Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 261–283

Race–gender Differences in Risk and Protective Factors among Youth in Residential Group Homes

  • Robert W. Strack
  • Karyn Kai Anderson
  • Camelia M. Graham
  • Naomi Tomoyasu
Article

Abstract

Analysis reported here examined youth in residential group home placements in order to better understand how sexual behaviors, drug use, and environmental experiences differ by race and gender subgroups. Data were collected from 336 youth aged 14–21 residing in one of 41 group homes in Maryland. Chi square and logistic regression analyses were done to determine differences on study variables among the race-gender groupings. Results demonstrate not only significant health concerns overall but notable differences were also found between race-gender subgroups. Findings suggest that found race-gender subgroup differences might be informative for tailoring programming for youth of residential group home settings.

Keywords

Adolescents Foster Care Homeless Youth Group Homes Sexual Behaviors 

References

  1. Berrick, J. D., Courtney, M., & Barth, R. P. (1993). Speciallized foster care and group home care: similarities and differences in the characteristics of children in care. Children and Youth Services Review, 15, 453–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Breland-Noble, A. M., Farmer, M. Z., Dubs, M. S., Potter, E., & Burns, B. J. (2005). Mental health and other service use by youth in therapeutic foster care and group homes. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 14(2), 167–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brener, N. D., Kann, L., McManus, T., Kinchen, S. A., Sundberg, E. C., & Ross, J. G. (2002). Reliability of the 1999 youth risk behavior survey questionnaire. Journal of Adolescence, 31(4), 336–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Child Welfare League of America. (2004). CWLA Standards of Excellence for Residential Services. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Committee on Ways and Means of the U.S. House of Representatives. (2004). The Green Book, 108-6, Section 11- Child Protection, Foster Care, and Adoption Assistance. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing OfficeGoogle Scholar
  6. Courtney, M. E., & Barth, R. P. (1996). Pathways of older adolescents out of foster care: Implications for independent living services. Social Work, 41(1), 75–83PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Elze, D. E., Auslander W., McMillen C., Edmond T., & Thompson, R. (2001). Untangling the impact of sexual abuse on HIV risk behaviors among youth in foster care. AIDS Education and Prevention, 13(4), 377–389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ensign, J. (2001). The health of shelter-based foster youth. Public Health Nursing, 18(1), 19–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ensign, J., & Gittelsohn, J. (1998). Health and access to care: perspectives of homeless youth in Baltimore City, U.S.A. Social Science Medicine, 47(12), 2087–2099PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ensign, J., & Santelli, J. (1998). Health status and service use. Comparison of adolescents at a school-based health clinic with homeless adolescents. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine, 152(1), 20–24Google Scholar
  11. Handwerk, M. L., Larzelere R. E., Friman P. C., & Mitchell, A. M. (1998). The relationship between lethality of attempted suicide and prior suicidal communications in a sample of residential youth. Journal of Adolescence, 21(4), 407–414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li, C., Johnson P., & Leopard, K. (2001). Risk factors for depression among adolescents living in group homes in South Carolina. Journal of Health and Social Policy, 13(2), 41–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McMillen, J. C., & Tucker, J. (1999). The status of older adolescents at exit from out-of-home care. Child Welfare, 78(3), 339–360PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Moore, J. M. (1995). The journey toward independence: Transitional services for adolescents. In E. Mech & J. Rycroft (Eds.), Preparing foster youth for adult living (pp. 155–157). Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of AmericaGoogle Scholar
  15. Pumariega, A. J., Johnson, N. P., & Sheridan, D. (1995). Emotional disturbance and substance abuse in youth placed in residential group homes. Journal of Mental Health Administration, 22(4), 426–432PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rew, L., Taylor-Seehafer, M., & Fitzgerald, M. L. (2001). Sexual abuse, alcohol and other drug use, and suicidal behaviors in homeless adolescents. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 24(4), 225–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ringwalt, C. L., Greene, J. M., Robertson, M., & McPheeters, M. (1998). The prevalence of homelessness among adolescents in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 88(9), 1325–1329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rotheram-Borus, M. J., Mahler, K. A., Koopman, C., & Langabeer, K. (1996). Sexual abuse history and associated multiple risk behavior in adolescent runaways. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 66(3), 390–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rotheram-Borus, M. J., Parra, M., Cantwell, C., Gwadz, M., & Murphy, D. A. (1996). Runaway and homeless youth. In R. J. Diclemente, W. B. Hansen & L. E. Ponton (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent health risk behavior. New York, NY: Plenum PressGoogle Scholar
  20. Slesnick, N., & Meade, M. (2001). System youth: A subgroup of substance-abusing homeless adolescents. Journal of Substance Abuse, 13, 367–384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Slonim-Nevo, V., Ozawa, M., & Auslander, W. (1991). Knowledge, attitudes and behaviors related to AIDS among youth in residential centers: results from an exploratory study. Journal of Adolescence, 14, 17–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, C. s. B. (1997). National study of protective, preventive and reunification services delivered to children and their families. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing OfficeGoogle Scholar
  23. US General Accounting Office (1995) Health, Education, and Human Services Division. In Foster care overview: Complex needs strain capacity to provide services (No. GAO/HEHS-95-208). Washington, DC: US General Accounting Office, Health, Education, and Human Services DivisionGoogle Scholar
  24. US General Accounting Office (2002) Health, Education, and Human Services Division. Foster Care: Recent legislation helps states focus on finding permanent homes for children but long-standing barriers remain (No. GAO-02-585). Washington, DC: US General Accounting OfficeGoogle Scholar
  25. Whittaker, J. K. (2000). The future of residential group care. Child Welfare, 79(1), 59–74PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert W. Strack
    • 1
  • Karyn Kai Anderson
    • 2
  • Camelia M. Graham
    • 3
  • Naomi Tomoyasu
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Public Health EducationUniversity of North Carolina GreensboroGreensboroUSA
  2. 2.Division of State Program Research, Research and Evaluation Group, Office of Research, Development and InformationCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.Department of Health and Mental HygieneCenter for Surveillance and Epidemiology, Maryland AIDS AdministrationBaltimoreUSA
  4. 4.Department of Health and Mental HygieneMaryland AIDS AdministrationBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations