Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Aortic valve microcalcification and cardiovascular risk: an exploratory study using sodium fluoride in high cardiovascular risk patients

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

18F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) has been used to access aortic stenosis in clinical research setting. It is known that its uptake is related with microcalcification. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between 18F-NaF uptake by the aortic valve and cardiovascular risk. Twenty-five patients with risk factors for cardiovascular disease, without known cardiovascular disease or aortic stenosis underwent PET-CT with 18F-NaF. Cardiovascular risk was assessed through the ASCVD (Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease) risk calculator. Aortic valve 18F-NaF (AoVCUL) uptake was evaluated through the corrected uptake per lesion (CUL = max SUV − mean blood-pool SUV). Calcium score was obtained through cardiac CT. The patients present a mean age of 63.90 ± 8.60 years and 56% males. The mean ASCVD was of 28.76 ± 18.96 (M 25, IQR 38.50). The mean aortic valve calcium score (AoVCaSc) was of 53.24 ± 164.38 (M 6; IQR 29.75) and the AoVCUL was of 0.50 ± 0.10 (M 0.52, IQR 0.15). The patients were classified according to the ASCVD: patients with a risk greater or equal than the 50th percentile of the ASCVD risk and patients with a risk lower than the 50th percentile. The AoVCUL was evaluated in both groups: AoVCUL = 0.56 ± 0.10 vs 0.42 ± 0.15, p = 0.02; AoVCaSc was of 0 in 11 patients (44%) and those with an ASCVD greater or equal than the 50th percentile had a mean AoVCaSc of 8.00 ± 13.80, and those with an ASCVD risk lower than the 50th percentile had a mean AoVCaSc of 95.00 ± 223.45; p = 0.09. In this study microcalcification, evaluated through 18F-NaF on PET-CT, was related with cardiovascular risk. Although the score of calcium seems to be higher in higher cardiovascular risk patients, no significant difference was found between groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

18F-NaF:

18F-sodium fluoride

AoVCaSc:

Aortic valve calcium score

AoVCUL:

Aortic valve 18F-NaF uptake

ASCVD:

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease score from American College of Cardiology

CVR:

Cardiovascular risk

MDRD:

Modification of diet in Renal disease equation

PET-CT:

Positron emission tomography-computed tomography

References

  1. Bonow RO, Greenland P (2015) Population-wide trends in aortic stenosis incidence and outcomes. Circulation 131(11):969–971

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R et al (2017) Heart disease and stroke statistics-2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 135(10):e146–e603

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdiener JS, Scott CG, Enriquez-Sarano M (2006) Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet 368(9540):1005–1011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mohler ER 3rd, Gannon F, Reynolds C, Zimmerman R, Keane MG, Kaplan FS (2001) Bone formation and inflammation in cardiac valves. Circulation 103(11):1522–1528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dweck MR, Khaw HJ, Sng GK, Luo EL, Baird A, Williams MC et al (2013) Aortic stenosis, atherosclerosis, and skeletal bone: is there a common link with calcification and inflammation? Eur Heart J 34(21):1567–1574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dweck MR, Jones C, Joshi NV, Fletcher AM, Richardson H, White A et al (2012) Assessment of valvular calcification and inflammation by positron emission tomography in patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation 125(1):76–86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Beheshti M, Mottaghy FM, Paycha F, Behrendt FFF, Van den Wyngaert T, Fogelman I et al (2015) (18)F-NaF PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for bone imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 42(11):1767–1777

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dweck MR, Jenkins WS, Vesey AT, Pringle MA, Chin CW, Malley TS et al (2014) 18F-sodium fluoride uptake is a marker of active calcification and disease progression in patients with aortic stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 7(2):371–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Joshi NV, Vesey AT, Williams MC, Shah AS, Calvert PA, Craighead FH et al (2014) 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography for identification of ruptured and high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a prospective clinical trial. Lancet 383(9918):705–713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jenkins WS, Vesey AT, Shah AS, Pawade TA, Chin CW, White AC et al (2015) Valvular (18)F-fluoride and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake predict disease progression and clinical outcome in patients with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 66(10):1200–1201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferreira MJ, Oliveira-Santos M, Silva R, Gomes A, Ferreira N, Abrunhosa A et al (2017) Assessment of atherosclerotic plaque calcification using F18-NaF PET-CT. J Nucl Cardiol 25:1733–1741

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Irkle A, Vesey AT, Lewis DY, Skepper JN, Bird JL, Dweck MR et al (2015) Identifying active vascular microcalcification by (18)F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography. Nat commun 6:7495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, Buroker AB, Goldberger ZD, Hahn EJ et al (2019) 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 74:1376–1414

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Gharacholou SM, Karon BL, Shub C, Pellikka PA (2011) Aortic valve sclerosis and clinical outcomes: moving toward a definition. Am J Med 124(2):103–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Milin AC, Vorobiof G, Aksoy O, Ardehali R (2014) Insights into aortic sclerosis and its relationship with coronary artery disease. J Am Heart Assoc 3(5):e001111

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lerman DA, Prasad S, Alotti N (2015) Calcific aortic valve disease: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic approaches. Eur Cardiol 10(2):108–112

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Shen M, Tastet L, Bergler-Klein J, Pibarot P, Clavel MA (2018) Blood, tissue and imaging biomarkers in calcific aortic valve stenosis: past, present and future. Curr Opin Cardiol 33(2):125–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jung JJ, Jadbabaie F, Sadeghi MM (2018) Molecular imaging of calcific aortic valve disease. J Nucl Cardiol 25(4):1148–1155

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Marincheva-Savcheva G, Subramanian S, Qadir S, Figueroa A, Truong Q, Vijayakumar J et al (2011) Imaging of the aortic valve using fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography increased valvular fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 57(25):2507–2515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Abdelbaky A, Corsini E, Figueroa AL, Subramanian S, Fontanez S, Emami H et al (2015) Early aortic valve inflammation precedes calcification: a longitudinal FDG-PET/CT study. Atherosclerosis 238(2):165–172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hyafil F, Messika-Zeitoun D, Burg S, Rouzet F, Benali K, Iung B et al (2012) Detection of 18fluoride sodium accumulation by positron emission tomography in calcified stenotic aortic valves. Am J Cardiol 109(8):1194–1196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Oliveira-Santos M, Castelo-Branco M, Silva R, Gomes A, Chichorro N, Abrunhosa A et al (2017) Atherosclerotic plaque metabolism in high cardiovascular risk subjects—a subclinical atherosclerosis imaging study with (18)F-NaF PET-CT. Atherosclerosis 260:41–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Peltier M, Trojette F, Sarano ME, Grigioni F, Slama MA, Tribouilloy CM (2003) Relation between cardiovascular risk factors and nonrheumatic severe calcific aortic stenosis among patients with a three-cuspid aortic valve. Am J Cardiol 91(1):97–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Le Tourneau T, Marechaux S, Vincentelli A, Ennezat PV, Modine T, Polge AS et al (2007) Cardiovascular risk factors as predictors of early and late survival after bioprosthetic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. J Heart Valve Dis 16(5):483–488

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rossebo AB, Pedersen TR, Boman K, Brudi P, Chambers JB, Egstrup K et al (2008) Intensive lipid lowering with simvastatin and ezetimibe in aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 359(13):1343–1356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Arsenault BJ, Boekholdt SM, Mora S, DeMicco DA, Bao W, Tardif JC et al (2014) Impact of high-dose atorvastatin therapy and clinical risk factors on incident aortic valve stenosis in patients with cardiovascular disease (from TNT, IDEAL, and SPARCL). Am J Cardiol 113(8):1378–1382

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao Y, Nicoll R, He YH, Henein MY (2016) The effect of statins on valve function and calcification in aortic stenosis: A meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis 246:318–324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Célia Domingues.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Domingues, C., João Ferreira, M., Silva, R. et al. Aortic valve microcalcification and cardiovascular risk: an exploratory study using sodium fluoride in high cardiovascular risk patients. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 36, 1593–1598 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-01854-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-01854-0

Keywords

Navigation