Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 165–181

Child Abuse Investigations: Reasons for using Child Advocacy Centers and Suggestions for Improvement

  • Bernie Sue Newman
  • Paul L. Dannenfelser
  • Derek Pendleton
Article

Abstract

Child protective service (CPS) and child abuse law enforcement (LE) investigators have been required by the majority of states to work together when investigating criminal cases of child abuse. Child Advocacy Centers (CACs) and other. multidisciplinary models of collaboration have developed across the United States to meet these requirements. This study surveyed 290 CPS and LE investigators who use a CAC in their investigations of criminal cases of child abuse. Reasons given for using, centers, include legal or administrative mandate and protocol, child appropriate environment, support, referrals, capacity for medical exams, expertise of center interviewers and access to video and audio technology. Respondents also identified ways that centers could be more helpful.

Keywords

Child abuse investigations Collaboration Child sexual abuse 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beatrice, D. F. 1990Inter-agency coordination: A practitioner’s guide to a strategy for effective social policyAdministration in Social Work144559Google Scholar
  2. Faller, K. C., Henry, J. 2000Child sexual abuse: A case study community collaborationChild Abuse and Neglect2412151225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hochstadt, N. J., Harwicke, N. J. 1985How effective is the multidisciplinary approach? A follow-up studyChild Abuse and Neglect2412151225Google Scholar
  4. Jenson, J. M., Jacobson, M., Unrau, Y., Robinson, R. L. 1996Intervention for victims of child sexual abuse: An evaluation of the children’s advocacy modelChild and Adolescent Social Work Journal13139156Google Scholar
  5. Kolbo, J. R., Strong, E. 1997Multi-disciplinary team approaches to the investigation and resolution of child abuse and neglect: A national surveyChild Maltreatment26172Google Scholar
  6. Moran-Ellis, J., Fielding, N. 1996A national survey of the investigation of child sexual abuseBritish Journal of Social Work26337356Google Scholar
  7. National Children’s Alliance (2003). National Children’s Alliance. Standards for full member programs. Available at http://www.nca-online.org/network.html. Retrieved March 10, 2003Google Scholar
  8. Royse, D., Dhooper., S. S., Rompf, E. L. 2003Field instruction: .A guide for social work studentsAllyn and BaconBoston, MAGoogle Scholar
  9. Sheppard, D. I., & Zangrillo, P. A. (1996). Coordinating investigations of child abuse. Public Welfare, Winter, 21–32Google Scholar
  10. U.S. Dept of Justice2000Forming a multidisciplinary team to investigate child abuseUS Department of JusticeWashington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernie Sue Newman
    • 1
  • Paul L. Dannenfelser
    • 2
  • Derek Pendleton
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Social AdminstrationTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaU.S.A.
  2. 2.Tempel UniversityU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations