Advertisement

Catalysis Letters

, Volume 149, Issue 12, pp 3312–3327 | Cite as

A Highly Efficient and Stable Copper BTC Metal Organic Framework Derived Electrocatalyst for Oxidation of Methanol in DMFC Application

  • Tayyaba NoorEmail author
  • Muhammad Ammad
  • Neelam Zaman
  • Naseem Iqbal
  • Lubna Yaqoob
  • Habib Nasir
Article

Abstract

In present work the development of copper benzenetricarboxylic acid metal organic framework (Cu-BTC MOF) based electrocatalyst and the effect of graphene oxide on catalytic activity of metal organic framework were studied for methanol oxidation reaction. Cu-MOF was prepared by a facile hydrothermal method and graphene oxide flakes were synthesized via improved Hummer’s method. Surface morphological studies of catalyst were analyzed through scanning electron microscopy technique, which revealed cubic structure of crystals, while the crystallinity and functional groups present were characterized through X-ray Diffraction and FTIR spectroscopy respectively. Electrochemical studies were conducted by using cyclic voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, and chronoamperometry techniques. Among all series of catalyst, 5 wt% GO/Cu-MOF exhibit highest current density of 120 mA/cm2 at a scan rate value of 50 mV/s at a voltage of 0.9 V.

Graphic Abstract

Keywords

Metal organic framework (MOF) Methanol oxidation reaction (MOR) Graphene oxide (GO) Direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) Cyclic voltammetry (CV) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The provisions of lab facilities by School of Chemical and Material Engineering (SCME), NUST and U.S.-Pakistan Centre for Advance Studies in Energy (USPCASE) at NUST are greatly acknowledged by authors for this work. Financial grant from Higher Education Commission, Pakistan under its NRPU program with project no 6013 is also acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Ata MS, Poon R, Syed AM, Milne J, Zhitomirsky I (2018) New developments in non-covalent surface modification, dispersion and electrophoretic deposition of carbon nanotubes. Carbon 130:584–598Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gong L, Yang Z, Li K, Xing W, Liu C, Ge J (2018) Recent development of methanol electrooxidation catalysts for direct methanol fuel cell. J Energy Chem 27:1618–1628Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhu J, Su Y, Cheng F, Chen J (2007) Improving the performance of PtRu/C catalysts for methanol oxidation by sensitization and activation treatment. J Power Sources 166:331–336Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nouralishahi A, Mortazavi Y, Khodadadi AA, Choolaei M, Thompson LT, Horri BA (2019) Characteristics and performance of urea modified Pt-MWCNTs for electro-oxidation of methanol. Appl Surf Sci 467–468:335–344Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu H, Song C, Zhang L, Zhang J, Wang H, Wilkinson DP (2006) A review of anode catalysis in the direct methanol fuel cell. J Power Sources 155:95–110Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bai L (2018) Synthesis of PtRu/Ru heterostructure for efficient methanol electrooxidation: the role of extra Ru. Appl Surf Sci 433:279–284Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Watanabe M, Motoo S (1975) Electrocatalysis by ad-atoms: part II. Enhancement of the oxidation of methanol on platinum by ruthenium ad-atoms. J Electroanal Chem Interfacial Electrochem 60:267–273Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Štrbac S, Maksić A, Rakočević Z (2018) Methanol oxidation on Ru/Pd(poly) in alkaline solution. J Electroanal Chem 823:161–170Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li J, Luo Z, Zuo Y, Liu J, Zhang T, Tang P et al (2018) NiSn bimetallic nanoparticles as stable electrocatalysts for methanol oxidation reaction. Appl Catal B 234:10–18Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sunitha M, Durgadevi N, Sathish A, Ramachandran T (2018) Performance evaluation of nickel as anode catalyst for DMFC in acidic and alkaline medium. J Fuel Chem Technol 46:592–599Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Szunerits S, Boukherroub R (2018) Graphene-based nanomaterials in innovative electrochemistry. Curr Opin Electrochem 10:24–30Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pumera M (2013) Electrochemistry of graphene, graphene oxide and other graphenoids: review. Electrochem Commun 36:14–18Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Daşdelen Z, Yıldız Y, Eriş S, Şen F (2017) Enhanced electrocatalytic activity and durability of Pt nanoparticles decorated on GO-PVP hybride material for methanol oxidation reaction. Appl Catal B 219:511–516Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chang G, Cai Z, Jia H, Zhang Z, Liu X, Liu Z et al (2018) High electrocatalytic performance of a graphene-supported PtAu nanoalloy for methanol oxidation. Int J Hydrog Energy 43:12803–12810Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ren Y, Chia GH, Gao Z (2013) Metal–organic frameworks in fuel cell technologies. Nano Today 8:577–597Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rowsell JLC, Yaghi OM (2004) Metal–organic frameworks: a new class of porous materials. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 73:3–14Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Du W, Bai Y-L, Xu J, Zhao H, Zhang L, Li X et al (2018) Advanced metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and their derived electrode materials for supercapacitors. J Power Sources 402:281–295Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang T, Jin Y, Shi Y, Li M, Li J, Duan C (2019) Modulating photoelectronic performance of metal–organic frameworks for premium photocatalysis. Coord Chem Rev 380:201–229Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Raja DS, Lin HW, Lu SY (2019) Synergistically well-mixed MOFs grown on nickel foam as highly efficient durable bifunctional electrocatalysts for overall water splitting at high current densities. Nano Energy 57:1–13Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mandegarzad S, Raoof JB, Hosseini SR, Ojani R (2018) MOF-derived Cu-Pd/nanoporous carbon composite as an efficient catalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction: a comparison between hydrothermal and electrochemical synthesis. Appl Surf Sci 436:451–459Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mehek R, Iqbal N, Noor T, Nasir H, Mehmood Y, Ahmed S (2017) Novel Co-MOF/graphene oxide electrocatalyst for methanol oxidation. Electrochim Acta 255:195–204Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lin S, Song Z, Che G, Ren A, Li P, Liu C et al (2014) Adsorption behavior of metal–organic frameworks for methylene blue from aqueous solution. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 193:27–34Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mu X, Chen Y, Lester E, Wu T (2018) Optimized synthesis of nano-scale high quality HKUST-1 under mild conditions and its application in CO2 capture. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 270:249–257Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shen J, Wang X, Zhang L, Yang Z, Yang W, Tian Z et al (2018) Size-selective adsorption of methyl orange using a novel nano-composite by encapsulating HKUST-1 in hyper-crosslinked polystyrene networks. J Clean Prod 184:949–958Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhao X, Chen L, Guo Y, Ma X, Li Z, Ying W et al (2019) Porous cellulose nanofiber stringed HKUST-1 polyhedron membrane for air purification. Appl Mater Today 14:96–101Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vulcu A, Olenic L, Blanita G, Berghian-Grosan C (2016) The electrochemical behavior of a metal-organic framework modified gold electrode for methanol oxidation. Electrochim Acta 219:630–637Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Haneef M, Saleem H, Habib A (2017) Use of graphene nanosheets and barium titanate as fillers in PMMA for dielectric applications. Synth Met 223:101–106Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chang W-T, Chao Y-H, Li C-W, Lin K-L, Wang J-J, Kumar SR et al (2019) Graphene oxide synthesis using microwave-assisted vs. modified Hummer’s methods: efficient fillers for improved ionic conductivity and suppressed methanol permeability in alkaline methanol fuel cell electrolytes. J Power Sources 414:86–95Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hromadka J, Tokay B, Correia R, Morgan SP, Korposh S (2018) Carbon dioxide measurements using long period grating optical fibre sensor coated with metal organic framework HKUST-1. Sens Actuators B Chem 255:2483–2494Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mustafa D, Breynaert E, Bajpe SR, Martens JA, Kirschhock CE (2011) Stability improvement of Cu3(BTC)2 metal–organic frameworks under steaming conditions by encapsulation of a Keggin polyoxometalate. Chem Commun 47:8037–8039Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kole M, Dey T (2013) Investigation of thermal conductivity, viscosity, and electrical conductivity of graphene based nanofluids. J Appl Phys 113:084307Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hidayah N, Liu WW, Lai CW, Noriman N, Khe CS, Hashim U et al. (2017) Comparison on graphite, graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide: synthesis and characterization. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. p 150002Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Feng H, Cheng R, Zhao X, Duan X, Li J (2013) A low-temperature method to produce highly reduced graphene oxide. Nat Commun 4:1539PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Srimuk P, Luanwuthi S, Krittayavathananon A, Sawangphruk M (2015) Solid-type supercapacitor of reduced graphene oxide-metal organic framework composite coated on carbon fiber paper. Electrochim Acta 157:69–77Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhu Y, Murali S, Cai W, Li X, Suk JW, Potts JR et al (2010) Graphene and graphene oxide: synthesis, properties, and applications. Adv Mater 22:3906–3924PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhang X, Jiang ZH, Yao ZP, Song Y, Wu ZD (2009) Effects of scan rate on the potentiodynamic polarization curve obtained to determine the Tafel slopes and corrosion current density. Corros Sci 51:581–587Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shahid MM, Pandikumar A, Golsheikh AM, Huang NM, Lim HN (2014) Enhanced electrocatalytic performance of cobalt oxide nanocubes incorporating reduced graphene oxide as a modified platinum electrode for methanol oxidation. RSC Adv 4:62793–62801Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hassan H, Rahim MA, Khalil M, Mohammed R (2014) Ni modified MCM-41 as a catalyst for direct methanol fuel cells. Int J Electrochem Sci 9:760–777Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cordeiro C, De Vries M, Cremers T, Westerink B (2016) The role of surface availability in membrane-induced selectivity for amperometric enzyme-based biosensors. Sens Actuators B Chem 223:679–688Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mahapatra SS, Datta J (2011) Characterization of Pt-Pd/C electrocatalyst for methanol oxidation in alkaline medium. Int J Electrochem.  https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/563495 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ghouri ZK, Barakat NA, Kim HY, Park M, Khalil KA, El-Newehy MH et al (2016) Nano-engineered ZnO/CeO2 dots@ CNFs for fuel cell application. Arab J Chem 9:219–228Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Santoro C, Serov A, Gokhale R, Rojas-Carbonell S, Stariha L, Gordon J et al (2017) A family of Fe-NC oxygen reduction electrocatalysts for microbial fuel cell (MFC) application: relationships between surface chemistry and performances. Appl Catal B 205:24–33PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Vetter KJ (2013) Electrochemical kinetics: theoretical aspects. Elsevier, Saint LouisGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tapan NA, Prakash J (2005) Determination of the methanol decomposition mechanism on a polycrystalline platinum electrode. Turk J Eng Environ Sci 29:95–104Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wang W, Li Y, Wang H (2013) Tin oxide nanoparticle-modified commercial PtRu catalyst for methanol oxidation. Micro Nano Lett 8:23–26Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Behmenyar G, Akın AN (2014) Investigation of carbon supported Pd–Cu nanoparticles as anode catalysts for direct borohydride fuel cell. J Power Sources 249:239–246Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Huang W, Wang H, Zhou J, Wang J, Duchesne PN, Muir D et al (2015) Highly active and durable methanol oxidation electrocatalyst based on the synergy of platinum–nickel hydroxide–graphene. Nat Commun 6:10035PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tayyaba Noor
    • 1
    Email author
  • Muhammad Ammad
    • 1
  • Neelam Zaman
    • 2
  • Naseem Iqbal
    • 3
  • Lubna Yaqoob
    • 2
  • Habib Nasir
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Chemical and Materials Engineering (SCME)National University of Sciences and TechnologyIslamabadPakistan
  2. 2.School of Natural Sciences (SNS)National University of Sciences and TechnologyIslamabadPakistan
  3. 3.U.S.-Pakistan Centre for Advanced Studies in Energy (USPCAS-E)National University of Sciences and TechnologyIslamabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations