Advertisement

Drop-off in positivity rate of stress echocardiography based on regional wall motion abnormalities over the last three decades

  • Lauro Cortigiani
  • Pamela Ramirez
  • Maico Coltelli
  • Francesco Bovenzi
  • Eugenio PicanoEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested a decline in positivity of stress cardiac imaging based on regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA). To assess the rate of RWMA positivity of stress echocardiography (SE) over 3 decades in the same primary care SE lab. We retrospectively assessed the rate of SE positivity in 7626 SE tests (dipyridamole in 5053, dobutamine in 2496, exercise in 77) in consecutive patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease and /or heart failure who performed SE in a primary care referral center from April 1991 to May 2018. Starting April 2005, SE based on RWMA was complemented by assessment of coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Starting October 2016, we added left ventricular contractile reserve (LVCR). Starting October 2016, we also added B-lines by lung ultrasound. There was a progressive decline over time in the rate of SE positivity based on RWMA from 24% (1991–1999) to 10% (2000–2009) down to 4% (2010–2018) (p < 0.0001). Positivity rate was 29% with CFVR, 16% with LVCR, and 12% with B-lines. Over three decades, we observed a dramatic decline in SE positivity rate based on classical RWMA. In the last decade, the positivity rate rose sharply thanks to the stepwise introduction of CFVR, LVCR and B-lines as additional positivity criteria in integrated quadruple SE.

Keywords

Echocardiography Ischemia Pre-test probability Stress 

Abbreviations

CAD

Coronary artery disease

CFVR

Coronary flow velocity reserve

LVCR

Left ventricular contractile reserve

RWMA

Regional wall motion abnormalities

SE

Stress echocardiography

TTE

Transthoracic echocardiography

WMSI

Wall motion score index

Notes

Funding

This study was supported by Institutional funds of Institute of Clinical Physiology of National Research Council of Pisa.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Nichols M, Nick T, Scarborough P et al (2014) Cardiovascular disease in Europe 2014: epidemiological update. Eur Heart J 35:2950–2959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pellikka PA, Nagueh SF, Elhendy AA, American Society of Echocardiography (2007) et al. American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for performance, interpretation, and application of stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 20:1021–1041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sicari R, Nihoyannopoulos P, Evangelista A (2008) European Association of Echocardiography et al. Stress echocardiography expert consensus statement: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC). Eur J Echocardiogr 9:415–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S et al (2013) 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 34:2949–3003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bouzas-Mosquera A, Peteiro J, Broullón FJ, Calviño-Santos R, Mosquera VX, Sánchez-Fernández G et al (2015) Temporal changes in the use and results of exercise echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16:207–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carpeggiani C, Landi P, Michelassi C, Sicari R, Picano E (2016) The declining frequency of inducible myocardial ischemia during stress echocardiography over 27 consecutive years (1983–2009). Int J Cardiol 224:57–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barbieri A, Mantovani F, Bursi F, Bartolacelli Y, Manicardi M, Lauria MG, Boriani G (2018) 12-year Temporal Trend in Referral Pattern and Test Results of Stress Echocardiography in a Tertiary Care Referral Center with Moderate Volume Activities and Cath-lab Facility. J Cardiovasc Echogr 28:32–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Parra-Arnau J, Castelluccia C. Dataveillance and the false positive paradox. HAL Archives Ouvertes. 2018 <hal-011579621v2%3E>.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eddy DM (1992) Probability reasoning in clinical medicine. Problems and opportunities. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 249–267Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Picano E, Ciampi Q, Citro R, D’Andrea A, Scali MC, Cortigiani L et al (2017) Stress echo 2020: the international stress echo study in ischemic and non-ischemic heart disease. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 15:3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rigo F (2005) Coronary flow reserve in stress-echo lab. From pathophysiologic toy to diagnostic tool. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 3:8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gaibazzi N, Rigo F, Reverberi C (2013) Detection of coronary artery disease by combined assessment of wall motion, myocardial perfusion and coronary flow reserve: a multiparametric contrast stress-echocardiography study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:1242–1250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cortigiani L, Rigo F, Galderisi M, Gherardi S, Bovenzi F, Picano E et al (2012) Coronary flow reserve during dipyridamole stress echocardiography predicts mortality. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 5:1079–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Picano E, Frassi F, Agricola E, Gligorova S, Gargani L, Mottola G (2006) Ultrasound lung comets: a clinically useful sign of extravascular lung water. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 19:356–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bombardini T, Gherardi S, Marraccini P et al (2013) The incremental diagnostic value of coronary flow reserve and left ventricular elastance during high-dose dipyridamole stress echocardiography in patients with normal wall motion at rest. Int J Cardiol 168:1683–1684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rigo F, Sicari R, Gherardi S, Djordjevic-Dikic A, Cortigiani L, Picano E (2008) The additive prognostic value of wall motion abnormalities and coronary flow reserve during dipyridamole stress echo. Eur Heart J 29:79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sicari R, Rigo F, Cortigiani L, Gherardi S, Galderisi M, Picano E (2009) Long-term survival of patients with chest pain syndrome and angio-graphically normal or near normal coronary arteries: the additional prognostic value of coronary flow reserve. Am J Cardiol 103:626–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cortigiani L, Rigo F, Gherardi S, Bovenzi F, Picano E, Sicari R (2010) Implication of the continuous prognostic spectrum of Doppler echocardiographic derived coronary flow reserve on left anterior descending artery. Am J Cardiol 105:158–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bombardini T, Correia MJ, Cicerone C, Agricola E, Ripoli A, Picano E (2003) Force-frequency relationship in the echo lab: a non invasive assessment of Bowditch Treppe? J Am Soc Echocardiogr 17:832–841Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grosu A, Bombardini T, Senni M, Duino V, Gori M, Picano E (2005) End-systolic pressure/volume relationship during dobutamine stress echo: a prognos- tically useful non-invasive index of left ventricular contractility. Eur Heart J 26:2404–2412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Picano E, Scali MC, Ciampi Q, Lichtenstein D (2018) Lung Ultrasound Ultrasound for the cardiologist. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 11:1692–1705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Scali MC, Zagatina A, Simova I, Zhuravskaya N, Ciampi Q, Paterni M, Marzilli M, Carpeggiani C, Picano E (2017) Stress Echo 2020 study group of the Italian Society of Cardiovascular Echography (SIEC), B-lines with Lung Ultrasound: The Optimal Scan Technique at Rest and During Stress. Ultrasound Med Biol 43:2558–2566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Scali MC, Cortigiani L, Simionuc A, Gregori D, Marzilli M, Picano E (2017) Exercise-induced B-lines identify worse functional and prognostic stage in heart failure patients with depressed left ventricular ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail 19:1468–1478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Scali MC, Zagatina A, Ciampi Q, Cortigiani L, D’Andrea A, Djordjevic-Dikic A, Merlo PM, Lattanzi F, Simova I, Monte I, Dodi C, Kasprzak J, Galderisi M, Boshchenko A, Rigo F, Varga A, Dekleva M, Re F, Pretto JL, Zhuravskaya N, Wierzbovska-Drabik K, Coviello K, Citro R, Colonna P, Carpeggiani C, Picano E (2019) The functional meaning of B-profile during stress lung ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 3:169–705Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lattanzi F, Picano E, Bolognese L, Piccinino C, Sarasso G, Orlandini A et al (1991) Inhibition of dipyridamole-induced ischemia by antianginal therapy in humans. Correlation with exercise electrocardiography. Circulation 83:1256–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sicari R, Cortigiani L, Bigi R, Landi P, Raciti M, Picano E (2004) The prognostic value of pharmacologic stress echo is affected by concomitant anti-ischemic therapy at the time of testing. Circulation 109:1428–1431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sicari R, Rigo F, Gherardi S, Galderisi M, Cortigiani L, Picano E (2008) The prognostic value of Doppler echocardiographic-derived coronary flow reserve is not affected by concomitant antiischemic therapy at the time of testing. Am Heart J 156:573–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fioretti P, Poldermans D, Salustri A et al (1994) Atropine increases the accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients taking beta-blockers. Eur Heart J 15:355–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ferrara N, Coltorti F, leosco D et al (1995) Protective effect of beta-blockade on dipyridamole-induced myocardial ischemia. Role of heart rate. Eur Heart J 16:903–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cortigiani L, Huqi A, Ciampi Q, Bombardini T, Bovenzi F, Picano E (2018) Integration of wall motion, coronary flow velocity, and left ventricular contractile reserve in a single test: prognostic value of vasodilator stress echocardiography in patients with diabetes. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 31:692–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bombardini T, Costantino MF, Sicari R, Ciampi Q, Pratali L, Picano E (2013) End- systolic elastance and ventricular-arterial coupling reserve predict cardiac events in patients with negative stress echocardiography. Biomed Res Int 2013:235194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Picano E, Lattanzi F, Masini M, Distante A, L’Abbate A (1988) Usefulness of the dipyridamole-exercise echocardiography test for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 62:67–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ostojic M, Picano E, Beleslin B, Djordjevic-Dikic A, Distante A, Stepanovic J, Reisenhofer B, Babic R, Stojkovic S, Nedeljkovic M, Stankovic G, Simeunovic S, Kanjuh V (1994) Dipyridamole-dobutamine echocardiography: a novel test for the detection of milder forms of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 23:1115–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Picano E, Morrone D, Scali MC, Huqi A, Coviello K, Ciampi Q (2018) Integrated quadruple stress echocardiography. Minerva Cardioangiol  https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4725.18.04691-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cardiology DivisionSan Luca HospitalLuccaItaly
  2. 2.National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador ZubiranMexico CityMexico
  3. 3.Department of Computer Science and TechnologyESTARPisaItaly
  4. 4.Institute of Clinical Physiology, Biomedicine DepartmentCNRPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations