Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 63–77 | Cite as

Adolescent Weblog Use: Risky or Protective?

  • Dawn Anderson-Butcher
  • Amber Lasseigne
  • Annahita Ball
  • Michelle Brzozowski
  • Megan Lehnert
  • Brandy L. McCormick


Weblogs, or personal websites updated in time-based fashions, are common media used for expressing thoughts and networking socially online (Lenhart et al. in Teens and social media, Pew Internet and American Life Project, Washington, DC, 2007). This qualitative study describes the content of 100 adolescent weblog users’ communications through a risk and resilience framework. These users primarily utilized weblogs for community building, as most of their postings involved communications designed to foster and nurture relationships with peers via the weblog. The majority of the content posted involved the discussion of common prosocial behaviors, such as doing homework, hanging out with friends, or planning for events such as dances. A surprisingly small amount of weblog content included text about risk factors and related problem behaviors. Findings are described in relation to adolescent use of the Internet. Specific implications are drawn for social workers and other professionals involved in youth work.


Adolescents Weblogs Internet use Risk and resilience Youth development 


  1. Anderson-Butcher, D. (2006). The role of the educator in early identification, referral and linkage. In R. J. Waller (Ed.), Child and adolescent mental health issues in the classroom (pp. 122–135). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson-Butcher, D., Newsome, W., & Ferrari, T. (2003). Participation in boys and girls clubs and relationships to youth outcomes. Journal of Community Psychology, 31(1), 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beebe, T. J., Asche, S. E., Harrison, P. A., & Quinlan, K. B. (2004). Heightened vulnerability and increased risk-taking among adolescent chat room users: Results from a statewide school survey. Journal of Adolescent Health, 35, 116–123.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Fraser, M. W. (2004). Risk and resilience in childhood: An ecological perspective. Washington, DC: NASW Press.Google Scholar
  5. Fraser, M. W., Richman, J. M., & Galinsky, M. J. (1999). Risk, protection, and resilience: Toward a conceptual framework for social work practice. Social Work Research, 23, 1999.Google Scholar
  6. Friedman, A. S., & Utada, A. (1989). A method for diagnosing and planning the treatment of adolescent drug abusers (the Adolescent Drug Abuse Diagnosis (ADAD) Instrument). Journal of Drug Education, 19(4), 285–312.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gross, E. F. (2004). Adolescent internet use: What we expect, what teens report. Applied Developmental Psychology, 25, 633–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gross, E. F., Juvonen, J., & Gable, S. L. (2002). Internet use and well-being in adolescence. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guerra, N. G., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2008). Linking the prevention of problem behaviors and positive youth development: Core competencies for positive youth development and risk prevention. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 122, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hanlon, J. (2001). Disembodied intimacies: Identity and relationship on the internet. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 18(3), 566–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescent and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 64–105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hepworth, D. H., Rooney, R. H., Rooney, G. D., Strom-Gottfried, K., & Larson, A. (2005). Direct social work practice: Theory and skills. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  13. Jensen, J., & Fraser, M. (2006). Social policy for children and families: A risk and resilience perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Juvonen, J., & Gross, E. F. (2008). Extending the school grounds?—Bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health, 78(9), 496–505.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kanani, K., & Regeher, C. (2003). Clinical, ethical, and legal issues in e-therapy. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 84(2), 155–162.Google Scholar
  16. Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kraut, R., Mukhopadhyay, T., Szczypula, J., Kiesler, S., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Communication and information: Alternative uses of the internet in households. In Proceedings of the CHI 98 (pp. 368–383). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  18. Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998b). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53, 1017–1031.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kumar, R., Novak, J., Raghavan, P., & Tomkins, A. (2004). Structure and evolution of blogspace. Communications of the Association for Computer Machinery, 47(12), 35–39.Google Scholar
  20. La Ferle, C. (2000). Teens’ use of traditional media and the internet. Journal of Advertising Research, 40, 55–65.Google Scholar
  21. Larson, R. W. (2001). How US children and adolescents spend time: What it does (and doesn’t) tell us about their development. Psychological Science, 10(5), 160–164.Google Scholar
  22. Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Macgill, A. R., & Smith, A. (2007). Teens and social media. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.Google Scholar
  23. Lenhart, A., Rainie, L., & Lewis, O. (2001). Teenage life online: The rise of the instant-message generation and the internet’s impact on friendships and family relationships. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.Google Scholar
  24. Maczewski, M. (2002). Exploring identities through the internet: Youth experiences online. Child & Youth Care Forum, 31(2), 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (2000). Plan 9 from cyerspace: The implications of the internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McKenna, K. Y., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. E. (2002). Relationship formation on the internet: What’s the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Merchant, G. (2001). Teenagers in cyberspace: An investigation of language use and language change in internet chatrooms. Journal of Research in Reading, 24(3), 293–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nardi, B. A., Schiano, D. J., Gumbrecht, M., & Swartz, L. (2004). Why we blog. Communications of the Association for Computer Machinery, 47(12), 41–47.Google Scholar
  29. Nygreen, K., Kwon, S. A., & Sanchez, P. (2006). Urban youth building community: Social change and participatory research in schools, homes, and community-based organizations. Journal of Community Practice, 14(1/2), 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oravec, J. A. (2002). Bookmarking the world: Weblog applications in education. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45(7), 616–621.Google Scholar
  31. Oravec, J. A. (2003). Blending by blogging: Weblogs in blended learning initiatives. Journal of Educational Media, 23(2/3), 225–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peter, J., Valkenburg, P. M., & Schouten, A. P. (2005). Developing a model of adolescent friendship formation on the internet. Cyberpsychology and behavior, 8(5), 423–430.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  34. Sanders, C. E., Field, T. M., Diego, M., & Kaplan, M. (2000). The relationships of internet use to depression and social isolation among adolescents. Adolescence, 35(138), 237–242.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Schmitt, K. L., Dayanim, S., & Matthias, S. (2008). Personal homepage construction as an expression of social development. Developmental Psychology, 44(2), 496–506.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Search Institute. (2004). 40 developmental assets for adolescents (ages 12–18). Retrieved July 7, 2008, from
  37. Subrahmanyam, K., & Greenfield, P. (2008). Online communication and adolescent relationships. Future of Children, 18(1), 119–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Subrahmanyam, K., Greenfield, P., Kraut, R., & Gross, E. (2001). The impact of computer use on children’s and adolescents’ development. Applied Developmental Psychology, 22, 7–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Subrahmanyam, K., Reich, S. M., Waechter, N., & Espinoza, G. (2008). Online and offline social networks: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 420–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Turkle, S. (1996). Virtuality and its discontents: Searching for community in cyberspace. The American Prospect, 24, 50–57.Google Scholar
  41. Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2009). The effects of instant messaging on the quality of adolescents’ existing friendships: A longitudinal study. Journal of Communication, 59, 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wolak, J., Mitchell, K. J., & Finkelhor, D. (2003). Escaping or connecting? Characteristics of youth who form close online relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 26, 105–119.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Wolfradt, W., & Doll, J. (2001). Motives of adolescents to use the Internet as a function of personality traits, personal and social factors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24(1), 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dawn Anderson-Butcher
    • 1
  • Amber Lasseigne
    • 2
  • Annahita Ball
    • 1
  • Michelle Brzozowski
    • 1
  • Megan Lehnert
    • 1
  • Brandy L. McCormick
    • 3
  1. 1.College of Social WorkThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  2. 2.Fort Worth School DistrictFort WorthUSA
  3. 3.University of IndianapolisIndianapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations