Advertisement

Catalysis Letters

, Volume 149, Issue 3, pp 744–752 | Cite as

Insight into the Mechanism of Ethylene Decomposition Over Co(0001) Surface: Formation of Carbon Species

  • Minhua Zhang
  • Heyuan Huang
  • Yingzhe YuEmail author
Article
First Online:
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

Ethylene decomposition over Co(0001) surface has been systematically studied by spin-polarized density functional theory calculations aiming to investigate the detail mechanism at the atomic level. All C–H bond and C–C bond scission reactions were computed and all the intermediates were considered. It is concluded that the C–H bond breaking reaction is always advantageous for a species possessing both C–H scission and C–C scission modes. C2 cluster is practicable formed during ethylene decomposition, which is coincide with experiment results. However, the high activated barrier blocks the C–C bond scission reaction of C2. After comparative analysis, two pathways of C2 cluster formation and two pathways of carbon monomer formation were proposed. These results provide novel information on ethylene decomposition over Co(0001), deepening our understanding of relevant catalytic reactions such as the carbon deposition and initial path to graphene formation.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Ethylene decomposition Carbon species formation Co(0001) surface First-principle 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest about this article.

Supplementary material

10562_2019_2676_MOESM1_ESM.docx (3 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 3094 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Steynberg AP (2004) Introduction to Fischer-Tropsch technology. Stud Surf Sci Catal 152:1–63Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Senden MMG, Punt AD, Hoek A (1998) Gas-to-liquids processes: current status & future prospects. Stud Surf Sci Catal 119:9461–966Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Saib AM, Moodley DJ, Ciobîc IM et al (2010) Fundamental understanding of deactivation and regeneration of cobalt Fischer-Tropsch synthesis catalysts. Catal Today 154:271–282Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tsakoumis NE, Rønning M, Borg Ø et al (2010) Deactivation of cobalt based Fischer-Tropsch catalysts: a review. Catal Today 154:162–182Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fei Tan K, Xu J, Chang J et al (2010) Carbon deposition on Co catalysts during Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: a computational and experimental study. J Catal 274:121–129Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zaera F, Bernstein N (1994) On the mechanism for the conversion of ethylene to ethylidyne on metal surfaces: vinyl halides on Pt(111). J Am Chem Soc 116:4881–4887Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stacchiola D, Azad S, Burkholder L, Tysoe WT (2001) An investigation of the reaction pathway for ethylene hydrogenation on Pd(111). J Phys Chem B 105:11233–11239Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li M, Guo W, Jiang R et al (2010) Mechanism of the ethylene conversion to ethylidyne on Rh(111): a density functional investigation. J Phys Chem C 114:8440–8448Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang Y, Dong X, Yu Y, Zhang M (2016) Ethylene decomposition over Pt(100): a mechanism study from first principle calculation. Appl Surf Sci 390:984–992Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cui Y, Fu Q, Zhang H, Bao X (2011) Formation of identical-size graphene nanoclusters on Ru(0001). Chem Commun 47:1470–1472Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Varykhalov A, Rader O (2009) Graphene grown on Co(0001) films and islands: electronic structure and its precise magnetization dependence. Phys Rev B 80:6–11Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eom D, Prezzi D, Rim KT et al (2009) Structure and electronic properties of graphene nanoislands on Co(0001). Nano Lett 9:2844–2848Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang B, Ma X, Caffio M et al (2011) Size-selective carbon nanoclusters as precursors to the growth of epitaxial graphene. Nano Lett 11:424–430Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hussain A, Liao Y, Zhang Q et al (2018) Floating catalyst CVD synthesis of single walled carbon nanotubes from ethylene for high performance transparent electrodes. Nanoscale 10:9752–9759Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tetlow H, Posthuma De Boer J, Ford IJ et al (2016) Ethylene decomposition on Ir(111): initial path to graphene formation. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:27897–27909Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xu L, Ma Y, Zhang Y et al (2011) Surface chemistry of C2H4, CO, and H2 on clean and graphite carbon-modified Co(0001) surfaces. J Phys Chem C 115:3416–3424Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gao M, Pan Y, Huang L et al (2011) Epitaxial growth and structural property of graphene on Pt(111). Appl Phys Lett 98:2009–2012Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lahiri J, Miller T, Adamska L et al (2011) Graphene growth on Ni(111) by transformation of a surface carbide. Nano Lett 11:518–522Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    De La Ree AB, Hemminger JC (2009) Scanning tunneling microscopy investigation of the conversion of ethylene to carbon clusters and graphite on Pt (111). J Phys Chem C 113:4441–4444Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wintterlin J, Bocquet ML (2009) Graphene on metal surfaces. Surf Sci 603:1841–1852Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Koel BE, Bent BE, Samorjai GA (1984) Hydrogenation and H,D exchange studies of ethylidyne (CCH3) on Rh(111) crystal surfaces at 1 atm pressure using high resolution electron energy loss spectrometry. Surf Sci 146:211–228Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gates JA, Kesmodel LL (1983) Thermal evolution of acetylene and ethylene on Pd(111). Surf Sci 124:68–86Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kostov KL, Marinova TS (1987) Interaction of ethylene and acetylene with oxygen on An Ir(111) surface. Surf Sci 184:359–373Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhao ZJ, Moskaleva LV, Aleksandrov HA et al (2010) Ethylidyne formation from ethylene over Pt(111): a mechanistic study from first-principle calculations. J Phys Chem C 114:12190–12201Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Erley W, Baro AM, Ibach H (1982) Vibrational spectra of acetylene and ethylene adsorbed on Fe(110). Surf Sci 120:273–290Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lorenz MPA, Fuhrmann T, Streber R et al (2010) Ethene adsorption and dehydrogenation on clean and oxygen precovered Ni(111) studied by high resolution X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. J Chem Phys 133:014706Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hamilton JC, Swanson N, Waclawski BJ, Celotta RJ (1981) Specular and off-specular high resolution electron energy loss spectroscopy of acetylene and ethylene on tungsten (100). J Chem Phys 74:4156–4163Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hills MM, Parmeter JE, Mullins CB, Weinberg WH (1986) Interaction of ethylene with the ruthenium(001) surface. J Am Chem Soc 108:3554–3562Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Slavin AJ, Bent BE, Kao CT, Somorjai GA (1988) Thermal fragmentation of ethylene on the Rh(100) single crystal surface in the temperature range of 200–800 K. Surf Sci 206:124–144Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Albert MR, Sneddon LG, Plummer EW (1984) An UPS study of the chemisorption of acetylene and ethylene on Co(0001). Surf Sci 147:127–142Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tiscione P, Rovida G (1985) Adsorption and decomposition of ethylene and acetylene on cobalt. Surf Sci 154:255–260Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Xu L, Ma Y, Wu Z et al (2012) A photoemission study of ethylene decomposition on a Co(0001) surface: formation of different types of carbon species. J Phys Chem C 116:4167–4174Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ramsvik T, Borg A, Venvik HJ et al (2002) Acetylene chemisorption and decomposition on the Co(11–20) single crystal surface. Surf Sci 499:183–192Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vaari J, Lahtinen J, Hautojarvi P (1997) The adsorption and decomposition of acetylene on clean and K-covered Co(0001). Catal Lett 44:43–49Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Weststrate CJ, Kazalkaya AC, Rossen ETR et al (2012) Atomic and polymeric carbon on Co(0001): surface reconstruction, graphene formation, and catalyst poisoning. J Phys Chem C 116:11575–11583Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Batzill M (2012) The surface science of graphene: metal interfaces, CVD synthesis, nanoribbons, chemical modifications, and defects. Surf Sci Rep 67:83–115Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Delley B (1990) An all-electron numerical method for solving the local density functional for polyatomic molecules. J Chem Phys 508:508–517Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Delley B (2000) From molecules to solids with the from molecules to solids with the DMol3 approach. J Chem Phys 113:7756–7764Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pack JD, Monkhorst HJ (1977) Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys Rev B 16:1748–1749Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Halgren TA, Lipscohlb WN (1977) The synchronous-transit method for determining reaction pathways and locating molecular transition states. Chem Phys Lett 49:225–232Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Qi Y, Ledesma C, Yang J et al (2017) Adsorption energy-driven carbon number-dependent olefin to paraffin ratio in cobalt-catalyzed Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. J Catal 349:110–117Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wen G, Wang Q, Zhang R et al (2016) Insight into the mechanism about the initiation, growth and termination of the C–C chain in syngas conversion on the Co(0001) surface: a theoretical study. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:27272–27283Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Liu S, Li Y-W, Wang J, Jiao H (2016) Mechanisms of H– and OH–assisted CO activation as well as C–C coupling on the flat Co(0001) surface—revisited. Catal Sci Technol 6:8336–8343Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Molero H, Stacchiola D, Tysoe WT (2005) The kinetics of ethylene hydrogenation catalyzed by metallic palladium. Catal Lett 101:145–149Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Basaran D, Aleksandrov HA, Chen ZX et al (2011) Decomposition of ethylene on transition metal surfaces M(111). A comparative DFT study of model reactions for M = Pd, Pt, Rh, Ni. J Mol Catal A 344:37–46Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kyriakou G, Kim J, Tikhov MS et al (2005) Acetylene coupling on Cu(111): formation of butadiene, benzene, and cyclooctatetraene. J Phys Chem B 109:10952–10956Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lee AF, Wilson K, Middleton RL et al (1999) In situ observation of a surface chemical reaction by fast X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 121:7969–7970Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Liu ZP, Hu P (2003) General rules for predicting where a catalytic reaction should occur on metal surfaces: a density functional theory study of C–H and C–O bond breaking/making on flat, stepped, and kinked metal surfaces. J Am Chem Soc 125:1958–1967Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Andersin J, Honkala K (2010) DFT study on complete ethylene decomposition on flat and stepped Pd. Surf Sci 604:762–769Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Andersin J, Lopez N, Honkala K (2009) Dft study on the complex reaction networks in the conversion of ethylene to ethylidyne on flat and stepped Pd. J Phys Chem C 113:8278–8286Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory for Green Chemical Technology of Ministry of Education, R&D Center for Petrochemical TechnologyTianjin UniversityTianjinPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and EngineeringTianjinPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options