Parenting Practices in Vietnam: An Investigation of the Psychometric Properties of the PBS-S and PCS
There has been an increase in externalizing problem behaviour in Vietnam over the last decade and parenting has been considered an important factor in the development of problem behaviour in adolescents in Western countries. However, few studies addressed parenting in a Vietnamese context, which may be due to the lack of a validated questionnaire.
The present study aims to translate and validate a Vietnamese version of the Parental Behavior Scale-Short form (PBS-S) and the Psychological Control Scale (PCS).
We collected data from 529 Vietnamese parents (60% mothers; Mage = 39.50, SD = 5.25), who have children from 10 to 14 years old. A Confirmatory Factor Analysis was used to investigate the factor structure of the combined parenting questionnaires. Afterwards, the subscales Emotional Symptoms, Conduct Problems, and Prosocial Behavior from the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire were used to establish criterion (i.e., convergent and divergent) validity.
The combination of items of the PBS-S and PCS resulted in a six-factor structure representing the original six scales (PBS-S: Positive Parenting, Discipline, Punishment, Material Reward and Rule Setting; PCS: Psychological Control).
The Vietnamese version of the PBS-S and PCS proved to be valid and will be useful to investigate the perception of Vietnamese parents on their parenting behaviour and the association with psychosocial outcome measures in Vietnamese adolescents.
KeywordsParenting Vietnam Validation study
Martijn Van Heel and Ba Tuan Vu were involved in the conceptualization of the study. Dung Tien Hoang collected the data. Martijn Van Heel drafted the article and Ba Tuan Vu, Guy Bosmans, Katja Petry, and Karla Van Leeuwen revised the manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Access to Data
The corresponding author takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
- Barber, B. K. (1996). Parental psychological control: Revisiting a neglected construct. Child Development, 67, 3296–3319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01915.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bornstein, M. H. (1989). Between caretakers and their young: Two models of interaction and their consequences for cognitive growth. In M. H. Bornstein & J. S. Bruner (Eds.), Interaction in human development (pp. 197–214). Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). The bioecological theory of human development. In U. Bronfenbrenner (Ed.), Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development (pp. 3–15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial development. In N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Series Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 646–718). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Hang, N. T. T., & Tam, T. N. T. M. (2013). School violence evidence from young lives in Vietnam. Vietnam Policy Paper, 1. Google Scholar
- IBM Corp. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
- Janssens, A., Goossens, L., Van Den Noortgate, W., Colpin, H., Verschueren, K., & Van Leeuwen, K. (2015). Parents’ and adolescents’ perspectives on parenting: Evaluating conceptual structure, measurement invariance, and criterion validity. Assessment, 22, 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114550477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Janssens, A., Van Den Noortgate, W., Goossens, L., Verschueren, K., Colpin, H., Claes, S., et al. (2017). Adolescent externalizing behaviour, psychological control, and peer rejection: Transactional links and dopaminergic moderation. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 35, 420–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kenny, D. (2015). Measuring model fit. http://davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm#null.
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide, 7th edn. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & MuthénGoogle Scholar
- Reid, J. B., Patterson, G. R., & Snyder, J. (2002). Antisocial behaviour in children and adolescents: A developmental analysis and model for intervention. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Stevens, J. P. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Stone, L. L., Otten, R., Engels, R. C. M. E., Vermulst, A. A., & Janssens, J. M. A. M. (2010). Psychometric properties of the parent and teacher versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for 4- to 12-year-olds: A review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 13, 254–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Van Leeuwen, K., & Vermulst, A. (2010). De verkorte versie van de Schaal voor Ouderlijk Gedrag. [Shortened version of the Parental Behaviour Scale]. Internal report, not published. Leuven: Katholieke UniversiteitGoogle Scholar
- Van Widenfelt, B. M., Treffers, P. D. A., de Beurs, E., Siebelink, B. M., & Koudijs, E. (2005). Translation of cross-cultural adaptation of assessment instruments used in psychological research with children and families. Clincial Child and Family Psychology Review, 8, 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-005-4752-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vu, B. T., Petry, K., & Bosmans, G. (2016). Peer victimization and emotional problems in Vietnamese children: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 3, 143–154. ISSN 2348-5396Google Scholar