Cell and Tissue Banking

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 9–13

Development of a data entry auditing protocol and quality assurance for a tissue bank database

  • Matloob Khushi
  • Jane E. Carpenter
  • Rosemary L. Balleine
  • Christine L. Clarke
Brief Communication

Abstract

Human transcription error is an acknowledged risk when extracting information from paper records for entry into a database. For a tissue bank, it is critical that accurate data are provided to researchers with approved access to tissue bank material. The challenges of tissue bank data collection include manual extraction of data from complex medical reports that are accessed from a number of sources and that differ in style and layout. As a quality assurance measure, the Breast Cancer Tissue Bank (http:\\www.abctb.org.au) has implemented an auditing protocol and in order to efficiently execute the process, has developed an open source database plug-in tool (eAuditor) to assist in auditing of data held in our tissue bank database. Using eAuditor, we have identified that human entry errors range from 0.01% when entering donor’s clinical follow-up details, to 0.53% when entering pathological details, highlighting the importance of an audit protocol tool such as eAuditor in a tissue bank database. eAuditor was developed and tested on the Caisis open source clinical-research database; however, it can be integrated in other databases where similar functionality is required.

Keywords

eAuditor Caisis Quality control protocol Auditing BCTB 

References

  1. Burrage K, Hood L et al (2006) Advanced computing for systems biology. Briefings in Bioinformatics 7(4):390–398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carpenter JE, Miller JA et al (2007) The Caisis system for biorepository data requirements—Breast cancer tissue bank, Australia. Cell Preserv Technol 5(1):51–52Google Scholar
  3. Fan J-W, Friedman C (2008) Semantic reclassification of the UMLS concepts. Bioinformatics 24(17):1971–1973PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fearn P, Regan K et al (2007) Lessons learned from Caisis: an open source, web-based system for integrating clinical practice and research. Computer-based medical systems, 2007. CBMS ‘07. In: Twentieth IEEE international symposium on 2007Google Scholar
  5. Fearn P, Sculli F (2010) The CAISIS research data system. In: Ochs MF, Casagrande JT, Davuluri RV (eds) Biomedical informatics for cancer research. Springer, US, pp 215–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goldberg SI, Niemierko A et al (2008) Analysis of data errors in clinical research databases. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008:242–246Google Scholar
  7. Kawado M, Hinotsu S et al (2003) A comparison of error detection rates between the reading aloud method and the double data entry method. Control Clin Trials 24(5):560–569PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Verspoor K, Dvorkin D et al (2009) Ontology quality assurance through analysis of term transformations. Bioinformatics 25(12):i77–i84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Womack C, Gray NM (2009) Banking human tissue for research: vision to reality. Cell and Tissue Banking 10(3):267–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matloob Khushi
    • 1
  • Jane E. Carpenter
    • 1
  • Rosemary L. Balleine
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Christine L. Clarke
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Breast Cancer Tissue BankThe University of Sydney at the Westmead Millennium InstituteWestmeadAustralia
  2. 2.Translational OncologyWestern Sydney Local Health NetworkWestmeadAustralia
  3. 3.Westmead Institute for Cancer ResearchThe University of Sydney at the Westmead Millennium InstituteWestmeadAustralia

Personalised recommendations