, L. A. (2005). Yoga as an intervention for children with attention problems. School Psychology Review, 34(3), 415–424.Google Scholar
  397. Pellegrini, A. D. (1992). Rough-and-tumble play and social problem solving flexibility. Creativity Research Journal, 5(1), 13–26.Google Scholar
  398. Pellegrini, A. D., & Smith, P. K. (1998). Physical activity play: Consensus and debate. Child Development, 69(3), 609–610. doi:10.2307/1132192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  399. Perna, G., Ieva, A., Caldirola, D., Bertani, A., & Bellodi, L. (2002). Respiration in children at risk for panic disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59(2), 185–186. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.59.2.185.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  400. Petry, N. M., & Martin, B. (2002). Low-cost contingency management for treating cocaine- and opioid-abusing methadone patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70(2), 398–405. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.70.2.398.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  401. Petry, N. M., Martin, B., Cooney, J. L., & Kranzler, H. R. (2000). Give them prizes and they will come: Contingency management for treatment of alcohol dependence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(2), 250–257. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.68.2.250.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  402. Petry, N. M., Martin, B., & Finocche, C. (2001a). Contingency management in group treatment: A demonstration project in an HIV drop-in center. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 21(2), 89–96. doi:10.1016/S0740-5472(01)00184-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  403. Petry, N. M., Petrakis, I., Trevisan, L., Wiredu, G., Boutros, N. N., Martin, B., et al. (2001b). Contingency management interventions: From research to practice. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 158(5), 694–702. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.158.5.694.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  404. Petry, N. M., Tedford, J., & Martin, B. (2001c). Reinforcing compliance with non-drug-related activities. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 20(1), 33–44. doi:10.1016/S0740-5472(00)00143-4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  405. Petry, N. M., Peirce, J. M., Stitzer, M. L., Blaine, J., Roll, J. M., Cohen, A., et al. (2005). Effect of prize-based incentives on outcomes in stimulant abusers in outpatient psychosocial treatment programs: A national drug abuse treatment clinical trials network study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(10), 1148–1156. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.10.1148.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  406. Petry, N. M., & Simcic, F., Jr. (2002). Recent advances in the dissemination of contingency management techniques: Clinical and research perspectives. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 23(2), 81–86. doi:10.1016/S0740-5472(02)00251-9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  407. Petry, N. M., Tedford, J., Austin, M., Nich, C., Carroll, K. M., & Rounsaville, B. J. (2004). Prize reinforcement contingency management for treating cocaine users: how low can we go, and with whom? Addiction (Abingdon, England), 99(3), 349–360. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2003.00642.x.Google Scholar
  408. Petscher, E. S., & Bailey, J. S. (2006). Effects of training, prompting, and self-monitoring on staff behavior in a classroom for students with disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39(2), 215–226. doi:10.1901/jaba.2006.02-05.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  409. Pfiffner, L. J., O’Leary, S. G., Rosen, L. A., & Sanderson, W. C. (1985). A comparison of the effects of continuous and intermittent response cost and reprimands in the classroom. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 14(4), 348–352. doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp1404_14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  410. Phillips, W. T., Kiernan, M., & King, A. C. (2003). Physical activity as a nonpharmacological treatment for depression: A review. Complementary Health Practice Review, 8, 139–152. doi:10.1177/1076167502250792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  411. Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Contrucci, S. A., Delia, M. D., Adelinis, J. D., & Goh, H.-L. (1999). An evaluation of the properties of attention as reinforcement for destructive and appropriate behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32(4), 437–449. doi:10.1901/jaba.1999.32-437.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  412. Pine, D. S., Coplan, J. D., Papp, L. A., Klein, R. G., Martinez, J. M., Kovalenko, P., et al. (1998). Ventilatory physiology of children and adolescents with anxiety disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55(2), 123–129. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.55.2.123.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  413. Pitre, U., Dansereau, D. F., & Joe, G. W. (1996). Client education levels and the effectiveness of node-link maps. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 15(3), 27. doi:10.1300/J069v15n03_02.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  414. Pitre, U., Dansereau, D. F., Newbern, D., & Simpson, D. D. (1998). Residential drug abuse treatment for probationers: Use of node-link mapping to enhance participation and progress. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 15(6), 535. doi:10.1016/S0740-5472(97)00313-9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  415. Pitre, U., Dansereau, D. F., & Simpson, D. D. (1997). The role of node-link maps in enhancing counseling efficiency. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 16(3), 39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  416. Plummer, S., Baer, D. M., & LeBlanc, J. M. (1977). Functional considerations in the use of procedural timeout and in effective alternative. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10(4), 689–705. doi:10.1901/jaba.1977.10-689.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  417. Porterfield, J. K., Herbert-Jackson, E., & Risley, T. R. (1976). Contingent observation: an effective and acceptable procedure for reducing disruptive behavior of young children in a group setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9(1), 55–64. doi:10.1901/jaba.1976.9-55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  418. Possell, L. E., Kehle, T. J., McLoughlin, C. S., & Bray, M. A. (1999). Self-modeling as an intervention to reduce disruptive classroom behavior. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 6(2), 99–105. doi:10.1016/S1077-7229(99)80017-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  419. Premack, D. (1962). Reversibility of the reinforcement relation. Science, 136(3512), 255–257. doi:10.1126/science.136.3512.255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  420. Prinz, R. J., Sanders, M. R., Shapiro, C. J., Whitaker, D. J., & Lutzker, J. R. (accepted). Population-based prevention of child maltreatment: The U.S. Triple P System Population Trial. Prevention Science.Google Scholar
  421. Priya, J. J. (2004). Kangaroo care for low birth weight babies. Nursing Journal of India, 95(9), 209–212.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  422. Putnam, R. F., Handler, M. W., Ramirez-Platt, C. M., & Luiselli, J. K. (2003). Improving student bus-riding behavior through a whole-school intervention. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36(4), 583. doi:10.1901/jaba.2003.36-583.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  423. Ragnarsson, R. S., & Bjorgvinsson, T. (1991). Effects of public posting on driving speed in Icelandic traffic. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 53–58. doi:10.1901/jaba.1991.24-53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  424. Rajan, S., Sethuraman, M., & Mukherjee, P. K. (2002). Ethnobiology of the Nilgiri Hills, India. Phytotherapy Research, 16(2), 98–116. doi:10.1002/ptr.1098.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  425. Ram, N., & McCullagh, P. (2003). Self-modeling: Influence on psychological responses and physical performance. The Sport Psychologist, 17(2), 220–241.Google Scholar
  426. Rawson, R. A., McCann, M. J., Flammino, F., Shoptaw, S., Miotto, K., Reiber, C., et al. (2006). A comparison of contingency management and cognitive-behavioral approaches for stimulant-dependent individuals. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 101(2), 267–274. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01312.x.Google Scholar
  427. Reagles, K. W., & O’Neill, J. (1977). Single-subject design for client groups: Implications for program evaluation. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 21(1), 13–22.Google Scholar
  428. Reamer, R. B., Brady, M. P., & Hawkins, J. (1998). The effects of video self-modeling on parents’ interactions with children with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33(2), 131–143.Google Scholar
  429. Reed, T., & Brown, M. (2001). The expression of care in the rough and tumble play of boys. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 15(1), 104–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  430. Resnicow, K., Jackson, A., Wang, T., De, A. K., McCarty, F., Dudley, W. N., et al. (2001). A motivational interviewing intervention to increase fruit and vegetable intake through black churches: Results of the Eat for Life trial. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 1686–1693.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  431. Richards, J. M., Beal, W. E., Seagal, J. D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2000). Effects of disclosure of traumatic events on illness behavior among psychiatric prison inmates. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 156–160. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.109.1.156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  432. Richardson, A. J. (2006). Omega-3 fatty acids in ADHD and related neurodevelopmental disorders. International Review of Psychiatry (Abingdon, England), 18(2), 155–172. doi:10.1080/09540260600583031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  433. Rickards-Schlichting, K. A., Kehle, T. J., & Bray, M. A. (2004). A self-modeling intervention for high school students with public speaking anxiety. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 20(2), 47–60.Google Scholar
  434. Rickel, A. U., & Fields, R. B. (1983). Storybook models and achievement behavior of preschool children. Psychology in the Schools, 20(1), 105. doi:10.1002/1520-6807(198301)20:1<105::AID-PITS2310200121>3.0.CO;2-GCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  435. Ridgway, A., Northup, J., Pellegrin, A., LaRue, R., & Hightsoe, A. (2003). Effects of recess on the classroom behavior of children with and without attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(3), 253–268. doi:10.1521/scpq.18.3.253.22578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  436. Ringwalt, C. L., Ennett, S., Johnson, R., Rohrbach, L. A., Simons-Rudolph, A., Vincus, A., et al. (2003). Factors associated with fidelity to substance use prevention curriculum guides in the nation’s middle schools. Health Education & Behavior, 30, 375–391. doi:10.1177/1090198103030003010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  437. Risley, T. (2005). Montrose M. Wolf (1935–2004). Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38(2), 279–287. doi:10.1901/jaba.2005.165-04.
  438. Roberts, M. C., & Fanurik, D. (1986). Rewarding elementary schoolchildren for their use of safety belts. Health Psychology, 5(3), 185. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.5.3.185.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  439. Robertson, L. S. (1975). Safety belt use in automobiles with starter-interlock and buzzer-light reminder systems. American Journal of Public Health, 65(12), 1319–1325.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  440. Robertson, L. S., & Haddon, W., Jr. (1974). The buzzer-light reminder system and safety belt use. American Journal of Public Health, 64(8), 814–815.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  441. Robin, A., Schneider, M., & Dolnick, M. (1976). The turtle technique: An extended case study of self-control in the classroom. Psychology in the Schools, 13(4), 449–453. doi:10.1002/1520-6807(197610)13:4<449::AID-PITS2310130420>3.0.CO;2-W.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  442. Robinson, T. N., Borzekowski, D. L. G., Matheson, D. M., & Kraemer, H. C. (2007). Effects of fast food branding on young children’s taste preferences. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 161(8), 792–797. doi:10.1001/archpedi.161.8.792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  443. Robinson, C. M., & Robinson, L. W. (1979). Involving parents in the treatment of behaviorally disordered children. Clinical Social Work Journal, 7(3), 182–193. doi:10.1007/BF00760495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  444. Robinson, K. E., & Sheridan, S. M. (2000). Using the Mystery Motivator to improve child bedtime compliance. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 22(1), 29–49.Google Scholar
  445. Roca, J. V., & Gross, A. M. (1996). Report-do-report: Promoting setting and setting-time generalization. Education and Treatment of Children, 19(4), 408–424.Google Scholar
  446. Rock, M. L. (2005). Use of strategic self-monitoring to enhance academic engagement, productivity, and accuracy of students with and without exceptionalities. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 7(1), 3–17. doi:10.1177/10983007050070010201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  447. Rodrigues, E. (2006). Plants and animals utilized as medicines in the Jau National Park (JNP), Brazilian Amazon. Phytotherapy Research, 20(5), 378–391. doi:10.1002/ptr.1866.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  448. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  449. Rolider, A., & Van Houten, R. (1984). The effects of DRO alone and DRO plus reprimands on the undesirable behavior of three children in home settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 7(1), 17–31.Google Scholar
  450. Roos, S. (2005). Blind trust: Large groups and their leaders in times of crisis and terror. Gestalt Review, 9(1), 129–135.Google Scholar
  451. Rosenkoetter, S. E., & Fowler, S. A. (1986). Teaching mainstreamed children to manage daily transitions. Teaching Exceptional Children, 19(1), 20–23.Google Scholar
  452. Rudin, D. O. (1981). The major psychoses and neuroses as omega-3 essential fatty acid deficiency syndrome: Substrate pellagra. Biological Psychiatry, 16(9), 837–850.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  453. Rusch, N., & Corrigan, P. W. (2002). Motivational interviewing to improve insight and treatment adherence in schizophrenia. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 26(1), 23–32. doi:10.2975/26.2002.23.32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  454. Rutter, M. (1981). School influences on children’s behavior and development: The 1979 Kenneth Blackfan Lecture, Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Boston. Annual Progress in Child Psychiatry and Child Development, 170, 197.Google Scholar
  455. Saari, L. M., & Latham, G. P. (1982). Employee reaction to continuous and variable ratio reinforcement schedules involving a monetary incentive. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 506. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.67.4.506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  456. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1994). Urban poverty and the family context of delinquency: A new look at structure and process in a classic study. Child Development, 65, 523–540. doi:10.2307/1131400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  457. Sanchez, V., Steckler, A., Nitirat, P., Hallfors, D., Cho, H., & Brodish, P. (2007). Fidelity of implementation in a treatment effectiveness trial of reconnecting youth. Health Education Research, 22(1), 95–107. doi:10.1093/her/cyl052.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  458. Sanders, M. R., Bor, W., & Dadds, M. R. (1984). Modifying bedtime disruptions in children using stimulus control and contingency management techniques. Behavioural Psychotherapy, 12, 130–141.Google Scholar
  459. Sanders, M. R., Cann, W., & Markie-Dadds, C. (2003). Why a universal population-level approach to the prevention of child abuse is essential. Child Abuse Review, 12, 145–154. doi:10.1002/car.797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  460. Sanders, M. R., Markie-Dadds, C. (1996). Triple P: A multilevel family intervention program for children with disruptive behaviour disorders. Early intervention and prevention in mental health (7th ed., pp. 59–85). Carlton, South VIC: Australian Psychological Society.Google Scholar
  461. Sanders, M. R., Montgomery, D. T., & Brechman-Toussaint, M. L. (2000). The mass media and the prevention of child behavior problems: The evaluation of a television series to promote positive outcomes for parents and their children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 41, 939–948. doi:10.1017/S0021963099006198.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  462. Sandyk, R. (1990). Zinc deficiency in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. The International Journal of Neuroscience, 52(3–4), 239–241.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  463. Saunders, C. M. (2005). Effectiveness of the toll-free line for public insurance programs. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 28(1), 27–39. doi:10.1177/0163278704273082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  464. Scafidi, F., & Field, T. (1996). Massage therapy improves behavior in neonates born to HIV-positive mothers. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 21(6), 889. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/21.6.889.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  465. Scheckner, S., Rollin, S. A., Kaiser-Ulrey, C., Wagner, R., & Gerler, E. R., Jr. (2004). School violence in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of current interventions. Handbook of school violence (pp. 81–113). New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  466. Schilling, D. L., Washington, K., Billingsley, F. F., & Deitz, J. (2003). Classroom seating for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Therapy balls versus chairs. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy., 57, 534–541.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  467. Schilmoeller, G. L., Schilmoeller, K. J., Etzel, B. C., & LeBlanc, J. M. (1979). Conditional discrimination after errorless and trial-and-error training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 31(3), 405–420. doi:10.1901/jeab.1979.31-405.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  468. Schloss, P. J., Schloss, C. N., & Harris, L. (1984). A multiple baseline analysis of an interpersonal skills training program for depressed youth. Behavioral Disorders, 9(3), 182–188.Google Scholar
  469. Scholer, S. J., Nix, R. L., & Patterson, B. (2006). Gaps in pediatricians’ advice to parents regarding early childhood aggression. Clinical Pediatrics, 45(1), 23–28. doi:10.1177/000992280604500104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  470. Schunk, D. H., & Hanson, A. R. (1989). Self-modeling and children’s cognitive skill learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 155–163. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  471. Schwartz, C., Houlihan, D., Krueger, K. F., & Simon, D. A. (1997). The behavioral treatment of a young adult with post-traumatic stress disorder and a fear of children. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 19(1), 37–49. doi:10.1300/J019v19n01_03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  472. Scott, E., & Panksepp, J. (2003). Rough-and-tumble play in human children. Aggressive Behavior, 29(6), 539–551. doi:10.1002/ab.10062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  473. Scott, S., Spender, Q., Doolan, M., Jacobs, B., & Aspland, H. (2001). Multicentre controlled trial of parenting groups for childhood antisocial behaviour in clinical practice. British Medical Journal, 323, 194. doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7306.194.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  474. Selznick, L., & Savage, R. C. (2000). Using self-monitoring procedures to increase on-task behavior with three adolescent boys with brain injury. Behavioral Interventions, 15, 243–260. doi:10.1002/1099-078X(200007/09)15:3<243::AID-BIN59>3.0.CO;2-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  475. Shabani, D. B., & Carr, J. E. (2004). An evaluation of response cards as an adjunct to standard instruction in university classrooms: A systematic replication and extension. North American Journal of Psychology, 6, 85–100.Google Scholar
  476. Shabani, D. B., Wilder, D. A., & Flood, W. A. (2001). Reducing stereotypic behavior through discrimination training, differential reinforcement of other behavior, and self monitoring. Behavioral Interventions, 16(4), 279–286. doi:10.1002/bin.96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  477. Shannon, J. D., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., London, K., & Cabrera, N. (2002). Beyond rough and tumble: Low-income fathers’ interactions and children’s cognitive development at 24 months. Parenting, Science and Practice, 2(2), 77–104. doi:10.1207/S15327922PAR0202_01.Google Scholar
  478. Sharma, N. R., Yadava, A., & Hooda, D. (2005). Effect of yoga on psychophysical functions. Journal of Indian Psychology, 23(1), 37–42.Google Scholar
  479. Sherif, M. (1958). Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 349. doi:10.1086/222258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  480. Sherif, M. (1968). If the social scientist is to be more than a mere technician. The Journal of Social Issues, 24(1), 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  481. Sherif, M. (1970). On the relevance of social psychology. The American Psychologist, 25(2), 144. doi:10.1037/h0029429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  482. Sherif, M., Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D.(2001). Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict. Intergroup relations: Essential readings (p. 64). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  483. Sherif, M., White, B. J., & Harvey, O. J. (1955). Status in experimentally produced groups. American Journal of Sociology, 60, 370. doi:10.1086/221569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  484. Shimabukuro, S. M., Prater, M. A., Jenkins, A., & Edelen-Smith, P. (1999). The effects of self-monitoring of academic performance on students with learning disabilities and ADD/ADHD. Education and Treatment of Children, 22(4), 397–414.Google Scholar
  485. Sideridis, G. D., Utley, C., Greenwood, C. R., Delquadri, J., Dawson, H., Palmer, P., et al. (1997). Classwide peer tutoring: Effects on the spelling performance and social interactions of students with mild disabilities and their typical peers in an integrated instructional setting. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7, 435–462. doi:10.1023/A:1022855218347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  486. Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research. Oxford, UK: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  487. Silva, F. J. (1999). Beyond the “hot-and-cold” game”: A demonstration of computer-controlled shaping. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 31(1), 63–73.Google Scholar
  488. Singh, N. N. (1987). Overcorrection of oral reading errors. A comparison of individual- and group-training formats. Behavior Modification, 11(2), 165–181. doi:10.1177/01454455870112003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  489. Singh, N. N., & Singh, J. (1988). Increasing oral reading proficiency through overcorrection and phonic analysis. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 93(3), 312–319.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  490. Sisson, L. A., Van Hasselt, V. B., & Hersen, M. (1993). Behavioral interventions to reduce maladaptive responding in youth with dual sensory impairment. An analysis of direct and concurrent effects. Behavior Modification, 17(2), 164–188. doi:10.1177/01454455930172005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  491. Siviy, S. M., Fleischhauer, A. E., Kerrigan, L. A., & Kuhlman, S. J. (1996). D-sub-2 dopamine receptor involvement in the rough-and-tumble play behavior of juvenile rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 110(5), 1168–1176. doi:10.1037/0735-7044.110.5.1168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  492. Skinner, C. H., Cashwell, T. H., & Skinner, A. L. (2000). Increasing tootling: The effects of a peer-monitored group contingency program on students’ reports of peers’ prosocial behaviors. Psychology in the Schools, 37(3), 263–270. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6807(200005)37:3<263::AID-PITS6>3.0.CO;2-C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  493. Smith, D. K. (2004). Risk, reinforcement, retention in treatment, and reoffending for boys and girls in multidimensional treatment Foster care. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 12(1), 38–48. doi:10.1177/10634266040120010501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  494. Smyth, J. M., Stone, A. A., Hurewitz, A., & Kaell, A. (1999). Effects of writing about stressful experiences on symptom reduction in patients with asthma or rheumatoid arthritis: A randomized trial. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 281, 1304–1309. doi:10.1001/jama.281.14.1304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  495. Snell, R., & Cole, M. (1976). The use of a VI schedule of token reinforcement to effect all-day control of thumbsucking in the classroom. SALT: School Applications of Learning Theory, 9(2), 14–21.Google Scholar
  496. Sobell, L. C., Agrawal, S., Sobell, M. B., Leo, G. I., Young, L. J., Cunningham, J. A., et al. (2003). Comparison of a quick drinking screen with the timeline followback for individuals with alcohol problems. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 64(6), 858–861.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  497. Sorock, G. S. (1988). Falls among the elderly: Epidemiology and prevention. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 4(5), 282–288.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  498. Spencer, V. G., Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (2003). Content area learning in middle school social studies classrooms and students with emotional or behavioral disorders: A comparison of strategies. Behavioral Disorders, 28(2), 77–93.Google Scholar
  499. Spera, S. P., Buhrfeind, E. D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (1994). Expressive writing and coping with job loss. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 722–733. doi:10.2307/256708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  500. Spindler, K. (1995). The man in the ice: The discovery of a 5,000-year-old body reveals the secrets of the Stone Age. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press.Google Scholar
  501. Spirito, A., Monti, P. M., Barnett, N. P., Colby, S. M., Sindelar, H., Rohsenow, D. J., et al. (2004). A randomized clinical trial of a brief motivational intervention for alcohol-positive adolescents treated in an emergency department. The Journal of Pediatrics, 145(3), 396–402 (see comment). doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.04.057.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  502. St. Pierre, T. L., Osgood, D., Mincemoyer, C. C., Kaltreider, D. L., & Kauh, T. J. (2005). Results of an independent evaluation of project ALERT delivered in schools by cooperative extension. Prevention Science, 6, 305–317. doi:10.1007/s11121-005-0015-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  503. Stage, S. A., & Quiroz, D. R. (1997). A meta-analysis of interventions to decrease disruptive classroom behavior in public education settings. School Psychology Review, 26(3), 333–368.Google Scholar
  504. Standley, J. M. (1996). A meta-analysis on the effects of music as reinforcement for education/therapy objectives. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44(2), 105–133. doi:10.2307/3345665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  505. Standley, J. M. (1999). Music therapy in the NICU: Pacifier-activated-lullabies (PAL) for reinforcement of nonnutritive sucking. International Journal of Arts Medicine, 6, 17–21.Google Scholar
  506. Stawar, T. L. (1978). The modification of coprophagic behavior in a 16-month-old boy using errorless discrimination learning. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 9(4), 373–376. doi:10.1016/0005-7916(78)90017-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  507. Stecker, P. M., Whinnery, K. W., & Fuchs, L. S. (1996). Self-recording during unsupervised academic activity: Effects on time spent out of class. Exceptionality, 6(3), 133–147. doi:10.1207/s15327035ex0603_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  508. Stein, M. B. (2005). Sweating away the blues: Can exercise treat depression? American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(1), 140–141. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2004.09.024.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  509. Stein, L. A. R., Colby, S. M., Barnett, N. P., Monti, P. M., Golembeske, C., Lebeau-Craven, R., et al. (2006). Enhancing substance abuse treatment engagement in incarcerated adolescents. Psychological Services, 3(1), 25–34. doi:10.1037/1541-1559.3.1.0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  510. Steiner, K. (1986). The mystery shopper: An anonymous review of your services. Health Care Strategic Management, 4(6), 9–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  511. Stella, S. G., Vilar, A. P., Lacroix, C., Fisberg, M., Santos, R. F., Mello, M. T., et al. (2005). Effects of type of physical exercise and leisure activities on the depression scores of obese Brazilian adolescent girls. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 38(11), 1683–1689. doi:10.1590/S0100-879X2005001100017.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  512. Stoll, A. L., Damico, K. E., Marangell, L. B., & Severus, W. E. (2000a). Omega 3 fatty acids in bipolar disorder: A preliminary double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Archives of General Psychiatry, 57(7), 716–717 (Reply). doi:10.1001/archpsyc.57.7.716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  513. Stoll, A. L., Marangell, L., & Severus, W. E. (2000b). Omega 3 fatty acids in bipolar disorder: A preliminary double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Archives of General Psychiatry, 57(7), 715 (Reply). doi:10.1001/archpsyc.57.7.715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  514. Stoll, A. L., Severus, E., Freeman, M. P., Rueter, S., Zboyan, H. A., Diamond, E., et al. (1999). Omega 3 fatty acids in bipolar disorder: A preliminary double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56(5), 407–412. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.56.5.407.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  515. Storr, C. L., Ialongo, N. S., Kellam, S. G., & Anthony, J. C. (2002). A randomized controlled trial of two primary intervention strategies to prevent early onset tobacco smoking. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 66(1), 51. doi:10.1016/S0376-8716(01)00184-3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  516. Sumner, J. H., Mueser, S. T., Hsu, L., & Morales, R. G. (1974). Overcorrection treatment for radical reduction of aggressive-disruptive behavior in institutionalized mental patients. Psychological Reports, 35(1 Pt 2), 655–662.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  517. Sund, K.-P., Huang, S.-Y., Chiu, C.-C., & Shen, W. W. (2003). Omega-3 fatty acids in major depressive disorder. A preliminary double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 13(4), 267–271. doi:10.1016/S0924-977X(03)00032-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  518. Suzuki, T., Egami, S., & Haruki, Y. (2000). Improvement in the state of the type A behavior pattern by breathing exercises. Japanese Journal of Health Psychology, 13(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
  519. Sykes, S., & O’Sullivan, K. (2006). A ‘mystery shopper’ project to evaluate sexual health and contraceptive services for young people in Croydon. The Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, 32(1), 25–26. doi:10.1783/147118906775275334.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  520. Szapocznik, J., & Williams, R. A. (2000). Brief strategic family therapy: Twenty-five years of interplay among theory, research, and practice in adolescent behavior problems and drug abuse. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 3, 117–134. doi:10.1023/A:1009512719808.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  521. Tanskanen, A., Hibbeln, J. R., Tuomilehto, J., Uutela, A., Haukkala, A., Viinamaki, H., et al. (2001). Fish consumption and depressive symptoms in the general population in Finland. Psychiatric Services (Washington, D.C.), 52(4), 529–531. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.52.4.529.Google Scholar
  522. Taubman, M., Brierley, S., Wishner, J., Baker, D., McEachin, J., & Leaf, R. B. (2001). The effectiveness of a group discrete trial instructional approach for preschoolers with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 22(3), 205–219. doi:10.1016/S0891-4222(01)00068-3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  523. Taylor, G. T., Frechmann, T., & Royalty, J. (1986). Social behaviour and testicular activity of juvenile rats. The Journal of Endocrinology, 110(3), 533–537.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  524. Taylor, T. K., Eddy, J. M., & Biglan, A. (1999). Interpersonal skills training to reduce aggressive and delinquent behavior: Limited evidence and the need for an evidence-based system of care. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 2, 169–182. doi:10.1023/A:1021855022385.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  525. Taylor, V. L., Cornwell, D. D., & Riley, M. T. (1984). Home-based contingency management programs that teachers can use. Psychology in the Schools, 21(3), 368. doi:10.1002/1520-6807(198407)21:3<368::AID-PITS2310210316>3.0.CO;2-U.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  526. Telles, S., Narendran, S., Raghuraj, P., Nagarathna, R., & Nagendra, H. R. (1997). Comparison of changes in autonomic and respiratory parameters of girls after yoga and games at a community home. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84(1), 251–257.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  527. Terrace, H. S. (1969). Extinction of a discriminative operant following discrimination learning with and without errors. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 571–582. doi:10.1901/jeab.1969.12-571.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  528. Theodore, A., Runyan, D., & Chang, J. J. (2007). Measuring the risk of physical neglect in a population-based sample. Child Maltreatment, 12(1), 96–105. doi:10.1177/1077559506296904.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  529. Thomas, E. J., Abrams, K. S., & Johnson, J. B. (1971). Self-monitoring and reciprocal inhibition in the modification of multiple tics of Gilles de la Torette’s syndrome. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 2(3), 159–171. doi:10.1016/0005-7916(71)90054-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  530. Thorpe, H. W., Darch, C. B., & Drecktrah, M. (1978). The principal lottery: A system utilizing contingent principal telephone calls to increase on-task behavior. Corrective and Social Psychiatry and Journal of Behavior Technology Methods and Therapy, 24(1), 20.Google Scholar
  531. Thorpe, H. W., Drecktrah, M., & Darch, C. B. (1979). The principal lottery revisited in a middle school classroom. Corrective and Social Psychiatry and Journal of Behavior Technology Methods and Therapy, 25(3), 86.Google Scholar
  532. Tobler, N. S., Roona, M. R., Ochshorn, P., Marshall, D. G., Streke, A. V., & Stackpole, K. M. (2000). School-based adolescent drug prevention programs: 1998 meta-analysis. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 20, 275–336. doi:10.1023/A:1021314704811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  533. Todd, A. W., Horner, R. H., & Sugai, G. (1999). Self-monitoring and self-recruited praise: Effects on problem behavior, academic engagement, and work completion in a typical classroom. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1(2), 66–76. doi:10.1177/109830079900100201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  534. Trammel, D. L., Schloss, P. J., & Alper, S. (1994). Using self-recording, evaluation, and graphing to increase completion of homework assignments. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 75–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  535. Twemlow, S. W., & Sacco, F. C. (1998). The application of traditional martial arts practice and theory to the treatment of violent adolescents. Adolescence, 33(131), 505–518.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  536. Vaddadi, K. (2006). Essential fatty acids and mental illness. International Review of Psychiatry (Abingdon, England), 18(2), 81–84. doi:10.1080/09540260600581837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  537. Van Hevel, J., & Hawkins, R. P. (1974). Modification of behavior in secondary school students using the Premack principle and response cost technique. SALT: School Applications of Learning Theory, 6(4), 31–41.Google Scholar
  538. Van Houten, R., & Malenfant, L. (1992). The influence of signs prompting motorists to yield before marked crosswalks on motor vehicle-pedestrian conflicts at crosswalks with flashing amber. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 24(3), 217–225. doi:10.1016/0001-4575(92)90001-Y.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  539. Van Houten, R., & Nau, P. A. (1981). A comparison of the effects of posted feedback and increased police surveillance on highway speeding. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 261–271. doi:10.1901/jaba.1981.14-261.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  540. Van Houten, R., Nau, P. A., MacKenzie-Keating, S. E., Sameoto, D., & Colavecchia, B. (1982). An analysis of some variables influencing the effectiveness of reprimands. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15(1), 65–83. doi:10.1901/jaba.1982.15-65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  541. Van Houten, R., & Retting, R. A. (2001). Increasing motorist compliance and caution at stop signs. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34(2), 185–193. doi:10.1901/jaba.2001.34-185.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  542. Vazsonyi, A. T., Belliston, L. M., & Flannery, D. J. (2004). Evaluation of a school-based, universal violence prevention program: Low-, medium-, and high-risk children. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2, 185–206. doi:10.1177/1541204003262224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  543. Wagenaar, A. C., Maybee, R. G., & Sullivan, K. P. (1988). Mandatory seat belt laws in eight states: A time-series evaluation. Journal of Safety Research, 19(2), 51–70. doi:10.1016/0022-4375(88)90044-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  544. Walker, C. J., & Clement, P. W. (1992). Treating inattentive, impulsive, hyperactive children with self-modeling and stress inoculation training. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 14(2), 75–85. doi:10.1300/J019v14n02_05.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  545. Walsh, B. F., & Lamberts, F. (1979). Errorless discrimination and picture fading as techniques for teaching sight words to TMR students. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 83(5), 473–479.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  546. Wang, T. H., & Katzev, R. D. (1990). Group commitment and resource conservation: two field experiments on promoting recycling. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 265–275. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1990.tb00411.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  547. Wasserman, T. H. (1977). The utilization of a clock-light cueing device to signal group progress towards reinforcement in a classroom setting. Psychology in the Schools, 14(4), 471–479. doi:10.1002/1520-6807(197710)14:4<471::AID-PITS2310140419>3.0.CO;2-K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  548. Watson, T. S. (1993). Effectiveness of arousal and arousal plus overcorrection to reduce nocturnal bruxism. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 24, 181–185. doi:10.1016/0005-7916(93)90047-Z.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  549. Webster-Stratton, C., & Reid, M. J. (2007). Incredible years parents and teachers training series: A head start partnership to promote social competence and prevent conduct problems. In P. H. Tolan, J. Szapocznik, & S. Sambrano (Eds.), Preventing youth substance abuse: Science-based programs for children and adolescents (pp. 67–88). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  550. Wedel, J. W., & Fowler, S. A. (1984). “Read me a story, Mom”: A home-tutoring program to teach prereading skills to language-delayed children. Behavior Modification, 8(2), 245. doi:10.1177/01454455840082006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  551. Welsh, D. H., Bernstein, D. J., & Luthans, F. (1992). Application of the Premack principle of reinforcement to the quality performance of service employees. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 13(1), 9–32. doi:10.1300/J075v13n01_03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  552. Wencai, Z., Xinhu, L., Kele, Y., & Yiyuan, T. (2005). The effect of relaxation training on heart rate, T-wave amplitude and mental arithmetic achievement. Psychological Science (China), 28(3), 706–707.Google Scholar
  553. West, R. P., Young, K. R., & Callahan, K. (1995). The musical clocklight: Encouraging positive classroom behavior. Teaching Exceptional Children, 27(2), 46–52.Google Scholar
  554. White, A. G., & Bailey, J. S. (1990). Reducing disruptive behaviors of elementary physical education students with sit and watch. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 353–359. doi:10.1901/jaba.1990.23-353.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  555. Williamson, P. N. (1984). An intervention for hypochondriacal complaints. Clinical Gerontologist, 3(1), 64–68.Google Scholar
  556. Wilson, C. V. (1976). The use of rock music as a reward in behavior therapy with children. Journal of Music Therapy, 13(1), 39–48.Google Scholar
  557. Wilson, D. S., & Wilson, E. O. (2007). Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 82, 327–348.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  558. Winn, B. D., Skinner, C. H., Allin, J. D., & Hawkins, J. A. (2004). Practicing school consultants can empirically validate interventions: A description and demonstration of the non-concurrent multiple-baseline design. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 20, 109–128.Google Scholar
  559. Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., Doyle, P. M., Gast, D. L., et al. (1992). Choral and individual responding during small group instruction: Identification of interactional effects. Education and Treatment of Children, 15(4), 289–309.Google Scholar
  560. Wolf, M. M., Risley, T., & Mees, H. (1964). Application of operant conditioning procedures to the behavior problems of an autistic child. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1, 305–312. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(63)90045-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  561. Wolf, M., Risley, T. R., Johnston, M., Harris, F. R., & Allen, K. E. (1967). Application of operant conditioning procedures to the behavior problems of an autistic child: A follow-up and extension. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 5(2), 103–112. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(67)90004-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  562. Wolfe, D. E. (1982). The effect of interrupted and continuous music on bodily movement and task performance of third grade students. Journal of Music Therapy, 19(2), 74–85.Google Scholar
  563. Wolfe, D. A., Kelly, J. A., & Drabman, R. S. (1981). “Beat the buzzer”: A method for training an abusive mother to decrease recurrent child conflicts. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 10(2), 114–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  564. Woltersdorf, M. A. (1992). Videotape self-modeling in the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 14(2), 53–73. doi:10.1300/J019v14n02_04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  565. Wood, S. J., Murdock, J. Y., & Cronin, M. E. (2002). Self-monitoring and at-risk middle school students: Academic performance improves, maintains, and generalizes. Behavior Modification, 26(5), 605–626. doi:10.1177/014544502236653.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  566. Wood, S. J., Murdock, J. Y., Cronin, M. E., Dawson, N. M., & Kirby, P. C. (1998). Effects of self-monitoring on on-task behaviors of at-risk middle school students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 263–279. doi:10.1023/A:1022891725732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  567. Wurtele, S. K., & Drabman, R. S. (1984). “Beat the buzzer” for classroom dawdling: A one-year trial. Behavior Therapy, 15(4), 403–409. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(84)80009-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  568. Zaichkowsky, L. B., Zaichkowsky, L. D., & Yeager, J. (1986). Biofeedback-assisted relaxation training in the elementary classroom. Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, 20(4), 261–267.Google Scholar
  569. Zanarini, M. C., & Frankenburg, F. R. (2003). Omega-3 fatty acid treatment of women with borderline personality disorder: A double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 160(1), 167–169. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.1.167.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  570. Zivin, G., Hassan, N. R., DePaula, G. F., Monti, D. A., Harlan, C., Hossain, K. D., et al. (2001). An effective approach to violence prevention: Traditional martial arts in middle school. Adolescence, 36(143), 443–459.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.PAXIS InstituteTucsonUSA
  2. 2.Oregon Research InstituteEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations