Allen, T., DeVoogth, K., & Geen, R. (2008). Findings from the 2007 Casey Kinship Foster Care Policy Survey
. Washington, DC: Child Trends.Google Scholar
Anderson, S. G. (2006). The impact of state TANF policy decisions on kinship care providers. Child Welfare,
(4), 715–736.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Bartholet, E. (1999). Nobody’s children: Abuse and neglect foster drift and the adoption alternative
. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Beeman, S., & Boisen, L. (1999). Child welfare professionals’ attitudes toward kinship foster care. Child Welfare,
(3), 315–337.Google Scholar
Beeman, S. K., Kim, H., & Bullerdick, S. K. (2000). Factors affecting placement of children in kinship and non-kinship foster care. Children and Youth Services Review,
, 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beeman, S, Wattenberg, E., Boisen, L., & Bullerdick, S. (1996). Kinship foster care in Minnesota. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota School of Social Work, Center for Advanced Studies in Child Welfare.
Brooks, S. L. (2002). Kinship and adoption. Adoption Quarterly,
(3), 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey Family Programs. (2008). White paper: Kinship care
. Seattle, WA: Author.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, P., Price, J., Reid, J., Landsverk, J., Fisher, P., & Stoolmiller, M. (2006). Who disrupts from placement in foster and kinship care? Child Abuse and Neglect,
, 409–424.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childstats.gov. (2009). America’s children: Key national indicators of well
Retrieved online November 4, 2009, from http://www.childstats.gov/americaschildren/famsoc1.asp
Chipungu, S., Everett, J., Verduik, M., & Jones, J. (1998). Children placed in foster care with relatives: A multi-state study. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Children, Youth and Families.
Cohen, A. (1991). Dummy variables in stepwise regression. The American Statistician,
, 226–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, L. (2004). How do we choose among permanency options? The adoption rule out and lessons from Illinois. In M. Bissell & J. L. Miller (Eds.), Using subsidized guardianship to improve outcomes for children: Key questions to consider
(pp. 19–22). Washington, DC: Cornerstone consulting and children’s defense fund. Available at www.childrensdefense.org/childwelfare/kinshipcare/default.asp
Cox, C. B. (2002). Empowering African American custodial grandparents. Social Work,
(1), 45–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Davis, I., Landsverk, J., Newton, R., & Ganger, W. (1996). Parental visiting and foster care reunification. Children and Youth Services Review,
(4–5), 363–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method
. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2008). Internet, mail and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method
(3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Ehrle, J., Geen, R., & Clark, R. (2001). Children cared for by relatives: Who are they and how are they faring? New federalism: National survey of America’s families. (series no. B-28). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
Geen, R. (2003). Finding permanency homes for foster children: Issues raised by kinship care. New federalism: National survey of America’s families. (series no. A-60). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
Generations United. (2006). All children deserve a permanent home: Subsidized guardianship as a common sense solution for children in long-term relative foster care. Washington, DC: Author.
Generations United. (2007). Time for reform: Support relatives in providing foster care and permanent families for children. Washington, DC: Author.
George, R. M., & Mackey-Bilaver, L. (2003). The effect of race on reunification from substitute care in Illinois. Unpublished manuscript. Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago.
Hairston, C. F. (1999). Kinship care when parents are incarcerated. In J. P. Gleeson & C. F. Hairston (Eds.), Kinship care: Improving practice through research
(pp. 189–214). Washington, DC: CWLA Press.Google Scholar
Hairston, C. F. (2009). Kinship care when parents are incarcerated: What we know what we can do
. Baltimore, MD: Annie E. Casey Foundation.Google Scholar
Hanlon, T. E., Carswell, S. B., & Rose, M. (2007). Research on the caretaking of children of incarcerated parents: Findings and their service delivery implications. Children and Youth Services Review,
(3), 362–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, M. S., & Courtney, M. E. (2003). The interaction of race, ethnicity and family structure with respect to timing of family reunification. Children and Youth Services Review,
(5–6), 409–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (1990). Applied logistic regression
. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kay, R., & Little, S. (1987). Transformation of the explanatory variables in the logistic regression model for binary data. Biometrika,
(3), 495–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, S. J., Yorker, B. C., Whitley, D. M., & Sipe, T. A. (2001). A multimodal intervention for grandparents raising grandchildren: Results of an exploratory study. Child Welfare,
(1), 27–49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Koh, E., & Testa, M. F. (2008). Propensity score matching of children in kinship and nonkinship foster care: Do permanency outcomes still differ? Social Work Research,
(2), 105–116.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, V. H., Myers, B. J., & Kennon, S. S. (2006). Children of incarcerated mothers and their caregivers: Factors affecting the quality of their relationship. Journal of Child and Family Studies,
(5), 581–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Main, R., Macomber, J. E., & Geen, R. (2006). Trends in service receipt: Children in kinship care gaining ground. New federalism: National survey of America’s families (series no. B-68). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
Murray, J., Macomber, J. E., & Geen, R. (2004). Estimating financial support for kinship caregivers. New federalism: National survey of America’s families. (series no. B- 63). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
National. Resource. Center for Family-Centered Practice, Permanency Planning. (2009). Tools for permanency: Tool #4–Kinship care
. New York, NY: Hunter College School of Social Work.Google Scholar
O’Brien, P., Massat, C. R., & Gleeson, J. P. (2001). Upping the ante: Relative caregivers’ perceptions of changes in child welfare policies. Child Welfare,
(6), 719–748.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in quantitative methods
. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Parke, R., & Clarke-Stewart, K. A. (2002). Effects of parental incarceration on young children. Paper presented at the From Prison to Home Conference, January 30–31, 2002. Washington, DC.
Shtatland, E. S., Cain, E. M., & Barton, M. B. (2001). The perils of stepwise logistic regression and how to escape them using information criteria and the output delivery system. Proceedings of the 26th Annual SAS Users Group International Conference.
Shtatland, E. S., Kleinman, K., & Cain, E. M. (2004). A new strategy of model building in proc logistic with automatic variable selection, validation, shrinkage and model averaging. Proceedings of the 29th Annual SAS Users Group International Conference.
Snyder, P., & Lawson, S. (1993). Evaluating results using corrected and uncorrected effect size estimates. Journal of Experimental Education,
, 334–349.Google Scholar
Terling-Watt, T. (2001). Permanency in kinship care: An exploration of disruption rates and factors associated with placement disruption. Children and Youth Services Review,
(2), 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Testa, M. F. (2001). Kinship care and permanency. Journal of Social Service Research,
(1), 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Testa, M. F. (2004). When children cannot return home: Adoption and guardianship. The Future of Children,
(1), 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Testa, M. F. (2004–2005). The quality of permanence: Lasting or binding? Subsidized guardianship and kinship foster care as alternatives to adoption. Virginia Journal of Social Policy and Law, 12
(3), 499–534.Google Scholar
Testa, M. F, Bruhn, C., & Helton. J. (2007). Comparative safety, stability, and continuity of children’s placements in formal and informal substitute care. Paper presented at the NSCAW Data Users’ Workshop, January 25–26, 2007. Washington, DC.
Testa, M. F., Shook, K. L., Cohen, L. S., & Woods, M. G. (1996). Permanency planning options for children in formal kinship care. Child Welfare,
(5), 451–470.Google Scholar
Thompson, B. (1995). Stepwise regression and stepwise discriminant analysis need not apply here: A guidelines editorial. Educational and Psychological Measurement,
, 525–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Department of Commerce. (2008). Bureau of the Census, and United States Department of Labor. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Current Population Survey: Annual Social and Economic (ASEC) Supplement Survey, 2007
[Computer File]. ICPSR21321-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2008-07-29. doi:10.3886/ICPSR21321
Wells, K., & Guo, S. (1999). Reunification and reentry of foster children. Children and Youth Services Review,
(4), 273–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wulczyn, F. (2003). Closing the gap: Are changing exit patterns reducing the time African American children spend in foster care relative to Caucasian children. Children and Youth Services Review,
(5–6), 431–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, E., Daykin, D., Moore, V., Wuu, C., & Li, J. (1998). Kinship and non-kinship foster care in New York City: Pathways and outcomes. Report the City of New York human resources administration and administration for children’s services by the United Way of New York City.
Zinn, A. (2009). Foster family characteristics, kinship, and permanence. Social Service Review,
(2), 185–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar