Evidence of myocardial scarring and microvascular obstruction on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in a series of patients presenting with myocardial infarction without obstructed coronary arteries

  • Jeannine A. J. M. Hermens
  • Jan van Es
  • Clemens von Birgelen
  • Jeroen W. op den Akker
  • Lodewijk J. Wagenaar
Original Paper
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Patients with acute chest pain, electrocardiographic ST-elevation and significant elevation of cardiac troponin but without obstructive coronary artery disease represent a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) can elucidate underlying alternative causes of troponin elevation including detection of (minor) myocardial infarction (MI) by identifying myocardial scarring as delayed enhancement. Of 77 patients, who were admitted between March 2009 and December 2012 with electrocardiographic (ECG) and biochemical evidence of acute MI without obstructive coronary artery disease, 45 patients underwent CMR that showed in 11/77 (14 %) late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), compatible with myocardial scarring. We analyzed clinical, echocardiographic, and CMR data of these patients. Elevated troponin I levels were observed in all patients (median 1.3 ng/l, IQR 0.44–187) with median peak creatinine phosphokinase of 485 U/l (IQR 234–618). Echocardiographic wall motion abnormalities were detected in 8/11 (73 %) patients; in 75 % of these segments, ECG abnormalities were observed in corresponding leads. CMR detected LGE in the inferior (4/11), the inferolateral (5/11), the inferoseptal (2/11), the anterior (3/11), apical (3/11) and in the lateral segments (2/11). In addition, in all but two patients, these segments matched ECG abnormalities in corresponding leads. CMR identified microvascular obstruction in 4/11 (36 %) patients. Patients with clinical, ECG, and biochemical signs of acute MI but unobstructed coronary arteries may have CMR-detectable myocardial scars. Information on myocardial scarring may help to make the diagnosis and draw therapeutic consequences. This case series underlines the value of contrast-enhanced CMR for myocardial tissue characterization.

Keywords

Myocardial infarction Non-obstructed coronary arteries Cardiac MR delayed enhancement Myocardial scarring 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Wang K, Asinger RW, Marriott HJL (2003) ST-segment elevation in conditions other than acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 348:2128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Assomull RG, Lyne JC, Keenan N, Gulati A, Bunce NH, Davies SW, Pennell DJ, Prasad SK (2007) The role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients presenting with chest pain, raised troponin, and unobstructed coronary arteries. Eur Heart J 28(10):1242–1249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Laraudogoitia Zaldumbide E, Pérez-David E, Larena JA, Velasco del Castillo S, Rumoroso Cuevas JR, Onaindía JJ, Lekuona Goya I, García-Fernández MA (2000) The value of cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with acute coronary syndrome and normal coronary arteries. Rev Esp Cardiol 62(9):976–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ambrosio G, Weisman HF, Mannisi JA, Becker LC (1989) Progressive impairment of regional myocardial perfusion after initial restoration of postischemic blood flow. Circulation 80:1846–1861PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wu KC, Zerhouni EA, Judd RM, Lugo-Olivier CH, Barouch LA, Schulman SP, Blumenthal RS, Lima JA (1998) Prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 97:765–772PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ito H, Maruyama A, Iwakura K, Takiuchi S, Masuyama T, Hori M, Higashino Y, Fujii K, Minamino T (1996) Clinical implications of the “no-reflow”phenomenon: a predictor of complications and left ventricular remodeling in reperfused anterior wall myocardial infarction. Circulation 93:223–228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blackburn H, Keys A, Simonsen E et al (1960) The electrocardiogram in population studies. A classification system. Circulation 21:1160–1175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    ESC committee for practical guidelines (2007) Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. The task force for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 28:1598–1660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK et al (2002) Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement or healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council in Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105:539–542PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bugiardini R, Manfrini O, De Ferrari GM (2006) Unanswered questions for management of acute coronary syndrome: risk stratification of patients with minimal disease or normal findings on coronary angiography. Arch Intern Med 166(13):1391–1395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jeremias A, Gibson CM (2005) Narrative review: alternative causes for elevated cardiac troponin levels when acute coronary syndromes are excluded. Ann Intern Med 142(9):786–791PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aldrovandi A, Cademartiri F, Arduini D, Lina D, Ugo F, Maffei E, Menozzi A, Martini C, Palumbo A, Bontardelli F, Gherli T, Ruffini L, Ardissino D (2012) Computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction without significant coronary stenosis. Circulation 126(25):3000–3007PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kovacic JC, Fuster V (2012) Smoking gun theory; angiographically normal or mild coronary plaque as a cause of myocardial infarction. Circulation 126:2918–2920PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yasue H, Nakagawa H, Itoh T, Harada E, Mizuno Y (2008) Coronary artery spasm—clinical features, diagnosis, pathogenesis and treatment. J Cardiol 51:2–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Böse D, von Birgelen C, Zhou XY, Schmermund A, Philipp S, Sack S et al (2008) Impact of atherosclerotic plaque composition on coronary microembolization during percutaneous coronary interventions. Basic Res Cardiol 103:587–597PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Christiansen JP, Edwards C, Sinclair T, Armstrong G, Scott A, Patel H, Hart H (2006) Detection of myocardial scar by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with troponin-positive chest pain and minimal angiographic coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 97(6):768–771PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeannine A. J. M. Hermens
    • 1
  • Jan van Es
    • 1
  • Clemens von Birgelen
    • 1
    • 3
  • Jeroen W. op den Akker
    • 2
  • Lodewijk J. Wagenaar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcentrum TwenteMedisch Spectrum TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyZiekenhuisgroep TwenteAlmeloThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of Health Technology and Services Research, MIRA-InstituteUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations