Advertisement

Cell and Tissue Banking

, 10:317 | Cite as

A clinical and radiological evaluation of DFDBA with amniotic membrane versus bovine derived xenograft with amniotic membrane in human periodontal grade II furcation defects

  • Shaila V. Kothiwale
  • P. Anuroopa
  • A. L. Gajiwala
Article

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to clinically and radiographically evaluate and compare the efficacy of demineralized freeze dried bone allograft (DFDBA) and bovine derived xenogenic bone graft (BDX) [Bio-Oss] with amniotic membrane (AM) as guided tissue regeneration (GTR) in the treatment of human periodontal Grade II buccal furcation defects. Ten patients suffering from chronic periodontitis, displaying bilateral Grade II buccal furcation defect, were randomly treated using DFDBA with AM (Experimental site A) or using bovine derived xenograft (BDX) with AM (Experimental site B). The clinical and radiographic parameters were recorded at baseline, 6 and 9 months. Healing was uneventful in all patients except one site which was treated with BDX + AM. At 9 months after therapy, soft tissue measurements for the DFDBA + AM group showed pocket depth (PD) reduction of 4.7 mm ± 0.58, and relative attachment level gain of 4.8 mm + 0.32, while the BDX + AM group showed a PD reduction of 4.4 mm ± 0.27, and AL gain of 5.1 mm ± 0.09. Osseous measurements showed bone fill of 2.1 mm ± 0.36 for the DFDBA + AM group and 2.43 mm ± 0.38 for the BDX + AM group. Percentage gain in bone was 76.3% for the DFDBA + AM group and 79.6% for the BDX + AM group. Statistical analysis revealed there was no statistical difference between the two materials in all measurements. Within the limits of the present study, it can be concluded that: (1) at 9 months after surgery both therapies resulted in significant PD reductions and CAL gains and (2) significant improvement was seen in bone fill and percentage gain with both the material, however, there was no significant difference between both.

Keywords

Regenerative periodontal therapy Controlled clinical study Bovine derived xenograft DFDBA Amniotic membrane 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank; (1) Tissue Bank, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India for providing us the DFDBA and AM. (2) Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, KLE’s Institute of Dental Sciences, Belgaum, Karnataka, India for allowing us to use RVG.

References

  1. Bowers GM, Chadroff B, Carnevale R, Mellonig J, Corio R, Emerson J, Stevens M, Romberg E (1989a) Histologic evaluation of new attachment apparatus in humans. Part I. J Periodontol 60:675–682PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowers GM, Chadroff B, Carnevale R et al (1989b) Histologic evaluation of new attachment apparatus formation in humans, Part III. J Periodontol 60:683–693PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowers G, Chadroff B, Carnevale R, Mellonig J, Corio E, Emerson J, Stevens J, Romberg E (1989c) Histologic evaluation of new attachment apparatus formation in humans: Part III. J Periodontol 60:683–693PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brunsvold MA, Mellonig JT (1993) Bone grafts and periodontal regeneration. Periodontology 2000(1):80–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Camargo PM, Lekovic V, Weinlaender M, Nedic M, Vasilic N, Wolinsky LE, Kenney EB (2000) A controlled re-entry study on the effectiveness of bovine porous bone mineral used in combination with a collagen membrane of porcine origin in the treatment of intrabony defects in humans. J Clin Periodontol 27:889–896PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Camelo M, Nevins ML, Schenk R, Simion M, Rasperini G, Lynch S, Nevins M (1998) Clinical, radiographic, and histologic evaluation of human periodontal defects treated with Bio-Oss and Bio-Gide. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 18:321–331PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Carranza FA, Newman MG (1996) Clinical Periodontology, 8th edn. WB Saunders & Co, Philadelphia, pp 61–82Google Scholar
  8. Clergeau LP, Danan M, Clergeau-Guerithault S, Brion M (1996) Healing response to anorganic bone implantation in periodontal Intrabony defects in dogs. Part I. Bone regeneration. A microradiographic study. J Periodontol 67:140–149PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen P, Tobaly K, Danan M, Pare C, Sauven J, Brion M (1990) Treatment of intraosseous lesions with anorganic bovine bone plus collagen. Entret Bichat, Odontol et Stomatol xx:91–94Google Scholar
  10. Cortellini P, Bowers GM (1995) Periodontal regeneration of Intrabony defects: An evidence-based treatment approach. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 15(12):8–145Google Scholar
  11. Dragoo M, Sullivan M (1973) A clinical and histologic evaluation of autogenous iliac bone grafts in humans. Part I. wound healing 2–8 months. J of Periodontol 44:599–612Google Scholar
  12. Fernandes M, Sridhar MS, Sangwan VS, Rao GN (2005) Amniotic membrane transplantation for ocular surface reconstruction. Cornea 24:643–653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gottlow Jan (1993) Guided tissue regeneration using bioresorbable and non-resorbable devices: initial healing and long-term results. J Periodontol 64:1157–1165PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Guillemin MR, Mellonig JT, Brunsvold MA (1993) Healing in periodontal defects treated by DFDBA in combination with ePTFE membranes (I). Clinical and scanning electron microscope analysis. J Clin Periodontol 1993(20):528–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jensen SS, Aaboe M, Pinholt EM, Hjorting-Hansen E, Melsen F, Ruyter IE (1996) Tissue reaction and material characteristics of four bone substitutes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 11:55–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Libin BM, Ward HL, Fishman L (1975) Decalcified, lyophilized bone allografts for use in human periodontal defects. J Periodontol 46(5):1–56Google Scholar
  17. Machtei EE, Schallhorn RG (1995) Successful regeneration of mandibular class II furcation defects: An evidence-based treatment approach. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 15:146–167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mellonig J (1984) Decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft as an implant material in human periodontal defects. Int J Periodontol Restorative Dent 4:40–55Google Scholar
  19. Mellonig JT (1992) Autogenous and allogeneic bone grafts in periodontal therapy. Crit Rev Oral Biol 3:333–352Google Scholar
  20. Mellonig J (2000) Human histologic evaluation of a bovine-derived xenograft in the treatment of periodontal osseous defects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 20:19–29PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Niknejad H, Peirovi H, Jorjani M, Ahmadiani A, Ghanavi J, Seifalian Alexander (2008) Properties of the amniotic membrane for potential use in tissue engineering. Eur Cells Mater 15:88–99Google Scholar
  22. Pihlstrom BL, Michalowicz BS, Johnson NW (2005) Periodontal diseases. Lancet 366:1809–1820PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Polimeni G, Xiropaidis AV, Wikesjo UM (2006) Biology and principles of periodontal wound healing/regeneration. Periodontal 2000(41):30–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Quintero G, Mellonig J, Gambill V, Pelleu G Jr (1982) A 6-month clinical evaluation of decalcified freeze-dried bone allografts in periodontal osseous defects. J Periodontol 53:726–730PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Richardson CR, Mellonig JT, Brunsvold MA, McDonnell HT, Cochran DL (1999) Clinical evaluation of Bio-Oss: a bovine-derived xenograft for the treatment of periodontal osseous defects in humans. J Clin Periodontol 26:421–428PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sander L, Karring T (1995) Healing of periodontal lesions in monkeys following the guided tissue regeneration procedure. A histological study. J Clin Periodontol 22:332–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schwartz Z, Somers A, Mellonig JT et al (1998) Ability of commercial demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft to induce new bone formation is dependent on donor age but not gender. J Periodontol 69:470–478PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Sculean A, Chiantella GC, Windisch P, Gera I, Reich E (2002) Clinical evaluation of an enamel matrix protein derivative (Emdogains) combined with a bovine derived xenograft (Bio-Oss) for the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects in humans. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 22:259–267PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Urist MR (1965) Bone: Formation by autoinduction. Science 150(698):893–899PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shaila V. Kothiwale
    • 1
  • P. Anuroopa
    • 1
  • A. L. Gajiwala
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PeriodonticsKLE’S VK Institute of Dental SciencesBelgaumIndia
  2. 2.Tissue BankTata Memorial HospitalMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations