Advertisement

Child & Youth Care Forum

, Volume 41, Issue 2, pp 109–117 | Cite as

Advancing Intervention Science Through Effectiveness Research: A Global Perspective

  • Laura Ferrer-WrederEmail author
  • Lena Adamson
  • Karol L. Kumpfer
  • Kyle Eichas
Original Paper

Abstract

Background

Effectiveness research is maturing as a field within intervention and prevention science. Effectiveness research involves the implementation and evaluation of the effectiveness of the dissemination of evidence-based interventions in everyday circumstances (i.e., type 2 translational research). Effectiveness research is characterized by diverse types of research studies. Progress in this field has the potential to inform several debates within intervention science [e.g., fidelity versus local and cultural adaptation; identification of core components, effective dissemination systems).

Objective

To provide illustrations from different countries (Ireland, Italy, South Africa, Sweden, New Zealand, and the United States) of how intervention science might raise the value of future effectiveness or type 2 translational research.

Methods

Themes raised by individual articles and across articles are summarized and expanded on in this commentary.

Results

Themes consist of raising awareness about the importance of effectiveness research on the cultural adaptation of evidence-based interventions and intervention support structures, as well as further development of strategies to bridge the gap between research and practice.

Conclusions

Effectiveness research has an important role to play in affecting systemic change on a population level and allowing us to gain a realistic global understanding of the phenomena we hope to change through interventions. Articles in this special issue provide reports from social scientists and practitioners located in various parts of the world and offer a rich, diverse portrait of effectiveness research and theory development. The totality of the work contained in this special issue anticipates many of the changes that intervention and prevention science will undergo as we progress and develop effective dissemination strategies for evidence-based interventions that promote positive youth development and prevent youth and family problems on a global scale.

Keywords

Effectiveness research Type 2 translational research Evidence-based intervention Intervention science Prevention science 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors found no conflict of interest between themselves and any organization that may be affected by the publication of this article.

References

  1. Arnett, J. J. (Ed.). (2012). Adolescent psychology around the world. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  2. Backer, T. E. (2001). Finding the balance—Program fidelity and adaptation in substance abuse prevention: A state-of-the art review. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Prevention.Google Scholar
  3. Caldwell, L. L., Smith, E. A., Collins, L. M., Graham, J. W., Lai, M., Wegner, L., et al. (2012). Translational research in South Africa: Evaluating implementation quality using a factorial design. Child and Youth Care Forum. doi: 10.1007/s10566-011-9164-4.
  4. Castro, F. G., Barrera, M., Jr, & Martinez, C. R., Jr. (2004). The cultural adaptation of prevention interventions: Resolving tensions between fidelity and fit. Prevention Science, 5(1), 41–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Domitrovich, C. E., Bradshaw, C. P., Poduska, J. M., Hoagwood, K., Buckley, J. A., Olin, S., et al. (2008). Maximizing the implementation quality of evidence-based preventive interventions in schools: A conceptual framework. Advances in School Mental Health Promotion, 1(3), 6–28.Google Scholar
  7. Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elliott, D. S., & Mihalic, S. (2004). Issues in disseminating and replicating effective prevention programs. Prevention Science, 5(1), 47–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Emshoff, J. G. (2008). Researchers, practitioners, and funders: Using the framework to get us on the same page. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 393–403. doi: 10.1007/s10464-008-9168-x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferrer-Wreder, L., Sundell, K., & Mansoory, S. (2012). Tinkering with perfection: Theory development in the intervention cultural adaptation field. Child and Youth Care Forum. doi: 10.1007/s10566-011-9162-6.
  11. Fetterman, D. (2002). 2001 INVITED ADDRESS: Empowerment evaluation: Building communities of practice and a culture of learning. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(1), 89–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Flaspohler, P., Duffy, J., Wandersman, A., Stillman, L., & Maras, M. A. (2008). Unpacking prevention capacity: An intersection of research-to-practice models and community-centered models. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 182–196.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Flay, B. R., Biglan, A., Boruch, R. F., Castro, F. G., Gottfredson, D., & Kellam, S. (2005). Standards of evidence: Criteria for efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination. Prevention Science, 6(3), 151–175. doi: 10.1007/s11121-005-5553-y.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Greenberg, M., Domitrovich, C. E., Graczyk, P., & Zins, J. (2001). The study of implementation in school-based preventive interventions: Theory, research, and practice. Report to Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS), Substance Abuse Mental Health Services Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  15. Hansen, W. B. (2011). Was Herodotus correct? Prevention Science, 12, 118–120. doi: 10.1007/s11121-011-0218-5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kumpfer, K. L., & Alvarado, R. (2003). Family strengthening approaches for the prevention of youth problem behaviors. American Psychologist, 58(6/7), 457–465. [PMID: 12971192].PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kumpfer, K. L., & Kafetarian, J. (2000). Bridging the gap between family-focused research and practice: Preface. Journal of Primary Prevention, 21(2), 169–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kumpfer, K. L., Pinyuchon, M., de Melo, A., & Whiteside, H. O. (2008). Cultural adaptation process for international dissemination of the strengthening families program (SFP). Evaluation and Health Professions, 33(2), 226–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kumpfer, K. L., Xie, J., & Magalhães, C. (2012a). Cultural adaptations of evidence-based family interventions to strengthen families and improve children’s developmental outcomes. European Journal of Developmental Psychology.Google Scholar
  20. Kumpfer, K. L., Xie, J., & O’Driscoll, R. (2012b). Effectiveness of a culturally adapted strengthening families program 12–16 years for high-risk Irish families. Child and Youth Care Forum. doi: 10.1007/s10566-011-9168-0.
  21. Mrazek, P., & Haggerty, R. (1994). Reducing risks for mental disorders: Frontiers for preventive intervention research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  22. Mundy-McPherson, S., Fouché, C., & Elliot, K. (2012). If only “a rose by any other name would smell as sweet”: A systematic review on the impact of youth work for young people. Child and Youth Care Forum. doi: 10.1007/s10566-011-9169-z.
  23. Olsson, T. M. (2012). Economic evaluation as a component of quality effectiveness research: Methodological and practical benefits. Child and Youth Care Forum. doi: 10.1007/s10566-011-9158-2.
  24. Ortega, E., Giannotta, F., Latina, D., & Ciairano, S. (2012). Cultural adaptation of the strengthening families program 10–14 to Italian families. Child and Youth Care Forum. doi: 10.1007/s10566-011-9170-6.
  25. Spoth, R., Greenberg, M., Bierman, K., & Redmond, C. (2004). PROSPER community-university partnership model for public education systems: Capacity-building for evidence-based, competence-building prevention. Prevention Science, 5(1), 31–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Spoth, R., Rohrbach, L., Hawkins, D., Greenberg, M. T., Pentz, M., & Robertson, E. (2008). Type 2 translational research: Overview and definitions. Society for Prevention Research. Available at http://www.preventionresearch.org/SPR_Type%202%20Translation%20Research_Overview%20and%20Definition.pdf.
  27. UNODC. (2009). Guide to implementing family skills training programmes for drug abuse prevention. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  28. Urban, J. B., & Trochim, W. (2009). The role of evaluation in research-practice integration: Working toward the “golden spike”. American Journal of Evaluation, 30(4), 538–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Valentine, J. C., Biglan, A., Boruch, R. F., Castro, F. G., Collins, L. M., Flay, B. R., et al. (2011). Replication in prevention science. Prevention Science, 12, 103–117. doi: 10.1007/s11121-011-0217-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wandersman, A., Duffy, J., Flaspohler, P., Noonan, R., Lubell, K., Stillman, L., et al. (2008). Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: The interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 171–181.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weisz, J. R., Sandler, I. N., Durlak, J. A., & Anton, B. S. (2005). Promoting and protecting youth mental health through evidence-based prevention and treatment. American Psychologist, 60(6), 628–648.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura Ferrer-Wreder
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lena Adamson
    • 2
  • Karol L. Kumpfer
    • 3
  • Kyle Eichas
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
  2. 2.European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT)/European CommissionSwedish Royal Technical CollegeStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Department of Health Promotion and EducationUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  4. 4.SafePlaceAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations