Advertisement

Child & Youth Care Forum

, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp 93–110 | Cite as

Psychometric Properties of the Compass of Shame Scale: Testing for Measurement Invariance Across Community Boys and Boys in Foster Care and Juvenile Detentions Facilities

  • Paula VagosEmail author
  • Diana Ribeiro da Silva
  • Nélio Brazão
  • Daniel Rijo
  • Jeff Elison
Original Paper

Abstract

Background

Shame has been found to relate to several psychopathologies, but the way the individual copes with experiences of shame may determine specific expressions of psychopathology, making it essential to rigorously address such coping styles.

Objective

This study evaluated the psychometric properties of a Portuguese version of the Compass of Shame Scale using an adolescent sample, to investigate if its internal structure was valid for diverse adolescent subsamples, and to gather evidence on the construct validity of the instrument.

Method

Adolescent community boys and girls (n = 1924; 52.3% boys) and adolescent boys with a history of behavior problems taken from foster care and juvenile detention facilities (n = 396) filled in self-report questionnaires on coping with shame and other relevant constructs.

Results

A five-factor model was applicable to exploring the coping with shame of adolescent community boys and girls and adolescent boys with behavior problems. Girls, in comparison with boys, more frequently internalized shame or coped with it adaptively. Boys taken from foster care and juvenile detention facilities, compared with community boys, more often externalized shame by attacking others and less frequently attacked themselves, avoided shame experiences or coped with it adaptively. Construct validity in relation to self-criticism, external shame, and experiential avoidance was found.

Conclusions

The measure demonstrated reliability and validity estimates consistent with expectations across diverse samples of adolescents. So, it may help advance knowledge on how diverse youth cope with shame and on the interchanges between experiencing shame, managing shame, and psychopathology.

Keywords

Shame Shame coping-styles Psychometrics Measurement invariance Adolescence Disruptive behavior 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the psychologists from foster care and juvenile detention facilities for collaborating in this research, as well as Marta Capinha and Maria do Natal Sousa for helping in the assessment in the Azores Island. The authors would also like to thank the several undergraduate students at the University of Coimbra that contributed to data collection.

Funding

ESF – European Regional Development Fund through the COMPETE 2020 – Operational Programme for Competitiveness and Internationalization and FCT – Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (reference project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016724).

Supplementary material

10566_2018_9474_MOESM1_ESM.docx (18 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 18 kb)

References

  1. Abram, K. M., Teplin, L. A., Charles, D. R., Longworth, S. L., McClelland, G. M., & Dulcan, M. K. (2004). Posttraumatic stress disorder and trauma in youth in juvenile detention. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61, 403–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allan, S., Gilbert, P., & Goss, K. (1994). An exploration of shame measures-II: Psychopathology. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 719–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boals, A. (2010). Events that have become central to identity: Gender differences in the centrality of events scale for positive and negative events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. M., Guenole, N., Orcutt, H. K., et al. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: A revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behavior Therapy, 42, 676–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, J. S., & Elison, J. (2005). Shame coping styles and psychopathic personality traits. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84, 96–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castilho, P., & Pinto-Gouveia, J. (2011). Auto-criticismo: Estudo de validação da versão portuguesa da Escala das Formas do Auto-Criticismo e Auto-Tranquilização (FSCRS) e da Escala das Funções do Auto-Criticismo e Auto-Ataque (FSCS) [Self-criticism: Validation study of the Portuguese version of The Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking & Self-Reassuring Scale (FSCRS) and Functions of Self-Criticizing Scale (FSCS)]. Psychologica, 54, 63–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Castilho, P., Pinto-Gouveia, J., & Duarte, J. (2015). Exploring self-criticism: Confirmatory factor analysis of the FSCRS in clinical and nonclinical samples. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 22, 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crittenden, P. M. (1992). Children’s strategies for coping with adverse home environments: An interpretation using attachment theory. Child Abuse and Neglect, 16, 329–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cunha, M., Matos, M., Faria, D., & Zagalo, S. (2012). Shame memories and psychopathology in adolescence: The mediator effect of shame. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 12, 203–218.Google Scholar
  12. Cunha, M., Xavier, A., Cherpe, S., & Pinto-Gouveia, J. (2015). Avaliação da vergonha em adolescentes: The Other as Shamer Scale [The assessment of shame in adolescents: The Other as Shamer Scale]. (Manuscript submitted for publication).Google Scholar
  13. da Motta, C., Ribeiro da Silva, D., Brazão, N., & Rijo, D. (2012). The Portuguese version of the Compass of Shame Scale (Unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
  14. Dimitrov, D. M. (2006). Comparing groups on latent variables: A structural equation modeling approach. Work (Reading, Mass.), 26, 429–436.Google Scholar
  15. Dimitrov, D. M. (2010). Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct validation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43, 121–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elison, J., Garofalo, C., & Velotti, P. (2014). Shame and aggression: Theoretical considerations. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19, 447–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elison, J., Hilwig, S., Waddell, B., & Brydges, J. (2015, April). Gender socialization predicts sex differences in socially desirable responding and shame-coping. In: Paper presented at the rocky mountain psychological association convention, Boise, ID.Google Scholar
  18. Elison, J., Lennon, R., & Pulos, S. (2006). Investigating the compass of shame: The development of the Compass of Shame Scale. Social Behavior and Personality, 34, 221–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gilbert, P. (2014). The origins and nature of compassion focused therapy. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53, 6–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gilbert, P., Clark, M., Hempel, S., Miles, J. N. V., & Irons, C. (2004). Criticizing and reassuring oneself: An exploration of forms, styles and reasons in female students. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gilbert, P., & Irons, C. (2009). Shame, self-criticism, and self-compassion in adolescence. In N. Allen (Ed.), Psychopathology in adolescence (pp. 195–214). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Goss, K., Gilbert, P., & Allan, S. (1994). An exploration of shame measures-I: The ‘Other As Shamer’ Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 713–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P. F., & Spielberger, C. D. (2005). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
  24. Harper, J. M. (2011). Regulating and coping with shame. In R. Trnka, K. Balcar, & M. Kuska (Eds.), Reconstructing emotional spaces: From experience to regulation (pp. 189–206). Prague: Prague of College of Psychological Studies Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 61, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Instituto Nacional de Estatística. (2011). Classificação Portuguesa das profissões 2010 [2010 Portuguese classification of professions]. Lisboa: Instituto Nacional de Estatística.Google Scholar
  27. Kaufman, I. (1996). The psychology of shame (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Korkmaz, S., Goksuluk, D., & Zararsiz, G. (2014). An R Package for assessing multivariate normality. The R Journal, 6, 151–162.Google Scholar
  29. Kroger, J. (2004). Identity in adolescence: The balance between self and other (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McWilliams, N. (2011). Psychoanalytic diagnosis. Understanding personality structure in the clinical process. New York, NY: Guilford Press. (Original work published 1994).Google Scholar
  31. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (Vol. 7). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  32. Nathanson, D. L. (1992). Shame and pride: Affect, sex and the birth of the self. New York: W. Norton.Google Scholar
  33. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  34. Nyström, M. B. T., & Mikkelsen, F. (2012). Psychopathy-related personality traits and shame management. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28, 519–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pinto-Gouveia, J., Gregório, S., Dinis, A., & Xavier, A. (2012). Experiential avoidance in clinical and non-clinical samples: AAQ-II Portuguese version. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 12, 139–156.Google Scholar
  36. Ribeiro da Silva, D., Rijo, D., & Salekin, R. T. (2015). The evolutionary roots of psychopathy. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 21, 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schalkwijk, F., Stams, G. J., Dekker, J., Peen, J., & Elison, J. (2016). Measuring shame regulation: Validation of the Compass of Shame Scale. Social Behavior and Personality, 44, 1775–1792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tangney, J., & Tracy, J. L. (2012). Self-conscious emotions. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 446–480). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  39. Vagos, P., Ribeiro da Silva, D., Brazão, N., & Rijo, D. (2018). The Centrality of Event Scale in Portuguese adolescents: Validity evidence based on internal structure and on relations to other variables. Assessment, 25(4), 527–538.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116651137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vagos, P., Ribeiro da Silva, D., Brazão, N., Rijo, D., & Gilbert, P. (2016). Dimensionality and measurement invariance of the Other as Shamer Scale across diverse adolescent samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 289–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vagos, P., Rijo, D., Santos, I. M., & Marsee, M. A. (2014). Forms and functions of aggression in adolescents: Validation of the Portuguese version of the Peer Conflict Scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 36, 570–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yelsma, P., Brown, N. M., & Elison, J. (2002). Shame-focused coping styles and their associations with self-esteem. Psychological Reports, 90, 1179–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zeman, J., Cassano, M., Perry-Parrish, C., & Stegall, S. (2006). Emotion regulation in children and adolescents. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 27, 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zimmermann, P., & Iwanski, A. (2014). Emotion regulation from early adolescence to emerging adulthood and middle adulthood: Age differences, gender differences, and emotion specific developmental variations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 38, 182–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive and Behavioral Intervention, Faculty of Psychology and Educational SciencesUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
  2. 2.Portucalense Institute for Human Development – INPPUniv. PortucalenseOportoPortugal
  3. 3.School of Psychology and Life SciencesLusófona UniversityLisbonPortugal
  4. 4.Adams State UniversityDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations