Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal

, Volume 24, Issue 6, pp 579–589

Sexual Abuse in the Preschool Years: Blending Ideas from Object Relations Theory, Ego Psychology, and Biology

Article

Abstract

This paper uses concepts from relational psychodynamic theories and findings from neurobiology to conceptualize a young child’s experience of sexual abuse. Selected developmental tasks are discussed using an integrated theoretical framework. Literature which highlights the importance of the child’s environment is reviewed. A case of a sexually abused 5-year-old girl demonstrates consequences of sexual abuse using ideas from psychodynamic theories and neurobiology. It is recommended that social work practitioners expand on the biology domain when conducting a bio-psycho-social assessment. Social work students may benefit from additional content on biology in social work curricula.

Keywords

Child sexual abuse Preschoolers Development 

References

  1. Adams-Tucker, C. (1982). Proximate effects of sexual abuse in childhood: A report on 28 children. American Journal of Psychiatry, 139(10), 1252–1256.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Applegate, J., & Shapiro, J. (2005). Neurobiology for clinical social work. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  3. Bowlby, J. (1988). Developmental psychiatry comes of age. American Journal of Psychiatry, 145(1), 1–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Campis, L. B., Hebdon-Curtis, J., Demaso, D. (1999). Developmental differences in detection and disclosure of sexual abuse. Journal of American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 5(32), 920–924.Google Scholar
  5. Corwin, D. (1988). Early diagnosis of child sexual abuse. In G. Wyatt & G. Powell (Eds.), Lasting effects of child sexual abuse (pp. 251–270). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Elbow, M., & Mayfield, J. (1991). Mothers of incest victims: Villains, victims, or protectors? Families in Society, 72, 78–85.Google Scholar
  7. Everson, M., & Boat, B. (1990). Sexualized doll play among young children: Implications for the use of anatomical dolls in sexual abuse evaluations. Journal of American Academy Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 29(5), 736–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Faller, K. (2005). Anatomical dolls: Their use in assessment of children who may have been sexually abused. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 14(3), 1–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferrara, F. (2002). Childhood sexual abuse. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  10. Finkelhor, D., & Browne, A. (1985). The traumatic impact of child sexual abuse: A conceptualization. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 55(4), 530–540.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Freud, A. (1965). Normality & pathology in childhood: Assessments of development. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  12. Freud, A. (1966). The ego and mechanisms of defense. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hartman, H. (1958). Ego psychology and the problem of adaptation. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  14. Henry, J., Sloane, M., & Black-Pond, C. (2007). Neurobiology and neurodevelopmental impact of childhood traumatic stress and prenatal alcohol exposure. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 38, 99–108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Herman, J. (1982) Trauma and recovery. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  16. James, B. (1994). Handbook for treatment of attachment-trauma problems in children. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kilgore, L. (1988). Effects of early childhood sexual abuse on self and ego development. Social Casework, 69(4), 224–230.Google Scholar
  18. Lister, E. (1982). Forced silence: A neglected dimension of trauma. American Journal of Psychiatry, 139(7), 872–876.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lovett, B. (1995). Child sexual abuse: The female victim’s relationship with her non-offending mother. Child Abuse & Neglect, 19(60), 729–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lusk, R., & Waterman, J. (1986). Effects of sexual abuse on children. In K. MacFarlane & J. Waterman (Eds.), Sexual abuse of young children (pp. 101–120). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  21. Martin, H. (1980). The consequences of being abused and neglected: How the child fares. In C. H. Kempe & R. Helfer (Eds.), The battered child (pp. 347–366). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Mian, M., Wehrspann, W., Klajner-Diamond, H., LeBaron, D., & Winder, C. (1986). Review of 125 children 6 years of age and under who were sexually abused. Child Abuse & Neglect, 10, 223–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Miller, A. (1981). The drama of the gifted child. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  24. Montgomery, A. (2002). Converging perspectives of dynamic theory and evolving neurobiological knowledge. Smith Studies in Social Work, 72(2), 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Paolucci, E., Genuis, M., & Violato, C. (2001). A meta-analysis of the published research on the effects of child sexual abuse. The Journal of Psychology, 135(1), 17–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Perry, B. (1997). Incubated in terror: Neurodevelopmental factors in the “Cycle of Violence”. In J. Osofsky (Ed.), Children in a violent society (pp. 124–149). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  27. Sattler, J. M. (1998). Clinical and forensic interviewing of children and families. San Diego: Jerome M. Sattler Press.Google Scholar
  28. Saywitz, K., Mannarino, A., Berliner, L., & Cohen, J. (2000). Treatment for sexually abused children and adolescents. American Psychologist, 55(9), 1040–1049.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shamroy, J. (1987). Interviewing the sexually abused child with anatomically correct dolls. Social Work, 32(2), 165–166.Google Scholar
  30. Solomon, J., & George, C. (Eds.). (1999). Attachment disorganization. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  31. Sorensen, T., & Snow, B. (1991). How children tell: The process of disclosure in child sexual abuse. Child Welfare, 1(70), 3–16.Google Scholar
  32. Steinmetz, M. (1995). Interviewing children: Balancing forensic and therapeutic techniques. National Resource Center On Child Sexual Abuse of the National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect, 4(3), 1, 4.Google Scholar
  33. Stovall, G., & Craig, R. (1990). Mental representations of physically and sexually abused latency-aged females. Child Abuse & Neglect, 14, 233–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Summit, R. (1983). The child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome. Child Abuse & Neglect, 7, 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Snyder, H. (2000). Sexual assault of young children as reported to law enforcement: Victim, incident, and offender characteristics. The National Center for Juvenile Justice.Google Scholar
  36. Waldinger, R., Toth, S., & Gerber, A. (2001). Maltreatment and internal representations of relationships: Core relationship themes in the narratives of abused and neglected preschoolers. Social Development, 1(10), 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Winer, R. (1989). The role of the transitional experience in development in healthy and incestuous families. In J. Scharff (Ed.), Foundations of object relations family therapy (pp. 357–384). Northvale: Jason Aronson, Inc.Google Scholar
  38. Winnicott, D. (1965). The maturational process and the facilitating environment. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  39. Winnicott, D. (1986). Transitional objects & transitional phenomena. In P. Buckley (Ed.), Essential papers on object relations. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Zeanah, C., Scheeringa, M., Boris, N., Heller, S., Smyke, A., & Trapani, J. (2004). Reactive attachment disorder in maltreated toddlers. Child Abuse & Neglect, 8(28), 877–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Social Work DepartmentBridgewater State CollegeBridgewaterUSA

Personalised recommendations