Cell and Tissue Banking

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 357–367 | Cite as

Porcine bone grafts defatted by lipase: efficacy of defatting and assessment of cytocompatibility

  • Naili Zhang
  • Mo Zhou
  • Yumin Zhang
  • Xusheng Wang
  • Shaoying Ma
  • Li Dong
  • Ting Yang
  • Lina Ma
  • Baoxing Li
Original Paper

Abstract

Defatting is an important procedure for the preparation of bone grafts because lipids in bone grafts strongly influence the osteointegration. Lipases have been widely used in different fields. However, study on the application to defatting process for bone grafts preparation has never been found so far. In this study, bone samples were treated respectively by lipase, NaHCO3/Na2CO3, acetone and deionized water. The lipids content of processed bone grafts was calculated in Soxhlet extractor method. Surface morphology of the bone grafts was observed under scanning electron microscope (SEM). DNA content of processed bone grafts was measured. Cytocompatibility was evaluated by co-culturing mouse preosteoblasts (MC3T3-E1) on defatted bone cubes. Proliferation rates of MC3T3-E1 were examined by cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay. No statistically significant difference was found between lipids amount of bone processed by lipase (0.46 ± 0.16 %) and acetone (1.11 ± 0.13 %) (P > 0.05). Both of them were significantly lower than that in groups processed by Na2CO3/NaHCO3 (3.46 ± 0.69 %) and deionized water (8.88 ± 0.18 %) (P = 0.000). Only cell debris were discovered over the surface of bone processed by lipase or acetone, while lipid droplets were observed on bone processed by Na2CO3/NaHCO3 or water by SEM. The difference of DNA concentration between the bone processed by lipase (3.16 ± 0.81 ng/μl) and acetone (4.14 ± 0.40 ng/μl) is not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Both of them are significantly lower than that groups processed by Na2CO3/NaHCO3 (5.22 ± 0.38 ng/μl) and water (7.88 ± 0.55 ng/μl) (P < 0.05). MC3T3-E1 cells maintained their characteristic spreading on the trabecular surfaces of bone processed by lipase. There were no statistically significant differences among absorbance of lipase, acetone groups in CCK-8 assay. The application of lipase to bone tissue defatting appears to be a very promising technique for bone grafts preparation.

Keywords

Bone grafts Preparation Lipase Defatting Cytocompatibility 

References

  1. Aho AJ, Ekfors T, Dean PB, Aro HT, Ahonen A, Nikkanen V (1994) Incorporation and clinical results of large allografts of the extremities and pelvis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 307:200–213PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Aspenberg P, Thorén K (1990) Lipid extraction enhances bank bone incorporation: an experiment in rabbits. Acta Orthop Scand 61:546–548PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baslé MF, Grizon F, Pascaretti C, Lesourd M, Chappard D (1998) Shape and orientation of osteoblast-like cells (Saos-2) are influenced by collagen fibers in xenogenic bone biomaterial. J Biomed Mater Res 40:350–357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berkowitz MJ, Clare MP, Walling AK, Sanders R (2011) Salvage of failed total ankle arthroplasty with fusion using structural allograft and internal fixation. Foot Ankle Int 32:S493–S502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borgonovo AE, Tommasi F, Panigalli A, Bianchi AC, Boninsegna R, Santoro F (2012) Use of fresh frozen bone graft in rehabilitation of maxillar atrophy. Minerva Stomatol 61:141–154PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Camozzi V, Vescini F, Luisetto G, Moro L (2010) Bone organic matrix components: their roles in skeletal physiology. J Endocrinol Invest 33(7 Suppl):13–15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Casas-Godoy L, Duquesne S, Bordes F, Sandoval G, Marty A (2012) Lipases: an overview. Methods Mol Biol 861:3–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Castrogiovanni P, Imbesi R, Fisichella M, Mazzone V (2011) Osteonic organization of limb bones in mammals, including humans, and birds: a preliminary study. Ital J Anat Embryol 116:30–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chahinian H, Sarda L (2009) Distinction between esterases and lipases: comparative biochemical properties of sequence-related carboxylesterases. Protein Pept Lett 16:1149–1161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chappard D, Fressonnet C, Genty C, Baslé MF, Rebel A (1993) Fat in bone xenografts: importance of the purification procedures on cleanliness, wettability and biocompatibility. Biomaterials 14:507–512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Costain DJ, Crawford RW (2009) Fresh-frozen vs. irradiated allograft bone in orthopaedic reconstructive surgery. Injury 40:1260–1264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Di Iorgi N, Rosol M, Mittelman SD, Gilsanz V (2008) Reciprocal relation between marrow adiposity and the amount of bone in the axial and appendicular skeleton of young adults. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:2281–2286PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dumas A, Gaudin-Audrain C, Mabilleau G, Massin P, Hubert L, Baslé MF, Chappard D (2006) The influence of processes for the purification of human bone allografts on the matrix surface and cytocompatibility. Biomaterials 27:4204–4211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dziedzic-Goclawska A, Kaminski A, Uhrynowska-Tyszkiewicz I, Stachowicz W (2005) Irradiation as a safety procedure in tissue banking. Cell Tissue Bank 6:201–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elliot RR, Richards RH (2011) Failed operative treatment in two cases of pseudarthrosis of the clavicle using internal fixation and bovine cancellous xenograft (Tutobone). J Pediatr Orthop B 20:349–353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Endres S, Kratz M (2009) Gamma irradiation: an effective procedure for bone banks, but does it make sense from an osteobiological perspective? J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 9:25–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Endres S, Kratz M, Heinz M, Herzberger C, Reichel S, von Garrel T, Gotzen L, Wilke A (2005) Biocompatibility testing of different sterilised or disinfected allogenous bone grafts in comparison to the gold standard of autologous bone grafts–an “in vitro” analysis of immunomodulation. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 143:660–668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fages J, Marty A, Delga C, Condoret JS, Combes D, Frayssinet P (1994) Use of supercritical CO2 for bone delipidation. Biomaterials 15:650–656PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Finkemeier CG (2002) Bone-grafting and bone-graft substitutes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84A:454–464Google Scholar
  20. Frayssinet P, Rouquet N, Mathon D, Autefage A, Fages J (1998) Histological integration of allogeneic cancellous bone tissue treated by supercritical CO2 implanted in sheep bones. Biomaterials 19:2247–2253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Galia CR, Macedo CA, Rosito R, Mello TM, Camargo LM, Moreira LF (2008) In vitro and in vivo evaluation of lyophilized bovine bone biocompatibility. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 63:801–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gorski JP (1998) Is all bone the same? Distinctive distributions and properties of non-collagenous matrix proteins in lamellar vs woven bone imply the existence of different underlying osteogenic mechanisms. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 9:201–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gouin F, Passuti N, Verriele V, Delecrin J, Bainvel JV (1996) Histological features of large bone allografts. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:38–41PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Graham SM, Leonidou A, Aslam-Pervez N, Hamza A, Panteliadis P, Heliotis M, Mantalaris A, Tsiridis E (2010) Biological therapy of bone defects: the immunology of bone allo-transplantation. Expert Opin Biol Ther 10(6):885–901PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hagen A, Gorenoi V, Schönermark MP (2012) Bone graft substitutes for the treatment of traumatic fractures of the extremities. GMS Health Technol Assess. doi:10.3205/hta000102 Google Scholar
  26. Haimi S, Vienonen A, Hirn M, Pelto M, Virtanen V, Suuronen R (2008) The effect of chemical cleansing procedures combined with peracetic acid–ethanol sterilization on biomechanical properties of cortical bone. Biologicals 36(2):99–104Google Scholar
  27. Hölzer A, Pietschmann MF, Rösl C, Hentschel M, Betz O, Matsuura M, Jansson V, Müller PE (2012) The interrelation of trabecular microstructural parameters of the greater tubercle measured for different species. J Orthop Res 30:429–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hornicek FJ, Gebhardt MC, Tomford WW, Sorger JI, Zavatta M, Menzner JP, Mankin HJ (2001) Factors affecting nonunion of the allograft-host junction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 382:87–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Horowitz M (2003) Matrix proteins versus cytokines in the regulation of osteoblast function and bone formation. Calcif Tissue Int 72:5–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ishiyama M, Tominaga H, Shiga M, Sasamoto K, Ohkura Y, Ueno K (1996) A combined assay of cell viability and in vitro cytotoxicity with a highly water-soluble tetrazolium salt, neutral red and crystal violet. Biol Pharm Bull 19:1518–1520PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kalus U, Müller H, Baudisch H, Birkhahn HJ, von Versen R, Hansen A, Pruss A (2005) A method for the determination of the residual chloroform in defatted cancellous bone transplants. Cell Tissue Bank 6:71–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Katz J, Mukherjee N, Cobb RR, Bursac P, York-Ely A (2009) Incorporation and immunogenicity of cleaned bovine bone in a sheep model. J Biomater Appl 24:159–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kemper N, Davison N, Fitzpatrick D, Marshall R, Lin A, Mundy K, Cobb RR (2011) Characterization of the mechanical properties of bovine cortical bone treated with a novel tissue sterilization process. Cell Tissue Bank 12:273–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kluger R, Bouhon W, Freudenberger H, Kröner A, Engel A, Hoffmann O (2003) Removal of the surface layers of human cortical bone allografts restores in vitro osteoclast function reduced by processing and frozen storage. Bone 32:291–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Liu X, Lim JY, Donahue HJ, Dhurjati R, Mastro AM, Vogler EA (2007) Influence of substratum surface chemistry/energy and topography on the human fetal osteoblastic cell line hFOB 1.19: phenotypic and genotypic responses observed in vitro. Biomaterials 28:4535–4550PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mehta A, Kumar R, Gupta R (2012) Isolation of lipase producing thermophilic bacteria: optimization of production and reaction conditions for lipase from Geobacillus sp. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung 59:435–450PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Merritt AL, Spinnicke A, Pettigrew K, Alamin TF (2010) Gluteal-sparing approach for posterior iliac crest bone graft: description of a new technique and assessment of morbidity in ninety-two patients after spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:1396–1400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Miyamoto T, Min W, Lillehoj HS (2002) Lymphocyte proliferation response during Eimeria tenella infection assessed by a new, reliable, nonradioactive colorimetric assay. Avian Dis 46:10–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moreau MF, Gallois Y, Baslé MF, Chappard D (2000) Gamma irradiation of human bone allografts alters medullary lipids and releases toxic compounds for osteoblast-like cells. Biomaterials 21:369–376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mroz TE, Lin EL, Summit MC, Bianchi JR, Keesling JE Jr, Roberts M, Vangsness CT Jr, Wang JC (2006) Biomechanical analysis of allograft bone treated with a novel tissue sterilization process. Spine J 6:34–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nguyen H, Morgan DA, Forwood MR (2007) Sterilization of allograft bone: effects of gamma irradiation on allograft biology and biomechanics. Cell Tissue Bank 8:93–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Parhami F, Morrow AD, Balucan J, Leitinger N, Watson AD, Tintut Y, Berliner JA, Demer LL (1997) Lipid oxidation products have opposite effects on calcifying vascular cell and bone cell differentiation: a possible explanation for the paradox of arterial calcification in osteoporotic patients. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 17:680–687PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Robey PG, Fedarko NS, Hefferan TE, Bianco P, Vetter UK, Grzesik W, Friedenstein A, Van der Pluijm G, Mintz KP, Young MF et al (1993) Structure and molecular regulation of bone matrix proteins. J Bone Miner Res 8(Suppl 2):S483–S487PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Silber JS, Anderson DG, Daffner SD, Brislin BT, Leland JM, Hilibrand AS, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ (2003) Donor site morbidity after anterior iliac crest bone harvest for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:134–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stevenson S, Emery SE, Goldberg VM (1996) Factors affecting bone graft incorporation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 324:66–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Summit MC, Bianchi JR, Keesling JE et al (2001) Biomechanical testing of bone treated through a new tissue cleaning process. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Tissue Banks, Washington, DC Google Scholar
  47. Supronowicz P, Zhukauskas R, York-Ely A, Wicomb W, Thula T, Fleming L, Cobb RR (2008) Immunologic analyses of bovine bone treated with a novel tissue sterilization process. Xenotransplantation 15:398–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tadic D, Epple M (2004) A thorough physicochemical characterisation of 14 calcium phosphate-based bone substitution materials in comparison to natural bone. Biomaterials 25:987–994PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thorén K, Aspenberg P, Thorngren KG (1995) Lipid extracted bank bone: bone conductive and mechanical properties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 311:232–246PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Vavken P, Joshi S, Murray MM (2009) TRITON-X is most effective among three decellularization agents for ACL tissue engineering. J Orthop Res 27:1612–1618PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wallin RF, Arscott EF (1998) A practical guide to ISO 10993-5: cytotoxicity. MDDI 20:96–98Google Scholar
  52. Ward WG, Gautreaux MD, Lippert DC 2nd, Boles C (2008) HLA sensitization and allograft bone graft incorporation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:1837–1848PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Xu H, Watkins BA, Seifert MF (1995) Vitamin stimulates trabecular bone formation and alters epiphyseal cartilage morphometry. Calcif Tissue Int 57:293–300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yoshioka H, Inoguchi K, Khaleduzzaman M, Ninomiya Y, Andrikopoulos K, Ramirez F (1995) Coding sequence and alternative splicing of the mouse alpha 1(XI) collagen gene (Col11a1). Genomics 28:337–340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Young MF (2003) Bone matrix proteins: more than markers. Calcif Tissue Int 72:2–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Naili Zhang
    • 2
  • Mo Zhou
    • 2
  • Yumin Zhang
    • 3
  • Xusheng Wang
    • 1
  • Shaoying Ma
    • 1
  • Li Dong
    • 1
  • Ting Yang
    • 1
  • Lina Ma
    • 4
  • Baoxing Li
    • 1
  1. 1.China Institute for Radiation ProtectionTaiyuanChina
  2. 2.School of Basic Medical ScienceSouthern Medical UniversityTongHe, GuangZhouChina
  3. 3.Shanxi University of Traditional Chinese MedicineTaiyuanChina
  4. 4.Shanxi Coal Central HospitalTaiyuanChina

Personalised recommendations