Advertisement

Cell and Tissue Banking

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 637–644 | Cite as

Tectonic epikeratoplasty with ethanol-stored donor corneas

  • Apostolos Lazaridis
  • Dimitrios Brouzas
  • Walter Sekundo
  • Ilias Georgalas
  • George Kymionis
  • Klio Chatzistefanou
  • Chryssanthi Koutsandrea
  • Konstantinos Droutsas
Article
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of tectonic epikeratoplasty with use of ethanol-preserved corneal grafts for the management of perforated corneal melts. The present retrospective case series includes 10 eyes which underwent tectonic epikeratoplasty for perforated corneal melts. The stromal remainders of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) graft preparation were stored in 95% ethanol and used as emergency tectonic grafts for restoring globe integrity after sterile and infectious perforated corneal melts. In 6 cases with subtotal corneal melt, DMEK remainders (endothelium-denuded corneoscleral buttons) were used for ‘limbus to limbus’ tectonic epikeratoplasty and in 4 cases DSAEK remainders (anterior stroma) were used to seal focal perforated melts. Graft storage time was 5.1 ± 4.9 (ranging from 0.5 to 17) months. The surgeries were successful in all cases with restitution of the globe integrity. During the postoperative course 4 cases developed a graft melt (corneoscleral button for limbus to limbus tectonic epikeratoplasty, n = 3; lamellar patch, n = 1) within 2–6 months after the initial procedure. Three patients underwent successful repeat tectonic epikeratoplasty. In the fourth case of graft melt the globe was enucleated due to underlying expulsive haemorrhage and severe pain. The short-term results of the present case series suggest that the use of ethanol-stored stromal remainder of donor corneas after endothelial keratoplasty is an efficient temporary measure for tectonic restoration of perforated corneas.

Keywords

Tectonic epikeratoplasty Corneal melt Perforation Ethanol 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ang M, Mehta JS, Arundhati A et al (2009) Anterior lamellar keratoplasty over penetrating keratoplasty for optical, therapeutic, and tectonic indications: a case series. Am J Ophthalmol 147:697–702CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ang M, Mehta JS, Sng CC et al (2012) Indications, outcomes, and risk factors for failure in tectonic keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 119:1311–1319CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Anshu A, Parthasarathy A, Mehta JS et al (2009) Outcomes of therapeutic deep lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty for advanced infectious keratitis: a comparative study. Ophthalmology 116:615–623CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Armitage WJ (2011) Preservation of human cornea. Transfus Med Hemother 38:143–147CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhatt PR, Lim LT, Ramaesh K (2007) Therapeutic deep lamellar keratoplasty for corneal perforations. Eye (Lond) 21:1168–1173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chang SW, Chou SF, Wang YH (2006) Ethanol treatment induces significant cell death in porcine corneal fibroblasts. Cornea 25:1072–1079CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen W, Lin Y, Zhang X et al (2010) Comparison of fresh corneal tissue versus glycerin-cryopreserved corneal tissue in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:775–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chu HS, Hsieh MC, Chen YM et al (2014) Anterior corneal buttons from DSAEK donor tissue can be stored in optisol GS for later use in tectonic lamellar patch grafting. Cornea 33:555–558CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dailey JR, Rosenwasser GO (1994) Viability of bacteria in glycerin and ethanol preserved sclera. J Refract Corneal Surg 10:38–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Heindl LM, Riss S, Bachmann BO et al (2011) Split cornea transplantation for 2 recipients: a new strategy to reduce corneal tissue cost and shortage. Ophthalmology 118:294–301CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kapur R, Tu EY, Pendland SL et al (2006) The effect of temperature on the antimicrobial activity of optisol-GS. Cornea 25:319–324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Khodadoust A, Quinter AP (2003) Microsurgical approach to the conjunctival flap. Arch Ophthalmol 121:1189–1193CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kymionis GD, Plaka AD, Diakonis VF et al (2013) Cross-linking as an adjuvant treatment for tectonic corneal lamellar graft preparation. Open Ophthalmol J 7:79–81CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Lie JT, Groeneveld-van Beek EA, Ham L et al (2010) More efficient use of donor corneal tissue with Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK): two lamellar keratoplasty procedures with one donor cornea. Br J Ophthalmol 94:1265–1266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lin HC, Ong SJ, Chao AN (2012) Eye preservation tectonic graft using glycerol-preserved donor cornea. Eye (Lond) 26:1446–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Oh JY, Yu JM, Ko JH (2013) Analysis of ethanol effects on corneal epithelium. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:3852–3856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pels E, Beele H, Claerhout I (2008) Eye bank issues: II. Preservation techniques: warm versus cold storage. Int Ophthalmol 28:155–163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Portnoy SL, Insler MS, Kaufman HE (1989) Surgical management of corneal ulceration and perforation. Surv Ophthalmol 34:47–58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Prabhasawat P, Tesavibul N, Komolsuradej W (2001) Single and multilayer amniotic membrane transplantation for persistent corneal epithelial defect with and without stromal thinning and perforation. Br J Ophthalmol 85:1455–1463CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Shapiro MS, Friend J, Thoft RA (1981) Corneal re-epithelialization from the conjunctiva. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 21:135–142Google Scholar
  21. Sharma A, Kaur R, Kumar S et al (2003) Fibrin glue versus N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate in corneal perforations. Ophthalmology 110:291–298CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Shimmura S, Shimazaki J, Tsubota K (2003) Therapeutic deep lamellar keratoplasty for cornea perforation. Am J Ophthalmol 135:896–897CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Tuli SS, Schultz GS, Downer DM (2007) Science and strategy for preventing and managing corneal ulceration. Ocul Surf 5:23–39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Turner SJ, Johnson Z, Corbett M et al (2010) Scleral autoplasty for the repair of corneal perforations: a case series. Br J Ophthalmol 94:669–670CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Wilson SL, Sidney LE, Dunphy SE et al (2013) Keeping an eye on decellularized corneas: a review of methods. Charact Appl J Funct Biomater 4:114–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yalniz-Akkaya Z, Burcu A, Doğan E et al (2015) Therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty for infectious and non-infectious corneal ulcers. Int Ophthalmol 35:193–200CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Yao Y-F, Zhang Y-M, Zhou P et al (2003) Therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty in severe fungal keratitis using cryopreserved donor corneas. Br J Ophthalmol 87:543–547CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Apostolos Lazaridis
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dimitrios Brouzas
    • 1
  • Walter Sekundo
    • 2
  • Ilias Georgalas
    • 1
  • George Kymionis
    • 1
  • Klio Chatzistefanou
    • 1
  • Chryssanthi Koutsandrea
    • 1
  • Konstantinos Droutsas
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.First Department of Ophthalmology, Medical School of AthensUniversity of AthensAthensGreece
  2. 2.Department of OphthalmologyPhilipps UniversityMarburgGermany

Personalised recommendations