Advertisement

Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal

, Volume 31, Issue 5, pp 475–493 | Cite as

Helping Youth Transition into an Alternative Residential School Setting: Exploring the Effects of a Wilderness Orientation Program on Youth Purpose and Identity Complexity

  • Christine Lynn NortonEmail author
  • Betsy L. Wisner
  • Matthew Krugh
  • Aleah Penn
Article

Abstract

This mixed-methods study examines the relationship between adolescent identity complexity (Clin Social Work J 21(1):11–24 1991) and youth purpose related to participation in a wilderness experience program at an alternative, residential boarding school in Colorado. Students in this study (N = 55) completed an adapted version of the Self-Worth Index (Ment Health Relig Cult 4(2):103–108 2001) before and after participation in a wilderness experience program. Youth in the study also completed a pre- and post-test eight-item index measuring identity complexity, with each item assessed on a five-point Likert scale. Likewise, qualitative, face-to-face interviews with each student were conducted to triangulate findings and further explore the impact of the wilderness program on identity complexity and youth purpose for youth labeled “high risk.” Data analysis revealed that the wilderness program contributed to students’ positive sense of identity and purpose in their lives, and helped them transition into the residential school culture successfully.

Keywords

Adolescence Wilderness orientation program Alternative school Youth purpose Identity complexity 

References

  1. Anderson, J. R. (2003). A foot in each world: The development of identity complexity in impinging environments. Praxis, 3, 45–51.Google Scholar
  2. Bettmann, J. E., Russell, K. C., & Parry, K. J. (2012). How substance abuse recovery skills, readiness to change and symptom reduction impact change processes in wilderness therapy participants. Journal of Child and Family Studies,. doi: 10.1007/s10826012-9665-2.Google Scholar
  3. Biglan, A., Ary, D., & Wagenaar, A. C. (2000). The value of interrupted time-series experiments for community intervention research. Prevention Science, 1(1), 31–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bronk, K. (2012). A grounded theory of the development of noble youth purpose. Journal of Adolescent Research, 27(1), 78–109. doi: 10.1177/0743558411412958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bronk, K., Holmes Finch, W. W., & Talib, T. L. (2010). Purpose in life among high ability adolescents. High Ability Studies, 21(2), 133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bundick, M. (2011). The benefits of reflecting on and discussing purpose in life in emerging adulthood. New directions for youth development, 2011(132), 89. doi: 10.1002/yd.430.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burrow, A. L., O’Dell, A. C., & Hill, P. L. (2010). Profiles of a developmental asset: Youth purpose as a context for hope and well-being. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(11), 1265–1273. doi: 10.1007/s10964-009-9481-1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Catalano, R. F., Berglund, M. L., Ryan, J. A., Lonczak, H. S., & Hawkins, J. D. (2004). Positive youth development in the United States: Research findings on evaluations of positive youth development programs. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591(1), 98–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In C. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Damon, W., Menon, J., & Bronk, K. C. (2003). The development of purpose during adolescence. Applied Developmental Science, 7(3), 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis, M., & Wallbridge, D. (2012). Boundary and space: An introduction to the work of DW Winnicott. London: Karnac Books.Google Scholar
  12. DeJong, J. A., & Hall, P. S. (2006). Best practices: A cross-site evaluation. The Journal of The National Center, 13(2), 177–210.Google Scholar
  13. Deutsch, H. (1944). The psychology of women. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  14. Eagle Rock School. (ERS). (2013). History. Retrieved on June, 14, 2013, from http://www.eaglerockschool.org/about_us/history.aspx.
  15. Francis, L. J., Gibson, H. M., & Robbins, M. (2001). God images and self-worth in adolescents in Scotland. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 4(2), 103–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garbarino, J. (1998). Raising children in a socially toxic environment. Child Care Information Exchange, 122, 8–12.Google Scholar
  17. Gass, M. A., Garvey, D. E., & Sugarman, D. A. (2003). The long-term effects of a first-year student wilderness orientation program. Journal of Experiential Education, 26(1), 34–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grunbaum, J. A., Lowry, R., & Kann, L. (2001). Prevalence of health-related behaviors among alternative high school students as compared with students attending regular high schools. Journal of Adolescent Health, 29(5), 337–343.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harper, N. J., & Russell, K. C. (2008). Family involvement and outcome in adolescent wilderness treatment: A mixed-methods evaluation. International Journal of Child and Family Welfare, 1, 19–36.Google Scholar
  20. Jones, J. J., & Hinton, J. (2007). Study of self-efficacy in a freshman wilderness experience program: Measuring general versus specific gains. Journal of Experiential Education, 29(3), 382–385.Google Scholar
  21. Kaplan, S., & Talbot, J. F. (1983). Psychological benefits of a wilderness experience. In Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 163–203). Springer US.Google Scholar
  22. Kasen, S., Cohen, P., & Brook, J. S. (1998). Adolescent school experiences and dropout, adolescent pregnancy, and young adult deviant behavior. Journal of Adolescent Research, 13(1), 49–72.Google Scholar
  23. Kleiner, B., Porch, R., & Farris, E. (2002). Public alternative schools and programs for students at risk of education failure: 2000–2001. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  24. Lerner, R. M., Almerigi, J. B., & Theokas, C. (2005). Positive youth development: A view of the issues. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(1), 10–16. doi: 10.1177/0272431604273211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mariano, J., & Savage, J. (2009). Exploring the language of youth purpose. Journal of Research in Character Education, 7(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
  26. Mead, G. H. (2009). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist (Vol. 1). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Miles, J. (1987). Wilderness as healing place. Journal of Experiential Education, 10(3), 4–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. National Association of Therapeutic Schools and Programs (NATSAP). (2013). Program definitions. Retrieved on June, 12, 2013, from http://natsap.org/natsap-members/natsap-programschools/natsap-program-definitions/.
  29. National Youth Network. (2013). Therapeutic boarding schools for troubled teens and residential treatment schools. Retrieved on June, 12, 2013, from http://www.nationalyouth.com/therapeuticboardingschool.html.
  30. Neill, J. (2008). Why use effect sizes instead of significance testing in program evaluation? Retrieved on June, 12, 2013, from http://www.wilderdom.com/research/effectsizes.html.
  31. Neild, R. C., & Balfanz, R. (2006). Unfulfilled promise: The dimensions and characteristics of philadelphia's dropout crisis, 2000–2005. Philadelphia Youth Network.Google Scholar
  32. Norton, C. L. (2010a). Into the wilderness—A case study: The psychodynamics of adolescent depression and the need for a holistic intervention. Clinical Social Work Journal, 38(2), 226–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Norton, C. L. (2010b). Exploring the process of wilderness therapy: Key therapeutic components in the treatment of adolescent depression and psychosocial development. Journal of Therapeutic Schools and Programs, 4, 24–46.Google Scholar
  34. Pang, L. S., & Foley, R. M. (2006). Alternative education programs: Program and student characteristics. The High School Journal, 89(3), 10–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pizzolato, J., Brown, E., & Kanny, M. (2011). Purpose plus: Supporting youth purpose, control, and academic achievement. New Directions for Youth Development, 2011(132), 75. doi: 10.1002/yd.429.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rumberger, R., & Lim, S. A. (2008). Why students drop out of school: A review of 25 years of research. Retrieved on January 2, 2014, from http://inpathways.net/researchreport15.pdf.
  37. Russell, K. C. (2001). What is wilderness therapy? Journal of Experiential Education, 24(2), 70–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Russell, K. (2003). An assessment of outcomes in outdoor behavioral healthcare treatment. Child & Youth Care Forum, 32(6), 355–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Russell, K. C. (2005). Two years later: A qualitative assessment of youth well-being and the role of aftercare in outdoor behavioral healthcare treatment. Child & Youth Care Forum, 34(3), 209–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Saari, C. (1991). Identity complexity as an indicator of health. Clinical Social Work Journal, 21(1), 11–24.Google Scholar
  41. Scales, P., Sesma, A., & Bolstrom, B. (2004). Coming into their own: How developmental assets promote positive growth in middle childhood. Minneapolis, MN: Search Institute.Google Scholar
  42. Thompson, B. (2000). A suggested revision to the forthcoming 5th edition of the APA publication manual. Retrieved on June, 12, 2013, from http://people.cehd.tamu.edu/~bthompson/apaeffec.htm.
  43. Weller, N. F., Tortolero, S. R., Kelder, S. H., Grunbaum, J. A., Carvajal, S. C., & Gingiss, P. M. (1999). Health risk behaviors of Texas students attending dropout prevention/recovery schools in 1997. Journal of school health, 69(1), 22–28.Google Scholar
  44. Winnicott, D. W. (1956). Primary maternal preoccupation (pp. 300–305). London: Tavistock.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christine Lynn Norton
    • 1
    Email author
  • Betsy L. Wisner
    • 1
  • Matthew Krugh
    • 1
  • Aleah Penn
    • 1
  1. 1.Texas State University-San Marcos School of Social WorkSan MarcosUSA

Personalised recommendations