Catalysis Letters

, Volume 143, Issue 9, pp 966–974 | Cite as

Overlayer Bimetallic Catalysts or Particle Size Effects? A Comparison of Re@Pd Catalysts with Different Particle Sizes

  • Michael D. Skoglund
  • Joseph H. HollesEmail author


Alumina supported Re@Pd bimetallic overlayer catalysts of different loading, dispersion, and particle size were synthesized using the directed deposition technique. Past computational and empirical studies have shown that through depositing a monoatomic pseudomorphic overlayer of one metal atop a different base metal it is possible to alter the adsorption and catalytic properties of the system when compared to both monometallic counterparts. It has been shown that a 2 wt% Re@Pd overlayer catalyst was capable of having lower hydrogen adsorption strength and lower activity for ethylene hydrogenation than its pure Pd counterpart. Particle size effects have long been known to play a role in the behavior of various catalysts as smaller particles tend to have more unsaturated, highly reactive, metal sites (e.g., kinks, corners, edges, etc.). In order to demonstrate that the observed changes in activity were not merely particle size effects, 7 wt% Re@Pd catalysts have been synthesized through similar methods and consist of particles much larger than those in the 2 wt% sample (viz., 6.3 and 2.7 nm). Similar reductions in hydrogen adsorption quantity and strength were seen for both Re@Pd samples and ethylene hydrogenation activity proved consistent. Both results indicate that the formation of a Pd overlayer was reason for this observed change in adsorption and activity and the effect cannot be merely attributed to particle size effects.

Graphical Abstract


Heterogeneous catalysis Chemisorption Hydrogenation Overlayer catalysts Pd Re 



The authors would like to acknowledge funding support from Funding provided by National Science Foundation, Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental and Transport Systems [CBET-0933017].


  1. 1.
    Watanabe M, Saegusa S (1989) High platinum electrocatalysts utilizations for direct methanol oxidation. J Electroanal Chem 271:213–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Watanabe M, Sei H, Stonehart P (1989) The influence of platinum crystallite size on the electroreduction of oxygen. J Electroanal Chem 261:375–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ostermaier JJ, Katzer JR, Manogue WH (1974) Crystallite size effects in the low-temperature oxidation of ammonia over supported platinum. J Catal 33:457–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bett J, Lundquist J, Washington E, Stonehart P (1973) Platinum crystallite size considerations for electrocatalytic oxygen reduction - I. Electrochima Acta 18:343–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Manogue WH, Katzer JR (1974) On subdivision of the classification of demanding reactions. J Catal 32:166–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Holles JH, Davis RJ, Murray TM, Howe JM (2000) Effects of pd particle size and ceria loading on NO reduction with CO. J Catal 195:193–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bond GC (1984) The origins of particle size effects in heterogeneous catalysts. Surf Sci 156:966–981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fuentes S, Figueras F (1978) Hydrogenolysis of cyclopentane and hydrogenation of benzene on palladium catalysts of widely varying dispersion. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 1(74):174–181Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Coq B, Ferrat G, Figueras F (1986) Conversion of chlorobenzene over palladium and rhodium catalysts of widely varying dispersion. J Catal 101:434–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boudart M, DjBga-Mariadassou G (1984) Kinetics of heterogeneous catalytic reactions. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gates BC (1995) Supported metal clusters: synthesis, structure, and catalysis. Chem Rev 95:511–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Navarro RM, Pawelec B, Trejo JM, Mariscal R, Fierro JLG (2000) Hydrogenation of aeromatics on sulfur-resistant PtPd bimetallic catalysts. J Catal 189:184–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Prüsse U, Vorlop K-D (2001) Supported bimetallic palladium catalysts for water-phase nitrate reduction. J Mol Catal A: Chem 173:313–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Coq B, Figueras F (2001) Bimetallic palladium catalysts: influence of the co-metal on catalyst performance. J Mol Catal A: Chem 173:117–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Carter JL, McVicker GB, Weissman W, Kmak WS, Sinfelt JH (1982) Bimetallic catalysts; application in catalytic reforming. Appl Catal 3:327–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Burch R, Mitchell AJ (1983) The role of tin and rhenium in bimetallic reforming catalysts. Appl Catal 6:121–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Massard R, Uzio D, Thomazeau C, Pichon C, Rousset JL, Bertolini JC (2007) Strained Pd overlayers on Ni nanoparticles supported on alumina and catalytic activity for buta-1,3-diene selective hydrogenation. J Catal 245:133–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Juszczyk W, Karpinski Z (2001) Hydrocarbon reactions on Pd-Re/Al2O3 catalysts. Appl Catal A 206:67–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chen JG, Menning CA, Zellner MB (2008) Monolayer bimetallic surfaces: experimental and theoretical studies of trends in electronic and chemical properties. Surf Sci Rep 63:201–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Skoplyak O, Barteau MA, Chen JG (2006) Reforming of oxygenates for H2 production: correlating reactivity of ethylene glycol and ethanol on Pt(111) and Ni/Pt(111) with surface d-band center. J Phys Chem B 110:1686–1694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kitchin JR, Khan NA, Barteau MA, Chen JG, Yakshinskiy B, Madey TE (2003) Elucidation of the active surface and origin of the weak metal-hydrogen bond on Ni/Pt(111) bimetallic surfaces: a surface science and density functional theory study. Surf Sci 544:295–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hwu HH, Eng J, Chen JG (2002) Ni/Pt(111) bimetallic surfaces: unique chemistry at monolayer Ni coverage. J Am Chem Soc 124(4):702–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Khan NA, Hwu HH, Chen JG (2002) Low-temperature hydrodesulfurization of thiophene on Ni/Pt(111) bimetallic surfaces with monolayer Ni coverage. J Catal 205(2):259–265Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pallassana V, Neurock M, Coulston GW (1999) Theoretical density function analysis of maleic anhydride chemisorption on Pd(111), Re(0001), and bimetallic PdML/Re(0001) and PdML/Mo(110) pseudomorphic overlayers. J Phys Chem B 103:8973–8983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pallassana V, Neurock M (2000) Electronic factors governing ethylene hydrogenation and dehydrogenation activity of pseudomorphic PdML/Re(0001), PdML/Ru(0001), Pd(111), and PdML/Au(111) surfaces. J Catal 191:301–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pallassana V, Neurock M, Hansen LB, Hammer B, Norskov JK (1999) Theoretical analysis of hydrogen chemisorption on Pd(111), Re(0001), and PdML/Re(0001), ReML/Pd(111) pseudomorphic overlayers. Phys Rev B 60(5):6146–6154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zellner MB, Chen JG (2005) Supporting monolayer Pt on W(110) and C/W(110): modification effects on the reaction pathways of cyclohexene. J Catal 235:393–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zellner MB, Goda AM, Skoplyak O, Barteau MA, Chen JG (2005) Trends in the adsorption and decomposition of hydrogen and ethylene on monolayer metal films: a combined dft and experimental study. Surf Sci 583:281–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Christoffersen E, Liu P, Ruban A, Skriver HL, Norskov JK (2001) Anode materials for low-temperature fuel cells: a density functional theory study. J Catal 199:123–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pallassana V, Neurock M, Hansen LB, Norskov JK (2000) First principles analysis of hydrogen chemisorption on pd-re alloyed overlayers and alloyed surfaces. J Chem Phys 112(12):5435–5439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Campbell RA, Rodriguez JA, Goodman DW (1992) Chemical and electronic properties of ultrathin metal films: the Pd/Re(0001) and Pd/Ru(0001) systems. Phys Rev B 46(11):7077–7087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Latusek MP, Heimerl RM, Spigarelli BP, Holles JH (2009) Synthesis and characterization of supported bimetallic overlayer catalysts. Appl Catal A 358:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Latusek MP, Spigarelli BP, Heimerl RM, Holles JH (2009) Correlation of H2 heat of adsorption and ethylene hydrogenation activity for supported Re@Pd overlayer catalysts. J Catal 263:306–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Womes M, Cholley T, Le Peltier F, Morin S, Didillon B, Szydlowski-Schildknecht N (2005) Study of the reaction mechanisms between Pt(acac)2 and alumina surface sites: application to a new refilling technique for the controlled variation of the particle size of Pt/Al2O3 catalysts. Appl Catal A 283:9–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Goddard SA, Cortright RD, Dumesic JA (1992) Deuterium tracing studies and microkinetic analysis of ethylene hydrogenation over platinum. J Catal 137:186–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hansen EW, Neurock M (2000) First-principles-based monte carlo simulation of ethylene hydrogenation kinetics on Pd. J Catal 196:241–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Okal J, Kepinski L, Krajczyk L, Tylus W (2003) Oxidation and redisperson of a low loaded Re/γ-Al2O3 catalyst. J Catal 219:362–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Davis ME, Davis RJ (2003) Fundamentals of chemical reaction engineering. In: Glandt ED, Klein MT, Edgar TF (eds). McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chadzyński GW, Kubicka H (1990) Chemisorption of hydrogen and oxygen on γ-alumina-supported rhenium: Part 1. Chemisorption of hydrogen. Thermochim Acta 158(2): 353–367Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chou C-W, Chu S-J, Chiang H-J, Huang C-Y, Lee C-J, Sheen S-R, Perng TP, Yeh C-T (2001) Temperature-programmed reduction study on calcination of nano-palladium. J Phys Chem 105:9113–9117Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Molero H, Stacchiola D, Tysoe WT (2005) The kinetics of ethylene hydrogenation catalyzed by metallic palladium. Catal Lett 101:145–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Morkel M, Rupprechter G, Freund H-J (2005) Finite size effects on supported Pd nanoparticles: interaction of hydrogen with CO and C2H4. Surf Sci Lett 588:L209–L219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Teschner D, Revay Z, Borsodi J, Havecker M, Knop-Gericke A, Schlogl R, Milroy D, Jackson SD, Torres D, Sautet P (2008) Understanding palladium hydrogenation catalysts: when the nature of the reactive molecule controls the nature of the catalyst active phase. Angew Chem Int Ed 47:9274–9278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Michalak WD, Miller JB, Alfonso DR, Gellman AJ (2012) Uptake, transport, and release of hydrogen from Pd(100). Surf Sci 606:146–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Bartholomew CH (1990) Hydrogen adsorption on supported cobalt, iron, and nickel. Catal Lett 7:27–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Fu L, Bartholomew CH (1985) Structure sensitivity and its effects on product distribution in CO hydrogenation on cobalt/alumina. J Catal 92:376–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Shen DBM, Siperstein F, Engelhard M, Myers AL (2000) Comparison of experimental techniques for measuring isoteric heat of adsorption. Adsorption 6:275–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ranke W, Joseph Y (2002) Determination of adsorption energies and kinetic parameters by isosteric methods. Phys Chem Chem Phys 4:2483–2498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Chou S, Lin S, Yeh C (1995) Isosteric heat of sorption of dihydrogen on alumina-supported palladium. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 91:949–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Poulter KF, Pryde JA (1968) Chemisorption of hydrogen on rhenium. J Phys D Appl Phys 1:169–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Pallassana V, Neurock M (2000) First-principles periodic density functional study of the hydrogenation of maleic anhydride to succinic anhydride over palladium(111). J Phys Chem B 104(40):9449–9459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Zea H, Lester K, Datye AK, Rightor E, Gulotty R, Waterman W, Smith M (2005) The influence of Pd–Ag catalyst restructuring on the activation energy for ethylene hydrogenation in ethylene-acetylene mixtures. Appl Catal A 282:237–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Cortright RD, Goddard SA, Rekoske JE, Dumesic JA (1991) Kinetic study of ethylene hydrogenation. J Catal 127:342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Dorling TA, Eastlake MJ, Moss RL (1969) The structure and activity of supported metal catalysts: IV. Ethylene hydrogenation on platinum/silica catalysts. J Catal 14:23–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Rainer DR, Vesecky SM, Koranne M, Oh WS, Goodman DW (1997) The CO+NO reaction over Pd: a combined study using single-crystal, planar-model-supported, and high-surface-area Pd/Al2O3 catalysts. J Catal 167:234–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Molero H, Stacchiola D, Tysoe WT (2005) The kinetics of ethylene hydrogenation catalyzed by metallic palladium. Catal Lett 101(3–4):145–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Logadottir A, Rod TH, Nørskov JK, Hammer B, Dahl S, Jacobsen CJH (2001) The Brønsted–Evans–Polanyi relation and the volcano plot for ammonia synthesis over transition metal catalysts. J Catal 197:229–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Dept. 3295University of WyomingLaramieUSA

Personalised recommendations