Child & Youth Care Forum

, Volume 42, Issue 3, pp 225–238 | Cite as

Family Involvement and Changes in Child Behavior During Residential Mental Health Treatment

  • John Robst
  • Lodi Rohrer
  • Mary Armstrong
  • Norín Dollard
  • Patty Sharrock
  • Catherine Batsche
  • Steven Reader
Original Paper



Family involvement is viewed as an important component of the treatment process for children in residential treatment centers, but little is known about the impact of contact with family members on changes in youth functioning.


The goal of this study was to use administrative data to examine the association between family involvement and youth outcomes for a Medicaid-funded residential treatment program in Florida. Differences between in-person and telephone intervention contacts based on the proximity of the family residence to the program were also explored.


The sample was divided into two groups based on the number of family contacts per month during the treatment episode; i.e., number of family contacts equal to or less than the median and number of family contacts greater than the median. Generalized estimating equations were used to examine characteristics related to the percent change in scores on a measure of emotional and behavioral functioning.


Results suggest that maternal and paternal contacts, as well as the total number of family contacts, were associated with greater improvements in youth functioning. Youth that resided in a different county than the residential program had greater improvement in behaviors when the family was involved regardless of whether contact was in-person or over the phone.


Family involvement, including phone contacts, is associated with improved youth outcomes during the treatment episode.


Residential treatment Child behavior Family involvement Treatment outcomes 


  1. Achenbach, T. (1991). Manual for the child behavior checklist/4-18 and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
  2. Affronti, M. L., & Levinson-Johnson, J. (2009). The future of family engagement in residential care settings. Residential Treatment for Children & Youth, 26, 257–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Association of Children’s Residential Centers. (2005). Redefining residential: One through eight. Retrieved from
  4. Antonucci, T. C., Akiyama, H., & Takahashi, K. (2004). Attachment and close relationships across the life span. Attachment and Human Development, 6, 353–370.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Armstrong, M., Dollard, N., Robst, J., Hummer, V., Li, W., Cobb, S., et al. (2010). Evaluation of Medicaid-funded out-of-home alternatives for FY 09–10. Tampa, FL: Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, University of South Florida.Google Scholar
  6. Baker, B. L., & Blacher, J. (2002). For better or worse? Impact of residential placement on families. Mental Retardation, 40, 1–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baker, B. L., Blacher, J., & Pfeiffer, S. (1993). Family involvement in residential treatment of children with psychiatric disorder and mental retardation. Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 44, 561–566.Google Scholar
  8. Blader, J. C. (2004). Symptom, family, and service predictors of children’s psychiatric rehospitalization within one year of discharge. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 43, 440–451.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blau, G. M., Caldwell, B., Fisher, S. K., Kuppinger, A., Levison-Johnson, J., & Lieberman, R. (2010). The building bridges initiative: Residential and community-based providers, family, and youth coming together to improve outcomes. Child Welfare, 89(2), 21–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowlby, J. (1969/1982). Attachment and loss. New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. Child Welfare League of America, Inc. (2004). CWLA standards of excellence for residential services. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  12. Frensch, K. M., & Cameron, G. (2002). Treatment of choice or a last resort? A review of residential mental health placements for children and youth. Child & Youth Care Forum, 31, 307–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gorske, T. T., Srebalus, D. J., & Walls, R. T. (2003). Adolescents in residential centers: Characteristics and treatment outcomes. Children and Youth Services Review, 25(4), 317–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Greenbaum, P. E., & Dedrick, R. F. (1998). Hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis of the Child Behavior Checklist/4-18. Psychological Assessment, 10, 149–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hair, H. J. (2005). Outcomes for children and adolescents after residential treatment: A review of research from 1993 to 2003. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 14(4), 551–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hardin, J., & Hilbe, J. (2002). Generalized estimating equations. Danvers, MA: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoagwood, K., Burns, B. J., Kiser, L., Ringeisen, H., & Schoenwald, S. K. (2001). Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health services. Psychiatric Services, 52, 1179–1189.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jenson, J. M., & Whittaker, J. K. (1987). Parental involvement in children’s residential treatment. Children and Youth Services Review, 9, 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kahn, R. L., & Antonucci, T. C. (1980). Convoys over the life course: Attachment, roles, and social support. In P. B. Baltes & O. G. Brim (Eds.), Life-span development and behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 253–286). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kruzich, J. M., Jivanjee, P., Robinson, A., & Friesen, B. J. (2003). Family caregivers’ perceptions of barriers to and support of participation in their children’s out-of-home treatment. Psychiatric Services, 54, 1513–1518.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lakin, B. L., Brambila, A. D., & Sigda, K. B. (2004). Parental involvement as a factor in the readmission to a residential treatment center. Residential Treatment for Children & Youth, 22(2), 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leathers, S. J. (2002). Parental visiting and family reunification: Could inclusive practice make a difference? Child Welfare, 81, 595–616.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee, L. J. (2011). Adult visitation and permanency for children following residential treatment. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(7), 1288–1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Levitt, M. J., Levitt, J., Bustos, G. L., Crooks, N. A., Santos, J. D., Telan, P., et al. (2005). Patterns of social support in the middle childhood to early adolescent transition: Implications for adjustment. Social Development, 14, 398–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McWey, L. (2000). I promise to act better if you let me see my family: Attachment theory and foster care visitations. Journal of Family Social Work, 5, 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stage, S. A. (1999). Predicting adolescents’ discharge status following residential treatment. Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 16(3), 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sunseri, P. A. (2001). The prediction of unplanned discharge from residential treatment. Child & Youth Care Forum, 30, 283–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sunseri, P. A. (2004). Family functioning and residential treatment outcomes. Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 22(1), 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Walter, U. M., & Petr, C. G. (2008). Family-centered residential treatment: Knowledge, research, and values converge. Residential Treatment for Children & Youth, 25(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wells, K., Wyatt, E., & Hobfoll, S. (1991). Factors associated with adaptation of youths discharged from residential treatment. Children and Youth Services Review, 13, 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Robst
    • 1
  • Lodi Rohrer
    • 2
  • Mary Armstrong
    • 2
  • Norín Dollard
    • 2
  • Patty Sharrock
    • 2
  • Catherine Batsche
    • 3
  • Steven Reader
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Mental Health Law and Policy, Florida Mental Health InstituteUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Child and Family StudiesUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA
  3. 3.College of Behavioral and Community Sciences Dean’s OfficeUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA
  4. 4.Department of Geography, Environment and PlanningUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations