Myocardial perfusion in patients with non-ischaemic systolic heart failure and type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study using Rubidium-82 PET/CT
Both patients with non-ischaemic systolic heart failure and patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) often have reduced myocardial blood flow without significant coronary atherosclerosis. However, the mechanisms are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to investigate whether perfusion is reduced additionally when the 2 are combined. In a cross-sectional study, we scanned patients with non-ischaemic systolic heart failure with and without T2DM using Rubidium-82 positron emission tomography/computed tomography at rest and adenosine-induced stress, thereby obtaining the myocardial flow reserve (myocardial flow reserve (MFR) = stress flow/rest flow) as a measure of the myocardial vasomotor function; 28 patients with T2DM and 123 without T2DM were included. All patients received heart failure treatment according to guidelines. Multiple regression analysis was performed to assess the association between T2DM and MFR. Age [68 (60–75) years vs. 68 (62–72) years; P = 0.84] and female sex (21% vs. 33%; P = 0.26) were similar between patients with and without T2DM. Patients with T2DM had higher body mass index, (29.9 vs. 26.5 kg/m2; P = 0.02), higher blood glucose (6.2 vs. 5.7 mmol/L; P = 0.03), more often hypertension (50 vs. 27%; P = 0.02) and received more cholesterol lowering medication (61 vs. 35%; P = 0.02). Apart from this, the groups were similar. In a multivariable analysis, MFR was 16% lower in patients with T2DM compared with patients without [estimate − 16%; 95% confidence interval (CI) − 29 to − 0.7%; P = 0.04]. Patients with T2DM and systolic heart failure have lower myocardial flow reserve compared with heart failure patients without T2DM.
KeywordsMyocardial perfusion Positron emission tomography Non-ischaemic systolic heart Failure Diabetes
Rubidium-82 positron emission tomography/computed tomography
Coronary artery calcium score
Cardiac resynchronisation therapy
A DANish randomized, controlled, multicenter study to assess the efficacy of implantable cardioverter defibrillator in patients with non-ischaemic systolic heart failure on mortality
Myocardial blood flow
Myocardial flow reserve
Myocardial perfusion imaging
Rate pressure product
Summed difference score
Summed rest score
Summed stress score
Transient ischaemic dilation
Københavns Universitet (Copenhagen, DK), Hjerteforeningen (Copenhagen, DK), Arvid Nielssons Fond (Copenhagen, DK), Grosserer Valdemar Foersom og hustru Thyra Foersoms Fond (Copenhagen, DK), Snedkermester Sophus Jacobsen og hustru Astrid Jacobsens Fond (Copenhagen, DK), and Eva og Henry Frænkels Mindefond (Holte, DK).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 4.De Boer RA, Pinto YM, Van Veldhuisen DJ (2003) The imbalance between oxygen demand and supply as a potential mechanism in the pathophysiology of heart failure: the role of microvascular growth and abnormalities. Microcirculation 10:113–126. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.mn.7800188 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Majmudar MD, Murthy VL, Shah RV et al (2015) Quantification of coronary flow reserve in patients with ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy and its association with clinical outcomes. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16:900–909. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jev012 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 20.Cerqueira MD (2002) Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105:539–542. https://doi.org/10.1161/hc0402.102975 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Byrne C, Jensen T, Hjortkjær H et al (2015) Myocardial perfusion at rest in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 compared with healthy controls assessed with multi detector computed tomography. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 107:15–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2014.10.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar