Catalysis Letters

, Volume 144, Issue 12, pp 2065–2070 | Cite as

Magnetically Responsive Core–Shell Pd/Fe3O4@C Composite Catalysts for the Hydrogenation of Cinnamaldehyde

Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Magnetically responsive Pd/Fe3O4@C catalysts have been successfully prepared by depositing Pd nanoparticles onto the surface of Fe3O4@C composites. Various techniques such as XRD, SEM, TEM, SQUID etc. have been used to characterize the composite catalysts. The obtained catalysts, consisting of core–shell structured microspheres with high uniformity, show a good superparamagnetic property. The selective hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde on the magnetic catalysts has been investigated, achieving about 70 % selectivity to hydrocinnamaldehyde at 100 % conversion. Moreover, the magnetic catalyst can be easily recovered under an external magnetic field and reused for seven cycles without any degradation in activity.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Heterogeneous catalysis Magnetic separation Hydrogenation Cinnamaldehyde Superparamagnetism 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The financial supports by the Natural Science Foundation of China (21101139 and 21371152) are gratefully acknowledged. XQ also thanks Dr. Deli Chen for constructive discussion and helpful language suggestions.

Supplementary material

10562_2014_1328_MOESM1_ESM.doc (3.6 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 3709 kb)
10562_2014_1328_MOESM2_ESM.doc (6.6 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOC 6765 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Yuan Y, Yao S, Wang M, Lou S, Yan N (2013) Curr Org Chem 17:400–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bertolini GR, Cabello CI, Munoz M, Casella M, Gazzoli D, Pettiti I, Ferraris G (2013) J Mol Catal A 366:109–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhao BH, Chen JG, Liu X, Liu ZW, Hao ZP, Xiao JL, Liu ZT (2012) Ind Eng Chem Res 51:11112–11121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sairanen E, Karinen R, Borghei M, Kauppinen EI, Lehtonen J (2012) ChemCatChem 4:2055–2061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Galletti AMR, Toniolo L, Antonetti C, Evangelisti C, Forte C (2012) Appl Catal A 447:49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bhogeswararao S, Srinivas D (2010) Catal Lett 140:55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Galletti AMR, Antonetti C, Venezia AM, Giambastiani G (2010) Appl Catal A 386:124–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baig RBN, Varma RS (2013) Chem Commun 49:752–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shylesh S, Schuenemann V, Thiel WR (2010) Angew Chem Int Ed 49:3428–3459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ma M, Zhang Q, Yin D, Dou J, Zhang H, Xu H (2012) Catal Commun 17:168–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xu L, Shen XX, Xiao Q, Zhong YJ, Ye SF, Ye XR, Zhu WD (2011) Acta Phys Chim Sin 27:1956–1960Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schätz A, Reiser O, Stark WJ (2010) Chem Eur J 16:8950–8967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lim CW, Lee IS (2010) Nano Today 5:412–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Polshettiwar V, Luque R, Fihri A, Zhu H, Bouhrara M, Basset JM (2011) Chem Rev 111:3036–3075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosario-Amorin D, Gaboyard M, Clerac R, Vellutini L, Nlate S, Heuze K (2012) Chem Eur J 18:3305–3315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Si J, Yang H (2011) Mater Chem Phys 128:519–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sun X, Li Y (2004) Angew Chem Int Ed 43:597–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Teunissen W, de Groot FMF, Geus J, Stephan O, Tence M, Colliex C (2001) J Catal 204:169–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu R, Guo Y, Odusote G, Qu F, Priestley RD (2013) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:9167–9171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang P, Gao M, Pan H, Zhang J, Liang C, Wang J, Zhou P, Liu Y (2013) J Power Sources 239:466–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang C, Wang H, Liu F, Wang L, He H (2013) Cellulose 20:127–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhao N, Wu S, He C, Wang Z, Shi C, Liu E, Li J (2013) Carbon 57:130–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wei S, Dong Z, Ma Z, Sun J, Ma J (2013) Catal Commun 30:40–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hu W, Liu B, Wang Q, Liu Y, Liu Y, Jing P, Yu S, Liu L, Zhang J (2013) Chem Commun 49:7596–7598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ge J, Hu Y, Biasini M, Beyermann WP, Yin Y (2007) Angew Chem Int Ed 46:4342–4345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Xuan S, Wang YXJ, Yu JC, Leung KCF (2009) Chem Mater 21:5079–5087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Deng H, Li X, Peng Q, Wang X, Chen J, Li Y (2005) Angew Chem Int Ed 44:2782–2785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li R, Zhang P, Huang Y, Zhang P, Zhong H, Chen Q (2012) J Mater Chem 22:22750–22755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Delbecq F, Sautet P (1995) J Catal 152:217–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gryglewicz S, Śliwak A, Ćwikła J, Gryglewicz G (2014) Catal Lett 144:62–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mehri A, Kochkar H, Daniele S, Mendez V, Ghorbel A, Berhault G (2012) J Colloid Interface Sci 369:309–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education for Advanced Catalysis Materials, Institute of Physical ChemistryZhejiang Normal UniversityJinhuaPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations