Cardiovascular Engineering

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 187–193 | Cite as

A Dual Mechanism of Biomechanical Change in Rat Cervix in Gestation and Postpartum: Applied Vascular Mechanics

  • G. Drzewiecki
  • C. Tozzi
  • S. Y. Yu
  • P. C. Leppert
Article

Abstract

Biomechanical studies were designed to determine the dynamic progression of the uterine cervix of pregnant rats at various stages of gestation and to determine its functions in retaining the fetus while at the same time undergoing characteristic softening to allow for dilatation at parturition. Whole cervices from Sprague-Dawley rats at 10, 15, and 21 days gestation and at 3 days postpartum were subjected to detailed biomechanical studies. Tension–length change, tension–diameter, pressure–area, stress–diameter, and stress–strain curves were calculated using analytical methods adopted from vascular mechanics. The circular diameter of the tissue was greatly increased as pregnancy advanced. Cervix volume increased, while tissue wall stress and cervix pressure were both maintained in a constant range throughout pregnancy. The compliance increased until term. The rat cervix undergoes two mechanical changes, a change in mechanical properties and a increase in volume, that allow it to maintain its two physiological functions of: (a) softening in preparation for delivery, and (b) at the same time remaining undilated in order to maintain fetuses in utero.

Keywords

uterine cervix pregnancy cervical softening and remodeling rats extracellular matrix pregnancy biomechanics vascular mechanics 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aggele J, Frisch SM, and Werb Z. Changes in cell shape correlate with collagenase gene express in rabbit synovial fibroblasts. J Cell Biol 98: 1662–1671, 1984.Google Scholar
  2. Csapo A, Erdos T, DeMaltos ER, Gremos E, and Moscowitz C. Stretch-induced uterine growth, protein synthesis and function. Nature 207: 1378–1379, 1965.Google Scholar
  3. Danforth DN, Veis A, Breen M, Weinstein HG, Buckingham JC, and Manalo P. The effect of pregnancy and labor on the human cervix: changes in collagen, glycoproteins, and glycosaminoglycans. Am J Obstet Gynecol 120: 641–651, 1974.Google Scholar
  4. Drzewiecki G, Field S, Moubarak I, and Li JK-J. Vascular growth and collapsible pressure-area relationship. Am J Physiol 273: H2030–H2043, 1997.Google Scholar
  5. Goslin JM, and Rosenbloom J. Elastin. In Piez KA, and Reddi AH, Eds, Extracellular Matrix Biochemistry, New York: Elsevier, 1984.Google Scholar
  6. Grodzinsky AJ, Levenston ME, Jin M, and Frank EH. Cartilage tissue remodeling in response to mechanical forces. Ann Rev Biomed Eng 2: 691–713, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hollingsworth M, Isherwood CNM, and Foster RW. The effects of estradiol benzoate, progesterone, relaxin and ovariectomy on cervical extensibility in the late pregnant rat. J Reprod Fertil 56: 471–477, 1979.Google Scholar
  8. Hunter CJ, Imler SM, Malaviya P, Nerem RM, and Levenston ME. Mechanical compression alters gene expression and extracellular matrix synthesis by chondrocytes in collagen I gels. Biomaterials 23: 1249–1259, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ito A, Kitamura K, Mori Y, and Hirakawa S. The change in solubility of type I collagen in human uterine cervix in pregnancy at term. Biochem Med 21: 262–270, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kerr JS, Ruppert CL, Tozzi CA, et al. Reduction of chronic hypoxic pulmonary hypertension in the rat by an inhibitor of collagen production. Am Rev Respir Dis 135: 300–306, 1987.Google Scholar
  11. Kleissl HP, Van Der Rest M, Naftolin F, Glorieux FH, and de Leon A. Collagen changes in the human cervix at parturition. Am J Obstet Gynecol 130: 748–753, 1978.Google Scholar
  12. Kokenyesi R, and Woessner JF, Jr. Relationship between dilatation of the rat uterine cervix and a small dermatan sulfate proteoglycan. Biol Reprod 42: 87–97, 1994.Google Scholar
  13. Kokeynesi R, and Woessner JF, Jr. Purification and characterization of a small dermatan sulphate proteoglycan implicated in the dilatation of the rat uteri cervix. Biochem J 260: 423–419, 1989.Google Scholar
  14. Kovach IS. A molecular theory of cartilage viscoelasticity. Biophys Chem 59: 61–73, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leppert PC, and Yu SY. Remodeling collagen structure in cervical ripening. J Soc Gynecol Investing 408, 1994.Google Scholar
  16. Leppert PC. Uterine cervical elastin in normal and abnormal mammalian gestation and parturition [Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University]. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University Microfilm, 1986.Google Scholar
  17. Leppert PC, Kokenyesi R, Klemenich CA, and Fisher J. Further evidence for a decorin-collagen interaction in the disruption of cervical collagen fibers during rat gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182: 372–378, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Manabe Y, and Yoshida Y. Collagenolysis in human vaginal tissue during pregnancy and delivery: A light and electron microscopic study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 155: 1060–1066, 1986.Google Scholar
  19. Owiny JR, Fitzpatrick RJ, and Spiller DG. Changes in the extensibility of the ovine cervix uteri following infusion of extradiol-17β at term. Small Ruminant Res 7: 75–83, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Petersen LK, Uldbjerg N, Oxlund H, and Forman A. Active and passive biomechanical properties of uterine cervical samples from nonpregnant women. In Leppert PC, and Woessner JF, Jr., Eds, The Extracellular Matrix of the Uterus, Cervix and Fetal Membranes: Synthesis, Degradation, and Hormonal Regulation. Ithaca, New York: Perinatology Press, 1991, pp. 97–107.Google Scholar
  21. Poiani GJ, Tozzi CA, Yohn SE, and Pierce RA. Collagen and elastin metabolism in hypertensive pulmonary uterus of rat. Circ Res 66: 968–978, 1990.Google Scholar
  22. Sandberg LB, Soskel NT, and Leslie JG. Elastin structure, biosynthesis and relation to disease states. N Engl J Med 304: 566–577, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tozzi CA, Wilson FJ, Yu SY, Barnett RF, Ping BW, and Riley DJ. Vascular connective tissue is rapidly degraded in early regression of pulmonary hypertension. Chest 99: 415–425, 1991.Google Scholar
  24. Uldbjerg N, Ekman G, Malmström A, Olsson K, and Ulmsten U. Ripening of the human uterine cervix related to changes in collagen, glycosaminoglycans, and collagenolytic activity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 147: 662–666, 1983.Google Scholar
  25. Vandenburgh HH. Mechanical forces and their second messengers in stimulating cell growth in vitro. Am J Physiol 262: R350–R355, 1992.Google Scholar
  26. Wang N, Butler JP, and Ingber DE. Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton. Science 260: 1124–1127, 1993.Google Scholar
  27. William LM, Hollingsworth M, and Dixon JS. Changes in the tensile properties and fine structure of the rat cervix in late pregnancy and during parturition. J Reprod Fertil 66: 203–211, 1982.Google Scholar
  28. Woessner JF, Jr. Relationship between dilatation of the rat uterine cervix and a small dermatan sulfate proteoglycan. In Leppert PC, and Woessner JF, Jr, Eds, The Extracellular Matrix of the Uterus, Cervix and Fetal Membranes: Synthesis, Degradation, and Hormonal Regulation. Ithaca, New York: Perinatology Press, 1991, pp. 97–107.Google Scholar
  29. Wong M, Siegrist M, and Cao X. Cyclic compression of articular cartilage explants is associated with progressis consolidation and altered expression pattern of extracellular matrix proteins. Matrix Biol 18: 391–399, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wray L. The role of mechanical and hormonal stimuli on uterine involution in the rat. J Physiol 328: 1–9, 1982.Google Scholar
  31. Yu SY, and Leppert PC. The collagenous tissue of the cervix during pregnancy and delivery. In Leppert PC, and Woessner JF, Jr, Eds, The Extracellular Matrix of the Uterus, Cervix, and Fetal Membranes: Synthesis, Degradation, and Hormonal Regulation, Ithaca, New York: Perinatology Press, 1991, pp. 68–76.Google Scholar
  32. Yu SY, Tozzi CA, Babiarz J, and Leppert PC. Collagen changes in rat cervix in pregnancy. Polarized light microcopic and electron microscopic studies. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 209: 360–368, 1995.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Drzewiecki
    • 1
  • C. Tozzi
    • 2
  • S. Y. Yu
    • 3
  • P. C. Leppert
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Biomedical Engineering DepartmentCardiovascular Research Labs Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyPiscataway
  2. 2.Merck Pharmaceuticals
  3. 3.Formerly Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyRochester General HospitalRochester
  4. 4.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyReproductive Sciences Branch, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and Uniformed Services University of the Health SciencesBethesda
  5. 5.Reproductive Sciences Branch, NICHD, CPR, RSBBethesda

Personalised recommendations