Advertisement

Transthoracic echocardiography in patients undergoing mitral valve repair: comparison of new transthoracic 3D techniques to 2D transoesophageal echocardiography in the localization of mitral valve prolapse

  • Paola Gripari
  • Massimo Mapelli
  • Ilaria Bellacosa
  • Concetta Piazzese
  • Maria Milo
  • Laura Fusini
  • Manuela Muratori
  • Sarah Ghulam Ali
  • Gloria Tamborini
  • Mauro Pepi
Original Paper

Abstract

Successful mitral valve (MV) repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) is mainly related to surgical expertise and MV anatomy. Although 2D echocardiography, specifically transoesophageal (TOE), provides precise information regarding MV anatomy, recent advancements in matrix technology meant a decisive step forward to the point where segmental MV analysis can be accurately performed from a noninvasive 3D transthoracic (TTE) approach. The aims of this study were: (a) to evaluate the feasibility and time required for real-time 3D TTE in a large consecutive cohort of patients with severe DMR in the assessment of MV anatomy; (b) to compare the accuracy of 3D TTE and 2D TOE versus surgical inspection in the recognition and localization of all components of the MV leaflets; (c) to establish the added diagnostic value of 3D colourDoppler examination to pure 3D morphologic evaluation. 149 consecutive patients with severe DMR underwent complete 3D TTE before surgery and 2D TOE in the operating room. Echocardiographic data obtained by the different techniques were compared with surgical inspection. 3D TTE was feasible in a relatively short time (8 ± 4 min), with good (49%) and optimal (33%) imaging quality in the majority of cases. 3D TTE had significant better overall accuracy compared to 2D TOE (93 and 91%, p < 0.05, respectively). 2D TOE was significantly more specific than 3D TTE in the identification of A3 prolapse (99 vs. 96%). The colourDoppler mode did not improve significantly the accuracy of 3D TTE, albeit it determined a better sensitivity in the detection of A2 prolapse if compared to 2D TOE (95 vs. 85%). 3D TTE with or without colourDoppler is a feasible and useful method in the analysis of MV prolapse; it allows a preoperative and noninvasive description of the pathology as accurate as the 2D TOE.

Keywords

Mitral valve prolapse 3D echocardiography Surgical inspection 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Research with human and animal participants

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Enriquez-Sarano M, Akins CW, Vahanian A (2009) Mitral regurgitation. Lancet 373(9672):1382–1394.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60692-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F et al (2012) Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). Eur Heart J 33(19):2451–2496.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carabello BA (2008) The current therapy for mitral regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 52(5):319–326.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.02.084 (Review)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Enriquez-Sarano M, Avierinos JF, Messika-Zeitoun D, Detaint D, Capps M, Nkomo V, Scott C, Schaff HV, Tajik AJ (2005) Quantitative determinants of the outcome of asymptomatic mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med 352(9):875–883.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa041451 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kang DH, Kim JH, Rim JH, Kim MJ, Yun SC, Song JM, Song H, Choi KJ, Song JK, Lee JW (2009) Comparison of early surgery versus conventional treatment in asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation. Circulation 119(6):797–804.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.802314 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Montant P, Chenot F, Robert A, Vancraeynest D, Pasquet A, Gerber B, Noirhomme P, El Khoury G, Vanoverschelde JL (2009) Long-term survival in asymptomatic patients with severe degenerative mitral regurgitation: a propensity score based comparison between an early surgical strategy and a conservative treatment approach. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 138(6):1339–1348.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.03.046 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rosenhek R, Rader F, Klaar U, Gabriel H, Krejc M, Kalbeck D, Schemper M, Maurer G, Baumgartner H (2006) Outcome of watchful waiting in asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation. Circulation 113(18):2238–2244.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.599175 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gammie JS, O’Brien SM, Griffith BP, Ferguson TB, Peterson ED (2007) Influence of hospital procedural volume on care process and mortality for patients undergoing elective surgery for mitral regurgitation. Circulation 115(7):881–887.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.634436 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Adams DH, Anyanwu AC, Rahmanian PB, Abascal V, Salzberg SP, Filsoufi F (2006) Large annuloplasty rings facilitate mitral valve repair in Barlow’s disease. Ann Thorac Surg 82(6):2096–2100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.06.043 (discussion 2101).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Seeburger J, Borger MA, Falk V, Kuntze T, Czesla M, Walther T, Doll N, Mohr FW (2008) Minimal invasive mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation: results of 1339 consecutive patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 34(4):760–765.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.05.015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Adams DH, Anyanwu AC (2008) The cardiologist’s role in increasing the rate of mitral valve repair in degenerative disease. Curr Opin Cardiol 23(2):105–110.  https://doi.org/10.1097/HCO.0b013e3282f4fe47 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bridgewater B, Hooper T, Munsch C, Hunter S, von Oppell U, Livesey S, Keogh B, Wells F, Patrick M, Kneeshaw J, Chambers J, Masani N, Ray S (2006) Mitral repair best practice: proposed standards. Heart 92(7):939–944.  https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2005.076109 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Adams DH, Rosenhek R, Falk V (2010) Degenerative mitral valve regurgitation: best practice revolution. Eur Heart J 31(16):1958–1966.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq222 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gammie JS, Sheng S, Griffith BP, Peterson ED, Rankin JS, O’Brien S, Brown JM (2009) Trends in mitral valve surgery in the United States: results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. Ann Thorac Surg 87(5):1431–1439.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.01.064 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    O’Gara P, Sugeng L, Lang R, Sarano M, Hung J, Raman S, Fischer G, Carabello B, Adams D, Vannan M (2008) The role of imaging in chronic degenerative mitral regurgitation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 1(2):221–237.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.01.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zoghbi WA, Enriquez-Sarano M, Foster E et al (2003) Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16(7):777–802.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0894-7317(03)00335-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Enriquez-Sarano M, Tajik AJ, Schaff HV, Orszulak TA, Bailey KR, Frye RL (1994) Echocardiographic prediction of survival after surgical correction of organic mitral regurgitation. Circulation 90(2):830–837CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pepi M, Tamborini G, Maltagliati A, Galli CA, Sisillo E, Salvi L, Naliato M, Porqueddu M, Parolari A, Zanobini M, Alamanni F (2006) Head-to-head comparison of two- and three-dimensional transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in the localization of mitral valve prolapse. J Am Coll Cardiol 48(2):2524–2530.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.02.079 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Patel V, Hsiung MC, Nanda NC et al (2006) Usefulness of live/real time three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography in the identification of individual segment/scallop prolapse of the mitral valve. Echocardiography 23(6):513–518.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8175.2006.00252.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Muller S, Muller L, Laufer G, Alber H, Dichtl W, Frick M, Pachinger O, Bartel T (2006) Comparison of three-dimensional imaging to transesophageal echocardiography for preoperative evaluation in mitral valve prolapse. Am J Cardiol 98(2):243–248.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.01.076 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sharma R, Mann J, Drummond L, Livesey SA, Simpson IA (2007) The evaluation of real-time 3-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography for the preoperative functional assessment of patients with mitral valve prolapse: a comparison with 2-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 20(8):934–940.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2007.01.028 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Manda J, Kesanolla SK, Hsuing MC, Nanda NC, Abo-Salem E, Dutta R, Laney CA, Wei J, Chang CY, Tsai SK, Hansalia S, Yin WH, Young MS (2008) Comparison of real time two-dimensional with live/real time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in the evaluation of mitral valve prolapse and chordae rupture. Echocardiography 25(10):1131–1137.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8175.2008.00832.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gutierrez-Chico JL, Zamorano Gomez JL, Rodrigo-Lopez JL, Mataix L, Perez de Isla L, Ameria-Valera C, Aubele A, Macaya-Miguel C (2008) Accuracy of real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography in the assessment of mitral prolapse: is transesophageal echocardiography still mandatory? Am Heart J 155(4):694–698.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2007.10.045 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tamborini G, Muratori M, Maltagliati A, Galli CA, Naliato M, Zanobini M, Alamanni F, Salvi L, Sisillo E, Fiorentini C, Pepi M (2010) Pre-operative transthoracic real-time three-dimensional echocardiography in patients undergoing mitral valve repair: accuracy in cases with simple vs. complex prolapse lesions. Eur J Echocardiogr 11(9):778–785.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ejechocard/jeq066 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Salcedo EE, Quaife RA, Seres T, Carroll JD (2009) A framework for systematic characterization of the mitral valve by real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22(10):1087–1099.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2009.07.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lambert AS, Miller JP, Merrick SH, Schiller NB, Foster E, Muhiudeen-Russell I, Cahalan MK (1999) Improved evaluation of the location and mechanism of mitral valve regurgitation with a systematic transesophageal echocardiography examination. Anesth Analg 88(6):1205–1212CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Biaggi P, Gruner C, Jedrzkiewicz S, Karski J, Meineri M, Vegas A, David TE, Woo A, Rakowski H (2011) Assessment of mitral valve prolapse by 3D TEE angled views are key. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4(1):94–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.06.019 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Carpentier A (1983) Cardiac valve surgery-the ‘French correction’. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 86(3):323–337PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lancellotti P, Tribouilloy C, Hagendorff A, Popescu BA, Edvardsen T, Pierard LA, Badano L, Zamorano JL, Scientific Document Committee of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (2013) Recommendations for the echocardiographic assessment of native valvular regurgitation: an executive summary from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 14(7):611–644.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jet105 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Biaggi P, Jedrzkiewicz S, Gruner C, Meineri M, Karski J, Vegas A, Tanner FC, Rakowski H, Ivanov J, David TE, Woo A (2012) Quantification of mitral valve anatomy by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in mitral valve prolapse predicts surgical anatomy and the complexity of mitral valve repair. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 25(7):758–765.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2012.03.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    La Canna G, Arendar I, Maisano F, Monaco F, Collu E, Benussi S, De Bonis M, Castiglioni A, Alfieri O (2011) Real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography for assessment of mitral valve functional anatomy in patients with prolapse-related regurgitation. Am J Cardiol 107(9):1365–1374.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.12.048 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paola Gripari
    • 1
  • Massimo Mapelli
    • 1
  • Ilaria Bellacosa
    • 1
  • Concetta Piazzese
    • 1
  • Maria Milo
    • 1
  • Laura Fusini
    • 1
  • Manuela Muratori
    • 1
  • Sarah Ghulam Ali
    • 1
  • Gloria Tamborini
    • 1
  • Mauro Pepi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico MonzinoIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere ScientificoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations