Novel Approaches for Preventing or Limiting Events (NAPLES III) Trial: Randomised Comparison of Bivalirudin Versus Unfractionated Heparin in Patients at High Risk of Bleeding Undergoing Elective Coronary Stenting Throught The Femoral Approach. Rationale and Design
- First Online:
- 304 Downloads
Bivalirudin (Angiox, The Medicine’s Company, Parsippany, NJ), a synthetic direct thrombin inhibitor, when compared with standard antithrombotic therapy (including unfractionated heparin [UFH] alone or plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor) determines a significant decrease of major and minor bleeding and similar protection against ischemic events both in elective and in urgent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There is a lack of prospective clinical trial assessing the safety and the efficacy of bivalirudin compared with UFH alone in the subset of biomarker negative patients at high risk of bleeding undergoing to elective PCI through the femoral approach.
This is a single-center, investigator-driven, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial (www.clinicaltrial.gov registration: NCT01465503). Consecutive patients at high bleeding risk (score ≥10 according to Nikolsky et al.) undergoing elective PCI through the femoral approach will be screened for eligibility. Included patients will be randomized (ratio 1.1) to bivalirudin (Bivalirudin group) and UFH (UFH group). The primary endpoint will be the rate of major bleeding (REPLACE 2 criteria). We expect a major bleeding rate ≥5 % in the UFH group versus a ≤3 % event rate in the Bivalirudin group. Aiming for a 0.05 alpha and 0.80 power, a total of 662 patients will be needed. This number will be increased by about 25 % (leading to a total of ≈830 patients) because of uncertainty about expected endpoint rates.
The present trial will give important information on what is the best anticoagulation regimen when performing PCI through the femoral approach in patients at high risk for bleeding.
KeywordsPercutaneous coronary intervention Unfractionated heparin Bivalirudin Bleeding Outcome
- 1.Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B, et al. 2011 accf/aha/scai guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention. A report of the american college of cardiology foundation/american heart association task force on practice guidelines and the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:e44–e122.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Ndrepepa G, Berger PB, Mehilli J, Seyfarth M, Neumann FJ, Schomig A, et al. Periprocedural bleeding and 1-year outcome after percutaneous coronary interventions: appropriateness of including bleeding as a component of a quadruple end point. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:690–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Lincoff AM, Bittl JA, Harrington RA, Feit F, Kleiman NS, Jackman JD, et al. Bivalirudin and provisional glycoprotein iib/iiia blockade compared with heparin and planned glycoprotein iib/iiia blockade during percutaneous coronary intervention: Replace-2 randomized trial. JAMA. 2003;289:853–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.National Kidney Foundation. K/doqi clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;39:S1–S266.Google Scholar
- 15.World Medical Association Inc. Declaration of helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Indian Med Assoc. 2009;107:403–5.Google Scholar
- 22.Rao SV, McCoy LA, Spertus JA, Krone RJ, Singh M, Fitzgerald S, et al. An updated bleeding model to predict the risk of post-procedure bleeding among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a report using an expanded bleeding definition from the national cardiovascular data registry cathpci registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:897–904.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Tarantini G, Brener SJ, Barioli A, Gratta A, Parodi G, Rossini R, et al. Impact of baseline hemorrhagic risk on the benefit of bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in patients treated with coronary angioplasty: a meta-regression analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J. 2014;167:401–12. e406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Bittl JA, Strony J, Brinker JA, Ahmed WH, Meckel CR, Chaitman BR, et al. Treatment with bivalirudin (hirulog) as compared with heparin during coronary angioplasty for unstable or postinfarction angina. Hirulog angioplasty study investigators. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:764–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Berger PB, Best PJ, Topol EJ, White J, DiBattiste PM, Chan AW, et al. The relation of renal function to ischemic and bleeding outcomes with 2 different glycoprotein iib/iiia inhibitors: the do tirofiban and reopro give similar efficacy outcome (target) trial. Am Heart J. 2005;149:869–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Schulz S, Mehilli J, Ndrepepa G, Neumann FJ, Birkmeier KA, Kufner S, et al. Bivalirudin vs. Unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with stable and unstable angina pectoris: 1-year results of the isar-react 3 trial. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:582–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar