Advertisement

Child and Youth Care Forum

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 183–204 | Cite as

Continuing Rethinking The History of Ontario Day Nurseries: Loci for Intervention, Regulation, and Administration

Part Two
  • Veronica Pacini-KetchabawEmail author
Article

ABSTRACT

This article is the second half of “Rethinking The History of Ontario Day Nurseries: Loci for Intervention, Regulation and Administration.” The intent of the two-part article is to emphasize the discursive environment in which day nurseries in Ontario, Canada, developed in the early part of the twentieth century. Part One explores the theoretical lenses and the methodological approaches used for interpretation. Namely, the article uses poststructural approaches to understanding power/knowledge as an alternative lens to interpreting services for young children and their families. In the first part, the article also situates child care discourses within the broader literature of the history of childhood, and begins to outline the discursive environment in which day nurseries were created by describing how discourses of health positioned day nurseries as sites for intervention on the lives of young children and their families. This second half continues this dialogue by describing how day nurseries were positioned as sites of regulation and administration. In particular, it explores discourses of child welfare and child psychology and connects these back to health discussions outlined in part one. To end the discussion, the article presents connections to contemporary deliberations of child care.

Keywords

history of childhood poststructural analysis child care young children. 

References

  1. Arnup K. (1994). Education for motherhood: Advice for mothers in twentieth-century Canada University of Toronto Press, Toronto, ONGoogle Scholar
  2. Baird A. (1933). Maternal and child hygiene: Statistical indications in some problems in maternal and child hygiene. Child and Family Welfare 9(3):6–7Google Scholar
  3. Beach J., Bertrand J. (2000). More than the sum of parts: An early childhood development system for Canada Child Care Research and Resource Unit, Toronto, ONGoogle Scholar
  4. Blatz W. (1944a). Understanding the young child W. Morrow, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Blatz W. (1944b). Delinquency University of Toronto, Institute for Child Studies, Toronto, ONGoogle Scholar
  6. Blatz W. (1966). Human security: Some reflections University of Toronto Press, Toronto, ONGoogle Scholar
  7. Blatz W., Bott H. (1928). Parents and the pre-school child J.M. Dent, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Blatz W., Bott H. (1930). The management of young children McClelland & Stewart, Toronto, ONGoogle Scholar
  9. Blatz W., Millichamp D., Fletcher M. (1935). Nursery education: Theory and practice W. Morrow, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Canadian Council on Child Welfare. (1926). The Canadian nurse and maternal care Canadian Child Welfare News 2(1):21Google Scholar
  11. Cleveland G., Krashinsky M. (2001). Our children’s future: Child care policy in Canada University of Toronto Press, Toronto, ONGoogle Scholar
  12. Comacchio C. (1993). Nations are built of babies: Saving Ontario’s mothers and children, 1900–1940 McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal and Kingston, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  13. Dahlberg G., Moss P. (2005). Ethics and politics in early childhood education Routledge/Falmer, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Dehli K. (1994–1995). Fictions of the scientific imagination: Researching the Dionne Quintuplets. Journal of Canadian Studies 29(4):86–110Google Scholar
  15. Doherty G., Friendly M., Oloman M. (1998). Women’s support, women’s work: Child care in an era of deficit reduction, devolution, downsizing and deregulation Status of Women Canada, Ottawa, ONGoogle Scholar
  16. Donzelot J. (1977). The policing of families The Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  17. Foucault M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Vintage, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Friendly M., Oloman M. (1996). Child care at the centre: Child care on the social, economic and political agenda in the 1990s In: J. Pulkingham, G. Ternowetsky (eds)Remaking Canadian social policy: Social security in the late 1990s. Fernwood, Halifax, NS, pp. 273–285Google Scholar
  19. Gould M. (1933). The day nursery in the programme of child care. Child and Family Welfare 9(2):2–12Google Scholar
  20. Gleason M. (1999). Normalizing the ideal: Psychology, schooling, and the family in postwar Canada University of Toronto Press, Toronto, ONGoogle Scholar
  21. James, K. (1997). Gender, class and ethnicity in the organization of neighborhood and nation: The role of Toronto’s settlement houses in the formation of the Canadian State, 1902 to 1914. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  22. MacNaughton G. (2005). Doing Foucault in early childhood: Applying poststructural ideas to early childhood Routledge/Falmer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. McCain M., Mustard F. (1999). Reversing the real brain drain: Early Years Study final report Publications Ontario, Toronto, ONGoogle Scholar
  24. McLaren A. (1990). Our own master race: Eugenics in Canada, 1885–1945. Oxford University Press, Toronto, ONGoogle Scholar
  25. Metropolitan Toronto Archives, Federation of Community Service, CTA SC40/114, p. 17, Toronto’s Welfare and Relief ‘Work’, 1932Google Scholar
  26. Metropolitan Toronto Reference Library (MTRL), Pat Schulz Collection, Box 200, 86.15.3 vol. 1, Victoria Day Nursery Programme Committee Meeting, October 25, 1956; MTRL, Pat Schulz Collection, Box 200, 86.15.3 vol. 1, Letter from the Federation for Community Service, November 17, 1924Google Scholar
  27. Michel S. (1999). Children’s interests/mothers’ rights: The shaping of America’s child care policy Yale University Press, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  28. Miller P., Rose N. (1993). Governing economic life In: Johnson T., eds Foucault’s new domains. Routledge, London, pp. 75–105Google Scholar
  29. Moss P., Petrie P. (2002). From children’s services to children’s spaces: Public policy, children and childhood Falmer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (this issue). Rethinking the history of Ontario Day Nurseries: Loci for intervention, regulation and administration, Part One. Child and Youth Care ForumGoogle Scholar
  31. Pacini-Ketchabaw V. (2005). The meanings embedded within child care regulations: A historical analysisContemporary Issues in Early Childhood 6(1):41–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Popkewitz T. S. (1999). Changing terrains of knowledge and politics: A social epistemology of educational researchEducational Researcher 26(9):18–29Google Scholar
  33. Project Zero and Reggio Children. (2001). Making learning visible: Children as individual and group learners. Reggio Children, Reggio Emilia, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  34. Rose N. (1990). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Rose N. (1996). Governing “advanced” liberal democracies In: N. Rose ed. Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of government. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 37–64Google Scholar
  36. Ryan S., Grieshaber S. (eds). (2005). Practical transformations and transformational practices: Globalization, postmodernism, and early childhood education. Elsevier JAI, Amsterdam and BostonGoogle Scholar
  37. Singer E. (1992). Child care and the psychology of development Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Social Service Commission of Toronto. (1916). Fourth annual report: Social Service Commission of Toronto for the year 1915. The Industrial and Technical Press, Toronto, ONGoogle Scholar
  39. Stapleford F. (1937). Private social work: what it has to offer for community enrichment. Child and Family Welfare 12(6):11–19Google Scholar
  40. Strong-Boag V. (1982). Intruders in the nursery: Childcare professionals reshape the years one to five, 1920–1940 In: Parr J., ed. Childhood and family in Canadian history. McClellan and Stewart, Toronto, pp. 160–178Google Scholar
  41. Varga D. (1991). The cultural organization of the child care curriculum: The University of Toronto Institute of Child Study and day nurseries, 1890–1960 University of Toronto, Toronto, ONGoogle Scholar
  42. Varga D. (1997). Constructing the child: A history of Canadian day care James Lorimer & Company, Toronto, ONGoogle Scholar
  43. Wills G. (1995). A marriage of convenience: Business and social work in Toronto, 1918–1957 University of Toronto Press, Toronto, ONGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of VictoriaVictoria B.C.Canada
  2. 2.School of Child & Youth CareUniversity of VictoriaVictoria B.C.Canada

Personalised recommendations