Advertisement

A new approach to extend the storage of donor corneas after 28 days of corneal culture in an Italian eye bank

  • Raffaela Mistò
  • Jana D’Amato TóthováEmail author
  • Saifullah Khan
  • Anna Limongelli
  • Francesca Pateri
Full Length Paper
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the possibility to extend the storage of unused organ-cultured donor corneas. After 28 days of corneal culture in TISSUE-C (AL.CHI.MI.A. S.R.L., Italy) and 5-day storage in transport/deswelling medium CARRY-C (AL.CHI.MI.A. S.R.L., Italy), 25 corneas that were deemed suitable for transplantation were transferred in fresh TISSUE-C at 31 °C for additional 7 days and then in fresh CARRY-C at room temperature for 24 h. Tissues were assessed for endothelial cell density (ECD), endothelial mortality and morphology after the standard and the extended corneal storage. In addition, the effect of donor age < 85 years and ≥ 85 years on corneal characteristics was assessed. After the extended storage, 6 out of 25 tested corneas (24%) showed ECD values below the acceptance limit (< 2000 cells/mm2). 19 corneas (76%) were still suitable for transplantation and showed a 5.9% loss in ECD, which was not statistically significant (P = 0.0949) compared to standard storage period. The two donor age groups did not show statistically significant differences in any tested parameter, although a trend for lower ECD and higher mortality in Descemet’s folds after standard storage was observed in the ≥ 85 age donor group. Thus, the attempt of the current study to provide new sight-restorative options for unused tissues and increasing the availability of corneas in case of shortage gave encouraging results. Although a higher vulnerability of corneas from very old donors could not be statistically demonstrated in the present study, higher sample size could be required for prolonging the shelf life of these tissues.

Keywords

Extended corneal storage time Corneal transplantation Corneal preservation Eye bank Organ culture 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Cristina Gianotti for the writing assistance and Prof. Eugenio Ragazzi for support in statistical analysis.

Funding

No external funding was received for this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Author Raffaela Mistò declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author J. D’Amato Tóthová declares that she is employed by the company  Alchilife S.R.L., which was involved in the development of one medical device discussed in this article. Author Saifullah Khan declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Anna Limongelli declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author Francesca Pateri declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. All procedures performed in the studies involving human tissue were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. Armitage WJ (2011) Preservation of human cornea. Transfus Med Hemother 38:143–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armitage WJ, Easty DL (1997) Factors influencing the suitability of organ-cultured corneas for transplantation. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38:16–24Google Scholar
  3. Armitage WJ, Jones MNA, Zambrano I, Carley F, Tole DM, NHSBT Ocular Tissue Advisory Group, and Contributing Ophthalmologists OTAG Audit Study 12 (2014) The suitability of corneas stored by organ culture for penetrating keratoplasty and influence of donor and recipient factors on 5-year graft survival. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55:784–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashby BD, Garret Q, Willcox MPD (2014) Corneal injuries and wound healing: review of processes and therapies. Austin J Clin Ophthalmol 1(4):1017Google Scholar
  5. Ehlers H, Ehlers N, Hjortdal JO (1999) Corneal transplantation with donor tissue kept in organ culture for 7 weeks. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 77:277–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. European DIRECTIVE 2004/23/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE council of 31 March 2004 on setting standards of quality and safety for the donation, procurement, testing, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cell. Official Journal of the European Union (2004)Google Scholar
  7. European COMMISSION DIRECTIVE 2006/17/EC of 8 February 2006, implementing Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards certain technical requirements for the donation, procurement and testing of human tissues and cells. Official Journal of the European Union (2006)Google Scholar
  8. European COMMISSION DIRECTIVE 2006/86/EC of 24 October 2006 implementing Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards traceability requirements, notification of serious adverse reactions and events and certain technical requirements for the coding, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells. Official Journal of the European Union (2006)Google Scholar
  9. European Eye Bank Association - EEBA (2016) Letter from the President. https://www.eeba.eu/article/Letter%2Bfrom%2BPresident/279. Accessed 2 July 2019
  10. European Eye Bank Association - EEBA (2018) Minimum medical standards. https://www.eeba.eu/files/EEBA_Minimum_Medical_Standards_2018-01_003.pdf. Accessed 2 Oct 2018
  11. Eye Bank Association of America - EBAA (2017a) 2017 Eye banking statistical report. https://restoresight.org/what-we-do/publications/statistical-report/. Accessed 2 July 2019
  12. Eye Bank Association of America - EBAA (2017b) Medical standards. Int J Eye Bank 5(3):1–40Google Scholar
  13. Frueh BE, Böhnke M (1995) Corneal grafting of donor tissue preserved for longer than 4 weeks in organ culture medium. Cornea 14(5):463–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gain P, Thuret G, Chiquet C, Rizzi P, Pugniet JL, Acquart S, Colpart JJ, Le Petit JC, Maugery J (2002) Cornea procurement from very old donors: post organ culture cornea outcome and recipient graft outcome. Br J Ophthalmol 86:404–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gain P, Jullienne R, He Z, Aldossary M, Acquart S, Cognasse F, Thuret G (2016) Global survey of corneal transplantation and eye banking. JAMA Ophthalmol 134(2):167–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garg P, Krishna PV, Stratis AK, Gopinathan U (2005) The value of corneal transplantation in reducing blindness. Eye 19:1106–1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gavrilov JC, Borderie VM, Laroche L, Delboss B (2010) Influencing factors on the suitability of organ-cultured corneas. Eye 24:1227–1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hermel M, Salla M, Fuest M, Walter P (2017) The role of corneal endothelial morphology in graft assessment and prediction of endothelial cell loss during organ culture of human donor corneas. Acta Ophthalmol 95:205–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lass JH, Gal RL, Dontchev M, Beck RW, Kollman C, Dunn SP, Heck E, Holland EJ, Mannis MJ, Montoya MM, Schultze RL, Stulting RD, Sugar A, Sugar J, Tennant B, Verdier DD, Cornea Donor Study Investigator Group (2008) Donor age and corneal endothelial cell loss 5 years after successful cornea transplantation: specular microscopy ancillary study results. Ophthalmology 115(4):627–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lass JH, Sugar A, Benetz BA, Beck RW, Dontchev M, Gal RL, Kollman C, Gross R, Heck E, Holland EJ, Mannis MJ, Raber I, Stark W, Stulting RD, Cornea Donor Study Investigator Group (2010) Endothelial cell density to predict endothelial graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 128(1):63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Madzak A, Hjortdal J (2018) Outcome of human donor corneas stored for more than 4 weeks. Cornea 37(10):1232–1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Martínez-Cantullera AN, Pinuaga MC (2016) Obtaining corneal tissue for keratoplasty. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 91:491–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morris E, Fuller JR, Rosron CK (1998) Successful penetrating keratoplasty un an infant after extended storage of infantile donor cornea. Br J Ophthalmol 82(7):846–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pascolini D, Mariotti SP (2012) Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Ophthalmol 96(5):614–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pels E, Schuchard Y (1983) Organ­culture preservation of human corneas. Doc Ophthalmol 56(1–2):147–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rao G, Gopinathan U (2009) Eye banking: an introduction. Community Eye Health 22(71):46–47PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Redbrake C, Salla S, Frantz A (1998) Changes in human donor corneas preserved for longer than 4 weeks. Cornea 17(1):62–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Mariotti SP, Pokharel GP (2008) Global magnitude of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004. Bull World Health Organ 86(1):63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Slettedal JK, Lyberg T, Røger M, Beraki K, Ramstad H, Nicolaissen B (2008) Regeneration with proliferation of the endothelium of cultured human donor corneas with extended postmortem time. Cornea 27(2):212–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schroeter J, Rieck P (2009) Endothelial evaluation in the cornea bank. In: Bredehorn-Mayr T, Duncker GIW, Armitage WJ (eds) Eye banking. Development of ophthalmology, vol 43. Karger, Basel, pp 47–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stocker FW, King EH, Lucas DO, Georgiade N (1966) A comparison of two different staining methods for evaluating corneal endothelial viability. Arch Ophthalmol 76(6):833–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sugar A, Tanner JP, Dontchev M, Tennant B, Schultze RL, Dunn SP, Lindquist TD, Gal RL, Beck RW, Kollman C, Mannis MJ, Holland EJ, Cornea Donor Study Investigator Group (2009a) Recipient risk factors for graft failure in the cornea donor study. Ophthalmology 116(6):1023–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sugar J, Montoya M, Dontchev M, Tanner JP, Beck R, Gal R, Gallagher S, Gaster R, Heck E, Holland EJ, Kollman C, Malling J, Mannis MJ, Woody J, Group Cornea Donor Study Investigator Group (2009b) Donor risk factors for graft failure in the cornea donor study. Cornea 28(9):981–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Visby E, Hjortdal J, Nielsen K (2014) Evaluation of grafted patients with donor corneas that today are more than 100 years old. Acta Ophthalmol 92:478–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wolf AH, Welge-Lüssen UC, Priglinger S, Kook D, Grueterich M, Hartmann K, Kampik A, Neubauer AS (2009) Optimizing the deswelling process of organ-cultured corneas. Cornea 28(5):524–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. World Health Organization - WHO (2017) Blindness and visual impairment prevention. https://www.who.int/blindness/en/. Accessed 2 Apr 2019
  37. Yunliang S, Yuqiang H, Ying-peng L, Ming-zhi Z, Lam DSC, Rao SK (2007) Corneal endothelial cell density and morphology in healthy Chinese eyes. Cornea 26:130–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Eye Bank of MonzaOspedale San GerardoMonzaItaly
  2. 2.Alchilife S.R.L.Ponte San NicolòItaly
  3. 3.Peshawar Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS)PeshawarPakistan

Personalised recommendations