Advertisement

Cell and Tissue Banking

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 579–583 | Cite as

Effect of glycerol concentrations and temperatures on epidermal growth factor protein expression in preserved canine amniotic membrane

  • Panrawee PhoomvuthisarnEmail author
  • Gunnaporn Suriyaphol
  • Nalinee Tuntivanich
Article
  • 57 Downloads

Abstract

Amniotic membrane has been widely applied as a biological graft in both medical and veterinary practice. In ophthalmology, epidermal growth factor (EGF) in human amniotic membrane (HAM) promotes corneal epithelial cell proliferation and migration, thus it facilitates corneal wound healing. In dogs, with limited cryopreserved HAM availability, different cold glycerol preserving protocols have been developed for the storage canine amniotic membrane (CAM). This study aimed to study protein expression of EGF in CAM preserved with different concentrations of glycerol and storage temperatures, using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. CAM preserved in 50% glycerol and 99.5% glycerol and kept at 4 and − 20 °C for 7–30 days were compared. We found that preserving membrane with 50% glycerol at − 20 °C has significantly higher EGF protein expression compared with that at 4 °C (p < 0.05). There was a trend that the storage in 50% glycerol achieved higher EGF protein expression than 99.5% glycerol at both 4 °C and − 20 °C. In conclusion, 50% glycerol at − 20 °C was the best condition to preserve CAM in our study. Therefore, there is likely an alternative method to maintain level of EGF protein expression in preserved CAM.

Keywords

Canine amniotic membrane Cold glycerol-preservation Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay Epidermal growth factor 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by Grants for Development of New Faculty Staff, Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund, Chulalongkorn University (Grant No. RGN-2559-063-05-30). We would like to acknowledge staffs of the Ophthalmology Unit and Obstretic Gynaecology and Reproduction Unit, Small Animal Teaching Hospital and Biochemistry Unit, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University for their help and support.

References

  1. Allen CL, Clare G, Stewart EA et al (2013) Augmented dried versus cryopreserved amniotic membrane as an ocular surface dressing. PLoS ONE.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078441 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Barros PSM, Garcia JA, Laus JL et al (1998) The use of xenologous amniotic membrane to repair canine corneal perforation created by penetrating keratectomy. Vet Ophthalmol 1:119–123.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-5224.1998.00026.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bentley E, Murphy CJ (2004) Topical therapeutic agents that modulate corneal wound healing. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 34(3):623–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boisjoly HM, Laplante C, Bernatchez SF et al (1993) Effects of EGF, IL-1 and their combination on in vitro corneal epithelial wound closure and cell chemotaxis. Exp Eye Res 57:293–300.  https://doi.org/10.1006/exer.1993.1127 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Castellanos G, Bernabé-García Á, Moraleda JM, Nicolás FJ (2017) Amniotic membrane application for the healing of chronic wounds and ulcers. Placenta.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2017.04.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Choi JA, Jin H-J, Jung S et al (2009) Effects of amniotic membrane suspension in human corneal wound healing in vitro. Mol Vis 15:2230–2238PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Chopra A, Thomas B (2013) Amnitic membrane: a novel material for regeneration and repair. Biomimetics Biomater Tissue Eng.  https://doi.org/10.4172/1662-100x.1000106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grant MB, Khaw PT, Schultz GS et al (1992) Effects of epidermal growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, and transforming growth factor-beta on corneal cell chemotaxis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33:3292–3301PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hettiarachchi D, Dissanayake VHW, Goonasekera HWW (2016) Optimizing amniotic membrane tissue banking protocols for ophthalmic use. Cell Tissue Bank 17:387–397.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-016-9568-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Jie J, Yang J, He H et al (2018) Tissue remodeling after ocular surface reconstruction with denuded amniotic membrane. Sci Rep.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24694-4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Kalpravidh M, Tuntivanich P, Vongsakul S, Sirivaidyapong S (2009) Canine amniotic membrane transplantation for corneal reconstruction after the excision of dermoids in dogs. Vet Res Commun 33:1003–1012.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-009-9319-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim J, Tseng S (1995) Transplantation of preserved human amniotic membrane for a surface reconstruction in severely damaged rabbit corneas. Cornea 14:473–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koizumi N, Inatomi T, Sotozono C et al (2000a) Growth factor mRNA and protein in preserved human amniotic membrane. Curr Eye Res 20:173–177.  https://doi.org/10.1076/0271-3683(200003)2031-9FT173 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Koizumi NJ, Inatomi TJ, Sotozono CJ et al (2000b) Growth factor mRNA and protein in preserved human amniotic membrane. Curr Eye Res 20:173–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kubo M, Sonoda Y, Muramatsu R, Usui M (2001) Immunogenicity of human amniotic membrane in experimental xenotransplantation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42:1539–1546PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Leevirojana MS (2014) Reconstruction of perforating cornea using cold glycerol preserved canine amniotic membrane in dogs. Chulalongkorn University, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  17. Niknejad H, Peirovi H, Jorjani M et al (2008) Properties of the amniotic membrane for potential use in tissue engineering. Eur Cell Mater 15:88–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Paolin A, Cogliati E, Trojan D et al (2016) Amniotic membranes in ophthalmology: long term data on transplantation outcomes. Cell Tissue Bank.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-015-9520-y CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Qureshi IZ, Fareeha A, Khan WA (2010) Technique for processing and preservation of human amniotic membrane for ocular surface reconstruction. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 69:763–766Google Scholar
  20. Thomasen H, Pauklin M, Noelle B et al (2011) The effect of long-term storage on the biological and histological properties of cryopreserved amniotic membrane. Curr Eye Res.  https://doi.org/10.3109/02713683.2010.542267 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang L, Wu X, Shi T, Lu L (2013) Epidermal growth factor (EGF)-induced corneal epithelial wound healing through nuclear factor κB subtype-regulated CCCTC binding factor (CTCF) activation. J Biol Chem.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.458141 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Wichayacoop T, Wongpithayadisai K, Chaiprakit K et al (2005) The use of human amniotic membrane for deep corneal ulcer repair in dogs. Thai J Vet Med 35:97–102Google Scholar
  23. Yatim RM, Kannan TP, Sheikh S et al (2013) Effects of different processing methods of human amniotic membrane on the quality of extracted RNA. Arch Orofac Sci 8(2):47–53Google Scholar
  24. Yoshioka R, Shiraishi A, Kobayashi T et al (2010) Corneal epithelial wound healing impaired in keratinocyte-specific HB-EGF-deficient mice in vivo and in vitro. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.10-5158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zidan SM, Eleowa SA, Nasef MA et al (2015) Maximizing the safety of glycerol preserved human amniotic membrane as a biological dressing. Burns 41(7):1498–1503CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary ScienceChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand
  2. 2.Biochemistry Unit, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary ScienceChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations