Assessment of aortic valve tract dynamics using automatic tracking of 3D transesophageal echocardiographic images
- 20 Downloads
The assessment of aortic valve (AV) morphology is paramount for planning transcatheter AV implantation (TAVI). Nowadays, pre-TAVI sizing is routinely performed at one cardiac phase only, usually at mid-systole. Nonetheless, the AV is a dynamic structure that undergoes changes in size and shape throughout the cardiac cycle, which may be relevant for prosthesis selection. Thus, the aim of this study was to present and evaluate a novel software tool enabling the automatic sizing of the AV dynamically in three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) images. Forty-two patients who underwent preoperative 3D-TEE images were retrospectively analyzed using the software. Dynamic measurements were automatically extracted at four levels, including the aortic annulus. These measures were used to assess the software’s ability to accurately and reproducibly quantify the conformational changes of the aortic root and were validated against automated sizing measurements independently extracted at distinct time points. The software extracted physiological dynamic measurements in less than 2 min, that were shown to be accurate (error 2.2 ± 26.3 mm2 and 0.0 ± 2.53 mm for annular area and perimeter, respectively) and highly reproducible (0.85 ± 6.18 and 0.65 ± 7.90 mm2 of intra- and interobserver variability, respectively, in annular area). Using the maximum or minimum measured values rather than mid-systolic ones for device sizing resulted in a potential change of recommended size in 7% and 60% of the cases, respectively. The presented software tool allows a fast, automatic and reproducible dynamic assessment of the AV morphology from 3D-TEE images, with the extracted measures influencing the device selection depending on the cardiac moment used to perform its sizing. This novel tool may thus ease and potentially increase the observer’s confidence during prosthesis’ size selection at the preoperative TAVI planning.
KeywordsAortic valve sizing 3D transesophageal echocardiography Transcatheter aortic valve implantation Dynamic morphology assessment Tracking software tool
This work was funded by projects “NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000013” and “NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-024300”, supported by Northern Portugal Regional Operational Programme (Norte2020), under the Portugal 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER). This work has also been funded by FEDER funds, through Competitiveness Factors Operational Programme (COMPETE), and by national funds, through the FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, under the scope of the project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007038. The authors also acknowledge support from FCT and the European Social Found, through Programa Operacional Capital Humano (POCH), in the scope of the PhD grant SFRH/BD/93443/2013 (S. Queirós). The authors would also like to thank Judith Simons (St. Vinzenz-Hospital, Cologne, Germany) and Mahvish T. Elahi (KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium) for their technical assistance in collecting all patient/image data.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- 1.Osnabrugge RL, Mylotte D, Head SJ, Van Mieghem NM, Nkomo VT, LeReun CM, Bogers AJ, Piazza N, Kappetein AP (2013) Aortic stenosis in the elderly: disease prevalence and number of candidates for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis and modeling study. J Am Coll Cardiol 62(11):1002–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP, Guyton RA, O’Gara PT, Ruiz CE, Skubas NJ, Sorajja P (2014) 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. Circulation 129(23):521–643Google Scholar
- 6.Min JK, Berman DS, Leipsic J (2013) Multimodality imaging for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Springer Science & Business Media, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- 9.Hamdan A, Guetta V, Konen E, Goitein O, Segev A, Raanani E, Spiegelstein D, Hay I, Di Segni E, Eldar M (2012) Deformation dynamics and mechanical properties of the aortic annulus by 4-dimensional computed tomography: insights into the functional anatomy of the aortic valve complex and implications for transcatheter aortic valve therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 59(2):119–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Suchá D, Tuncay V, Prakken NH, Leiner T, van Ooijen PM, Oudkerk M, Budde RP (2015) Does the aortic annulus undergo conformational change throughout the cardiac cycle? A systematic review. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16(12):1307–1317Google Scholar
- 11.Murphy DT, Blanke P, Alaamri S, Naoum C, Rubinshtein R, Pache G, Precious B, Berger A, Raju R, Dvir D (2016) Dynamism of the aortic annulus: effect of diastolic versus systolic CT annular measurements on device selection in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 10(1):37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Blanke P, Russe M, Leipsic J, Reinöhl J, Ebersberger U, Suranyi P, Siepe M, Pache G, Langer M, Schoepf UJ (2012) Conformational pulsatile changes of the aortic annulus: impact on prosthesis sizing by computed tomography for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 5(9):984–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.von Aspern K, Foldyna B, Etz C, Hoyer A, Girrbach F, Holzhey D, Lücke C, Grothoff M, Linke A, Mohr F (2015) Effective diameter of the aortic annulus prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: influence of area-based versus perimeter-based calculation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 31(1):163–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Veronesi F, Corsi C, Mor-Avi V, Sugeng L, Wienert L, Lang R, Lamberti C (2009) Quantification of aortic valve stenosis using transesophageal real-time 3D echocardiographic images. In: Computers in Cardiology 2009. IEEE. pp 37–40Google Scholar
- 18.Barbosa D, Heyde B, Dietenbeck T, Friboulet D, D’hooge J, Bernard O (2013) Fast left ventricle tracking in 3D echocardiographic data using anatomical affine optical flow. In: Functional Imaging and Modeling of the Heart (FIMH2013). pp 191–199Google Scholar
- 22.Heyde B, Barbosa D, Claus P, Maes F, D’hooge J (2013) Three-dimensional cardiac motion estimation based on non-rigid image registration using a novel transformation model adapted to the heart. In: Statistical atlases and computational models of the heart. Imaging and modelling challenges. Springer. pp 142–150Google Scholar
- 29.Caballero L, Saura D, Oliva-Sandoval MJ, González-Carrillo J, Espinosa MD, García-Navarro M, Valdés M, Lancellotti P, de la Morena G (2017) Three-dimensional morphology of the left ventricular outflow tract: impact on grading aortic stenosis severity. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 30(1):28–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Queirós S, Papachristidis A, Barbosa D, Theodoropoulos KC, Fonseca JC, Monaghan MJ, Vilaça JL, D’ hooge J (2016) Aortic valve tract segmentation from 3D-TEE using shape-based B-spline explicit active surfaces. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 35(9):2015–2025. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2016.2544199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Prihadi EA, van Rosendael PJ, Vollema EM, Bax JJ, Delgado V, Marsan NA (2018) Feasibility, accuracy, and reproducibility of aortic annular and root sizing for transcatheter aortic valve replacement using novel automated three-dimensional echocardiographic software: comparison with multi–detector row computed tomography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 31(4):505–514.e503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Doddamani S, Bello R, Friedman MA, Banerjee A, Bowers JH, Kim B, Vennalaganti PR, Ostfeld RJ, Gordon GM, Malhotra D (2007) Demonstration of left ventricular outflow tract eccentricity by real time 3D echocardiography: implications for the determination of aortic valve area. Echocardiography 24(8):860–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Papachristidis A, Papitsas M, Roper D, Wang Y, Dworakowski R, Byrne J, Wendler O, MacCarthy P, Monaghan MJ (2017) Three-dimensional measurement of aortic annulus dimensions using area or circumference for transcatheter aortic valve replacement valve sizing: does it make a difference? J Am Soc Echocardiogr 30(9):871–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar