Advertisement

Platforms and Patterns for Practice: LGBTQ+ Youths’ Use of Information and Communication Technologies

  • Lauren B. McInroyEmail author
  • Shelley L. Craig
  • Vivian W. Y. Leung
Article
  • 182 Downloads

Abstract

LGBTQ+ (e.g., lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer) youths’ engagement with information and communication technologies (ICTs) allows them to access social support, develop their identities, and increase their well-being in a context of relative safety. However, a significant knowledge gap remains regarding the patterns of LGBTQ+ youths’ use of ICTs, how ICT usage varies among LGBTQ+ sub-populations, as well as how LGBTQ+ youths’ usage compares to the general youth population. This article investigates the use of ICTs by a geographically diverse, cross-sectional survey sample (n = 6309) of LGBTQ+ youth (ages 14–29) from across the United States and Canada. The sample’s use of mobile and non-mobile digital devices, their time spent engaging online, and their participation on a wide variety of social media and other online platforms were studied. A comparison of participants’ experiences was also undertaken based upon their sociodemographic characteristics—particularly age, sexual orientation, gender identity, ethno-racial identity, community type, and socioeconomic status. Significant implications for contemporary social work practice with diverse LGBTQ+ youth populations and sub-populations by individual service providers and social service organizations are discussed.

Keywords

Gender identity Sexual orientation Information and communication technologies Digital devices Social media use Sociodemographics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Grant #498466). We would like to acknowledge the participants for their contributions.

References

  1. Barman-Adhikari, A., & Rice, E. (2011). Sexual health information seeking online among runaway and homeless youth. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 2(2), 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cash, S. J., Thelwall, M., Peck, S. N., Ferrell, J. Z., & Bridge, J. A. (2013). Adolescent suicide statements on MySpace. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(3), 166–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coker, T. R., Austin, S. B., & Schuster, M. A. (2010). The health and health care of lesbian, gay, and bisexual adolescents. Annual Review of Public Health, 31, 457–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coyne, S. M., Stockdale, L., Busby, D., Iverson, B., & Grant, D. M. (2011). “I luv u:)!”: A descriptive study of the media use of individuals in romantic relationships. Family Relations, 60(2), 150–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Craig, S. L., & McInroy, L. (2014). You can form a part of yourself online: The influence of new media on identity development and coming out for LGBTQ youth. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health, 18(1), 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Craig, S. L., McInroy, L. B., D’Souza, S. A., Austin, A., McCready, L. T., Eaton, A. D., … Wagaman, M. A. (2017). Project #Queery: Influence of information and communication technologies on the resilience and coping of sexual and gender minority youth in the United States and Canada. JMIR Research Protocols, 6(9), e189.  https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.8397.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Craig, S. L., McInroy, L. B., McCready, L. T., & Alaggia, R. (2015). Media: A catalyst for resilience in sexual minority youth. Journal of LGBT Youth, 12(3), 254–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Craig, S. L., McInroy, L. B., McCready, L. T., Di Cesare, D. M., & Pettaway, L. D. (2015). Connecting without fear: Clinical implications of the consumption of information and communication technologies by sexual minority youth and young adults. Clinical Social Work Journal, 43(2), 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DeHaan, S., Kuper, L. E., Magee, J., Bigelow, L., & Mustanski, B. S. (2013). The interplay between online and offline explorations of identity, relationships, and sex: A mixed-methods study with LGBT youth. Journal of Sex Research, 50(5), 421–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DelValle Institute. (n.d.). Social media platforms. DelValle Institute for Emergency Preparedness. http://bit.ly/2wwqkHF. Retrieved 15 Dec 2017
  11. Foreman, C. (2017). 10 types of social media and how each can benefit your business. Hootsuite Blog. http://bit.ly/297sjtY. Retrieved 6 Sept 2017
  12. Fox, J., & Ralston, R. (2016). Queer identity online: Informal learning and teaching experiences of LGBTQ individuals on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 635–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. GLSEN, CiP. H. R., & CCRC (2013). Out online: The experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth on the Internet. New York: GLSEN. http://glsen.org/sites/default/files/Out%20Online%20FINAL.pdf.
  14. Gray, M. L. (2009). Out in the country: Youth, media, and queer visibility in rural America. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  15. Greenwood, S., Perrin, A., & Duggan, M. (2016). Social media update 2016. Pew Research Center. http://pewrsr.ch/2fIeTTY.
  16. Horne-Moyer, H. L., Moyer, B. H., Messer, D. C., & Messer, E. S. (2014). The use of electronic games in therapy: A review with clinical implications. Current Psychiatry Reports, 16(12), 520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Israelashvili, M., Kim, T., & Bukobza, G. (2012). Adolescents’ over-use of the cyber world–Internet addiction or identity exploration? Journal of Adolescence, 35(2), 417–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kennedy, H. (2006). Beyond anonymity, or future directions for internet identity research. New media & society, 8(6), 859–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kimbrough, A. M., Guadagno, R. E., Muscanell, N. L., & Dill, J. (2013). Gender differences in mediated communication: Women connect more than do men. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 896–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kosciw, J. G., Palmer, N. A., & Kull, R. M. (2015). Reflecting resiliency: Openness about sexual orientation and/or gender identity and its relationship to well-being and educational outcomes for LGBT students. American Journal of Community Psychology, 55, 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Langlois, M. (2011). Reset: Video games and psychotherapy. Cambridge: Chateau Escargot Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Lenhart, A., Duggan, M., Perrin, A., Stepler, R., Rainie, L., & Parker, K. (2015). Teens, social media and technology overview 2015. Pew Research Center. http://pewrsr.ch/1aoDmdM.
  23. Lucero, L. (2017). Safe spaces in online places: Social media and LGBTQ youth. Multicultural Education Review, 9(2), 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mathur, C., Erickson, D. J., Stigler, M. H., Forster, J. L., & Finnegan, J. R. (2013). Individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status effects on adolescent smoking: A multilevel cohort-sequential latent growth analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 103(3), 543–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McInroy, L., & Craig, S. L. (2012). Articulating identities: Language and practice with multiethnic sexual minority youth. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 25(2), 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McInroy, L. B., & Craig, S. L. (2017). Perspectives of LGBTQ emerging adults on the depiction and impact of LGBTQ media representation. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(1), 32–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McInroy, L. B., & Craig, S. L. (2018). Online fandom, identity milestones, and self-identification of sexual/gender minority youth. Journal of LGBT Youth.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2018.1459220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. National Association of Social Workers, Association of Social Work Boards, Council on Social Work Education, Clinical Social Work Education. (2017). NASW, ASWB, CSWE, & CSWA standards for technology in social work practice. National Association of Social Workers. http://www.socialworkers.org/includes/newIncludes/homepage/PRA-BRO-33617.TechStandards_FINAL_POSTING.pdf. Accessed 9 Feb 2018.
  29. NORC at the University of Chicago. (2017). New survey: Snapchat and Instagram are most popular social media platforms among American teens. ScienceDaily. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/04/170421113306.htm. Retrieved 6 Sept 2017
  30. O’Keeffe, G. S., & Clarke-Pearson, K. (2011). The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics, 127(4), 800–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Obar, J. A. (2015). Social media definition and the governance challenge: An introduction to the special issue. Telecommunications Policy, 39(9), 745–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Olmstead, K. (2017). A third of Americans live in a household with three or more smartphones. Pew Research Center. http://pewrsr.ch/2qnOAIw. Retrieved 10 Feb 2018
  33. Perrin, A. (2017). Digital gap between rural and nonrural America persists. Pew Research Centre. http://pewrsr.ch/2qNlqpk. Retrieved 11 Feb 2018
  34. Pew Research Center. (2015). Demographics of Tumblr. http://pewrsr.ch/1QlE4v0. Retrieved 9 Feb 2018
  35. Pew Research Center. (2017). Internet & technology: Datasets. http://www.pewinternet.org/datasets/.
  36. Pew Research Center. (2018a). Internet/broadband fact sheet. http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/internet-broadband/. Retrieved 9 Feb 2018
  37. Pew Research Center. (2018b). Social media fact sheet. http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/social-media/. Retrieved 9 Feb 2018
  38. Pew Research Center. (2018c). Mobile fact sheet. http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/mobile/. Retrieved 9 Feb 2018
  39. Rainie, L. (2017). About 6 in 10 young adults in U.S. primarily use online streaming to watch TV. Pew Research Center. http://pewrsr.ch/2wZNFC7. Retrieved 10 Feb 2018
  40. Raun, T. (2015). Archiving the wonders of testosterone via YouTube. Transgender Studies Quarterly, 2(4), 701–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rice, S. M., Goodall, J., Hetrick, S. E., Parker, A. G., Gilbertson, T., Amminger, G. P., … Alvarez-Jimenez, M. (2014). Online and social networking interventions for the treatment of depression in young people: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(9), e206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rosenkrantz, D. E., Black, W. W., Abreu, R. L., Aleshire, M. E., & Fallin-Bennett, K. (2017). Health and health care of rural sexual and gender minorities: A systematic review. Stigma and Health, 2(3), 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rouse, M., & Pratt, M. K. (2017). ICT (information and communications technology, or technologies). TechTarget. http://bit.ly/2EWFZ7G. Retrieved 15 Dec 2017
  44. Scott, M. (2014) Understanding the basic categories of social media marketing. Ahrefsblog. http://bit.ly/2G8lFiZ. Retrieved 6 Sept 2017
  45. Shwartz, T. J., & Lonborg, S. D. (2011). Security management in telepsychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 42(6), 419–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Singer, J. B., & Sage, M. (2015). Technology and social work practice: Micro, mezzo, and macro applications. In K. Corcoran & A. R. Roberts (Eds.), Social workers’ desk reference (3rd ed.), pp. 176–188). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Singh, A. A. (2013). Transgender youth of color and resilience: Negotiating oppression and finding support. Sex Roles, 68(11–12), 690–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Statista (n.d.). Distribution of Reddit users in the United States as of February 2016, by gender. https://www.statista.com/statistics/517155/reddit-user-distribution-usa-gender/. Accessed 9 Feb 2018.
  49. Steadman, J., Boska, C., Lee, C., Lim, X. S., & Nichols, N. (2014). Using popular commercial video games in therapy with children and adolescents. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 32(3), 201–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wargo, J. (2017a). #donttagyourhate: Reading collecting and curating as genres of participation in LGBT youth activism on Tumblr. Digital Culture & Education, 9(1), 14–31.Google Scholar
  51. Wargo, J. (2017b). “Every selfie tells a story…”: LGBTQ youth lifestreams and new media narratives as connective identity texts. New Media & Society, 19(4), 560–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Social WorkThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  2. 2.Canada Research Chair in Sexual and Gender Minority YouthFactor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of TorontoTorontoUSA
  3. 3.Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of TorontoTorontoUSA

Personalised recommendations