Comet assay: a reliable tool for the assessment of DNA damage in different models
New chemicals are being added each year to the existing burden of toxic substances in the environment. This has led to increased pollution of ecosystems as well as deterioration of the air, water, and soil quality. Excessive agricultural and industrial activities adversely affect biodiversity, threatening the survival of species in a particular habitat as well as posing disease risks to humans. Some of the chemicals, e.g., pesticides and heavy metals, may be genotoxic to the sentinel species and/or to non-target species, causing deleterious effects in somatic or germ cells. Test systems which help in hazard prediction and risk assessment are important to assess the genotoxic potential of chemicals before their release into the environment or commercial use as well as DNA damage in flora and fauna affected by contaminated/polluted habitats. The Comet assay has been widely accepted as a simple, sensitive, and rapid tool for assessing DNA damage and repair in individual eukaryotic as well as some prokaryotic cells, and has increasingly found application in diverse fields ranging from genetic toxicology to human epidemiology. This review is an attempt to comprehensively encase the use of Comet assay in different models from bacteria to man, employing diverse cell types to assess the DNA-damaging potential of chemicals and/or environmental conditions. Sentinel species are the first to be affected by adverse changes in their environment. Determination of DNA damage using the Comet assay in these indicator organisms would thus provide information about the genotoxic potential of their habitat at an early stage. This would allow for intervention strategies to be implemented for prevention or reduction of deleterious health effects in the sentinel species as well as in humans.
KeywordsComet assay In vivo In vitro Plants Invertebrate and vertebrate animal models Human monitoring
- Alink GM, Quik JT, Penders EJ, Spenkelink A, Rotteveel SG, Maas JL, et al. Genotoxic effects in the Eastern mudminnow (Umbra pygmaea L.) after exposure to Rhine water, as assessed by use of the SCE and Comet assays: a comparison between 1978 and 2005. Mutat Res. 2007;631(2):93–100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Augustowska K, Magnowska Z, Kapiszewska M, Gregoraszczuk EL. Is the natural PCDD/PCDF mixture toxic for human placental JEG-3 cell line? The action of the toxicants on hormonal profile, CYP1A1 activity, DNA damage and cell apoptosis. Human Exp Toxicol. 2007;26(5):407–17.Google Scholar
- Baos R, Jovani R, Pastor N, Tella JL, Jiménez B, Gómez G, et al. Evaluation of genotoxic effects of heavy metals and arsenic in wild nestling white storks (Ciconia ciconia) and black kites (Milvus migrans) from southwestern Spain after a mining accident. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2006;25(10):2794–803.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Benford DJ, Hanley AB, Bottrill K, Oehlschlager S, Balls M, Branca F, et al. Biomarkers as predictive tools in toxicity testing. Altern Lab Anim. 2000;28:119–31.Google Scholar
- Buehrlen M, Harréus UA, Gamarra F, Hagen R, Kleinsasser NH. Cumulative genotoxic and apoptotic effects of xenobiotics in a mini organ culture model of human nasal mucosa as detected by the alkaline single cell microgel electrophoresis assay and the annexin V-affinity assay. Toxicol Lett. 2007;169(2):152–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burlinson B, Tice RR, Speit G, Agurell E, Brendler-Schwaab SY, Collins AR, et al. In Vivo Comet Assay Workgroup, part of the Fourth International Workgroup on Genotoxicity Testing. Fourth International Workgroup on Genotoxicity testing: results of the In Vivo Comet Assay Workgroup. Mutat Res. 2007;627(1):31–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cemeli E, Smith IF, Peers C, Urenjak J, Godukhin OV, Obrenovitch TP, et al. Oxygen-induced DNA damage in freshly isolated brain cells compared with cultured astrocytes in the Comet assay. Teratog Carcinog Mutagen 2003;23(Suppl 2):43–52.Google Scholar
- COM (Committee on Mutagenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment), COM guidance on a strategy for testing of chemicals for mutagenicity, United Kingdom, December 2000.Google Scholar
- Dhawan A, Anderson D, de Pascual-Teresa S, Santos-Buelga C, Clifford MN, Ioannides C. Evaluation of the antigenotoxic potential of monomeric and dimeric flavanols, and black tea polyphenols against heterocyclic amine-induced DNA damage in human lymphocytes using the Comet assay. Mutat Res. 2002;515(1–2):39–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dusinska M, Collins AR. The comet assay in human biomonitoring: gene–environment interactions. Mutagenesis. 2008 (March 7, in press) DOI 10.1093/mutage/gen007.
- Forchhammer L, Brauner EV, Folkmann JK, Danielsen PH, Nielsen C, Jensen A, et al. Variation in assessment of oxidatively damaged DNA in mononuclear blood cells by the comet assay with visual scoring. Mutagenesis. 2008 (March 7, in press) DOI 10.1093/mutage/gen006.
- García Sar D, Montes-Bayón M, Aguado Ortiz L, Blanco-González E, Sierra LM, Sanz-Medel A. In vivo detection of DNA adducts induced by cisplatin using capillary HPLC-ICP-MS and their correlation with genotoxic damage in Drosophila melanogaster. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2008;390(1):37–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hahn A, Hock B. Assessment of DNA damage in filamentous fungi by single cell gel electrophoresis, Comet assay. Environ Toxicol Chem. 1999;18:1421–24.Google Scholar
- Hartl MG, Coughlan BM, Sheehan D, Mothersill C, van Pelt FN, O’Reilly SJ, et al. Implications of seasonal priming and reproductive activity on the interpretation of Comet assay data derived from the clam, Tapes semidecussatus Reeves 1864, exposed to contaminated sediments. Mar Environ Res. 2004;57(4):295–310.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Masuda S, Deguchi Y, Masuda Y, Watanabe T, Nukaya H, Terao Y, et al. Genotoxicity of 2-[2-(acetylamino)-4-[bis(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-5-methoxyphenyl]-5-amino-7-bromo-4-chloro-2H-benzotriazole (PBTA-6) and 4-amino-3,3¢-dichloro-5,4¢-dinitro-biphenyl (ADDB) in goldfish (Carassius auratus) using the micronucleus test and the Comet assay. Mutat Res. 2004;560(1):33–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mateos S, Daza P, Domínguez I, Cárdenas JA, Cortés F. Genotoxicity detected in wild mice living in a highly polluted wetland area in south western Spain. Environ Pollut 2008 (in press) DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.09.008.
- McKelvey-Martin VJ, Melia N, Walsh IK, Johnston SR, Hughes CM, Lewis SE, et al. Two potential clinical applications of the alkaline single-cell gel electrophoresis assay: (1). Human bladder washings and transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder; and (2). Human sperm and male infertility. Mutat Res. 1997;375(2):93–104.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- McKenna DJ, McKeown SR, McKelvey-Martin VJ. Potential use of the comet assay in the clinical management of cancer. Mutagenesis. 2008 (February 5, in press) DOI 10.1093/mutage/gem054.
- Mouchet F, Gauthier L, Mailhes C, Ferrier V, Devaux A. Comparative study of the Comet assay and the micronucleus test in amphibian larvae (Xenopus laevis) using benzo(a)pyrene, ethyl methanesulfonate, and methyl methanesulfonate: establishment of a positive control in the amphibian Comet assay. Environ Toxicol. 2005a;20(1):74–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mouchet F, Gauthier L, Mailhes C, Jourdain MJ, Ferrier V, Devaux A. Biomonitoring of the genotoxic potential of draining water from dredged sediments, using the Comet and micronucleus tests on amphibian (Xenopus laevis) larvae and bacterial assays (Mutatox and Ames tests). Toxicol Environ Health A. 2005b;68(10):811–32.Google Scholar
- Mouchet F, Gauthier L, Baudrimont M, Gonzalez P, Mailhes C, Ferrier V, et al. Comparative evaluation of the toxicity and genotoxicity of cadmium in amphibian larvae (Xenopus laevis and Pleurodeles waltl) using the Comet assay and the micronucleus test. Environ Toxicol. 2007;22(4):422–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Poli P, Buschini A, Restivo FM, Ficarelli A, Cassoni F, Ferrero I, et al. Comet assay application in environmental monitoring: DNA damage in human leukocytes and plant cells in comparison with bacterial and yeast tests. Mutagen. 1999;14:547–55.Google Scholar
- Roy LA, Steinert S, Bay SM, Greenstein D, Sapozhnikova Y, Bawardi O, et al. Biochemical effects of petroleum exposure in hornyhead turbot (Pleuronichthys verticalis) exposed to a gradient of sediments collected from a natural petroleum seep in CA, USA. Aquat Toxicol 2003;65(2):159–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Salagovic J, Gilles J, Verschaeve L, Kalina I. The Comet assay for the detection of genotoxic damage in the earthworms: a promising tool for assessing the biological hazards of polluted sites. Folia Biol (Praha). 1996;42(1–2):17–21.Google Scholar
- Sasaki YF, Sekihashi K, Izumiyama F, Nishidate E, Saga A, Ishida K, et al. The comet assay with multiple mouse organs: comparison of comet assay results and carcinogenicity with 208 chemicals selected from the IARC monographs and U.S. NTP Carcinogenicity Database. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2000;30(6):629–799.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schnurstein A, Braunbeck T. Tail moment versus tail length—application of an in vitro version of the Comet assay in biomonitoring for genotoxicity in native surface waters using primary hepatocytes and gill cells from zebrafish (Danio rerio). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2001;49(2):187–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Taban IC, Bechmann RK, Torgrimsen S, Baussant T, Sanni S. Detection of DNA damage in mussels and sea urchins exposed to crude oil using Comet assay. Marine Environ Res. 2004;58:701–5.Google Scholar
- Vandenhove H, Cuypers A, Van Hees M, Koppen G, Wannijn J. Oxidative stress reactions induced in beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) following exposure to uranium. Plant Physiol and Biochem. 2006;44:795–805.Google Scholar
- Vanzella TP, Martinez CB, Cólus IM. Genotoxic and mutagenic effects of diesel oil water soluble fraction on a neotropical fish species. Res. 2007;631(1):36–43.Google Scholar
- Verschaeve L, Gilles J, Schoeters J, Van Cleuvenbergen R, De Fre’ R. The single cell gel electrophoresis technique or Comet test for monitoring dioxin pollution and effects. In: Fiedler H, Frank H, Hutzinger O, Parzefall W, Riss A, editors. Organohalogen compounds 11. Austria: Federal Environmental Agency; 1993. p. 213–6.Google Scholar
- Villela IV, de Oliveira IM, Silveira JC, Dias JF, Henriques JA, da Silva J. Assessment of environmental stress by the micronucleus and Comet assays on Limnoperna fortunei exposed to Guaíba hydrographic region samples (Brazil) under laboratory conditions. Mutat Res. 2007;628(2):76–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wirnitzer U, Gross-Tholl N, Herbold B, von Keutz E. Photo-chemically induced DNA effects in the comet assay with epidermal cells of SKH-1 mice after a single oral administration of different fluoroquinolones and 8-methoxypsoralen in combination with exposure to UVA. Mutat Res. 2006;609(1):1–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar