Advertisement

Cell and Tissue Banking

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 527–534 | Cite as

Verifying measurements of residual calcium content in demineralised cortical bone

  • A. F. Ariffin
  • N. Yusof
  • S. MohdEmail author
  • S. A. Rahman
  • S. Ramalingam
  • A. Mansor
  • N. G. Min
Full Length Paper
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

Calcium contents of demineralised human cortical bone determined by titrimetric assay and atomic absorption spectrophotometry technique were verified by comparing to neutron activation analysis which has high recovery of more than 90%. Conversion factors determined from the comparison is necessary to correct the calcium content for each technique. Femurs from cadaveric donors were cut into cortical rings and demineralised in 0.5 M hydrochloric acid for varying immersion times. Initial calcium content in the cortical bone measured by titration was 4.57%, only 21% of the measurement by neutron activation analysis; while measured by atomic absorption spectrophotometer was 13.4%, only 61% of neutron activation analysis. By comparing more readings with the measurements by neutron activation analysis with 93% recovery, a conversion factor of 4.83 was verified and applied for the readings by titration and 1.45 for atomic absorption spectrophotometer in calculating the correct calcium contents. The residual calcium content started to reduce after the cortical bone was demineralised in hydrochloric acid for 8 h and reduced to 13% after 24 h. Using the linear relationship, the residual calcium content could be reduced to less than 8% after immersion in hydrochloric acid for 40 h. Atomic absorption spectrophotometry technique is the method of choice for calcium content determination as it is more reliable compared to titrimetric assay.

Keywords

Atomic absorption spectrophotometer Calcium content Cortical bone Demineralisation Neutron activation analysis Titrimetric assay 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by University of Malaya Research Grant (RG542-13HTM) and Bone Bank Internal Fund. The authors would like to thank Mr Hong Hao Chan for his technical assistance.

Funding

The study was supported by University of Malaya Research Grant (RG542-13HTM) and Bone Bank Internal Fund.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declared no competing of interest in the study.

References

  1. American Association of Tissue Banks (AATB) (2008) Standard for tissue banking, 12th edn. AATB, McLeanGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauer TW, Muschler GF (2000) Bone graft material: an overview of the basic science. Clin Orthop Relat Res 371:10–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Costa A, Oliveira C, Leopizzi N, Amatuzzi M (2001) The use of demineralised bone matrix in the repair of osteochondral lesions. Experimental in rabbits. Acta Ortop Bras 9(4):27–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dozza B, Lesci IG, Duchi S, Della Bella E, Martini L, Salamanna F, Falconi M, Cinotti S, Fini M, Lucarelli E, Donati D (2017) When size matters: differences in demineralised bone matrix particles affect collagen structures, mesenchymal stem cell behaviour, and osteogenic potential. J Biomed Mater Res, Part A 10(4):1019–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eagle MJ, Rooney P, Kearney JN (2014) Optimised demineralisation of human cancellous bone by application of a vacuum. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 103B(5):1023–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eagle MJ, Rooney P, Kearney JN (2015) Development of an improved bone washing and demineralisation process to produce large demineralised human cancellous bone sponges. Cell Tissue Bank 16(4):569–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Emes Y, Ipekoglu M, Haznedaroglu H, Issever H, Yalcin S, Altintas S (2011) The effects of freeze drying and solvent dehydration on the bending strength and calcium content of cortical bone. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 45(5):365–369PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Eppley BL, Pietrzak WS, Blanton MW (2005) Allograft and alloplastic bone substitutes: a review of science and technology for the craniomaxillofacial surgeon. J Craniofac Surg 16(6):981–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Figueiredo M, Cunha S, Martins G, Freitas J, Judas F, Figueiredo H (2011) Influence of hydrochloric acid concentration on the demineralisation of cortical bone. Chem Eng Res Design 89:116–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guo MZ, Xia ZS, Lin LB (1991) The mechanical and biological properties of demineralised cortical bone allografts in animal. J Bone Joint Surg 73:791–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hilmy N, Abbas B, Anas F (2007) Validation for processing and irradiation of freeze-dried bone grafts. In: Nather A, Yusof N, Hilmy N (eds) Radiation in Tissue banking: basic science and clinical applications of irradiated tissue allografts. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, pp 219–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Khan SN, Tomin E, Lane JM (2000) Clinical applications of bone graft substitutes. Orthop Clin North Am 31(3):389–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lewandrowski K, Gresser JD, Wise DL, Trantolo DJ (2000) Bioresorbable bone graft substitutes of different osteoconductivities: an istologic evaluation of osteointegration of poly (propylene glycol-co-fumaric acid) based cement implants in rats. Biomaterials 21(8):757–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mauney JR, Jaguiery C, Volloch V, Heberer M, Martin I, Kaplan D (2005) In vitro and in vivo evaluation of differently demineralised cancellous bone scaffolds combined with human bone marrow stromal cells for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 26:3173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mohd S, Samsuddin SM, Ramalingam S, Ng WM, Yusof N, Zaman TK, Mansor A (2015) Assessing bone banking activities at University of Malaya Medical Centre. Cell Tissue Bank 16(4):523–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Muschler GF, Negami S, Hyodo A, Gaisser D, Easley K, Kamic H (1996) Evaluation of collagen ceramic composite graft materials in a spinal fusion model. Clin Orthop 328:250–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Novitskaya E, Chen PY, Lee S, Cesen AC, Hirata G, Lubarda VA, McKittrick J (2011) Anisotropy in the compressive mechanical properties of bovine cortical bone and the mineral and protein constituents. Acta Biomater 7(8):3170–3177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pietrzak WS, Ali SN, Chitturi D, Jacob M, Woodell-May JE (2011) BMP depletion occurs during prolonged acid demineralization of bone: characterization and implications for graft preparation. Cell Tissue Bank 12:82–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Reddi AH, Huggins C (1972) Biochemical sequences in the transformation of normal fibrolast in adolescent rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci 69:1601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Salim NAA, Hamzah MS, Elias MS, Siong WB, Rahman SA, Hashim A, Shukor SA (2013) Instrumental neutron activation analysis of marine sediment in-house reference material. J Nucl Relat Technol 10(1):1–7Google Scholar
  21. Sandhu HS, Grewal HS, Parvataneni H (1999) Bone grafting for spinal fusion. Orthop Clin North Am 30:685–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sassard WR, Eidman DK, Gray PM, Block JE, Russo R, Russell JL, Taboada EM (2000) Augmenting local bone with Grafton demineralised bone matrix for posterolateral lumbar spine fusion: avoiding second site autologous bone harvest. Orthopedics 23(10):1059–1065PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Urist MR (1965) Bone formation by autoinduction. Science 150:893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Woodard HQ (1962) The elementary composition of human cortical bone. Health Phys 8:513–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bone Bank, National Orthopaedic Centre of Excellence in Research and Learning (NOCERAL), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
  2. 2.Waste and Environmental Technology DivisionMalaysian Nuclear AgencyBangi, KajangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations