Early Steps to School Success (ESSS): Examining Pathways Linking Home Visiting and Language Outcomes
- 199 Downloads
Improving the home environment and parenting practices to support children’s early development and learning is a key focus of many. Home visiting is one potential strategy to improve the home environment and parenting; however, more data about current programmatic efforts is needed, especially for children with multiple risks living in low-wealth communities.
Secondary analysis was conducted using the Early Steps to School Success home visiting program data to examine the pathway through which home visiting participation is associated with children’s early language outcomes and whether this pathway varies by quantity of risk factors.
In addition to conducting regression analyses, multiple group path analyses were done to examine the indirect relationship between home visiting participation and children’s early language outcomes through the home environment and literacy practices, and variation of this relationship by risks.
Participation in home visiting was indirectly associated with children’s receptive language through a responsive and language-rich home environment.
Home visiting is one strategy to improve the quality of home environment and parenting practices, especially for children experiencing multiple risks.
KeywordsHome visiting Cumulative risks Home environment Literacy practices Receptive language
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Iruka has no conflict of interest. Brown is a contract evaluator for Save the Children, developer of the Early Steps to School Success home visiting program. Jerald is an employee of Save the Children, and key developer of the Early Steps to School Success home visiting program. Blitch has no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
While this is secondary data analysis of existing data, informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Avellar, S., Paulsell, D., Sama-Miller, E., Grosso, P. D., Akers, L., & Kleinman, R. (2016). Home visiting evidence of effectiveness review: Executive summary (OPRE Report #2015-85a). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.Google Scholar
- Birch, S. H., & Ladd, G. W. (1996). Interpersonal relationships in the school environment and children’s early school adjustment. In K. Wentzel & J. Juvonen (Eds.), Social motivation: Understanding children’s school adjustment (pp. 199–225). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bollen, K. A. (1987). Total, direct, and indirect effects in structural equation models. In C. C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological methodology (Vol. 17, pp. 37–69). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
- Bradley, R. H., Whiteside, L., Mundfrom, D. J., Casey, P. H., Kelleher, K. J., & Pope, S. K. (1994). Early indications of resilience and their relation to experiences in the home environments of low birthweight, premature children living in poverty. Child Development, 65(2), 346–360. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1131388.
- Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2007). The bioecological model of human development. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 793–828). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Brooks-Gunn, J., & Markman, L. B. (2005). The contribution of parenting to ethnic and racial gaps in school readiness. The Future of Children, 15(1), 139–168. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1602666.
- Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Caldwell, B. M., & Bradley, R. H. (1984). Home observation for measurement of the environment. Little Rock, AR: University of Arkansas at Little Rock.Google Scholar
- Conger, R. D., & Elder, G. H. (Eds.). (1994). Families in troubled time: Adaptation in rural American. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Forget-Dubois, N., Dionne, G., Lemelin, J.-P., Pérusse, D., Tremblay, R. E., & Boivin, M. (2009). Early child language mediates the relation between home environment and school readiness. Child Development, 80(3), 736–749. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01294.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Forry, N., Bromer, J., Chrisler, A., Rothenberg, L., Simkin, S., & Daneri, P. (2012). Family-provider relationship quality: Review of conceptual and empirical literature of family-provider relationships (OPRE Report #2012-46). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.Google Scholar
- Foster, M. A., Lambert, R., Abbott-Shim, M., McCarty, F., & Franze, S. (2005). A model of home learning environment and social risk factors in relation to children’s emergent literacy and social outcomes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 20(1), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2005.01.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Iruka, I. U., LaForett, D. R., & Odom, E. C. (2012). Examining the validity of the family investment and stress models and relationship to children’s school readiness across five cultural groups. Journal of Family Psychology, 26(3), 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028290.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Love, J. M., Kisker, E. E., Ross, C., Raikes, H., Constantine, J., Boller, K., et al. (2005). The effectiveness of early head start for 3-year-old children and their parents: Lessons for policy and programs. Developmental Psychology, 41(6), 885–901. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-16220.127.116.115.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Luster, T., & Okagaki, L. (Eds.). (2005). Parenting: An ecological perspective (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- McLoyd, V., Mistry, R. S., & Hardaway, C. R. (2014). Poverty and children’s development: Familial processes as mediating influences. In E. T. Gershoff, R. S. Mistry, & D. A. Crosby (Eds.), Societal contexts of child development: Pathways of influence and implications for practice and policy (pp. 109–124). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus user’s guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- National Institute of Child Health Human Development Early Child Care Research Network. (2004). Are child developmental outcomes related to before- and after-school care arrangements? Results from the NICHD Study of Early Child Care. Child Development, 75(1), 280–295. https://doi.org/10.2307/3696581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pianta, R. C., & Walsh, D. J. (1996). High-risk children in schools: Constructing sustaining relationships. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Raikes, H. H., Roggman, L. A., Peterson, C. A., Brooks-Gunn, J., Chazan-Cohen, R., Zhang, X., et al. (2014). Theories of change and outcomes in home-based Early Head Start programs. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29(4), 574–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.05.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Raviv, T., Kessenich, M., & Morrison, F. J. (2004). A mediational model of the association between socioeconomic status and three-year-old language abilities: The role of parenting factors. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19(4), 528–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2004.10.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sameroff, A. J., Bartko, W. T., Baldwin, A., Baldwin, C., & Seifer, R. (1998). Family and social influences on the development of child competence. In M. Lewis & C. Feiring (Eds.), Family, risk, and competence (pp. 161–185). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
- Sameroff, A. J., Seifer, R., Baldwin, A., & Baldwin, C. (1993). Stability of intelligence from preschool to adolescence: The influence of social and family risk factors. Child Development, 64(1), 80–97. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1131438.
- Sameroff, A. J., Seifer, R., Barocas, R., Zax, M., & Greenspan, S. (1987). Intelligence quotient scores of 4-year-old children: Social-environmental risk factors. Pediatrics, 79(3), 343–350.Google Scholar
- Save the Children. (n.d.). Early Steps to School Success. Retrieved from http://www.savethechildren.org/site/c.8rKLIXMGIpI4E/b.8193011/k.4505/Early_Steps_to_School_Success.htm. Accessed 20 Aug 2016.
- Sawyer, B. E., Justice, L. M., Guo, Y., Logan, J. A. R., Petrill, S. A., Glenn-Applegate, K., et al. (2014). Relations among home literacy environment, child characteristics and print knowledge for preschool children with language impairment. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrir.12008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sylva, K., Melhuish, E., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Taggart, B. (2008). Final report from the primary phase: Pre-school, school and family influences on children’s development during key stage 2 (Age 7–11). London: DfES/Institute of Education, University of London.Google Scholar
- Walker, S. P., Wachs, T. D., Grantham-McGregor, S., Black, M. M., Nelson, C. A., Huffman, S. L., et al. (2011). Inequality in early childhood: Risk and protective factors for early child development. The Lancet, 378(9799), 1325–1338. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60555-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- West, J., Denton, K., & Germino-Hausken, E. (2000). American’s kindergartners, NCES 2000-070. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar