Skip to main content
Log in

Stent fracture is associated with a higher mortality in patients with type-2 diabetes treated by implantation of a second-generation drug-eluting stent

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes correlates with clinical events after the implantation of a second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES). The rate and prognostic value of stent fracture (SF) in patients with diabetes who underwent DES implantation remain unknown. A total of 1160 patients with- and 2251 without- diabetes, who underwent surveillance angiography at 1 year after DES implantation between June 2004 and August 2014, were prospectively studied. The primary endpoints included the incidence of SF and a composite major adverse cardiac event [MACE, including myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac death, and target-vessel revascularization (TVR)] at 1-year follow-up and at the end of follow-up for overall patients, and target lesion failure [TLF, including cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI) and target lesion revascularization (TLR)] at the end of study for SF patients. In general, diabetes was associated with a higher rate of MACE at 1-year (18.4 vs. 12.9%) and end of follow-up (24.0 vs. 18.6%, all p < 0.001), compared with those in patients who did not have diabetes. The 1-year SF rate was comparable among patients with diabetes (n = 153, 13.2%) and non-diabetic patients (n = 273, 12.1%, p > 0.05). Diabetic patients with SF had a 2.6-fold increase of SF-related cardiac death at the end of study and threefold increase of re-repeat TLR when compared with non-diabetic patients with SF (5.9 vs. 2.2%, p = 0.040; 6.5 vs. 2.2%, p = 0.032), respectively. Given the fact that diabetes is correlated with increased MACE rate, SF in diabetic patients translates into differences in mortality and re-repeat TLR compared with the non-diabetic group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Poddar KL, Modi DK, Wayangankar S, Thakkar B, Krishnaswamy A, Kumari M, Bdair H, Sud K, Parashar A, Raza MQ, Faruqui R, Agarwal S, Banerjee K, Tuzcu EM, Kapadia SR (2016) Two-decade trends in the prevalence of atherosclerotic risk factors, coronary plaque morphology, and outcomes in adults aged ≤45 years undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 118(7):939–943

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration, Sarwar N, Gao P, Seshasai SR, Gobin R, Kaptoge S, Di Angelantonio E, Ingelsson E, Lawlor DA, Selvin E, Stampfer M, Stehouwer CD, Lewington S, Pennells L, Thompson A, Sattar N, White IR, Ray KK, Danesh J (2010) Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet 375(9733):2215–2222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Haffner SM, Lehto S, Ronnemaa T, Pyörälä K, Laakso M (1998) Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 339(4):229–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Malmberg K, Yusuf S, Gerstein HC, Brown J, Zhao F, Hunt D, Piegas L, Calvin J, Keltai M, Budaj A (2000) Impact of diabetes on long-term prognosis in patients with unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: results of the OASIS (organization to assess strategies for ischemic syndromes) registry. Circulation 102(9):1014–1019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yusuf S, Sleight P, Pogue J, Bosch J, Davies R, Dagenais G (2000) Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, Ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. The heart outcomes prevention evaluation study investigators. N Engl J Med 342(3):145–153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Detection E and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in A (2002) Third report of the national cholesterol education program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III) final report. Circulation 106(25):3143–3421

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pajunen P, Taskinen MR, Nieminen MS, Syvänne M (2000) Angiographic severity and extent of coronary artery disease in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol 86(10):1080–1085

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mancini GB, Farkouh ME, Brooks MM, Chaitman BR, Boden WE, Vlachos H, Hartigan PM, Siami FS, Sidhu MS, Bittner V, Frye R, Fuster V (2016) Medical treatment and revascularization options in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 68(10):985–995

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Buntaine AJ, Shah B, Lorin JD, Sedlis SP (2016) Revascularization strategies in patients with diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndrome. Curr Cardiol Rep 18(8):79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zheng Z, Xu B, Zhang H, Guan C, Xian Y, Zhao Y, Fan H, Yang Y, Wang W, Gao R, Hu S (2016) Coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 9(11):1102–1111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sinning JM, Welz A, Nickenig G (2016) The heart team in planning and performance of revascularization: ESC guidelines versus clinical routine. Herz 41(7):562–565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kan J, Ge Z, Zhang JJ, Liu ZZ, Tian NL, Ye F, Li SJ, Qian XS, Yang S, Chen MX, Rab T, Chen SL (2016) Incidence and clinical outcomes of stent fractures on the basis of 6,555 patients and 16,482 drug-eluting stents from 4 centers. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 9(11):1115–1123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Alexopoulos D, Xanthopoulou I (2011) Coronary stent fracture: how frequent it is? Does it matter? Hellenic J Cardiol 52:1–5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chowdhury PS, Ramos RG (2002) Coronary-stent fracture. N Engl J Med 347(8):581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sianos G, Hofma S, Ligthart JM, Saia F, Hoye A, Lemos PA, Serruys PW (2004) Stent fracture and restenosis in the drug-eluting stent era. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 61:111–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nakazawa G, Finn AV, Vorpahl M, Ladich E, Kutys R, Balazs I, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R (2009) Incidence and predictors of drug-eluting stent fracture in human coronary artery a pathologic analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:1924–1931

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mohsen MK, Alqahtani A, Suwaidi JA (2013) Stent fracture: how frequently is it recognized? Heart Views 14:72–81

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee SE, Jeong MH, Kim IS, Ko JS, Lee MG, Kang WY, Kim SH, Sim DS, Park KH, Yoon NS, Yoon HJ, Kim KH, Hong YJ, Park HW, Kim JH, Ahn YK, Cho JG, Park JC, Kang JC (2009) Clinical outcomes and optimal treatment for stent fracture after drug-eluting stent implantation. J Cardiol 53:422–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Ling Lin, and registered research coordinators (Ms. Hai-Mei Xu and Ms. Yin-Yin Zhao), for help with data collection.

Funding

This study was funded by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 91639303 and NSFC 91439118), and Jiangsu Provincial Special Program of Medical Science (BL2013001), Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GZ and LZZ (who contributed same) analyzed and interpreted data and wrote and reviewed the drafts of the article. JK contributed to the statistical analyses and reviewed the final draft of the article. ZJJ, LSJ, TNL, YF, QXS, and YS contributed to the interventional procedures and data collection and reviewed the final draft of the article. CMX and RTS reviewed the final draft. CSL contributed to the design of this Study, guided the process of data analysis and interpretation, and read and reviewed the drafts of the article. CSL is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shao-Liang Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

The study involved human participants, all of the study participants had signed written informed consent for the procedure and the follow-up protocol.

Additional information

Zhen Ge and Zhi-Zhong Liu have contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ge, Z., Liu, ZZ., Kan, J. et al. Stent fracture is associated with a higher mortality in patients with type-2 diabetes treated by implantation of a second-generation drug-eluting stent. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33, 1873–1881 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1194-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1194-z

Keywords

Navigation