Child & Youth Care Forum

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 113–133 | Cite as

Teachers as School-Based Mentors for At-Risk Students: A Qualitative Study

Original Paper

Abstract

Background

Over the past decade, administrators have implemented school-based mentoring (SBM) programs in schools across several western countries. However, few studies have compared the views of mentors and parents regarding the factors that determine SBM success.

Objectives

The purpose of this work is to explore the factors that may facilitate or undermine the completion of SBM goals, according to the perspectives of both mentors and parents.

Methods

We conducted a qualitative study using the focus group technique, followed by a content analysis. The study involved 22 mentors and 16 parents. We then classified the emergent themes as either facilitators of or barriers to SBM success.

Results and Conclusions

The participants focused on how the relationships of mentors with parents, teachers and, more rarely, with social service officials affected the SBM accomplishments. The participants seldom regarded the characteristics of the mentees as an important influence on mentoring effectiveness. Our findings suggest that mentoring delivered by teachers may help to address some of the practical limitations of SBM programs. However, the overlap of mentoring and teaching roles in SBM may also necessitate additional care regarding the definition of purposeful interactions of the mentors with the other adults who are significant in the lives of the mentees, namely their parents and teachers.

Keywords

School-based mentoring Mentors Parents Teachers 

References

  1. Addi-Racah, A., & Ainhoren, R. (2009). School governance and teachers’ attitudes to parents’ involvement in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(6), 805–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bæck, U. D. (2010). Parental involvement practices in formalized home-school cooperation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 54(6), 549–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bardin, L. (2004). Análise de conteúdo [Content analysis] (p. 70). Lisboa: Edições.Google Scholar
  4. Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chan, C. S., & Ho, W. (2008). An ecological framework for evaluating relationship-functional aspects of youth mentoring. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(4), 837–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chan, C. S., Rhodes, J. E., Howard, W. J., Lowe, S. R., Schwartz, S. E. O., & Herrera, C. (2013). Pathways of influence in school-based mentoring: The mediating role of parent and teacher relationships. Journal of School Psychology, 51(1), 129–142.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deutsch, N. L., & Spencer, N. (2009). Capturing the magic: Assessing the quality of youth mentoring relationships. New Directions for Youth Development, 121, 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DuBois, D. L., Holloway, B. E., Valentine, J. C., & Cooper, H. (2002). Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(2), 157–197.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DuBois, D. L., Portillo, N., Rhodes, J. E., Silverthorn, N., & Valentine, J. C. (2011). How effective are mentoring programs for youth? A systematic assessment of the evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(2), 57–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College.Google Scholar
  11. Epstein, J. L. (2001). School, family and community partnerships. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  12. Goldner, L., & Mayseless, O. (2008). Juggling the roles of parents, therapists, friends and teachers: A working model for an integrative conception of mentoring. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 16(4), 412–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. González, R. L., & Jackson, C. L. (2012). Engaging with parents: The relationship between school engagement efforts, social class, and learning. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
  14. Grolnick, W. S., & Slowiaczek, M. L. (1994). Parents’ involvement in children’s schooling: A multidimensional conceptualization and motivational model. Child Development, 65(1), 237–252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grossman, J. B., Chan, C. S., Schwartz, S. E. O., & Rhodes, J. E. (2012). The test of time in SBM: The role of relationship duration and re-matching on academic outcomes. American Journal of Community Psychology, 49(1), 43–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Herrera, C., Grossman, J. B., Kauh, T. J., Feldman, A. F., McMaken, J., & Jucovy, L. Z. (2007). Making a difference in schools: The Big Brothers Big Sisters school-based mentoring impact study. Philadelphia, PA: Public/Private Ventures.Google Scholar
  17. Herrera, C., Grossman, J. B., Kauh, T. J., & McMaken, J. (2011). Mentoring in schools: An impact study of Big Brother Big Sisters school-based mentoring. Child Development, 82(1), 346–361.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hornby, G., & Lafaele, R. (2011). Barriers to parental involvement in education: An exploratory model. Educational Review, 63(1), 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Karcher, M. J. (2008). The study of mentoring in the learning environment (SMILE). A randomized evaluation of the effectiveness of SBM. Prevention Science, 9(2), 99–113.Google Scholar
  20. Karcher, M. J., Nakkula, M. J., & Harris, J. (2005). Developmental mentoring match characteristics: Correspondence between mentors’ and mentees’ assessments of relationship quality. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 26(2), 93–110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Keller, T. E. (2005). A systemic model of youth mentoring intervention. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 26(2), 169–188.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Komosa-Hawkins, K. (2009). Best practices in school-based mentoring for adolescents. Child & Youth Services, 31, 121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2008). Focus Groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  24. Miller, A. (2007). Best practices for formal youth mentoring. In T. D. Allen & L. T. Eby (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of mentoring: A multiple perspectives approach (pp. 307–324). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Omer, H. (2011). The new authority: Family, school and community. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Rhodes, J. E. (2002). Stand by me: The risks and rewards of mentoring today’s youth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Russell, L. (2007). Mentoring is not for you! Mentee voices on managing the mentoring experience. Improving Schools, 10(1), 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schwartz, S. E. O., Rhodes, J. E., Chan, E. S., & Herrera, C. (2011). The impact of school-based mentoring on youths with different relational profiles. Developmental Psychology, 47(2), 450–462.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schwartz, S. E. O., Rhodes, J. E., & Herrera, C. (2012). The influence of meeting time on academic outcomes in school-based mentoring. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(12), 2319–2326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Simões, F., & Alarcão, M. The structure and process of social support in school-based mentoring from a self-determination theory perspective. The Journal of Social Psychology of Education (submitted).Google Scholar
  32. Spencer, R. (2006). Understanding the mentoring process between adolescents and adults. Youth & Society, 37(3), 287–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Spencer, R., Basualdo-Delmonico, A., & Lewis, T. O. (2011). Working to make it work: The role of parents in the youth mentoring process. Journal of Community Psychology, 39(1), 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vicsek, L. (2010). Issues in the analysis of focus groups: Generalisability, quantifiability, treatment of context and quotations. Qualitative Report, 15(1), 122–141.Google Scholar
  35. Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative research interviewing: Biographic narrative and semi-structured methods. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  36. Wheeler, M. E., Keller, T. E., & DuBois, D. L. (2010). Review of three randomized trials of school-based mentoring: Making sense of mixed findings. Social Policy Report, 24(3), 1–21.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Psychology and Educational SciencesUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations