Analysis of Gd Level and Pt Dispersion on Ceria Support for Isobutane Steam Reforming
- 61 Downloads
Abstract
Ceria-supported platinum catalysts were used to produce hydrogen by isobutane steam reforming. The influence of gadolinia, as a trivalent cationic oxide (M2O3) dopant at 0–20%, is investigated here. The gadolinia content in the catalysts did not correlate well with reforming activity. The platinum dispersion ranged from 29 to 38% as measured by the propylene hydrogenation method and it did correlate well with reforming activity.
Keywords
Steam reforming Isobutane Ceria-gadolinia Platinum dispersion Propylene hydrogenation ChemisorptionNotes
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge David Carter of the Chemical Engineering Division at Argonne National Laboratory for his assistance with preparation of the catalysts. This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Hydrogen, Fuel Cells, and Infrastructure Technologies Program. Argonne National Laboratory is operated by UChicago Argonne, LLC, for the Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.
References
- 1.Kim G (1982) Ind Eng Chem Prod Res Dev 21:267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Cordatos H, Gorte RJ (1996) J Catal 159:112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Holmgren A, Azarnoush F, Fridell E (1999) Appl Catal B 22:49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Wang X, Gorte RJ (2001) Catal Lett 73:15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Wang X, Gorte RJ (2002) Appl Catal A 224:209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Cho BK (1991) J Catal 131:74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Lubke S, Wiemhofer HD (1999) Solid State Ionics 117:229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Ahmed S, Krumpelt M, Kumar R, Lee SHD, Carter JD, Wilkenhoener R, Marshall C (1998) 1998 Fuel Cell Seminar, Palm Spring, CA. November pp 16–19Google Scholar
- 9.Pereira C, Bae JM, Ahmed S, Krumpelt M (2000) US Department of Energy, 2000 Hydrogen Program Technical Review, San Ramon, CA. May 09Google Scholar
- 10.Kramarz KW, Bloom ID, Kumar R, Ahmed S, Wilkenhoener R, Krumpelt M (2001) US 6,303,098. October 16Google Scholar
- 11.Krumpelt M, Ahmed S, Kumar R, Rajiv D (1999) US 5,929,286. July 27Google Scholar
- 12.Wang J, Li C-H, Huang T-J (2005) Catal Lett 103:239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Rioche C, Kulkarni S, Meunier FC, Breen JP, Burch R (2005) Appl Catal B 61:130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Wang X, Gorte RJ (2003) Appl Catal A 247:157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Zhao S, Gorte RJ (2003) Appl Catal A 248:9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Kikuchi E, Ito K, Ino T, Morita Y (1977) J Catal 46:382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Holmgren A, Andersson B (1998) J Catal 178:14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Eskinazi V (1982) Appl Catal 4:37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Summers JC, Ausen SA (1979) J Catal 58:131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Sanchez MG, Gazquez JL (1987) J Catal 104:120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Pozdnyakova O, Teschner D, Wootsch A, Krohnert J, Steinhauer B, Sauer H, Toth L, Jentoft FC, Knop-Gericke A, Paal Z, Schlogl R (2006) J Catal 237:17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Teschner D, Wootsch A, Roder T, Matusek K, Paal Z (2001) Sol State Ionics 141–142:709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Pantu P, Gavalas GR (2002) Appl Catal A 223:253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Acharya CK, Lane AM, Krause TR (2006) Catal Lett 106:41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Primet M, El Azar M, Frety R, Guenin M (1990) Appl Catal 59:153CrossRefGoogle Scholar