Advertisement

Is there any diagnostic value of anteroposterior chest radiography in predicting cardiac chamber enlargement?

  • Hakan SahinEmail author
  • Divya N. Chowdhry
  • Andrew Olsen
  • Omar Nemer
  • Lindsay Wahl
Original Paper
  • 70 Downloads

Abstract

The anteroposterior (AP) portable chest radiograph is routinely performed to evaluate cardiopulmonary status, however heart size can be misrepresented by inherent technical factors. Our aim was to determine diagnostic accuracy of cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) on AP chest radiographs relative to echocardiography, as well as relative to axial computed tomography (CT) and frontal CT scout images in predicting cardiac chamber enlargement. 200 subjects with both chest CT and AP chest radiograph within 1 month were retrospectively identified. Patients with pericardial effusion or obscured heart borders were excluded. 130 of these subjects had also undergone echocardiography. Transverse diameters of the heart and thorax were used to calculate CTRs on AP chest radiograph, scout CT, and axial CT images. A second reader was used to verify measurement accuracy and reproducibility. Statistical analysis of CTRs for AP chest radiograph, CT scout, and axial CT images were calculated using echocardiography as gold standard. AP chest radiographs had higher CTR values than axial and scout CT images (by 0.075, p < 0.001), larger measured heart diameters by approximately 3 cm (p < 0.001), and larger thoracic diameters by approximately 2 cm (p < 0.001). CTRs on AP chest radiographs calculated with a cutoff of 0.50 had sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 32%. Sensitivity and specificity were 61% and 66% respectively when using a cutoff of 0.55, and 34% and 92% respectively when using a cutoff of 0.60. A CTR of 60% is more appropriate than 50–55% when evaluating an AP chest radiograph for cardiac chamber enlargement due to its much higher specificity.

Keywords

Cardiothoracic ratio Anteroposterior radiograph AP radiograph Computed tomography CT scout image Axial CT 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the contributions of the following individuals who assisted with research, statistical analysis and manuscript preparation: Amit K. Chowdhry, Lois Monterroso, and JoAnne McNamara.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. 1.
    Milne EN, Burnett K, Aufrichtig D, McMillan J, Imray TJ (1988) Assessment of cardiac size on portable chest films. J Thorac Imaging 3(2):64–72Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clark A, Coats A (2000) Unreliability of cardiothoracic ratio as a marker of left ventricular impairment: comparison with radionuclide ventriculography and echocardiography. Postgrad Med J 76(895):289–291Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gammill SL, Krebs C, Meyers P, Nice CM Jr, Becker HC (1970) Cardiac measurements in systole and diastole. Radiology 94(1):115–120Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dinsmore RE, Miller SW, Wernikoff RE, Potsaid MS (1978) Increasing the information content of chest radiographs: the use of an ECG gated interlaced radiography system for evaluation of the heart and great vessels. Presented at the annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North AmericaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dinsmore RE, Wernikoff RE, Miller SW, Pohost GM, Block PC, Potsaid MS (1979) Evaluation of left ventricular free wall asynergy due to coronary artery disease: use of an interlaced ECG-gated radiography system. Am J Roentgenol 132(6):909–914Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dinsmore RE, Phillips H, Boucher CA, Okada RD, Kushner F, Pohost GM (1983) A noninvasive radiographic technique for evaluation of exercise-induced changes in cardiac function. J Am Coll Cardiol 2(2):318–326Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dinsmore RE (1984) Improved use of interlaced ECG-gated radiography in cardiac evaluation. Am J Roentgenol 142(6):1295–1295Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gollub MJ, Panu N, Delaney H, Sohn M, Zheng J, Moskowitz CS, Rademaker J, Liu J (2012) Shall we report cardiomegaly at routine computed tomography of the chest? J Comput Assist Tomogr 36(1):67–71Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chana HS, Martin CA, Cakebread HE, Adjei FD, Gajendragadkar PR (2015) Diagnostic accuracy of cardiothoracic ratio on admission chest radiography to detect left or right ventricular systolic dysfunction: a retrospective study. J R Soc Med 108(8):317–324Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Loomba RS, Shah PH, Nijhawan K, Aggarwal S, Arora R (2015) Cardiothoracic ratio for prediction of left ventricular dilation: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Future Cardiol 11(2):171–175Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Philbin EF, Garg R, Danisa K, Denny M, Gosselin G, Hassapoyannes C, Horney A, Johnstone DE, Lang RM, Ramanathan K et al (1998) The relationship between cardiothoracic ratio and left ventricular ejection fraction in congestive heart failure. Arch Intern Med 158:501–506Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Carson PE, Johnson GR, Dunkman WB, Fletcher RD, Farrell L, Cohn JN (1993) The influence of atrial fibrillation on prognosis in mild to moderate heart failure. The V-HeFT studies. The V-HeFT VA cooperative studies group. Circulation 87(suppl):VI102–VI110Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fukuta H, Ohte N, Brucks S et al (2007) Contribution of right-sided heart enlargement to cardiomegaly on chest roentgenogram in diastolic and systolic heart failure. Am J Cardiol 99:62–67Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rosita Z, Mohammed SF Epidemiology of right ventricular dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Curr Heart Fail Rep (2015) 12:295–301Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Poels EM, da Costa Martins PA, van Empel VP (2015) Adaptive capacity of the right ventricle: why does it fail? Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 308:H803–H813Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Burke MA, Katz DH, Beussink L, Selvaraj S et al (2014) Prognostic importance of pathophysiologic markers in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. Circ Heart Fail 7(2):288–299Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morris DA, Gailani M, Vaz Perez A et al (2011) Right ventricular myocardial systolic and diastolic dysfunction in heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 24:886–897Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mohammed SF, Hussain I, Abou Ezzeddine OF et al (2014) Right ventricular function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a community-based study. Circulation 130:2310–2320Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guazzi M (2014) Pulmonary hypertension in heart failure preserved ejection fraction: prevalence, pathophysiology, and clinical perspectives. Circ Heart Fail 7:367–377Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lam CS, Roger VL, Rodeheffer RJ, Borlaug BA, Enders FT, Redfield MM (2009) Pulmonary hypertension in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a community-based study. J Am Coll Cardiol 53:1119–1126Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vaziri SM, Larson MG, Benjamin EJ, Levy D (1994) Echocardiographic predictors of nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. Framingham Heart Study Circ 89:724–730Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Psaty BM, Manolio TA, Kuller LH et al (1997) Incidence of and risk factors for atrial fibrillation in older adults. Circulation 96:2455–2461Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tsang TS, Barnes ME, Bailey KR et al (2001) Left atrial volume: important risk marker of incident atrial fibrillation in 1655 older men and women. Mayo Clin Proc 76:467–475Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tani T, Tanabe K, Ono M et al (2004) Left atrial volume and the risk of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 17:644–648Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Diker E, Aydogdu S, Ozdemir M et al (1996) Prevalence and predictors of atrial fibrillation in rheumatic valvular heart disease. Am J Cardiol 77:96–98Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dittrich HC, Pearce LA, Asinger RW et al (1999) Left atrial diameter in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: an echocardiographic study. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation investigators. Am Heart J 137:494–499Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kanmanthareddy A, Reddy YM, Boolani H et al (2014) Incidence, predictors, and clinical course of atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients with pulmonary hypertension. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 41:9–14Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chen SA, Tai CT, Yu WC et al (1999) Right atrial focal atrial fibrillation: electrophysiologic characteristics and radiofrequency catheter ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 10:328–335Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Roh SY, Choi JI, Lee JY et al (2011) Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with chronic lung disease. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 4:815–822Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Medi C, Kalman JM, Ling LH et al (2012) Atrial electrical and structural remodeling associated with longstanding pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular hypertrophy in humans. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 23:614–620Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Medi C, Teh AW, Roberts-Thomson K, Morton JB, Kistler PM, Kalman JM (2012) Right atrial remodeling is more advanced in patients with atrial flutter than with atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 23:1067–1072Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Waligóra M, Tyrka A, Miszalski-Jamka T et al (2018) Right atrium enlargement predicts clinically significant supraventricular arrhythmia in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Heart Lung 47:237–242Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Okute Y, Shoji T, Hayashi T (2017) Cardiothoracic ratio as a predictor of cardiovascular events in a cohort of hemodialysis patients. J. Atheroscler Thromb 24:412–421Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sinha AD, Agarwal R (2017) Setting the dry weight and its cardiovascular implications. Semin Dial 30(6):481–488Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shoji T, Tsubakihara Y, Fujii M, Imai E (2004) Hemodialysis associated hypotension as an independent risk factor for two-year mortality in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 66:1212–1220Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ok E, Levin NW, Asci G, Chazot C, Toz H, Ozkahya M (2017) Interplay of volume, blood pressure, organ ischemia, residual renal function, and diet: certainties and uncertainties with dialytic management. Semin Dial 30(5):420–429Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ozkahya M, Ok E, Toz H et al (2006) Long-term survival rates in hemodialysis patients treated with strict volume control. Nephrol Dial Transpl 21:3506–3513Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gunal AI (2013) How to determine ‘dry weight’? Kidney Int Suppl 3:377–379Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gunal AI, Ilkay E, Kirciman E et al (2003) Blood pressure control and left ventricular hypertrophy in long-term CAPD and hemodialysis patients: a cross-sectional study. Perit Dial Int 23:563–567Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Potter JF, Elahi D, Tobin JD, Andres R (1982) Effect of aging on the cardiothoracic ratio of men. J Am Geriatr Soc 30:404–409Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Inoue K, Yoshii K, Ito H (1999) Effect of aging on cardiothoracic ratio in women: a longitudinal study. Gerontology 45:53–58Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Robert D. Suh et al (2015) ACR appropriateness criterias intensive care unit patients. Expert panel on thoracic imaging. J Thorac Imaging 30:W63–W65Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Imaging SciencesUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterUSA
  2. 2.Department of AnesthesiologyHarvard School of MedicineBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations