Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Assessment Instruments Used in Psychological Research With Children and Families

  • Brigit M. van WidenfeltEmail author
  • Philip D. A. Treffers
  • Edwin de Beurs
  • Bart M. Siebelink
  • Els Koudijs


With the increased globalization of psychology and related fields, having reliable and valid measures that can be used in a number of languages and cultures is critical. Few guidelines or standards have been established in psychology for the translation and cultural adaptation of instruments. Usually little is reported in research publications about the translation and adaptation process thus making it difficult for journal readers and reviewers to adequately evaluate the equivalency and quality of an instrument. In this study, issues related to the translation and adaptation of assessment instruments for use in other cultures and/or languages are addressed. Existing literature on translation is reviewed and examples from the clinical child and family psychology field are given to illustrate relevant issues. Suggestions are made for avoiding common translation errors.

Key Words

translation cross-cultural assessment child family 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist. 4-18 and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, R. T., Aaronson, N. K., Bullinger, M., & McBee, W. L. (1996). A review of the progress towards developing health-related quality-of-life instruments for international clinical studies and outcome research. PharmacoEconomics, 10, 336–355.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrindell, W. A., & Ettema, J. H. M. (1986). SCL 90: Handleiding bij een multidimensionaele psychopathologie-indicator. [SCL-90: Manual for a multidimensional indicator of psychopathology]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  4. Barreto, S., & McManus, M. (1997). Casting the net for “depression” among ethnic minority children from the high-risk urban communities. Clinical Psychology Review, 17, 823–845.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bentler, P. M. (1992). EQS Structural equation program manual. Los Angeles: BMPD Statistical Software.Google Scholar
  6. Bornstein, M. H., Haynes, O. M., Azuma, H., Galperín, C.,/Maital, S., Ogino, M., et al. (1998). A cross-national study of self-evaluations and attributions in parenting: Argentina, Belgium, France, Israel, Italy, Japan, and the United States. Developmental Psychology, 34, 662–676.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brislin, R. W., Lonner, W. J., & Thorndike, R. M. (1973). Cross-cultural research methods. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Canino, G., & Bravo, M. (1999). The translation and adaptation of diagnostic instruments for cross-cultural use. In D. Shaffer, C. P. Lucas, & J. E. Richters (Eds.), Diagnostic assessment in child and adolescent psychopathology (pp. 285–298). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  9. Derksen, J. J. L., de Mey, H. R. A., Sloore, H., & Hellenbosch, G. (1993). MMPI-2 Handleiding bij afname, scoring, en interpretatie. [MMPI-2: Manual for administration, scoring and interpretation]. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Pen Tests Publisher.Google Scholar
  10. Derogatis, L. R. (1977). SCL-90. Administration, scoring and procedures manual-I for the R(evised) version and other instruments of the psychopathology rating scales series. Baltimore: Clinical Psychometrics Research Unit, John Hopkins University School of Medicine.Google Scholar
  11. Erkut, S., Alarcon, O., Garcia Coll, C., Tropp, L. R., & Garcia,/H. A. V. (1999). The dual-focus approach to creating bilingual measures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 206–218.Google Scholar
  12. Garcia Coll, C., Akerman, A., & Cicchetti, D. (2000). Cultural influences on developmental processes and outcomes: Implications for the study of development and psychopathology. Developmental Psychopathology, 12, 333–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Geisinger, K. F. (1994). Cross-cultural normative assessment: Translation and adaptation issues influencing the normative interpretation of assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 6, 304–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46, 1417–1432.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hambleton, R. (2001). The next generation of the ITC Test translation and adaptation guidelines. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 164–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hambleton, R. K., & Patsula, L. (1999). Increasing the validity of adapted tests: Myths to be avoided and guidelines for improving test adaptation practices. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 1, 1–30.Google Scholar
  17. Harter, S. (1982). The Perceived Competence Scale for Children. Child Development, 53, 87–97.Google Scholar
  18. Harter, S. (1988). Manual for the Self-Perception Profile for Adolescents. Denver, CO: University of Denver.Google Scholar
  19. Herdman, M., Fox-Rushby, J., & Badia, X. (1997). ‘Equivalence’ and the translation and adaptation of health-related quality of life questionnaires. Quality of Life Research, 6, 237–247.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Heubeck, B. G. (2000). Cross-cultural generalizability of CBCL syndromes across three continents: From the USA and Holland to Australia. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 439–450.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Jeanrie, C., & Bertand, R. (1999). Translating Tests with the International Test Commission’s Guidelines: Keeping validity in mind. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15, 277–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8. Chicago: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  23. Kovacs, M. (1992). Children’s Depression Inventory (CDI) manual. New York: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  24. March, J. S., Parker, J. D., Sullivan, K., Stallings, P., & Conners, K. (1997). The Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC): Factor Structure, Reliability and Validity. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 36, 554–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Muris, P., Schmidt, H., Merckelbach, H., & Schouten, E. (2001). Anxiety sensitivity in adolescents: factor structure and relationships to trait anxiety and symptoms of anxiety disorders and depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 39, 89–100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  27. Ollendick, T. H. (1983). Reliability and validity of the Revised Fear Survey Schedule for Children (FSSC-R). Behaviour Research and Therapy, 21, 685–692.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ollendick, T. H., King, N. J., & Frary, R. B. (1989). Fears in children and adolescents: Reliability and generalizability across gender, age, and nationality. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 27, 19–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ollendick, T. H., Yule, W., & Ollier, K. (1991). Fears in British children and their relations to manifest anxiety and depression. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 32, 321–331.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Parke, R. (2000). Beyond white and middle class: Cultural variations in families- assessments, processes, and policies. Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 331–333.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Perneger, T. V., Leplege, A., & Etter, J. F. (1999). Cross-cultural adaptation of a psychometric instrument: Two methods compared. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 52, 1037–1046.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Perris, C. Jacobsson, L., Lindstrom, H., von Knorring, L., &/Perris, H. (1980). Development of a new inventory for assessing memories of parental rearing behavior. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 61, 265–274.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rogler, L. H. (1999). Methodological sources of cultural insensitivity in mental health research. American Psychologist, 54, 424–433.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ronan, K., Kendall, P. C., & Rowe, M. (1994). Negative affectivity in children: Development and validation of a self-statement questionnaire. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 18, 509–528.Google Scholar
  35. Rubin, K. H. (1998). Social and emotional development from a cultural perspective. Developmental Psychology, 34, 611–615.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Saarni, C. (1998). Issues of cultural meaningfulness in emotional development. Developmental Psychology, 34, 647–652.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Schneider, B. H. (1998). Cross-cultural comparison as doorkeeper in research on the social and emotional adjustment of children and adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 34, 793–797.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Siebelink, B., & Treffers, P. D. A. (2001). Dutch version of the Anxiety Interview Schedule for children for DSM-IV, child and parent versions by W. K. Silverman & A. M. Albano. Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  39. Silverman, W., & Albano, A. M. (1996). The Anxiety Interview Schedule for children for DSM-IV, child and parent versions. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  40. Silverman, W. K., Fleisig, W., Rabian, B., & Peterson, R. A. (2001). Childhood anxiety sensitivity index. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 20, 162–168.Google Scholar
  41. Sprangers, M. A. G., Cull, A., Bjordal, K., Groenvold, M., & Aaronson, N. K. (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer approach to quality of life assessment: Guidelines for developing questionnaire modules. Quality of Life Research, 2, 287–295.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Sudman, S., & Bradburn, N. M. (1982). Asking questions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  43. Treffers, P. D. A., Goedhart, A. W., Veerman, J. W., van den Bergh, B. R. H., Ackaert, L., & de Rycke, L. (2002). Competentiebelevingsschaal voor adolescenten (CBSA) [Dutch adaptation of the Self-Perception Profile for Adolescents]. Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  44. Van de Vijver, F., & Tanzer, N. K. (1997). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: An overview. European Review of Applied Psychology, 47, 263–279.Google Scholar
  45. Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Poortinga, Y. H. (1997). Towards an integrated analysis of bias in cross-cultural assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessessment, 13, 29–/37.Google Scholar
  46. Veerman, J. W., Straathof, M. A. E., Treffers, P. D. A., Van den Bergh, B. R. H., & ten Brink, L. T. (1997). Competentiebelevingsschaal voor kinderen (CBSK) [Dutch adaptation of the Perceived Competence Scale for Children]. Lisse, the/Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  47. Wang, Y., & Ollendick, T. H. (2001). A cross-cultural and developmental analysis of self-esteem in Chinese and western children. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 4, 253–271.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Weisz, J. R., Suwanlert, S., Chaiyasit, W., Weiss, B., Achenbach,/T. M., & Walter, B. A. (1987). Epidemiology of behavioral and emotional problems among Thai and American/children: parent reports for ages 6–11. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 26, 890–898.Google Scholar
  49. Werner, O., & Campbell, D. T. (1970). Translating, working through interpreters, and the problem of decentering. In/R. Naroll & R. Cohen (Eds.), A handbook of method in cultural anthropology (pp. 398–420). New York: American Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brigit M. van Widenfelt
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Philip D. A. Treffers
    • 1
  • Edwin de Beurs
    • 2
  • Bart M. Siebelink
    • 1
  • Els Koudijs
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Child and Adolescent PsychiatryLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of Child and Adolescent PsychiatryLeiden University Medical CenterAK OegstgeestThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations