Skip to main content
Log in

Optical coherence tomography evaluation of the absorb bioresorbable scaffold performance for overlap versus non-overlap segments in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion: insight from the GHOST-CTO registry

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) promised to avoid some of the disadvantages of its metal predecessors. Even though it has been taken off the market, limited data is available about its use in coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) and its performance in overlap segments, which would be of special research interest due to its large thickness. This data is still pertinent since the platform of bioresorbable devices has not been abandoned, with several companies working on it. We aimed to compare healing and performance between overlap (OL) and non-overlap regions (NOL) of CTO lesions treated with BVS, using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Fourteen patients with overlapping BVS were included from the GHOST-CTO registry, resulting in 25 OL and 38 NOL regions. OCT based parameters were compared between OL and NOL groups at baseline (post-implantation) and 12-month follow-up. The mean age was 61.7 ± 7.2 years and 12 (86%) were males. Twelve (86%) patients underwent PCI for stable coronary artery disease and 2 (14%) had unstable angina. At 12-month follow-up, mean lumen area decreased in both NOL and OL regions, but the decrease was significantly larger in the OL region (NOL − 0.7 ± 1.33 vs. OL − 2.4 ± 1.54 mm2; p = 0.002). Mean scaffold area increased in both regions, but increased significantly more in NOL ( + 1.1 ± 1.54 vs. + 0.4 ± 1.16 mm2; p = 0.016). The percent of uncovered struts was lower in the OL group (5.0 ± 6.6% vs. 3.75 ± 8.7%, p = 0.043), whereas the percentage of malapposed struts was similar (0.3 ± 0.5% vs. 0.7 ± 2.3%, p = 0.441). Neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) was more pronounced in the OL region (0.13 ± 0.04 vs. 0.24 ± 0.10 mm2, p = 0.001). The OL and NOL segments showed comparable healing in terms of coverage and malapposition. However, NIH was more prominent in OL region. The long-term clinical implications of these findings needs further evaluation. The present study provides important insights for future development of BVS technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Graphic 1
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. De Felice F, Fiorilli R, Parma A, Nazzaro M, Musto C, Sbraga F, Caferri G, Violini R (2009) Year clinical outcome of patients with chronic total occlusion treated with drug-eluting stents. JACC 2(12):1260–1265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2009.09.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mori H, Lutter C, Yahagi K, Harari E, Kutys R, Fowler DR, Ladich E, Joner M, Virmani R, Finn AV (2017) Pathology of chronic total occlusion in bare-metal versus drug-eluting stents: implications for revascularization. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 10(4):367–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2016.11.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nakamura D, Attizzani GF, Toma C, Sheth T, Wang W, Soud M, Aoun R, Tummala R, Leygerman M, Fares A, Mehanna E, Nishino S, Fung A, Costa MA, Bezerra HG (2016) Failure mechanisms and neoatherosclerosis patterns in very late drug-eluting and bare-metal stent thrombosis. Circulation 9(9):003785. https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.116.003785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. La Manna A, Chisari A, Giacchi G, Capodanno D, Longo G, Di Silvestro M, Capranzano P, Tamburino C (2016) Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus second generation drug-eluting stents for percutaneous treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions: Technical and procedural outcomes from the GHOST-CTO registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 88(6):E155–E163. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.26397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Manna A, Miccichè E, D'Agosta G, Tensol Rodrigues Pereira G, Attizzani GF, Capranzano P, Capodanno D, Tamburino C (2017) Vascular response and healing profile of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for percutaneous treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions: a one-year optical coherence tomography analysis from the GHOST-CTO registry. Int J Cardiol 1:1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.10.107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vaquerizo B, Barros A, Pujadas S, Bajo E, Estrada D, Miranda-Guardiola F, Rigla J, Jiménez M, Cinca J, Serra A (2015) Bioresorbable everolimus-eluting vascular scaffold for the treatment of chronic total occlusions: CTO-ABSORB pilot study. EuroIntervention 11(5):555–563. https://doi.org/10.4244/eijy14m12_07

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Onuma Y, Ormiston J, Serruys PW (2011) Bioresorbable Scaffold technologies. Circ J 75(3):509–520. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.cj-10-1135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Serruys PW, Garcia-Garcia HM, Onuma Y (2011) From metallic cages to transient bioresorbable scaffolds: change in paradigm of coronary revascularization in the upcoming decade? Eur Heart J 33(1):16–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ali ZA, Gao RF, Kimura T, Onuma Y, Kereiakes DJ, Ellis SG, Chevalier B, Vu M-T, Zhang Z, Simonton CA, Serruys PW, Stone GW (2017) Three-year outcomes with the absorb bioresorbable scaffold: individual-patient-data meta-analysis from the ABSORB randomized trials. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.117.031843

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kereiakes DJ, Ellis SG, Metzger C, Caputo RP, Rizik DG, Teirstein PS, Litt MR, Kini A, Kabour A, Marx SO, Popma JJ, McGreevy R, Zhang Z, Simonton C, Stone GW (2017) 3-year clinical outcomes with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffolds. J Am Coll Cardiol 70(23):2852–2862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Dirschinger J, Dotzer F, Schuhlen H, Neumann FJ, Fleckenstein M, Pfafferott C, Seyfarth M, Schomig A (2001) Intracoronary stenting and angiographic results: strut thickness effect on restenosis outcome (ISAR-STEREO) trial. Circulation 103(23):2816–2821. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.103.23.2816

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kawamoto H, Jabbour RJ, Tanaka A, Latib A, Colombo A (2016) The Bioresorbable Scaffold. JACC 9(3):299–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2015.11.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Michael TT, Mogabgab O, Alomar M, Kotsia A, Christopoulos G, Rangan BV, Abdullah S, Grodin J, Banerjee S, Brilakis ES (2014) Long-term outcomes of successful chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary interventions using the antegrade and retrograde approach. J Interv Cardiol 27(5):465–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/joic.12149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. George S, Cockburn J, Clayton TC, Ludman P, Cotton J, Spratt J, Redwood S, de Belder M, de Belder A, Hill J, Hoye A, Palmer N, Rathore S, Gershlick A, Di Mario C, Hildick-Smith D, British Cardiovascular Intervention S, National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes R (2014) Long-term follow-up of elective chronic total coronary occlusion angioplasty: analysis from the U.K. Central cardiac audit database. J Am Coll Cardiol 64(3):235–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Valenti R, Vergara R, Migliorini A, Parodi G, Carrabba N, Cerisano G, Dovellini EV, Antoniucci D (2013) Predictors of reocclusion after successful drug-eluting stent-supported percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusion. J Am Coll Cardiol 61(5):545–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.10.036

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Garcia S, Abdullah S, Banerjee S, Brilakis ES (2013) Chronic total occlusions: patient selection and overview of advanced techniques. Curr Cardiol Rep 15(2):334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-012-0334-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brilakis ES, Kotsia A, Luna M, Garcia S, Abdullah SM, Banerjee S (2013) The role of drug-eluting stents for the treatment of coronary chronic total occlusions. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 11(10):1349–1358. https://doi.org/10.1586/14779072.2013.838142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Matsumoto D, Shite J, Shinke T, Otake H, Tanino Y, Ogasawara D, Sawada T, Paredes OL, Hirata K, Yokoyama M (2007) Neointimal coverage of sirolimus-eluting stents at 6-month follow-up: evaluated by optical coherence tomography. Eur Heart J 28(8):961–967. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehl413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bezerra HG, Attizzani GF, Sirbu V, Musumeci G, Lortkipanidze N, Fujino Y, Wang W, Nakamura S, Erglis A, Guagliumi G, Costa MA (2013) Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC 6(3):228–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2012.09.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bezerra HG, Costa MA, Guagliumi G, Rollins AM, Simon DI (2009) Intracoronary optical coherence tomography: a comprehensive review clinical and research applications. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2(11):1035–1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2009.06.019

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Mehanna EA, Attizzani GF, Kyono H, Hake M, Bezerra HG (2011) Assessment of coronary stent by optical coherence tomography, methodology and definitions. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27(2):259–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-010-9793-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Nakatani S, Sotomi Y, Ishibashi Y, Grundeken MJ, Tateishi H, Tenekecioglu E, Zeng Y, Suwannasom P, Regar E, Radu MD, Raber L, Bezerra H, Costa MA, Fitzgerald P, Prati F, Costa RA, Dijkstra J, Kimura T, Kozuma K, Tanabe K, Akasaka T, Di Mario C, Serruys PW, Onuma Y (2016) Comparative analysis method of permanent metallic stents (XIENCE) and bioresorbable poly-L-lactic (PLLA) scaffolds (Absorb) on optical coherence tomography at baseline and follow-up. EuroIntervention 12(12):1498–1509. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJY15M10_03

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, Boam A, Cohen DJ, van Es GA, Gabriel Steg P, Ma Morel, Mauri L, Vranckx P, McFadden E, Lansky A, Hamon M, Krucoff MW, Serruys PW (2007) Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation 115(17):2344–2351. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.106.685313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fujino A, Mintz GS, Matsumura M, Lee T, Kim SY, Hoshino M, Usui E, Yonetsu T, Haag ES, Shlofmitz RA, Kakuta T, Maehara A (2018) A new optical coherence tomography-based calcium scoring system to predict stent underexpansion. EuroIntervention 13(18):e2182–e2189. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sato T, Jose J, El-Mawardy M, Sulimov DS, Tölg R, Richardt G, Abdel-Wahab M (2016) Neointimal coverage of overlapping everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds: an optical coherence tomography study in native coronary arteries. Int J Cardiol 221:243–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Guagliumi G, Musumeci G, Sirbu V, Bezerra HG, Suzuki N, Fiocca L, Matiashvili A, Lortkipanidze N, Trivisonno A, Valsecchi O, Biondi-Zoccai G, Costa MA, Investigators OT (2010) Optical coherence tomography assessment of in vivo vascular response after implantation of overlapping bare-metal and drug-eluting stents. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 3(5):531–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2010.02.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gutierrez-Chico JL, Raber L, Regar E, Okamura T, di Mario C, van Es GA, Windecker S, Serruys PW (2013) Tissue coverage and neointimal hyperplasia in overlap versus nonoverlap segments of drug-eluting stents 9 to 13 months after implantation: in vivo assessment with optical coherence tomography. Am Heart J 166(1):83–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2013.04.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Farooq V, Serruys PW, Heo JH, Gogas BD, Onuma Y, Perkins LE, Diletti R, Radu MD, Räber L, Bourantas CV, Zhang Y, van Remortel E, Pawar R, Rapoza RJ, Powers JC, van Beusekom HMM, Garcìa-Garcìa HM, Virmani R (2013) Intracoronary optical coherence tomography and histology of overlapping everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in a porcine coronary artery model. JACC 6(5):523–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2012.12.131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tearney GJ, Regar E, Akasaka T, Adriaenssens T, Barlis P, Bezerra HG, Bouma B, Bruining N, Cho JM, Chowdhary S, Costa MA, de Silva R, Dijkstra J, Di Mario C, Dudek D, Falk E, Feldman MD, Fitzgerald P, Garcia-Garcia HM, Gonzalo N, Granada JF, Guagliumi G, Holm NR, Honda Y, Ikeno F, Kawasaki M, Kochman J, Koltowski L, Kubo T, Kume T, Kyono H, Lam CC, Lamouche G, Lee DP, Leon MB, Maehara A, Manfrini O, Mintz GS, Mizuno K, Morel MA, Nadkarni S, Okura H, Otake H, Pietrasik A, Prati F, Raber L, Radu MD, Rieber J, Riga M, Rollins A, Rosenberg M, Sirbu V, Serruys PW, Shimada K, Shinke T, Shite J, Siegel E, Sonoda S, Suter M, Takarada S, Tanaka A, Terashima M, Thim T, Uemura S, Ughi GJ, van Beusekom HM, van der Steen AF, van Es GA, van Soest G, Virmani R, Waxman S, Weissman NJ, Weisz G, International Working Group for Intravascular Optical Coherence T (2012) Consensus standards for acquisition, measurement, and reporting of intravascular optical coherence tomography studies: a report from the International Working Group for Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Standardization and Validation. J Am Coll Cardiol 59(12):1058–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.079

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Prati F, Guagliumi G, Mintz GS, Costa M, Regar E, Akasaka T, Barlis P, Tearney GJ, Jang IK, Arbustini E, Bezerra HG, Ozaki Y, Bruining N, Dudek D, Radu M, Erglis A, Motreff P, Alfonso F, Toutouzas K, Gonzalo N, Tamburino C, Adriaenssens T, Pinto F, Serruys PW, Di Mario C, Expert's OCTRD (2012) Expert review document part 2: methodology, terminology and clinical applications of optical coherence tomography for the assessment of interventional procedures. Eur Heart J 33(20):2513–2520. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs095

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Rikhtegar F, Wyss C, Stok KS, Poulikakos D, Müller R, Kurtcuoglu V (2014) Hemodynamics in coronary arteries with overlapping stents. J Biomech 47(2):505–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.10.048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bourantas CV, Papafaklis MI, Kotsia A, Farooq V, Muramatsu T, Gomez-Lara J, Zhang YJ, Iqbal J, Kalatzis FG, Naka KK, Fotiadis DI, Dorange C, Wang J, Rapoza R, Garcia-Garcia HM, Onuma Y, Michalis LK, Serruys PW (2014) Effect of the endothelial shear stress patterns on neointimal proliferation following drug-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation: an optical coherence tomography study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 7(3):315–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Papafaklis MI, Bourantas CV, Theodorakis PE, Katsouras CS, Naka KK, Fotiadis DI, Michalis LK (2010) The effect of shear stress on neointimal response following sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation compared with bare-metal stents in humans. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 3(11):1181–1189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2010.08.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Suzuki N, Nanda H, Angiolillo DJ, Bezerra H, Sabate M, Jimenez-Quevedo P, Alfonso F, Macaya C, Bass TA, Ilegbusi OJ, Costa MA (2008) Assessment of potential relationship between wall shear stress and arterial wall response after bare metal stent and sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in patients with diabetes mellitus. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24(4):357–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-007-9274-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wentzel JJ, Krams R, Schuurbiers JCH, Oomen JA, Kloet J, Giessen WJVD, Serruys PW, Slager CJ (2001) Relationship between neointimal thickness and shear stress after wallstent implantation in human coronary arteries. Circulation 103(13):1740–1745. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.103.13.1740

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Jimenez JM, Davies PF (2009) Hemodynamically driven stent strut design. Ann Biomed Eng 37(8):1483–1494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-009-9719-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Rikhtegar F, Wyss C, Stok KS, Poulikakos D, Muller R, Kurtcuoglu V (2014) Hemodynamics in coronary arteries with overlapping stents. J Biomech 47(2):505–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.10.048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Farooq V, Onuma Y, Radu M, Okamura T, Gomez-Lara J, Brugaletta S, Gogas B, van Geuns R-J, Regar E, Schultz C, Windecker S, Lefèvre T, Brueren BRG, Powers J, Perkins LL, Rapoza RJ, Virmani R, García-García HM, Serruys PW (2011) Optical coherence tomography (OCT) of overlapping bioresorbable scaffolds: from benchwork to clinical application. EuroIntervention 7(3):386–399. https://doi.org/10.4244/eijv7i3a64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Costa JR, Abizaid A, Bartorelli AL, Whitbourn R, Serruys PW, Smits PC (2017) Two-year clinical outcomes of patients treated with overlapping absorb scaffolds: an analysis of the ABSORB EXTEND single-arm study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ortega-Paz L, Capodanno D, Giacchi G, Gori T, Nef H, Latib A, Caramanno G, Di Mario C, Naber C, Lesiak M, Capranzano P, Wiebe J, Mehilli J, Araszkiewicz A, Pyxaras S, Mattesini A, Geraci S, Naganuma T, Colombo A, Münzel T, Sabaté M, Tamburino C, Brugaletta S (2016) Impact of overlapping on 1-year clinical outcomes in patients undergoing everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds implantation in routine clinical practice: Insights from the European multicenter GHOST-EU registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 89(5):812–818. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.26674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tarantini G, Mojoli M, Masiero G, Cortese B, Loi B, Varricchio A, Gabrielli G, Durante A, Pasquetto G, Calabrò P, Gistri R, Tumminello G, Misuraca L, Pisano F, Ielasi A, Mazzarotto P, Coscarelli S, Lucci V, Moretti L, Nicolino A, Colombo A, Olivari Z, Fineschi M, Piraino D, Piatti L, Canosi U, Tellaroli P, Corrado D, Rovera C, Steffenino G (2017) Clinical outcomes of overlapping versus non-overlapping everolimus-eluting absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: an analysis from the multicentre prospective RAI registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bangalore S, Bezerra HG, Rizik DG, Armstrong EJ, Samuels B, Naidu SS, Grines CL, Foster MT, Choi JW, Bertolet BD, Shah AP, Torguson R, Avula SB, Wang JC, Zidar JP, Maksoud A, Kalyanasundaram A, Yakubov SJ, Chehab BM, Spaedy AJ, Potluri SP, Caputo RP, Kondur A, Merritt RF, Kaki A, Quesada R, Parikh MA, Toma C, Matar F, DeGregorio J, Nicholson W, Batchelor W, Gollapudi R, Korngold E, Sumar R, Chrysant GS, Li J, Gordon JB, Dave RM, Attizzani GF, Stys TP, Gigliotti OS, Murphy BE, Ellis SG, Waksman R (2017) The state of the absorb bioresorbable scaffold: consensus from an expert panel. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 10(23):2349–2359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2017.09.041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Gabriel T. R. Pereira or Guilherme F. Attizzani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Guilherme F. Attizzani - Speaker for Abbott, Alessio La Manna - Consultant for Abbott. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pereira, G.T.R., La Manna, A., Ichibori, Y. et al. Optical coherence tomography evaluation of the absorb bioresorbable scaffold performance for overlap versus non-overlap segments in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion: insight from the GHOST-CTO registry. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 35, 1767–1776 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-019-01636-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-019-01636-3

Keywords

Navigation