Three-dimensional full automated software in the evaluation of the left ventricle function: from theory to clinical practice

  • Valentina Barletta
  • Rocio Hinojar
  • Alejandra Carbonell
  • Ariana González-Gómez
  • Iacopo Fabiani
  • Vitantonio Di Bello
  • José Julio Jiménez-Nacher
  • José Zamorano
  • Covadonga Fernández-Golfín
Original Paper
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

Left ventricular systolic function evaluation is an essential part of all transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) studies. 3D echocardiography (3DE) is superior to 2D and is recommended as the method of choice. However, since it is time consuming and requires training, it is rarely performed. Different automatic analysis software tries to overcome these limitations but they need to be accurate and reproducible before they can be used clinically. The aim of this study was to test the accuracy and reproducibility of new 3D automatic quantitative software in everyday clinical practice. 69 patients referred to our Echo Lab for a clinically indicated echocardiographic examination were included. All patients underwent a full TTE with 3D image acquisition. Left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction (LVEF) were obtained using Heart Model software, and compared with conventional 3D volumetric data. Automated analysis was performed using three different sliders setting, with or without regional editing if necessary. 20 patients underwent a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) study the same day of the echo and automated measurements were also compared with a CMR reference. Intra- and inter-technique comparisons including linear regression with Pearson correlation coefficients and Bland–Altman analyses were calculated. Mean age of the patients was 59 years, with 49.3% male. The automated 3DE model demonstrated excellent correlation with the conventional 3DE measurements of LVEF, using three different sliders settings (r = 0.906; r = 0.898 and r = 0.940). Correlations with CMR values were very good as well (r = 0.888; r = 0.869; r = 0.913). Similarly, no significant differences were noted between the values of EDV and ESV, measured with the automated model or CMR, with excellent correlation (EDV: r = 0.892, r = 0.842, 0.910; ESV: r = 0.925, r = 0.860, r = 0.907). Finally, volumes calculated with the automated software were significantly greater than those obtained manually, but they showed a very good correlation (EDV: r = 0.875, r = 0.856, r = 0.891; ESV: r = 0.929, r = 0.879, r = 949). 3D automatic software for LV quantification is feasible and shows excellent correlations with both CMR and 3D echocardiography, considered the gold standard. No clinically relevant differences were noted when applying different border settings. This technique holds promise to facilitate the integration of 3D TTE into clinical practice.

Keywords

2D transthoracic echocardiography 3D echocardiography Left ventricular ejection fraction Cardiac magnetic resonance Reproducibility 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Chuang ML, Hibberd MG, Salton CJ et al (2000) Importance of imaging method over imaging modality in noninvasive determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: assessment by two- and three-dimensional echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 35(2):477–484.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00551-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mor-Avi V, Jenkins C, Kühl HP et al (2008) Real-time 3-dimensional echocardiographic quantification of left ventricular volumes. Multicenter study for validation with magnetic resonance imaging and investigation of sources of error. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 1(4):413–423.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.02.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sugeng L, Mor-Avi V, Weinert L et al (2006) Quantitative assessment of left ventricular size and function: side-by-side comparison of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography and computed tomography with magnetic resonance reference. Circulation 114(7):654–661.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.626143 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Badano LP, Boccalini F, Muraru D et al (2012) Current clinical applications of transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Ultrasound 20(1):1–22.  https://doi.org/10.4250/jcu.2012.20.1.1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American society of echocardiography and the European association of cardiovascular imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16(3):233–271.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jev014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tsang W, Salgo IS, Medvedofsky D et al (2016) Transthoracic 3D echocardiographic left heart chamber quantification using an automated adaptive analytics algorithm. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.12.020 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Medvedofsky D, Mor-Avi V, Amzulescu M et al (2017) Three-dimensional echocardiographic quantification of the left-heart chambers using an automated adaptive analytics algorithm: multicentre validation study. Eur Hear J Cardiovasc Imaging.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jew328 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Otterstad JE, Froeland G, St John Sutton M, Holme I (1997) Accuracy and reproducibility of biplane two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular dimensions and function. Eur Heart J 18:507–513.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a015273 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ruddox V, Edvardsen T, Bækkevar M, Otterstad JE (2014) Measurements of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction with three-dimensional echocardiography: feasibility and agreement compared to two-dimensional echocardiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 30(7):1325–1330.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0478-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valentina Barletta
    • 1
  • Rocio Hinojar
    • 2
  • Alejandra Carbonell
    • 2
  • Ariana González-Gómez
    • 2
  • Iacopo Fabiani
    • 1
  • Vitantonio Di Bello
    • 1
  • José Julio Jiménez-Nacher
    • 2
  • José Zamorano
    • 2
  • Covadonga Fernández-Golfín
    • 2
  1. 1.Cardiac Vascular and Thoracic DepartmentAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria PisanaPisaItaly
  2. 2.Cardiac Imaging Unit, Cardiology DepartmentRamón y Cajal University HospitalMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations